NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Liberate the Arab League

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Appalachia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 179
Founded: Dec 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Appalachia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 5:49 pm

I'm strongly concerned that Anarchestan's so called 'surrender' is actually a ploy. With natives now back in control if the liberation still passes then the Arab League is even more vulnerable to Nazi invasion than it was before. Everyone should vote against the liberation to prevent this scenario from happening.
Last edited by Appalachia on Tue Jan 10, 2017 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Alkasia
Envoy
 
Posts: 281
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Alkasia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm

Everyone needs to vote against since they've been freed. A liberation now will only make it child's play to retake by raiders.

Not sure about native support, but this seems pretty straightforward.
Former Delegate of XKI, current Reject with a penchant for murder.
Defender Romeo
Democratic Socialist
Koth wrote:Alk resembles some sort of slime mold that asexually reproduces scum, as is standard for XKI natives
Cormactopia Prime wrote:You're silly. I miss the XKI veterans who knew how to appropriately deal with raiders.
Kanglia wrote:Can confirm lynching Alk is the most satisfying thing. :p
Sarakart wrote:What a time to be alive. Welcome to the legislative revolution, the liberation wars have begun.

In reference to XKI's Embassy thread:
Benevolent Thomas wrote:"Something you thought you'd never see for $3000, Alex."

User avatar
Moral States
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 43
Founded: Dec 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Moral States » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:30 pm

I believe that we must vote for this as it is supporting freedom even though I do not support islam.
Personal Political Beliefs (Survey Results): Conservatism, Sub-Categories: National Conservatism, Right-Populism, Nationalism, Trump Conservatism
Political Party Association (iSideWith Results)(US): 80% Republican, 76% Constitution, 51% Libertarian, 25% Democrat, 18% Green
2016 US Election Beliefs (iSideWith Results): 97% Donald Trump, 38% Gary Johnson, 9% Hillary Clinton, 8% Jill Stein, 7% Bernie Sanders

User avatar
Unowtican
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jan 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

What actually happened here?

Postby Unowtican » Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:14 pm

After going through message boards from regions involved, I am actually a bit confused.

It looks like elections for government positions were happening and it appears that a coup may have started happening as well?

In which the one who was delegate started taking measures to protect their position.

Sorry, It just looks like a lot of stuff has happened here
Founder of The Collective Nations


Current President of The Collective Nations


Current World Assembly Delegate of The Collective Nations

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11824
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:06 am

An investigation by Philjian officials notes that there are not actually any border controls in place. What's going on here?

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Second Constitutional Order
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Nov 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Second Constitutional Order » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:52 am

Guys the region is already liberated. Nazism is gone and there is no need to vote "for"

by voting for, you are giving the region a password-free pass which it doesn't need.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:01 am

Philjia wrote:An investigation by Philjian officials notes that there are not actually any border controls in place. What's going on here?

A pre-emptive Liberation. Perfectly legal.
Second Constitutional Order wrote:Guys the region is already liberated. Nazism is gone and there is no need to vote "for" by voting for, you are giving the region a password-free pass which it doesn't need.

Then someone can write a repeal.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22866
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:01 am

For the record, here is the submitted version of the proposal, without the 4b violations
OBSERVING

The violent seizure of power and martial law instituted by the brutal dictator Anarchestan, ejecting many faithful members of TAL in an attempt to seize full control, as well as disbanding all civilian forms of government. Actively suppressing opposing views, and banning envoys as well as shutting down every embassy over unfounded accusations and perpetual suspicion. Also they have forced other inactive nations to endorse them so their grip on power will not be broken. Also the above nation has banned and ejected any nation who has refused to endorse them.

NOTING

The baseless accusations towards former allies of The Arab League and diplomatic insults by Anarchestan after efforts by both Hatay and Khorason to peacefully resolve the situation.

SUPPORTING

The government in exile of The Arab League, League of Arab States and their struggle for freedom against Anarchestan's tyrannic and violent rule of The Arab League. Also supporting a planned liberation force ready to liberate the The Arab League on behalf of the rightful government.

RECOGNISING

That the The Arab League was a democratic region where all the members voted for their delegate. However Anarchestan has gone against these principles and has imposed martial law, giving themselves the authority to eject natives. Without this proposal they will destroy The Arab League in a silent and calculated manner in an effort to maintain power. Also recognising that as the natives have elected Al-Maghrebi, who has appealed for help as the rightful WA delegate of the The Arab League. Although this liberation cannot happen without the password upon the region being removed.

HEREBY

The World Assembely Security Council votes to strike down the unlawful delegate imposed password barrier in order to allow the liberation of The Arab League.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Appalachia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 179
Founded: Dec 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Appalachia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:32 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Second Constitutional Order wrote:Guys the region is already liberated. Nazism is gone and there is no need to vote "for" by voting for, you are giving the region a password-free pass which it doesn't need.

Then someone can write a repeal.


Yes, someone could write a repeal, leaving a period of days in which the region is not protected by border controls and the nazis could reinvade. All they'd really need to do is wait until the repeal is within hours of passing to strike and they've won. This is what comes of WA members not paying attention before they vote.

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:53 am

Appalachia wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Then someone can write a repeal.


Yes, someone could write a repeal, leaving a period of days in which the region is not protected by border controls and the nazis could reinvade. All they'd really need to do is wait until the repeal is within hours of passing to strike and they've won. This is what comes of WA members not paying attention before they vote.

It also means that a defence can be mounted. The region's native nations need to organise themselves so that happens.

And remember the invading nation left the region because the vote was overwhelmingly "For".
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Alkasia
Envoy
 
Posts: 281
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Alkasia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:02 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Then someone can write a repeal.

What's the point of writing a repeal when this resolution can be stopped now? Stopping it now makes it so that the natives can protect their region through a password. Letting it pass makes them completely vulnerable. The entire situation of having to free them again can be avoided if this resolution simply fails.
Former Delegate of XKI, current Reject with a penchant for murder.
Defender Romeo
Democratic Socialist
Koth wrote:Alk resembles some sort of slime mold that asexually reproduces scum, as is standard for XKI natives
Cormactopia Prime wrote:You're silly. I miss the XKI veterans who knew how to appropriately deal with raiders.
Kanglia wrote:Can confirm lynching Alk is the most satisfying thing. :p
Sarakart wrote:What a time to be alive. Welcome to the legislative revolution, the liberation wars have begun.

In reference to XKI's Embassy thread:
Benevolent Thomas wrote:"Something you thought you'd never see for $3000, Alex."

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:13 pm

Alkasia wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Then someone can write a repeal.

What's the point of writing a repeal when this resolution can be stopped now? Stopping it now makes it so that the natives can protect their region through a password. Letting it pass makes them completely vulnerable. The entire situation of having to free them again can be avoided if this resolution simply fails.

Then I suggest you mount a telegram campaign to get Delegates to change their vote.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Khorason
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 21
Founded: Jun 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Khorason » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:09 pm

The liberation force was not ready to deal with the cowardly invader fleeing at this time. We need time to organise our defence mesures due to his untimely departure. We appeal to any nation to write a repeal proposal so that the natives may retake control. As soon as the repeal proposal is ratified by the liberation force and natives we will propose it and begin a campaign to get it onto the voting floor and voted through to become a resolution. Whoever does write this will be recognised by the liberation force and please send me Khorason the repeal proposal before proposing it.

And thank you all for your overwhelming and unwavering support.

User avatar
Amerisika
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Jan 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

OK

Postby Amerisika » Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:46 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:
Tinhampton wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=sc
Below the resolution text, you should see your desired buttons.

You should really check if he's a WA member first. Which he isn't.





Okay. I'm going to check.

User avatar
Black-Ace
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jan 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Black-Ace » Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:52 pm

Why is this even at vote? Anarchestan ain't even in power, nor were there nations actually ejected. In fact, there is no password!!!

User avatar
Unowtican
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jan 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Unowtican » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:13 pm

I actually find this proposal misleading after looking into things a bit more. It is mentioned that Anarchestan violently seized power but a closer look reveals that he was the WA delegate for 55 days before leaving of his own accord with no arguments from Natives until the last 2 weeks.

It looks like there was an exodus in which the WA Delegate and leader at the time arranged founding another region to protect against future raids. No protections or policies were put in place on leaving which pretty much left a free region. Anarchestan became the WA Delegate and formed a government of his creation with him at the top.

The proposal mentions a rightful government but how can their be a rightful government when elections were happening when stuff started happening? The proposal also mentions a rightfully elected WA Delegate, how can that be when the proposed rightfully elected WA Delegate isn't even a member of the World Assembly?

It appears that the region behind the proposal was supportive of what was happening until a friend was ejected and accused of treachery in which ties between the 2 regions were severed.

The actions of Anarchestan, although appearing paranoid, was most likely an attempt to prevent future raids and other actions were to retain their power.

In my opinion, the security council has become involved after another nation failed at an attempt for a rise in power
Founder of The Collective Nations


Current President of The Collective Nations


Current World Assembly Delegate of The Collective Nations

User avatar
Aimdar-Goomdar
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 374
Founded: Jan 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aimdar-Goomdar » Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:05 pm

Unowtican wrote:I actually find this proposal misleading after looking into things a bit more. It is mentioned that Anarchestan violently seized power but a closer look reveals that he was the WA delegate for 55 days before leaving of his own accord with no arguments from Natives until the last 2 weeks.

It looks like there was an exodus in which the WA Delegate and leader at the time arranged founding another region to protect against future raids. No protections or policies were put in place on leaving which pretty much left a free region. Anarchestan became the WA Delegate and formed a government of his creation with him at the top.

The proposal mentions a rightful government but how can their be a rightful government when elections were happening when stuff started happening? The proposal also mentions a rightfully elected WA Delegate, how can that be when the proposed rightfully elected WA Delegate isn't even a member of the World Assembly?

It appears that the region behind the proposal was supportive of what was happening until a friend was ejected and accused of treachery in which ties between the 2 regions were severed.

The actions of Anarchestan, although appearing paranoid, was most likely an attempt to prevent future raids and other actions were to retain their power.

In my opinion, the security council has become involved after another nation failed at an attempt for a rise in power


Well, it's too late now.

CAIN has been tricked - again. Nazi Europa has absolutely no interest in any Arab regions, and though The Arab League was invaded by the Elite Region of Global Command, a region with embassies with Nazi Europa and KAISERREICH, Nazi Europa has administrators who simply don't care about Arabs and Islam in general.

This was an experiment done to see how CAIN would react towards a supposed Occupation by a "Nazi Collaborator," since Nazi Europa in the past and now has no interest in invading or occupying Islamic or Arabic regions. However, since Elite Region of Global Command, a region whose only connection to Nazi Europa was literally just its embassy, was marked as a "Nazi Collaborator," CAIN still took action to liberate The Arab League through a poorly written Liberation - though the embassies were mainly for "connection," and the WFE entry was put voluntarily by the administrators of Elite Region of Global Command and not with standard permission from Nazi Europa and KAISERREICH.

In summary: Nazi Europa and KAISERREICH were literally only connected to Elite Region of Global Command by their embassies, and not through government or military ties. Elite Region of Global Command may have had Nazi symbolism in their WFE, but that does not indicate a direct connection to either of CAIN's self-purported "Nazi Regions." Rather, it was just a region operating independently of the "Nazi Regions," but with its embassies sounding the alarm for CAIN.

CAIN needs to improve its detection agencies. Really.
Last edited by Aimdar-Goomdar on Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Redfaction01
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jan 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Redfaction01 Votes Yes For Arab Liberation

Postby Redfaction01 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:38 pm

Redfaction01 votes for the liberation of the Arabs we must stand for the proletariat across all nations and reigons oppressed by bourgiousie.

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:17 pm

Liberate The Arab League was passed 15,075 votes to 1,717.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
The Palentinate
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Palentinate » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:45 am

I am sad this has passed. Arabs cannot manage their own lands and have a prudent track record of that. This resolution will only cause further tyranny as the current "usurper" is actually the most democratic regime these Arabs can ask for.
From the Desk of
Ambassador of the Socialist Republic of the Palentinate Augustine Penlowski
Advisory Council for the Democratic Socialist Party of the Palentinate
President of the Palentinate Motor Company

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22866
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:48 pm

The Palentinate wrote:I am sad this has passed. Arabs cannot manage their own lands and have a prudent track record of that. This resolution will only cause further tyranny as the current "usurper" is actually the most democratic regime these Arabs can ask for.

NS =/= RL
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads