by Appalachia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 5:49 pm
by Alkasia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm
by Moral States » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:30 pm
by Unowtican » Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:14 pm
by Philjia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:06 am
by Second Constitutional Order » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:52 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:01 am
Philjia wrote:An investigation by Philjian officials notes that there are not actually any border controls in place. What's going on here?
Second Constitutional Order wrote:Guys the region is already liberated. Nazism is gone and there is no need to vote "for" by voting for, you are giving the region a password-free pass which it doesn't need.
by Wallenburg » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:01 am
The violent seizure of power and martial law instituted by the brutal dictator Anarchestan, ejecting many faithful members of TAL in an attempt to seize full control, as well as disbanding all civilian forms of government. Actively suppressing opposing views, and banning envoys as well as shutting down every embassy over unfounded accusations and perpetual suspicion. Also they have forced other inactive nations to endorse them so their grip on power will not be broken. Also the above nation has banned and ejected any nation who has refused to endorse them.
The baseless accusations towards former allies of The Arab League and diplomatic insults by Anarchestan after efforts by both Hatay and Khorason to peacefully resolve the situation.
The government in exile of The Arab League, League of Arab States and their struggle for freedom against Anarchestan's tyrannic and violent rule of The Arab League. Also supporting a planned liberation force ready to liberate the The Arab League on behalf of the rightful government.
That the The Arab League was a democratic region where all the members voted for their delegate. However Anarchestan has gone against these principles and has imposed martial law, giving themselves the authority to eject natives. Without this proposal they will destroy The Arab League in a silent and calculated manner in an effort to maintain power. Also recognising that as the natives have elected Al-Maghrebi, who has appealed for help as the rightful WA delegate of the The Arab League. Although this liberation cannot happen without the password upon the region being removed.
The World Assembely Security Council votes to strike down the unlawful delegate imposed password barrier in order to allow the liberation of The Arab League.
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD
by Appalachia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:32 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:53 am
Yes, someone could write a repeal, leaving a period of days in which the region is not protected by border controls and the nazis could reinvade. All they'd really need to do is wait until the repeal is within hours of passing to strike and they've won. This is what comes of WA members not paying attention before they vote.
by Alkasia » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:02 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:13 pm
What's the point of writing a repeal when this resolution can be stopped now? Stopping it now makes it so that the natives can protect their region through a password. Letting it pass makes them completely vulnerable. The entire situation of having to free them again can be avoided if this resolution simply fails.
by Khorason » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:09 pm
by Amerisika » Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:46 pm
by Unowtican » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:13 pm
by Aimdar-Goomdar » Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:05 pm
Unowtican wrote:I actually find this proposal misleading after looking into things a bit more. It is mentioned that Anarchestan violently seized power but a closer look reveals that he was the WA delegate for 55 days before leaving of his own accord with no arguments from Natives until the last 2 weeks.
It looks like there was an exodus in which the WA Delegate and leader at the time arranged founding another region to protect against future raids. No protections or policies were put in place on leaving which pretty much left a free region. Anarchestan became the WA Delegate and formed a government of his creation with him at the top.
The proposal mentions a rightful government but how can their be a rightful government when elections were happening when stuff started happening? The proposal also mentions a rightfully elected WA Delegate, how can that be when the proposed rightfully elected WA Delegate isn't even a member of the World Assembly?
It appears that the region behind the proposal was supportive of what was happening until a friend was ejected and accused of treachery in which ties between the 2 regions were severed.
The actions of Anarchestan, although appearing paranoid, was most likely an attempt to prevent future raids and other actions were to retain their power.
In my opinion, the security council has become involved after another nation failed at an attempt for a rise in power
by Redfaction01 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:38 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:17 pm
Liberate The Arab League was passed 15,075 votes to 1,717.
by The Palentinate » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:45 am
by Wallenburg » Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:48 pm
The Palentinate wrote:I am sad this has passed. Arabs cannot manage their own lands and have a prudent track record of that. This resolution will only cause further tyranny as the current "usurper" is actually the most democratic regime these Arabs can ask for.
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD