Worlds: 1st, 2nd, 3rd ???

by **Dystopianus** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:15 am

I'd say third world, considering the high unemployment rates (note: IC my unemployment rate is much higher then what NSTracker shows) and low average income. But the quality of the healthcare system, the economy, and the education system makes it appear more like first world. Plus politics are based on a first world system.

by **The Grand Millian** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:17 am

1st world

by **Chinese Regions** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:22 am

1st world in todays standards, 2nd world in the standards of the time where my nation is.

by **The Floridian Coast** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:22 am

As we understand, the concept of the 3rd world only came apart during Cold War times, distinguishing countries that were neither under the USA's (first) or Soviet's (second) sphere of influence.

This concept is outdated in the modern Floridian Coast, and we generally use terms like "industrialized" or "developing". However, considering our socialist policies, we operate most similar to the traditional "second world", though we have first rate health care, technology, and standards of living.

by **Minnysota** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:23 am

First world no doubt. We have a high quality of living, a high GDP per capita, a large economy, and we are very modern.

by **Arumdaum** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:24 am

We like to consider ourselves a first world nation. But we're modern.

by **Arkinesia** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:07 am

The WA considers Arkinesia a First World country, if the classifications are to be believed. We'd generally like to think the same, since most people are not eating food off of alleyways, nor are any starving.

by **Hypparchia** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:12 am

We have the technological advantage and precision of the 1st world, but we're 2nd world in terms of governance.

by **Saint-Sebastian** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:54 am

People are getting lazy when they can't even provide the most basic of definitions. After some research on the terms we conclude that Saint-Sebastian is a rapidly developing economy with broad social and political rights and developed civil society. We are possibly 2nd world.

by **Lunar Rai** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:57 am

Just got enough population to reach 1st world status! Woo!

by **South Eastern Regions** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:13 am

2nd and trying to be #1

by **Krumolia** » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:53 am

Krumolia is a 1st world nation.

by **Kenmoria** » Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:23 pm

Kenmoria is a 1^st world nation.

by **Democratic Exodian Territories** » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:39 pm

We straddle the line between 1st and 2nd. In terms of living conditions, we’re 1st-world due to high standard income and a flourishing economy, but in other aspects such as infrastructure and transportation, we’re 2nd-World. When a Post-Modern Tech nation is having trouble fixing their railroad and doesn’t have a fully-fledged nationwide transport system, you know you’ve got some problems.

by **Yavakhstan** » Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:37 pm

2nd world.

by **Randumbness** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:51 am

It is controversial since most people are split 50/50 on whether or not Randumbness is 1st world or 2 world.

by **Gandoor** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:43 am

Gandoor is considered to be a 1st world developed nation.

by **Viksberg** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:03 am

2nd world, but some nations have classified Viksberg as 1st world nation.

by **Great Karoo** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 7:06 am

We're second world. Not quite third world, not quite first world.

by **Maichuko** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:41 am

Third World in the cold war sense. We were not allied with the United States or The Soviet Union.

Worlds: 1st, 2nd, 3rd ???

Who is online