North Defese wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:$29 trillion yearly budget.
How can your nation afford THAT?
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... toklomolvi
Gross Domestic Product: $101,544,476,747,664.78
Defence: $29,278,105,774,444.81 29%
That's how.
Advertisement
by The Great Lord Tiger » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:02 pm
North Defese wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:$29 trillion yearly budget.
How can your nation afford THAT?
by North Defese » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:03 pm
by Reavani » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:07 pm
The Great Lord Tiger wrote:North Defese wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:$29 trillion yearly budget.
How can your nation afford THAT?
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... toklomolvi
Gross Domestic Product: $101,544,476,747,664.78
Defence: $29,278,105,774,444.81 29%
That's how.
by Stoklomolvi » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:14 pm
by Machina Haruspex » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:23 pm
by Zinaire » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:27 pm
Machina Haruspex wrote:By the NSE caculator I've about 73 trillion spent on defense alone. Fascism does work after all apparently.
by Stoklomolvi » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:29 pm
by Reavani » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:33 pm
Stoklomolvi wrote:81% of the budget being spent on the military and police is a bit...excessive, wouldn't you think?
by Machina Haruspex » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:09 pm
by Conserative Morality » Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:20 pm
Machina Haruspex wrote:I hear excessive, but law and order are maintained and thus our society is free from the worries of radical youth, gangs, violence against the proper citizenry. Crime is effectively minimalized to near non-existence.
by Ledarre » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:43 am
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Ledarre wrote:I'm struggling to see the problem here. Just look at my nation, looks like a politically free nation, right? WRONG! The democratically elected parliament requires a unanimous vote to actually pass legalisation and with proportional representation and the number of extremists in parliament this is near impossible.
So the monarchy effectively rules by decree. I have achieved this through answering issues in a certain way... Unfortunately I can’t remember what those issues were. That plus a little bit of RP. Anyway my point is it’s easy to have moderate to high political freedoms and still have absolute power, you just have to be creative.
Huh. That's a rather unique and, I must say, deliciously evil approach. *golfclap*
by Machina Haruspex » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:03 am
by Sorgan » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:38 pm
Stoklomolvi wrote:No, they're equipped with the NS equivalent of a United States. Just because I'm communist doesn't mean my men don't get the best of the best.
by Reavani » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:08 pm
Sorgan wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:No, they're equipped with the NS equivalent of a United States. Just because I'm communist doesn't mean my men don't get the best of the best.
Wow do you ever know how communism works? In Communism product are always Shanty and easily broken because of terrible work forces and a low pay.
by Jakra » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:13 pm
Reavani wrote:Sorgan wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:No, they're equipped with the NS equivalent of a United States. Just because I'm communist doesn't mean my men don't get the best of the best.
Wow do you ever know how communism works? In Communism product are always Shanty and easily broken because of terrible work forces and a low pay.
I couldn't bury an American assualt rifle, dig it up a month later, and then shoot it.
Find me one case where a terrorist organization EVER chooses the M-16 or M-4 over the Kalashnikov or one of her Cousins.
You can't.
Except in Georgia.
Those Klansmen are nuts.
by Allied Governments » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:16 pm
Reavani wrote:Sorgan wrote:Stoklomolvi wrote:No, they're equipped with the NS equivalent of a United States. Just because I'm communist doesn't mean my men don't get the best of the best.
Wow do you ever know how communism works? In Communism product are always Shanty and easily broken because of terrible work forces and a low pay.
I couldn't bury an American assualt rifle, dig it up a month later, and then shoot it.
Find me one case where a terrorist organization EVER chooses the M-16 or M-4 over the Kalashnikov or one of her Cousins.
You can't.
Except in Georgia.
Those Klansmen are nuts.
by Reavani » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:23 pm
Jakra wrote:
Ireland, the IRA always prefers the M-16 or AR-15 (only a minor difference) to the Kalashnikov
by Jakra » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:41 pm
Reavani wrote:Jakra wrote:
Ireland, the IRA always prefers the M-16 or AR-15 (only a minor difference) to the Kalashnikov
I wouldn't exactly call those people terrorists. Underhanded and Cowardly yes, but not quite Bombing civilians in a building for no real reason.
by Escafin » Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:03 pm
Letzen wrote:My Sig
by Zimbellomons » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:08 pm
OOC: Economic Left/Right: 0.25 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.10
IC: Economic Left/Right: -7.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.54
by Zimbellomons » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:08 pm
OOC: Economic Left/Right: 0.25 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.10
IC: Economic Left/Right: -7.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.54
by Reavani » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:09 am
Zimbellomons wrote:
by Crookfur » Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:39 am
Jakra wrote:Reavani wrote:Sorgan wrote:Wow do you ever know how communism works? In Communism product are always Shanty and easily broken because of terrible work forces and a low pay.
I couldn't bury an American assualt rifle, dig it up a month later, and then shoot it.
Find me one case where a terrorist organization EVER chooses the M-16 or M-4 over the Kalashnikov or one of her Cousins.
You can't.
Except in Georgia.
Those Klansmen are nuts.
Ireland, the IRA always prefers the M-16 or AR-15 (only a minor difference) to the Kalashnikov
by Grays Harbor » Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:52 am
Reavani wrote:Jakra wrote:
Ireland, the IRA always prefers the M-16 or AR-15 (only a minor difference) to the Kalashnikov
I wouldn't exactly call those people terrorists. Underhanded and Cowardly yes, but not quite Bombing civilians in a building for no real reason.
by Reavani » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:37 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Reavani wrote:Jakra wrote:
Ireland, the IRA always prefers the M-16 or AR-15 (only a minor difference) to the Kalashnikov
I wouldn't exactly call those people terrorists. Underhanded and Cowardly yes, but not quite Bombing civilians in a building for no real reason.
IRA not bombing civilians?
Manchester 1996
Omagh 1998
Birmingham 1974
Brighton 1984
Hyde park and Regents Park 1982
Guildford 1974
Lord Mountbatten 1979
It seems they were rather fond of bombing things. That makes them terrorists.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Kuuj, Russian Brotherhood, Silves
Advertisement