Advertisement

by Vostria » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:55 pm


by Indeos » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:58 pm

by Techno-Kat » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:05 pm
Indeos wrote:Thread needs more G3 love, and less ebil commie-terrorist love.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/DCB_Shooting_G3_pictures.jpg

by Australien » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:06 pm
Vostria wrote:Australien wrote:I'm joining in here, because we all need more love (Especially for smexy folding stock AK's!)
Awww would you look at us!! And all because I posted a picture of an AK variant.... Shame the AK (Folding stock or no folding stock) has led to countless deaths and is the weapon of dictators and terrorists but anyways... bck to the hugging!!


by Techno-Kat » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:07 pm

by Indeos » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:08 pm
...Oh wait, you're serious. 
by Rusikstan » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:09 pm
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Techno-Kat » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:09 pm

by Techno-Kat » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:12 pm

by Rusikstan » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:14 pm

Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Techno-Kat » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Rusikstan wrote:So Arronaux-59 with a lil change. Reason I bring it up though is I was think of make a wooden furniture variant. Y/N?
regards of your response I'm doing it anyway

by Brelden » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:18 pm

by Rusikstan » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:30 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Shouldn't even be a question, do it.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Wamitoria » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:42 pm


by New Korongo » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:48 pm

by Portugal 2874 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:39 am

what do you think?
by St George of England » Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:41 am

by Portugal 2874 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:44 am
i hate being like a telemarketer!


by Dimoniquid » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:46 am
Portugal 2874 wrote:May i interest in the Bravia FL54 light AR?
its cheap, and reliable!
i hate being like a telemarketer!
here it is:
650 rpm
900 m range
.45 cal rounds
30 round mags
1.9 kg weight
oh, what is inb4caliberargument?

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:47 am
Portugal 2874 wrote:My glorious army of freedom uses the Bravia RK75 family of rifles as standard:
starting from top:
RK75 standard with bayonet
RK75C (curto = short) for special forces
RK75P (pesado = heavy) with 60 round drum and 40 mm grenade launcher (grenade on the right)
RK75S sniper version with standard scope
This rifle fires 6.5 Grendel ammunition at 750 rounds a minute, except RK75C which fires at 1000 rpm.
Maximum range is 1100 m (standard) 600 m (short) 2000 m (sniper) and 900 m (heavy)
It costs 9000 dollars a rifle (export version)
warn me if its too expensive
what do you think?

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:48 am
Dimoniquid wrote:Portugal 2874 wrote:May i interest in the Bravia FL54 light AR?
its cheap, and reliable!
i hate being like a telemarketer!
here it is:
650 rpm
900 m range
.45 cal rounds
30 round mags
1.9 kg weight
oh, what is inb4caliberargument?
He's made a comment before an argument involving calibers can erupt. Like inb4lock.

by Licana » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:49 am
Portugal 2874 wrote:May i interest in the Bravia FL54 light AR?
its cheap, and reliable!
i hate being like a telemarketer!
here it is:
650 rpm
900 m range
.45 cal rounds
30 round mags
1.9 kg weight
oh, what is inb4caliberargument?
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:55 am
Portugal 2874 wrote:May i interest in the Bravia FL54 light AR?
its cheap, and reliable!
i hate being like a telemarketer!
here it is:
650 rpm
900 m range
.45 cal rounds
30 round mags
1.9 kg weight
oh, what is inb4caliberargument?

by Portugal 2874 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:08 am
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Portugal 2874 wrote:May i interest in the Bravia FL54 light AR?
its cheap, and reliable!
i hate being like a telemarketer!
here it is:
650 rpm
900 m range
.45 cal rounds
30 round mags
1.9 kg weight
oh, what is inb4caliberargument?
Range is once again too great, you might be able to get 100m, but you are still using an oversized pistol round, so you aren't going to be able to use it like an assault rifle. Here are some tips about guessing the range or your weapons, a rifle firing a 7.62x51mm NATO can get about 800 m range, an SAR-21 or other long barreled 5.56x45mm NATO assault rifles have an effective range of about 550 m, a Desert Eagle has an effective range of about 50 m.
im sorryAdvertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement