Advertisement

by New Korongo » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:18 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:21 am

by Tsarist China » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:24 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:
The GSh-6-30/23 have issues, but nothing's suggesting it's related to gas-operation vs electric motor operation.

by United States of PA » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:24 am

by Tsarist China » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:31 am
United States of PA wrote:
Why would the USAF fly without ammo when they dont use Gas Operated Gatling Guns?
The M61 has a electric motor if i recall correctly.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:32 am
United States of PA wrote:
Why would the USAF fly without ammo when they dont use Gas Operated Gatling Guns?
The M61 has a electric motor if i recall correctly.
by Crookfur » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:09 am

by Templeton and Unwin » Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:10 am


by Rusikstan » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:43 pm
United States of PA wrote:105mm Door Mounted Recoilless Rifle.
Probably the biggest down side of the russian gas op rotaries is the issue with jams and rounds that fail to fire. With an externally powered gun the action barely misses a beat as the unfired round is extracted where as on a gas op your gun coems to a crashign halt and you need to use one of your five special assited ignition catridges to peirce the side of the round and ignite the the round.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
Cyrupe wrote:Canadians are not good at electronics, hence why you never see them at the top of ANYTHING in the technology industry. Bowling ball track pads are the perfect example of this.

by Indeos » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:02 pm

by Brachyuria » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:05 pm


by Indeos » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:09 pm
Brachyuria wrote:(Image)
BAR87 Assault Rifle
Type: Assault Rifle
Place of origin: Brachyuria
Designer: Percy Luddite Kitchener
Designed: 1985
Manufacturer: Steel Carapace Manufacturers Incorporated
Produced: 1987-present
further information in the linked nswiki article
I would not mind some helpful opinions/scathing criticisms for the above.
Note that while I did roughly style it after the way PimpMyGun is all drawn, and spend a bit of time early on looking rather intensely at some PMG parts for reference, this was actually drawn in MSpaint. Not an important fact, but one that I was rather happy with myself over, and so felt that I should burden you with the knowledge.

by Brachyuria » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:20 pm

by Indeos » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:23 pm
Brachyuria wrote:Indeos wrote:
The stock looks uncomfortable.
If the stock is the only problem with it, I think I can live with that.
Might add some information regarding stock uncomfortable-ness into the wiki page though.
Thanks for taking the time from talking about Russians or whatever it is everyone is talking about here instead of firearms for fictional nations.

by Kel-Elysia » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:59 pm


by Wamitoria » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:03 pm

by Castleclose » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:04 pm


by Wamitoria » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:07 pm

by Castleclose » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:08 pm

by Kel-Elysia » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:10 pm

by New Korongo » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:19 pm
Altamirus wrote:Kel-Elysia wrote:Bet you anything that the FAL's sturdier than the M16 or any of its variations. I haven't fired an FAL before but I have fired an M16 while in basic.
I would bet that the AR-10 is sturdier than the FAL. Also if you want a 5.56 gun with bit looser tolerances try this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armalite_AR-18

by Kel-Elysia » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:23 pm

by Wamitoria » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:28 pm
Kel-Elysia wrote:Altamirus wrote:So basically a modernized version of this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-10
Yes, pretty much, although the M16A3 was used as the base. In any case, it's modified to be as sturdy as an AK, just to clear that up.
by Crookfur » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:44 pm
Rusikstan wrote:United States of PA wrote:105mm Door Mounted Recoilless Rifle.
105mm pelvic mounted recoilless rifle.....oh wait already got one
trololoProbably the biggest down side of the russian gas op rotaries is the issue with jams and rounds that fail to fire. With an externally powered gun the action barely misses a beat as the unfired round is extracted where as on a gas op your gun coems to a crashign halt and you need to use one of your five special assited ignition catridges to peirce the side of the round and ignite the the round.
Now that is a fun piece of info. How does that work? Like a back-up little piercing pin thing or what?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement