Creating You (Make Your Own Everything)

[Galla-]

(Image)
Rheinell Military Company - Aerial Wing Service Uniform

Why do children serve in your military?

[Frisbeeteria]

If me and Noders need to reveal some facts from your life as to why you are saying this we will... now please SHUSH already...

Threatening to reveal player information on our site? You'll find yourself banned in a heartbeat if you do. You better go read that link I just posted, pronto!

[Fashiontopia]

Did I ever show yall these?

[Nakarisaune]

Remove that ugly as hell person in the far right. Those women don't exist and never should.

With their lack of intelligence and far too big breasts.

((No offense to any women who are built that way intended. If you exist that is.))

If me and Noders need to reveal some facts from your life as to why you are saying this we will... now please SHUSH already...

I'm not sure why these 'facts' would have any bearing on it. I think it might just be that it's a bit demeaning to portray women with big tits and small heads.

[Graditora]

(Image) There's the Alimerian Bobtail. Originally bred for those lonely weapon-smiths in Alimeria.

It was a different time when being a Gunsmith wasn't considered noble and manly.

I would thicken her neck if I were you. Also, make one that isn't so muscular. It is easier to make uniforms without the ridiculously tall and muscular template. And the Muscular templates have weird things near their ankles that are ugly.

Graditoran Coon meets an Alimerian Bobtail.

Awe!!!

[Fashiontopia]

I put the RPG cage on the M118 Zupe, I think it is a pretty clean look. I'd say it's a very fitting replacement.

[Galla-]

Your APC is pointlessly long.

Add extra roadwheel.

[Ularn]

I know it was said before but I'm just going to reiterate quickly that it's better to keep your tank armour flat rather than curved. Also, don't go calling the M113 a "Gavin" - the name was coined by some internet armchair general who's convinced he can get the tank to fly, and has been banned from almost every reputable tank and warfare-related forum on the internet - he's that bad. No-one uses the name "Gavin" seriously.

EDIT: Also, you may not want the mesh armour extending past the back of the tank. It would be unfortunate it it happened to catch an RPG which would otherwise have missed, thereby causing damage to the weak rear armour of the APC.

[Landes der Dinosaurier]

WIP of something I'm working on.

EDIT: Credit to whoever made the tank & Ungern for the poses.

I can't believe I forgot this.

[Galla-]

I know it was said before but I'm just going to reiterate quickly that it's better to keep your tank armour flat rather than curved. Also, don't go calling the M113 a "Gavin" - the name was coined by some internet armchair general who's convinced he can get the tank to fly, and has been banned from almost every reputable tank and warfare-related forum on the internet - he's that bad. No-one uses the name "Gavin" seriously.

Gavin is fine.

Though any of the prototype proto-Bradleys is cooler. Also consider Sheridan MICV, with 11 personnel and a 20mm chaingun.



Notice portholes on the side. So the fellas can stick out their guns and shoot people.

[Nakarisaune]

(Image) There's the Alimerian Bobtail. Originally bred for those lonely weapon-smiths in Alimeria.

It was a different time when being a Gunsmith wasn't considered noble and manly.

I would thicken her neck if I were you. Also, make one that isn't so muscular. It is easier to make uniforms without the ridiculously tall and muscular template. And the Muscular templates have weird things near their ankles that are ugly.

Graditoran Coon meets an Alimerian Bobtail.

Awe!!!

But a badly-drawn Nakarisauna Giant Sinnye decides it wants the Coon for itself!

[Fashiontopia]

I know it was said before but I'm just going to reiterate quickly that it's better to keep your tank armour flat rather than curved. Also, don't go calling the M113 a "Gavin" - the name was coined by some internet armchair general who's convinced he can get the tank to fly, and has been banned from almost every reputable tank and warfare-related forum on the internet - he's that bad. No-one uses the name "Gavin" seriously.

http://www.combatreform.org/m113combat.htm
I'm not calling it SUPERGavin for no reason... it's posted there as the M113A3 SuperGavin

"The latest version of the Army's M-113 armored personnel carrier, which was first fielded in the early 1960s, proves it can still keep up with modern maneuver forces. An M-113A3 pulls away from a Bradley M-2A2 fighting vehicle as it crosses the finish line at an Army 'drag race' held March 19th at FMC Corp. in San Jose, Ca. The M-113A3, which weighs about one-third as much as the 33-ton M-2A2, is equipped with a 275 horsepower Detroit Diesel 6V53T turbocharged engine. The Bradley has a 600-hp Cummins V-903 turbocharged diesel engine...."

A3 Gavins have 1/2 the power of a Bradley but are 1/3 their weight = HIGHER POWER-TO-WEIGHT RATIO = greater speed. We already know that Gavins can FLY by C-130s, CH-47s, and swim across lakes, rivers and even in the ocean with waterjets for 3D maneuver while Bradleys and Strykers can't. Bradleys are useful in the 2D maneuver team with heavy M1 Abrams tanks in open terrain fights, but the roadbound but thinly armored Stryker trucks rolling on air-filled rubber tires that burn are worthless and dangerous as combat vehicles.

EXCLUSIVE M113 GAVIN NEWS!! SUPER GAVINS TO RESCUE MESS IN IRAQ!

Meet the M113A3+ Super Gavin in Iraq! Far Better Protected and Mobile than Stryker trucks!

* RPG pre-det bird cage all around but yet not so wide so Super Gavin can still roll-on/off USAF aircraft for 3D maneuver warfare capabilities, you can't do this in a Stryker truck!

* High Hard Steel belts on sides, front, rear to increase roadside bomb and bullet protection to beyond 14.5mm HMG protection

* Underbelly armor to defeat land mines

* Extra spall liner inside

* TAGS see-thru gunshields to protect and see enemy first to shoot & kill him

* Ability to stow troop gear, sandbags on outside beneath hull and bird cage to increase ballistic protection levels

* Rolls on tracks that are cross-country mobile and do not puncture and burn like Stryker truck tires

[Ularn]

I know it was said before but I'm just going to reiterate quickly that it's better to keep your tank armour flat rather than curved. Also, don't go calling the M113 a "Gavin" - the name was coined by some internet armchair general who's convinced he can get the tank to fly, and has been banned from almost every reputable tank and warfare-related forum on the internet - he's that bad. No-one uses the name "Gavin" seriously.

http://www.combatreform.org/m113combat.htm
I'm not calling it SUPERGavin for no reason... it's posted there as the M113A3 SuperGavin

"The latest version of the Army's M-113 armored personnel carrier, which was first fielded in the early 1960s, proves it can still keep up with modern maneuver forces. An M-113A3 pulls away from a Bradley M-2A2 fighting vehicle as it crosses the finish line at an Army 'drag race' held March 19th at FMC Corp. in San Jose, Ca. The M-113A3, which weighs about one-third as much as the 33-ton M-2A2, is equipped with a 275 horsepower Detroit Diesel 6V53T turbocharged engine. The Bradley has a 600-hp Cummins V-903 turbocharged diesel engine...."

A3 Gavins have 1/2 the power of a Bradley but are 1/3 their weight = HIGHER POWER-TO-WEIGHT RATIO = greater speed. We already know that Gavins can FLY by C-130s, CH-47s, and swim across lakes, rivers and even in the ocean with waterjets for 3D maneuver while Bradleys and Strykers can't. Bradleys are useful in the 2D maneuver team with heavy M1 Abrams tanks in open terrain fights, but the roadbound but thinly armored Stryker trucks rolling on air-filled rubber tires that burn are worthless and dangerous as combat vehicles.

EXCLUSIVE M113 GAVIN NEWS!! SUPER GAVINS TO RESCUE MESS IN IRAQ!

Meet the M113A3+ Super Gavin in Iraq! Far Better Protected and Mobile than Stryker trucks!

* RPG pre-det bird cage all around but yet not so wide so Super Gavin can still roll-on/off USAF aircraft for 3D maneuver warfare capabilities, you can't do this in a Stryker truck!

* High Hard Steel belts on sides, front, rear to increase roadside bomb and bullet protection to beyond 14.5mm HMG protection

* Underbelly armor to defeat land mines

* Extra spall liner inside

* TAGS see-thru gunshields to protect and see enemy first to shoot & kill him

* Ability to stow troop gear, sandbags on outside beneath hull and bird cage to increase ballistic protection levels

* Rolls on tracks that are cross-country mobile and do not puncture and burn like Stryker truck tires

That site was written by the jackass I just mentioned

Though I take the point that having mesh armour go past the tank's rear is apparently not as bad an idea as I thought if the US army was doing it.

[Fashiontopia]

Well

That site was written by the jackass I just mentioned [/quote]
Well in that case in Fashiontopia what he said is reality... if it's not called that in real life then it is in Fashiontopia then. It's not supposed to be exact copies of real life anyway lol.

[Galla-]

Slat armour pointlessly adds width to a vehicle, limiting airmobility.

Superior Sheridan will mount chain with balls on it like Israeli Centurions did.

Super Sheridan will just be too cool to resist fire from anything bigger than a BRG-15.

[Noders]

1stly Fash don't pull me into your arguments. 2ndly i have no idea what the heck you claim i know........geez

[Fashiontopia]

Slat armour pointlessly adds width to a vehicle, limiting airmobility.

Then why is that picture not photoshopped and is/was in use in Iraq? Also why do Strykers also use Slat Armor? Also I know an Army MP who uses Slat Armor on his Strykers IRL.

[Ularn]

Well

That site was written by the jackass I just mentioned

Well in that case in Fashiontopia what he said is reality... if it's not called that in real life then it is in Fashiontopia then. It's not supposed to be exact copies of real life anyway lol.[/quote]
Okay, but fair warning; if you use the name in a thread with any of the YNMBT regulars you'll probably get laughed out of the RP.

[Galla-]

Slat armour pointlessly adds width to a vehicle, limiting airmobility.

Then why is that picture not photoshopped and is/was in use in Iraq? Also why do Strykers also use Slat Armor? Also I know an Army MP who uses Slat Armor on his Strykers IRL.

Because they don't worry about air/railmobility. The US Navy has enough ships to deploy half the US Army's manpower in a month.

If they need to transport something, they strip it down and put it in a plane, because when the plane arrives at whatever air base, there will always be enough time to assemble it fully.

You do not get this luxury when the plane doesn't actually touch the ground, and literally drops you off in a war zone, dodging mortar shells and bullets.

[Fashiontopia]

Because they don't worry about air/railmobility. The US Navy has enough ships to deploy half the US Army's manpower in a month.

If they need to transport something, they strip it down and put it in a plane, because when the plane arrives at whatever air base, there will always be enough time to assemble it fully.

You do not get this luxury when the plane doesn't actually touch the ground, and literally drops you off in a war zone, dodging mortar shells and bullets.

You're either assuming I don't have a navy or that my navy isn't powerful enough to do the same? Most of the time wars are too far from Fashiontopia not to use long-range planes on Boeing 747 scale or by sea, so I would be forced to regularly use Naval power to deploy troops. Also there are different sections of the Rheinell Military Company that use MRAPs as well, whatever areas the M118 Zupe or M113 SuperGavin with Slat Armor can't cover, there will be either stripped ones available, stripping tools available, or alternative vehicles available to do so.

[Almire]

Came across this while going through my photobucket:

(Image)

Anybody wants it, it's theirs.

Making into steampunk suit! Yeah, I'm going back to JG scale.

[Sevvania]

Came across this while going through my photobucket:

(Image)

Anybody wants it, it's theirs.

Making into steampunk suit! Yeah, I'm going back to JG scale.

I look forward to seeing this.

[Alimeria II]

Yes, so do I. I look forward to seeing lots of JG scale stuff. So we can have the Alimerian-Almirian alliance.

Have you noticed we have rather similar names?

[Graditora]

Yes, so do I. I look forward to seeing lots of JG scale stuff. So we can have the Alimerian-Almirian alliance.

Have you noticed we have rather similar names?

*Feels sad that theres not another nation with a name close to Graditora*

[Nakarisaune]

Yes, so do I. I look forward to seeing lots of JG scale stuff. So we can have the Alimerian-Almirian alliance.

Have you noticed we have rather similar names?

*Feels sad that theres not another nation with a name close to Graditora*

Hopefully, there will NEVER be a nation with a name close to Nakarisaune!