Still small, and you'd never get someone with, ah, 'jugs', the size of their head without them being overweight or surgically enhanced. The rest of it seems alright, though it seems far smaller than the male
Advertisement

by Nakarisaune » Sun May 13, 2012 8:14 am

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 8:16 am
Nakarisaune wrote:
Still small, and you'd never get someone with, ah, 'jugs', the size of their head without them being overweight or surgically enhanced. The rest of it seems alright, though it seems far smaller than the male

by Coltarin » Sun May 13, 2012 8:18 am
Fashiontopia wrote:Nakarisaune wrote:Still small, and you'd never get someone with, ah, 'jugs', the size of their head without them being overweight or surgically enhanced. The rest of it seems alright, though it seems far smaller than the male
Well now that the mistake has been made it seems gay for me to make them smaller. I apologize to any feminists out there.
Puzikas wrote:"No gun? Fuck it , you're now Comrade Meat Shield" level.
Fordorsia wrote:Why sell the restored weapons when you can keep them in a military-themed sex dungeon?
Spreewerke wrote:Basically plainclothes, armed security on a plane. Terrorist starts boxcuttering? Shoot his ass. Passenger starts being a dickhole penisweiner? Arrest his ass. Stewardess walks by? Smack dat ass. People obviously see you? Lose your job as a federal employee and suffer a failing marriage while your children don't speak with you at home and, due to your newly-developed drinking problem, you also lose all custody rights of your children. Your life culminates with your self-immolation inside your one-bedroom trailer home.

by Nakarisaune » Sun May 13, 2012 8:19 am
Fashiontopia wrote:Nakarisaune wrote:Still small, and you'd never get someone with, ah, 'jugs', the size of their head without them being overweight or surgically enhanced. The rest of it seems alright, though it seems far smaller than the male
Well now that the mistake has been made it seems gay for me to make them smaller. I apologize to any feminists out there.

by Allmann » Sun May 13, 2012 8:34 am




by Kouralia » Sun May 13, 2012 8:39 am
Allmann wrote:(Image)(Image)(Image)
Changed the size of the bullpup magazine to the size of the conventional rifle magazine.
Added a new sighting system to both designs and added some stock details to both.
Also did a Conventional Design Version 2. Where the cartridge lever is of the same kind as the Bullpup one.
Do not the FAMAS use a lever like that too?
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:03 am


by Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen » Sun May 13, 2012 9:03 am

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:07 am

by Ularn » Sun May 13, 2012 9:08 am

by Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen » Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am

by Graditora » Sun May 13, 2012 9:15 am
Luziyca wrote:You were the one responsible for the Second Amendment.
Bafuria wrote:If I was allowed to carry I would carry a pistol with big, loud muzzle blast, something that says "I JUST SHOT YOU D:<".
Ea90 wrote:Someone knows what they want.
Romberg wrote:You do not mess with the nation with a scorpion on its flag.

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:17 am
Ularn wrote:She looks like she should be hiding in the cake at a serviceman's bachelor party.
Have you considered perhaps just taking the muscle man template, thinning the legs and arms by a pixel or two, taking in the waist, drawing on a bust and adjusting the hips and shoulders as appropriate?

by Ularn » Sun May 13, 2012 9:19 am

Fashiontopia wrote:Ularn wrote:She looks like she should be hiding in the cake at a serviceman's bachelor party.
Have you considered perhaps just taking the muscle man template, thinning the legs and arms by a pixel or two, taking in the waist, drawing on a bust and adjusting the hips and shoulders as appropriate?
-______- I wouldn't consider full service dress Playboy Bunny status...
Also... there's also paint on your computer, sense you're God and you know the female body better than me why don't you go ahead and do that for me buddy.

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:20 am

by Ularn » Sun May 13, 2012 9:22 am


by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:25 am

by Nakarisaune » Sun May 13, 2012 9:26 am

by Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen » Sun May 13, 2012 9:28 am
Fashiontopia wrote: Until then hop off my tip and work on your shit and stop using that damn ಠ_ಠ face because it's already spam and uncalled for. I didn't ask for your opinion if your opinion is a dumbass face. Notice how everyone else can actually provide educated critiques... where you at patna?

by Allmann » Sun May 13, 2012 9:28 am
Ea90 wrote:Allmann, what's your rifle's action (gas operated, blowback, recoil etc.)?

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:31 am
Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:Fashiontopia wrote:Come here bitch... when you decide to edit the female template to your liking so you can jack off to it like it's porn let me know.
i don't have to do that since your first attempt was outright traced from fapping material and the second reveals a fetish for wildly disproportional women with exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics
besides, if i was interested in masturbating to lineart (i'm not, the fact that you came up with that says interesting things about you), my own drawing would be much betterFashiontopia wrote: Until then hop off my tip and work on your shit and stop using that damn ಠ_ಠ face because it's already spam and uncalled for. I didn't ask for your opinion if your opinion is a dumbass face. Notice how everyone else can actually provide educated critiques... where you at patna?
not bothering with lengthy critiques because the issues with the drawing are pretty obvious
if you like i could use ಠ 益ಠ instead

by Nakarisaune » Sun May 13, 2012 9:32 am
Fashiontopia wrote:Not really... because in this thread I have a rule that says mild argument is allowed as long as it pertains to art. I admit what I said was over the top anyway but to say that type of stuff to a female makes me look like a rabid dog. I'm editing the rule to protect females from attacks.Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:i don't have to do that since your first attempt was outright traced from fapping material and the second reveals a fetish for wildly disproportional women with exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics
besides, if i was interested in masturbating to lineart (i'm not, the fact that you came up with that says interesting things about you), my own drawing would be much better
not bothering with lengthy critiques because the issues with the drawing are pretty obvious
if you like i could use ಠ 益ಠ instead
It's okay it's okay, calm thine nerve and let's return to a loving art community now lol

by Fashiontopia » Sun May 13, 2012 9:39 am
Nakarisaune wrote:Fashiontopia wrote:Not really... because in this thread I have a rule that says mild argument is allowed as long as it pertains to art. I admit what I said was over the top anyway but to say that type of stuff to a female makes me look like a rabid dog. I'm editing the rule to protect females from attacks.
It's okay it's okay, calm thine nerve and let's return to a loving art community now lol
Females aren't all that frail and emotional, no need to specifically protect them from attacks

by Ularn » Sun May 13, 2012 9:45 am
Fashiontopia wrote:Nakarisaune wrote:
Females aren't all that frail and emotional, no need to specifically protect them from attacks
Still I won't have myself nor anyone else attack a female in this thread... you never know what you might say that someone could consider is taking it too far and lead to lowering of self-esteem in real life.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Coral Sea Archipelago
Advertisement