by JJ Place » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:38 pm
by Saurisia » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:41 pm
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:Stealing a copy of The Land Before Time.
Coccygia wrote:The only good mammal is a dead mammal.
Pythria wrote:Fascist dictatorship run by dinosaurs. I like it
Tartonica wrote:2/10 because dinosaurs do NOT rule nations (Except for Saurisia)
The Tavan Race wrote:Yeah, your nation scares me
Wolohanistan wrote:Saurisia - Dinosaur Dictatorship is the best dictatorship, not that we support that sort of thing.
Conoga wrote:Dinosaurs-in-Bikinis-Boy
Lancov wrote:Condemn, because we now have to go soak our brains in bleach.
The Floor Kippers wrote:We Have Dinosaurs.....Argument Rendered Invalid
Grossrheinland Reich wrote:DINOSAUR FETISHIST
Tetraca wrote:Also: yay, Saurisia's here! This thread just became more awesome :D
by Israslovakahzerbajan » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:44 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.
by Auremena » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:45 pm
by Ramsetia » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:45 pm
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:46 pm
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:50 pm
Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:58 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
by The Steel Fraternity » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:01 pm
Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
by Cybernetic Replicants » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:02 pm
The Drone Empire wrote:But thats only because your just plain out nearly invincible. Noone could efeat you. Ever. Everever. Not even Jenrak.. Unless he god-modded..
by Augarundus » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:06 pm
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:08 pm
The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
by The Tavan Race » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:06 pm
by JJ Place » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:12 pm
The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:48 pm
JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
by JJ Place » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:56 pm
Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:04 pm
JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
Isn't that a bit God-Modding? Extreme God-Moding?
by JJ Place » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:22 pm
Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
Isn't that a bit God-Modding? Extreme God-Moding?
Not really. I RP it well, and I control three galaxies. Anyway, I don't throw trillions of soldiers at a problem. I'm always sure to only have a fleet at the most for any problem. If this is God-Modding then I'm not getting any of the benefits of it. I just made it that high to make a realistic case for having three galaxies in my factbook.
by Kreanoltha » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:33 pm
JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
Isn't that a bit God-Modding? Extreme God-Moding?
Not really. I RP it well, and I control three galaxies. Anyway, I don't throw trillions of soldiers at a problem. I'm always sure to only have a fleet at the most for any problem. If this is God-Modding then I'm not getting any of the benefits of it. I just made it that high to make a realistic case for having three galaxies in my factbook.
Wouldn't a society with one Galaxy first colonize all (or most all) planets in said galaxy, before moving on to a second or third galaxy? You'd only take a mere 300 planets in a Galaxy of many billions?
by Nearxuyiaro » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:46 pm
by JJ Place » Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:01 am
Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
Isn't that a bit God-Modding? Extreme God-Moding?
Not really. I RP it well, and I control three galaxies. Anyway, I don't throw trillions of soldiers at a problem. I'm always sure to only have a fleet at the most for any problem. If this is God-Modding then I'm not getting any of the benefits of it. I just made it that high to make a realistic case for having three galaxies in my factbook.
Wouldn't a society with one Galaxy first colonize all (or most all) planets in said galaxy, before moving on to a second or third galaxy? You'd only take a mere 300 planets in a Galaxy of many billions?
A lot of the star-systems were already taken, and we developed FTL drives fast enough to jump across galaxies before we needed to evict other nations so with went with the other galaxies option. We have three arms of the Milky Way under our control with 40,000 or so planets. I miscalculated in my first post. The majority of the remainder is in the Pegasus Dwarf galaxy. The majority of planets in our space aren't even inhabitable with terraforming so we just rip them apart with high gravity from our Planet Cracker class of mining ships and smelt the resources out of them.
OOC: Plus it's just cool to have an intergalactic empire.
by Kreanoltha » Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:16 am
JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:JJ Place wrote:The Steel Fraternity wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Kreanoltha wrote:Very much so. We have holdings in three galaxies, 1,030 planets, and a population of 2.06 quadrillion.
How do you have a population of 2.06 quadrillion, and only 1,030 planets? You must either be the size of ants, or literally standing on top of each other. Even if each planet had a population of 100 billion, you would still only have around 100 trillion people.
What? No way. 1,030 planets times 2,000,000,000 (two billion, the average population of each planet) equals 2,060,000,000,000 (2.06 quadrillion, our population). How did you get your answer?
2,060,000,000,000 is 2.06 trillion. 2.06 quadrillion would be 2,060,000,000,000,000.
Furthermore, how does a society with only 519 million citizens expand out to be a society of over 2 trillion? Isn't that extremely out of proportions?
OOC: I RP as FT so I need a bigger population to hold my vast empire. If I spreed my NS population our I'd only have a few people on each planet.
Isn't that a bit God-Modding? Extreme God-Moding?
Not really. I RP it well, and I control three galaxies. Anyway, I don't throw trillions of soldiers at a problem. I'm always sure to only have a fleet at the most for any problem. If this is God-Modding then I'm not getting any of the benefits of it. I just made it that high to make a realistic case for having three galaxies in my factbook.
Wouldn't a society with one Galaxy first colonize all (or most all) planets in said galaxy, before moving on to a second or third galaxy? You'd only take a mere 300 planets in a Galaxy of many billions?
A lot of the star-systems were already taken, and we developed FTL drives fast enough to jump across galaxies before we needed to evict other nations so with went with the other galaxies option. We have three arms of the Milky Way under our control with 40,000 or so planets. I miscalculated in my first post. The majority of the remainder is in the Pegasus Dwarf galaxy. The majority of planets in our space aren't even inhabitable with terraforming so we just rip them apart with high gravity from our Planet Cracker class of mining ships and smelt the resources out of them.
OOC: Plus it's just cool to have an intergalactic empire.
Well, that's always fun; but how many citizens, and how many planets, really are in your nation? Second, I'm still ever-questioning of that 519 million population translating to a few million, or billion, or trillion times that...
by Lemonius » Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:46 am
by Aquilinia » Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:27 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: -Terrapacis-
Advertisement