Advertisement
by Perspicacious Lawyers » Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:00 pm
by Israslovakahzerbajan » Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:08 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.
by Fatatatutti » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:16 pm
Laos Refugees wrote:Fatatatutti-Being Communist, having a leader whos name is a mix of Stalin and Castro, two men greatly hated by the Laosian People.
by Grays Harbor » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:17 pm
Krsta wrote:Fatatatutti wrote:Anemos Major wrote:Grays Harbor; ya hate him, or ya love him. Huh.
That's why we base our Good/Bad list objectively on behaviour instead of subjectively on like/dislike. Gray's Harbor might very well be on our "Bad" list - we really don't know - but that doesn't mean we dislike the nation. In fact, we have a lot of admiration for the nation and we get along just fine with them.
We also have a certain amount of respect for GWO, New Nicksyllvania, etc. even though they're definitely on our Bad list.
Fatatatutti is on a lot of Good lists because we're a genuinely wonderful nation but we're also on a few bad lists because people hold petty grudges against us.
We dislike Grays Harbor and really can't admire a nation which considers freedom of speech barbaric, an apartheid and discriminatory nation, in which certain political ideologies are banned and which is ruled by an oppressive and authoritarian, imperialist tyrant. Fanatically capitalist nation.
Total of 0,4% of our population admire Grays Harbor.
A famous book "Harberian democracy" is often considered one of the best analyses of the GH's policies - an objective view on such a kind of nation.
by Laos Refugees » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:34 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:Laos Refugees wrote:Fatatatutti-Being Communist, having a leader whos name is a mix of Stalin and Castro, two men greatly hated by the Laosian People.
This is what I meant about petty grudges. It's hard to think of a sillier reason to dislike a nation than the fact that a person in it has a name you don't like.
I'll repeat: The only reason we would dislike a nation, regardless of ideology, is because of what they do.
by Voltronica » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:44 pm
by Fatatatutti » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:49 pm
Laos Refugees wrote:The second, is that The Grand Leader Muyang Kai, and the rest of Laosia, view Fatatatutti's 'heroic' General to be quite insane, in a very dangerous way. They fear that any nation that trusts a man that would fly upside down blindfolded for the fun of it to be dangerous.
Laosians are a bit gun happy, and they view anything using less then a Rifle as insane.
While Laosians are fine with homosexuality, they don't believe that homosexuality deserves any special treatment, just like they wouldn't name a Battalion 'The 420th Transexual Armored'. It has no honor to its name.
by GarriCorp » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:57 pm
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:58 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:Laos Refugees wrote:The second, is that The Grand Leader Muyang Kai, and the rest of Laosia, view Fatatatutti's 'heroic' General to be quite insane, in a very dangerous way. They fear that any nation that trusts a man that would fly upside down blindfolded for the fun of it to be dangerous.
It's hard to tell what you're talking about but you seem to be confusing General Marie-Louise Castro-Stalina, who is seen as a peacekeeping hero, with her grandfather, General Carlos Maximiliano "Mad Max" Castro-Stalina. He has been retired for more than twenty-five years and most Fatatatutians, including himself, would agree that he is quite insane. We're not sure why one insane citizen makes our nation worthy of hatred. Don't you have any insanity in your nation?Laosians are a bit gun happy, and they view anything using less then a Rifle as insane.
And we view the use of rifles against animals as cowardly but we don't hate you for your cowardice.While Laosians are fine with homosexuality, they don't believe that homosexuality deserves any special treatment, just like they wouldn't name a Battalion 'The 420th Transexual Armored'. It has no honor to its name.
And we don't give homosexuality any special treatment. After all, we have about a thousand regiments that are not named after homosexuals and only one that is. We also have a Teamsters Regiment and a Hotdog Vendors Regiment. Does that mean we give special treatment to those segments of society? No. It means that we show respect for any and all segments of society.
So you've made my point. We are sometimes hated for the silliest of silly reasons and we are often misunderstood.
by New Huxlian Orwell » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:59 pm
by Techno-Soviet » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:59 pm
GarriCorp wrote:Free market capitalist nations with conservative social policies and strong militaries would be the best and socially liberal, economically communist, totalitarian dictatorships with strong militaries would be the worst.
by The Tavan Race » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:01 am
GarriCorp wrote:Free market capitalist nations with conservative social policies and strong militaries would be the best and socially liberal, economically communist, totalitarian dictatorships with strong militaries would be the worst.
by The Sapian Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:07 am
by GarriCorp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:08 am
Techno-Soviet wrote:GarriCorp wrote:Free market capitalist nations with conservative social policies and strong militaries would be the best and socially liberal, economically communist, totalitarian dictatorships with strong militaries would be the worst.
What about free market capitalist nations with strong militaries, which are also socially liberal and dictatorships (yet not totalitarian dictatorships)?
by The Adrian Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:36 am
GarriCorp wrote:Techno-Soviet wrote:GarriCorp wrote:Free market capitalist nations with conservative social policies and strong militaries would be the best and socially liberal, economically communist, totalitarian dictatorships with strong militaries would be the worst.
What about free market capitalist nations with strong militaries, which are also socially liberal and dictatorships (yet not totalitarian dictatorships)?
It would more on the bad side. I was just showing two ends of the political spectrum, one that I view most positively and the other being the one I view least positively.
Faith Hope Charity wrote:I would just like to take this time to say... The Adrian Empire is awesome.
by Laos Refugees » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:19 am
Yes, and hopefully the people of Laosia will grow to better understand other cultures, instead of being more focused on their own.Fatatatutti wrote:Laos Refugees wrote:The second, is that The Grand Leader Muyang Kai, and the rest of Laosia, view Fatatatutti's 'heroic' General to be quite insane, in a very dangerous way. They fear that any nation that trusts a man that would fly upside down blindfolded for the fun of it to be dangerous.
It's hard to tell what you're talking about but you seem to be confusing General Marie-Louise Castro-Stalina, who is seen as a peacekeeping hero, with her grandfather, General Carlos Maximiliano "Mad Max" Castro-Stalina. He has been retired for more than twenty-five years and most Fatatatutians, including himself, would agree that he is quite insane. We're not sure why one insane citizen makes our nation worthy of hatred. Don't you have any insanity in your nation?Laosians are a bit gun happy, and they view anything using less then a Rifle as insane.
And we view the use of rifles against animals as cowardly but we don't hate you for your cowardice.While Laosians are fine with homosexuality, they don't believe that homosexuality deserves any special treatment, just like they wouldn't name a Battalion 'The 420th Transexual Armored'. It has no honor to its name.
And we don't give homosexuality any special treatment. After all, we have about a thousand regiments that are not named after homosexuals and only one that is. We also have a Teamsters Regiment and a Hotdog Vendors Regiment. Does that mean we give special treatment to those segments of society? No. It means that we show respect for any and all segments of society.
So you've made my point. We are sometimes hated for the silliest of silly reasons and we are often misunderstood.
by Hegstoria » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:30 am
by Hegstoria » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:31 am
The Tavan Race wrote:GarriCorp wrote:Free market capitalist nations with conservative social policies and strong militaries would be the best and socially liberal, economically communist, totalitarian dictatorships with strong militaries would be the worst.
Socially liberal and totalitarian? How can these coexist? My mind is blown.
by Birnadia » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:33 am
Greater Rhodes wrote:In no particular order:
'Best' Nations
Ostronopolis
Maraque
Zeppy
Birnadia
Charlotte Ryberg
Reijistania
'Worst' Nations
Grand World Order
Kalasparata
Scandinvans
Station 12
Sorry if I left anyone out, I will probably think of more as I go.
by Voltronica » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:33 am
by Saurisia » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:42 pm
New Huxlian Orwell wrote:I wonder if NHO is in this thread anywhere...
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:Stealing a copy of The Land Before Time.
Coccygia wrote:The only good mammal is a dead mammal.
Pythria wrote:Fascist dictatorship run by dinosaurs. I like it
Tartonica wrote:2/10 because dinosaurs do NOT rule nations (Except for Saurisia)
The Tavan Race wrote:Yeah, your nation scares me
Wolohanistan wrote:Saurisia - Dinosaur Dictatorship is the best dictatorship, not that we support that sort of thing.
Conoga wrote:Dinosaurs-in-Bikinis-Boy
Lancov wrote:Condemn, because we now have to go soak our brains in bleach.
The Floor Kippers wrote:We Have Dinosaurs.....Argument Rendered Invalid
Grossrheinland Reich wrote:DINOSAUR FETISHIST
Tetraca wrote:Also: yay, Saurisia's here! This thread just became more awesome :D
by Mediterreania » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:59 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Krsta wrote:Fatatatutti wrote:Anemos Major wrote:Grays Harbor; ya hate him, or ya love him. Huh.
That's why we base our Good/Bad list objectively on behaviour instead of subjectively on like/dislike. Gray's Harbor might very well be on our "Bad" list - we really don't know - but that doesn't mean we dislike the nation. In fact, we have a lot of admiration for the nation and we get along just fine with them.
We also have a certain amount of respect for GWO, New Nicksyllvania, etc. even though they're definitely on our Bad list.
Fatatatutti is on a lot of Good lists because we're a genuinely wonderful nation but we're also on a few bad lists because people hold petty grudges against us.
We dislike Grays Harbor and really can't admire a nation which considers freedom of speech barbaric, an apartheid and discriminatory nation, in which certain political ideologies are banned and which is ruled by an oppressive and authoritarian, imperialist tyrant. Fanatically capitalist nation.
Total of 0,4% of our population admire Grays Harbor.
A famous book "Harberian democracy" is often considered one of the best analyses of the GH's policies - an objective view on such a kind of nation.
We love how you just make shit up to suit yourself. It is amusing.
by GarriCorp » Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:10 pm
Mediterreania wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:Krsta wrote:Fatatatutti wrote:Anemos Major wrote:Grays Harbor; ya hate him, or ya love him. Huh.
That's why we base our Good/Bad list objectively on behaviour instead of subjectively on like/dislike. Gray's Harbor might very well be on our "Bad" list - we really don't know - but that doesn't mean we dislike the nation. In fact, we have a lot of admiration for the nation and we get along just fine with them.
We also have a certain amount of respect for GWO, New Nicksyllvania, etc. even though they're definitely on our Bad list.
Fatatatutti is on a lot of Good lists because we're a genuinely wonderful nation but we're also on a few bad lists because people hold petty grudges against us.
We dislike Grays Harbor and really can't admire a nation which considers freedom of speech barbaric, an apartheid and discriminatory nation, in which certain political ideologies are banned and which is ruled by an oppressive and authoritarian, imperialist tyrant. Fanatically capitalist nation.
Total of 0,4% of our population admire Grays Harbor.
A famous book "Harberian democracy" is often considered one of the best analyses of the GH's policies - an objective view on such a kind of nation.
We love how you just make shit up to suit yourself. It is amusing.
Our World Assembly ambassador has had some...disputes with Grays Harbor, but nothing to warrant those accusations.
by The Remote Islands » Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:36 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Usually when I do a hit of acid or coke, I avoid NS. But you didn't. Shows a lot of balls. I like that.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: BLACKGRUE, British Georgia
Advertisement