Advertisement
by Tyr-risuur » Thu May 20, 2010 9:15 pm
Economic Left: -7.62 | Social Libertarian: -5.74 |
Moral Order: -1.5 | Moral Rules: 6.5 |
Foreign Policy: -0.86 | Culture: -6.11 |
by Hurtful Thoughts » Thu May 20, 2010 11:33 pm
New Garzah wrote:Our other policy of "We will win because we will. There is no argument, for we have already won."
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by Techno-Soviet » Fri May 21, 2010 1:23 am
by Strathy » Fri May 21, 2010 1:31 am
by Dagnia » Fri May 21, 2010 1:46 am
by Seculartopia » Fri May 21, 2010 4:59 am
Rhodmire wrote:4/5 for being bold enough to put up what looks like something made from MS Paint.
That takes balls, and you've got them.
All was dark when the armies surrounded the town. There was little bloodshed as they swept in, and they quickly took control. "Success," said a communicator, "a base has been established."
OOC:There. Now, we'll wait for UK to catch up.
by Hurtful Thoughts » Fri May 21, 2010 3:41 pm
Techno-Soviet wrote:
Sounds like that New Garzah fellow is awfully cocky. Allow me to add a couple more quotes to that list:
"Before doing battle, in the temple one calculates and will win, because many calculations were made; before doing battle, in the temple one calculates and will not win, because few calculations were made (...)" - Sun Tzu
"One who does not know the enemy and does not know himself will be in danger in every battle." - Sun Tzu
In fact, those quotes could apply to almost everyone in this thread.
"There is much evidence to show that officers who have received the best peacetime training available find themselves surprised and confused by the difference between conditions as pictured in map problems and those they encounter in campaign. This is largely because our peacetime training in tactics tends to become increasingly theoretical. In our schools we generally assume that organizations are well-trained and at full strength, that subordinates are competent, that supply arrangements function, that communications work, that orders are carried out. In war many or all of these conditions may be absent. The veteran knows that this is normal and his mental processes are not paralyzed by it. He knows that he must carry on in spite of seemingly insurmountable difficulties and regardless of the fact that the tools with which he has to work may be imperfect and worn. Moreover, he knows how to go about it."
----
The art of war has no traffic with rules, for the infinitely varied circumstances and conditions of combat never produce exactly the same situation twice. Mission, terrain, weather, dispositions, armament, morale, supply, and comparative strength are variables whose mutations always combine to form anew tactical pattern. Thus, in battle, each situation is unique and must be solved on its own merits.
It follows, then, that the leader who would become a competent tactician must first close his mind to the alluring formulae that well-meaning people offer in the name of victory. To master his difficult art he must learn to cut to the heart of a situation, recognize its decisive elements and base his course of action on these. The ability to do this is not God-given, nor can it be acquired overnight; it is a process of years. He must realize that training in solving problems of all types, long practice in making clear, unequivocal decisions, the habit of concentrating on the question at hand, and an elasticity of mind, are indispensable requisites for the successful practice of the art of war.
The leader who frantically strives to remember what someone else did in some slightly similar situation has already set his feet on a well-traveled road to ruin."
-George C. Marshall
May 1st, 1934
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by St Star » Fri May 21, 2010 5:28 pm
by Old Beringia » Fri May 21, 2010 5:30 pm
Ceasa wrote:being totally badass
Orlkjestad wrote:Badassery, weapons, weapons, manliness, and weapons.
by Joyous Zeltros » Fri May 21, 2010 6:46 pm
by - Marwin » Fri May 21, 2010 6:51 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Joyous Zeltros wrote:The Zeltros Defense Force is known for not leaving Zeltros, for being only volunteers, and for incredibly garish body armour in so many different colours that it can't really be called a uniform.
It is said that the only time a Nicksyllvanian soldier ever cries is when he witness's a Zeltros military parade and their outrageously terrible sense of style.
by - Marwin » Fri May 21, 2010 6:55 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:I sense mustache envy
New Nicksyllvania wrote:It's only a saying, it's blatently obvious a Nicksyllvanian man never cries, even at his parents funeral.
by Jbeil » Fri May 21, 2010 7:09 pm
by The Banshee species » Fri May 21, 2010 7:36 pm
by The shee species » Fri May 21, 2010 7:39 pm
The Banshee species wrote:Useing wepoens that look like they were stolen from the Warhammer 40K game. And work like it.
by North Amerikan States » Fri May 21, 2010 8:44 pm
by Letat » Fri May 21, 2010 8:55 pm
by West Estainia » Fri May 21, 2010 9:35 pm
Blue zone 1 wrote:Retaining Battleships
by Old Beringia » Fri May 21, 2010 9:38 pm
by Joyous Zeltros » Fri May 21, 2010 9:48 pm
- Marwin wrote:
Zeltros military what now? They do not strike me as the parading type. Maybe the orgy-in-public type, but not the parading type.
And anything is superior to those damn mustaches of yours.
by Grays Harbor » Fri May 21, 2010 10:48 pm
Joyous Zeltros wrote:- Marwin wrote:
Zeltros military what now? They do not strike me as the parading type. Maybe the orgy-in-public type, but not the parading type.
And anything is superior to those damn mustaches of yours.
Well spotted. We're not so good at that whole 'parade' thing.
And these are a sample of the not-uniforms we mean; every member gets to customise theirs so you can have countless combinations all gathered together.
by Joyous Zeltros » Fri May 21, 2010 10:56 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Joyous Zeltros wrote:- Marwin wrote:
Zeltros military what now? They do not strike me as the parading type. Maybe the orgy-in-public type, but not the parading type.
And anything is superior to those damn mustaches of yours.
Well spotted. We're not so good at that whole 'parade' thing.
And these are a sample of the not-uniforms we mean; every member gets to customise theirs so you can have countless combinations all gathered together.
Do they glow in the dark too? That should save bundles of cash on torch batteries.
by Imeriata » Fri May 21, 2010 11:35 pm
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Niwe England
Advertisement