Advertisement
by Gallia- » Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:44 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:43 am
by Champagne Socialist Sharifistan » Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:12 am
by New Visayan Islands » Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:26 am
Champagne Socialist Sharifistan wrote:Could someone lose a security clearance because their brother is an insurgent? Why or why not?
by Champagne Socialist Sharifistan » Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:06 am
New Visayan Islands wrote:Champagne Socialist Sharifistan wrote:Could someone lose a security clearance because their brother is an insurgent? Why or why not?
It depends on how the institution handles background checks and such. A thorough background check would spot suspicious aspects of a person being considered for a security clearance. In this case, having an insurgent for a brother militates against a security clearance, especially if that person was particularly close to said brother.
by Crookfur » Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:48 am
Champagne Socialist Sharifistan wrote:Could someone lose a security clearance because their brother is an insurgent? Why or why not?
by The Corparation » Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:12 pm
Champagne Socialist Sharifistan wrote:Could someone lose a security clearance because their brother is an insurgent? Why or why not?
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by The Akasha Colony » Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:43 pm
Hrstrovokia wrote:Is the MiG-31 still a viable concept today?
Most countries have gone towards multi-role aircraft. Would a nation be better off going for a Su-27 or F-16 variant than something as costly and without the same branching path towards multiple capabilities as the MiG-31?
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:59 pm
by Austrasien » Fri Feb 05, 2021 4:48 pm
Miku the Based wrote:Mig-31 is a interceptor and is made to intercept fast flying aircraft. It's not made to be a cost effective multirole fighter and you can't really compaire the two roles. Can a SU-37 catch a sr-71 or a X-43, 51, 53.
I thought the consensus here is that SAMs do not make a air defence and is entirely obsolete over a "competent air force" so that the only option to catch these aircraft is a interceptor?
by Spirit of Hope » Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:57 pm
Miku the Based wrote:Mig-31 is a interceptor and is made to intercept fast flying aircraft. It's not made to be a cost effective multirole fighter and you can't really compaire the two roles. Can a SU-37 catch a sr-71 or a X-43, 51, 53.
I thought the consensus here is that SAMs do not make a air defence and is entirely obsolete over a "competent air force" so that the only option to catch these aircraft is a interceptor?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
by Spirit of Hope » Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:53 pm
Miku the Based wrote:SAMs didn't stop the SR71 from doing its job in Libya.
And phasing out the MIG 31 won't make the threat of mach 3+ bombers disappear. I don't see how the existance of ICBM's negates this.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:06 pm
by Triplebaconation » Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:17 pm
by Spirit of Hope » Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:27 pm
Miku the Based wrote:I believe in Murphy's law. As soon as these get phased out suddenly these high speed bombers start flying through ones airspace with relative impunity, no one is going to let each other know who is developing what when.
The thing with icbms is the flights are predictable and you basically just need a large SAM (anti-ballistic missile) to take it down.
The SR 71 just slowed down it's speed and manuvered to dodge the missile.
I also heard of new types of ICBM's that work to go low altitude and operate like a high speed UAV before hitting its target which would necessitate a interceptor similar to the MIG 31.
Triplebaconation wrote:is everybody wrong again
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:50 pm
I estimated that we could beat the rocket-powered missiles to the turn
by Spirit of Hope » Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:56 pm
Miku the Based wrote:If the mig 31 gets phased out another high speed interceptor has to take its place to counter the threats I've mentioned above. There is no use to get complacent and there are consequences for doing so.
When the Anglos found out the Argentines brought anti-ship missiles from the French it was too late. But fine let's just throw away everything we don't need at the moment and just wait to see if it bites us in the behind like the idiots we are. Worst to have it and not need it then to not have it and need it.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Triplebaconation » Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:30 pm
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:04 pm
by Triplebaconation » Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:46 pm
Miku the Based wrote: it does not actually do long patrols
by Gallia- » Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:53 pm
by Miku the Based » Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:16 pm
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:23 pm
by Radictistan » Sat Feb 06, 2021 12:43 am
Miku the Based wrote:can a f22 attack 4 targets simultaneously? Or at least more than one?
The only ones I could pick out is the f-14, mig-31 and Rafael. This is due to the on board radar system right?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Holy Acarn, Notricia, Shearoa
Advertisement