In light of the unjustified violence taking place in Lebanon, and the failure of all international parties to rapidly achieve a ceasefire in this afflicted country, including the UN Security Council and major countries such as France and Britain, one stands to raise questions about the ability of developing countries to make their policies Foreign affairs independently of the positions of the only international pole that dominates international political decision-making in today's world. Is there really an independent foreign policy for developing countries? If there is such a foreign policy in theory, can it be achieved or implemented at the local level? What are the mechanisms and means available to developing countries to implement their foreign policy? From a purely theoretical standpoint, it can be said that the adoption of foreign policy-making in the developing world can be traced back to one of three main approaches: First, it can be applied to the developing countries that appeared on the international stage in the aftermath of the Second World War, the traditional approach that was applied to the existing countries before that period, i.e. the countries that are classified as modern or advanced, although the commonly accepted arguments and propositions in this regard are related. Closely related to the existing culture in every country, whether it is developing or advanced. Secondly, a special framework of reference can be employed that focuses in particular on the behavior of developing countries that have experience and a limited weight that is significant in terms of international politics, bearing in mind that it relates to the presence of small industrial sectors in this type of country. And third: To effectively combine the two approaches mentioned first and second, and to pair them by treating different types of countries within the same category of categories, but within the framework of a broader umbrella than that used by the behavioral school in the United States for foreign policy analysis. What I tend to use personally is to do an analysis of the foreign policies of developing countries within this third framework, which provides foreign policy students with the most mature and useful approaches. The multiplicity of problems and foreign policy-making methods countries face rarely seem to be used as a justification for defining the type of separation that will divide developing countries and place them in distinct forms. On the other hand, it also seems illogical to try to apply narrow-minded Western paradigms to multiple radical cultures. Accordingly, the least requirements that an open researcher needs, no matter how little his experiences in the field of studying the foreign policy of developing countries, is to clarify the issues of pre-theories in a more comprehensive manner, sufficient to be broad enough in a way that distracts the suspect from classifying the researcher as belonging to A country classified as liberal liberal or narrow ideology, such as being left or theological, advanced or developing, open to the world or closed living in isolation from the rest of the international community. Certainly, the analysis that can be done will focus initially on a direct categorization of all variables that may influence the decisions of foreign policy, according to what we know about or look at, with respect to the internal and external environment present at the moment of the analysis to be conducted. Of course, the most present ambition is related to the ability to speak confidently about any of the elements in the two environments, which will be the most influential and influential, and why. Although the questions related to why are the most important of all except them, they may not be answered without we have a precise and specific knowledge of the political phenomena that need to be explained. Therefore, if the curricula used do not help us in identifying important and answerable questions from others, then these approaches become futile and useless. Abstract classifications themselves are not of real benefit unless they are combined with their applicability and use in practice. In light of what is happening in today's world with regard to the Lebanese problem, the application of any of the three approaches mentioned, including the behavioral school theses in the United States, seems inappropriate for studying foreign policy-making in the developing world. Therefore, it is imperative that there be a continuous search by foreign policy scholars in the developing world, for modern approaches, methods and means to study the foreign policy form of their countries.
[img][/img]
