i'd say multi role. due to my military's obsession with tactical bombing.
Advertisement

by St George of England » Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:52 pm

by Estainia » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:28 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:33 am

by Estainia » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:34 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Develop your own. Real world stuff really doesn't exist here. Northrop never existed in NS.

by Satirius » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:48 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Develop your own. Real world stuff really doesn't exist here. Northrop never existed in NS.

by Soviet Haaregrad » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:32 am
Estainia wrote:Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Develop your own. Real world stuff really doesn't exist here. Northrop never existed in NS.
RL stuff doesn't exist here? -Looks at the LEGIONS of F-15's in the Imperial Airforce. Looks at the LEGIONS of M1A2 Abrams in the Imperial Armored Divisions.- Rly now? It's a well known fact that any thing that exists in reality can be domestically produced by anyone regardless of economic ability.

by Crimson PieRats » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:48 am




by Sucrati » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:44 am

George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

by Alternate Germany » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:17 am

by Imeriata » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:20 am
Alternate Germany wrote:The Fokker D.VII is the primary fighter of the Luftstreitkräfte.
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!

by Licana » Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:50 am
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Saurisia » Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:55 am
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:Stealing a copy of The Land Before Time.
Coccygia wrote:The only good mammal is a dead mammal.
Pythria wrote:Fascist dictatorship run by dinosaurs. I like it
Tartonica wrote:2/10 because dinosaurs do NOT rule nations (Except for Saurisia)
The Tavan Race wrote:Yeah, your nation scares me
Wolohanistan wrote:Saurisia - Dinosaur Dictatorship is the best dictatorship, not that we support that sort of thing.
Conoga wrote:Dinosaurs-in-Bikinis-Boy
Lancov wrote:Condemn, because we now have to go soak our brains in bleach.
The Floor Kippers wrote:We Have Dinosaurs.....Argument Rendered Invalid
Grossrheinland Reich wrote:DINOSAUR FETISHIST
Tetraca wrote:Also: yay, Saurisia's here! This thread just became more awesome :D

by West Podunk » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:05 pm

by Greater Rhodes » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:38 pm

by The Sentenial Empire » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:18 pm

by The Sentenial Empire » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:20 pm
West Podunk wrote:Officially, West Podunk does not have an air force.
snip

by Licana » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:24 pm
The Sentenial Empire wrote:The Canadian Pacific wrote:You mean the helicopters that get chewed up by MANPADs?
We disable most anti air positions before moving in...Off shore and high altitude cruise missile bombardment is generally pretty efficient. If all else fails insertion will be on foot, vehicle, and artillery untill it becomes irrelevant for the enemy to hold their AA positions.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Licana » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:29 pm
Altamirus wrote:The Sentenial Empire wrote:
A moderately populated island with no airforce? Man if took out all of your shipments you'd be done without any fighting.
Yeah the biggest prioty of a island usually should be in building up a good airforce and navy unless you have a good bit of geological features protecting you.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Arkinesia » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

by Licana » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:50 pm
Arkinesia wrote:St George of England wrote:i'd say multi role. due to my military's obsession with tactical bombing.
Well you could have an additional carrier-based fighter and have something based on the F-14D, excellent fighter due to its high speed, great maneuverability, very low cost, and wide selection of weapons. The Supercat was a very capable anti-air and anti-ground platform.
If you're looking into an airbase, ground-launched aircraft, F-16E/F (Block 60) is your best shot. It's like a Lightning II for land. Except better because the USAF Lightning II can't carry a B61 tactical nuke.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

by Sucrati » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:51 pm
Licana wrote:Arkinesia wrote:
Well you could have an additional carrier-based fighter and have something based on the F-14D, excellent fighter due to its high speed, great maneuverability, very low cost, and wide selection of weapons. The Supercat was a very capable anti-air and anti-ground platform.
If you're looking into an airbase, ground-launched aircraft, F-16E/F (Block 60) is your best shot. It's like a Lightning II for land. Except better because the USAF Lightning II can't carry a B61 tactical nuke.
I agree with everything, however the B61 is hardly a viable wartime weapon, and was, for my understanding, made for the lulz.
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

by Crimson PieRats » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:17 pm


by Arkinesia » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:23 pm
Licana wrote:Arkinesia wrote:
Well you could have an additional carrier-based fighter and have something based on the F-14D, excellent fighter due to its high speed, great maneuverability, very low cost, and wide selection of weapons. The Supercat was a very capable anti-air and anti-ground platform.
If you're looking into an airbase, ground-launched aircraft, F-16E/F (Block 60) is your best shot. It's like a Lightning II for land. Except better because the USAF Lightning II can't carry a B61 tactical nuke.
I agree with everything, however the B61 is hardly a viable wartime weapon, and was, for my understanding, made for the lulz.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Frestatia, Juansonia, New Texas Republic, Safiloa, Seten, Sovereign Island of Pimland
Advertisement