I know, and the Tsar wasn't a very practical weapon either.
Advertisement
by The Corparation » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:30 pm
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Licana » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:34 pm
by The Corparation » Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:45 pm
Licana wrote:The Corparation wrote:Tsar wasn't so much a weapon as a "Look at us we have a bigger bomb than you" weapon. They only built one.
Indeed, and so was the B61 to an extent. While the Russian's were doing the "bigger bomb" thing, we were putting tac-nukes on the tiniest planes possible. In a sense, they were both made for the lulz and braggin' rights.
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Germonica » Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:41 pm
by Arkinesia » Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:52 am
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by The Corparation » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:29 am
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Narexia » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:53 pm
by Satirius » Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:45 pm
by Grays Harbor » Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Narexia wrote:
by Narexia » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:04 pm
by Solarva » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:21 pm
Narexia wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:
With that many different fighter aircraft, we would certainly truly hate to be assigned to your logistics, maintenance and procurement departments. Talk about constant nightmares and massive migraines.
Well we have a huge Air Force and those 15 are only fighter planes as indicated by the criteria.
Also I wasn't able to include the Sukhoi Su-17N3, Su-24MN, Su-25TMN, Su-39N, Ilyushin IL-76, IL-78, Antonov An-22, An-24, An-26, An-30, An-70, An-74, An-124, An-225 and of course all the heli's!!!!! The only real problem for us is maintenance because of the volume of spare parts needed since we require each combat pilot to fly at least 20 hours a week! Also, they did not include aircraft being phased out of service MiG-15, MiG-17, MiG-19, Su-11, Su-9, Su-7, Yak-141, An-12 and the An-8.
by Strykla » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:35 pm
Solarva wrote:Narexia wrote:Well we have a huge Air Force and those 15 are only fighter planes as indicated by the criteria.
Also I wasn't able to include the Sukhoi Su-17N3, Su-24MN, Su-25TMN, Su-39N, Ilyushin IL-76, IL-78, Antonov An-22, An-24, An-26, An-30, An-70, An-74, An-124, An-225 and of course all the heli's!!!!! The only real problem for us is maintenance because of the volume of spare parts needed since we require each combat pilot to fly at least 20 hours a week! Also, they did not include aircraft being phased out of service MiG-15, MiG-17, MiG-19, Su-11, Su-9, Su-7, Yak-141, An-12 and the An-8.
=p Yes, it's only 15. Start standardizing and upgrading your air force rather than getting another new plane. Not a bad idea to have so many different planes for testing and experimenting though. I agree with greys, maintenance would be hell.
by Narexia » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:01 pm
Strykla wrote:Solarva wrote:
=p Yes, it's only 15. Start standardizing and upgrading your air force rather than getting another new plane. Not a bad idea to have so many different planes for testing and experimenting though. I agree with greys, maintenance would be hell.
Not to mention shit-your-pants expensive. All those for one little country? Not in hell.
by Strykla » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:08 pm
by Narexia » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:30 pm
Strykla wrote:Narexia wrote:Shit your pants expensive? Ha! hardly. We have our resources to deal with the $ amounts. No biggie! no worries.
After looking on your NSEconomy page, I see your budget is $25,337,804,133. The cost of 3,725 Su-30's is $126,650,000,000, or around 126 billion, whereas your budget is 25 billion. And that's only counting for your Su-30's, so I didn't count all the other mentioned aircraft.
Might wanna rethink your strategy.
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconomy.php?nation=Narexia
by Strykla » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:34 pm
Narexia wrote:Strykla wrote:After looking on your NSEconomy page, I see your budget is $25,337,804,133. The cost of 3,725 Su-30's is $126,650,000,000, or around 126 billion, whereas your budget is 25 billion. And that's only counting for your Su-30's, so I didn't count all the other mentioned aircraft.
Might wanna rethink your strategy.
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconomy.php?nation=Narexia
Not when you made domestically, no worries!
by Satirius » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:41 pm
Satirius wrote:The main fighter and infantry fighting vehicle is the M113-A "AeroGavin"
It can effectively deploy troops, engage enemy armor, complete stealthy infiltrations, and engage enemy fighters with its AIM-9X missiles
It is not, however, supersonic.
by The Corparation » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:52 pm
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Minnysota » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:54 pm
Satirius wrote:calculators are useless and too often a club to beat some aspirant RPer over the head with by c&p'ing various numbers, get this thread back on topic guysSatirius wrote:The main fighter and infantry fighting vehicle is the M113-A "AeroGavin"
It can effectively deploy troops, engage enemy armor, complete stealthy infiltrations, and engage enemy fighters with its AIM-9X missiles
It is not, however, supersonic.
by The Corparation » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:57 pm
Satirius wrote:calculators are useless and too often a club to beat some aspirant RPer over the head with by c&p'ing various numbers, get this thread back on topic guysSatirius wrote:The main fighter and infantry fighting vehicle is the M113-A "AeroGavin"
It can effectively deploy troops, engage enemy armor, complete stealthy infiltrations, and engage enemy fighters with its AIM-9X missiles
It is not, however, supersonic.
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Licana » Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:59 pm
The Corparation wrote:Your tiny country has more than twice the manned aircraft then the USAF, the largest and most powerful AF on the planet. And your country is a fraction of the size. Also USAF only operates 48 kinds of aircraft. Of these about 25% of these are variations of the C-130. Most of the types have less then 10 planes. The only aircraft that the USAF has anywhere near the amounts you have for your aircraft are the F-15, F-16, C-130, C-17, T-1, T-6, T-38, KC-135s, F-22s, and A-10s. These are the only 10 planes that the USAF has more then a hundred of.
The engines would have to be immense to get it to mach 4 or higher, and would likely compromise the RCS, and even if it didn't, it would look like a second sun on IR.by Licana » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:11 pm
Altamirus wrote:
Yeah, how the wholy hell can his aircraft fly over mach 2.5? IT seems like a wank to me.
by The Blue Helmets » Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:37 pm
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Frestatia, Juansonia, Safiloa, Sovereign Island of Pimland
