Advertisement
by Thermodolia » Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:37 pm
by Plaetopia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 3:18 am
Estado Novo Portugues wrote:OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? Does getting rid of heretics, witches and communists count?
Radiatia wrote:SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? I'm not entirely sure I understand this question, but based on what I think it's asking - yes. National representatives can develop, amend, cancel and alter the policies of the national government.
Thermodolia wrote:-snip-
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Thermodolia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:11 am
Plaetopia wrote:Updated. All nations have been scored.Estado Novo Portugues wrote:OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? Does getting rid of heretics, witches and communists count?
No, it's a question about genocide. Otherwise, every single dictatorship would score -1 here.Radiatia wrote:SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? I'm not entirely sure I understand this question, but based on what I think it's asking - yes. National representatives can develop, amend, cancel and alter the policies of the national government.
Though it seems that you do understand what the question is asking, here is some clarification: can freely elected representatives develop and implement new policies? Or is new policy never implemented in practice or always stalled in parliament because of severe and constant political deadlock, civil conflict, or similar? This question aims to assess whether the nation is democratically ruled in practice and whether the government can maintain the rule of law over all the territory (i.e. no territory controlled by organized crime or armed non-state groups). Thus, in case national representatives are not freely elected, the score is automatically 0.Thermodolia wrote:-snip-
Questions grouped together are scored together. Please, do not separate them, as it makes the process harder.
by Silver Commonwealth » Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:50 am
Data from Ministry of Foreign and Internal AffairsDemocracy and Freedom Index
ELECTIONS
How was the head of state (or other chief national authority) selected? What powers does the office exercise? ''SC is a totalitarian, decentralized world government (Something like HRE, but on steroids), where President Governor of the Commonwealth gets elected in Party's elections, where the members of the Party across the world come together in UCN HQ in New York, and elect the President (General of Mankind as well). Of course, only Party's members participate in the elections, and common citizens don't have much say there, although they still need to be appeased by populist policies. While President of the Commonwealth is supposed to be an uniting figure, which would make other regions loyal, in reality, central government controls only a small part of land, and the rest of the lands are ruled by various warlords, and regional-governors, creating a complex web of political alliances, and plots. As long as warlords hunt down monarchists, and pay tributes to the capital region, they are free to rule with iron fist in whatever way they want in their own region, or ''fiefdom'', as some warlords boast. Current President - Supercomputer Tom, has added title ''Eternal President'' to himself, as due of fact, that he is a supercomputer, he can theoretically be repaired for as long as necessary.''
How was the head of government selected? What powers does the office exercise? ''Head of Government is selected similarly to the Head of State- with vote between the members of The Party, and the simple principle, that the candidate reaches over 50% of the vote, or in cases when it is not possible - anyone, who has the biggest amount of votes by percentage. However, similarly to Head of State's elections, those elections take place only after the previous Head of Government dies, resigns, gets impeached, or gets taken out in other way from the government. In regions with bigger authority of the Head of State, Head of Government has somewhat equal amount of power, and is considered as a secretary and assistant of some sort for the President-Governor. However, in regions where the power is more split across the party, Head of Government often is the one, who actually takes decisions, but while they are not a bit more than a puppet, if compared to Head of State (Region), there are some things which they still can't do, like declaring a war (Requires a vote between the members of Council of Militarists), or signing science budget on their own (Requires a vote between the members of Council of Scientists). Overall, the electing process and role of the Head of Government is similar across the regions.''
How is the national legislature selected? ''The politicians, and other members of party can be both appointed by a President-Governor (or some other important person), or be elected in their position by the rest of The Party. Of course, common citizens, who aren't members of one of the Party's branches, don't have much say on the appointment of legislature. Each region can freely choose a delegate (Or delegates) to the UCN meetings in New York. Similar system is used in the ''Worker's Syndicates'' in various SC's state companies, and regions, where dominant ideology is national syndicalism - while it theoretically is supposed to serve the workers, in reality, the company's committee, and state's CEO themselves decide, what's the best for the company, along with who is getting appointed, and who on the other hand - demoted. Worker councils, similarly to state labor unions, are there only to serve state's needs.''
Are elections considered free and fair? Are irregularities serious enough that they alter the results significantly? ''No, of course. First, those, who aren't the members of Party, can't even vote in those elections, as The Party doesn't consider the President-Governor elections as ''the matter of the Proles'', as sometimes outright scornfully the Party calls common citizens. This is also the reason, why many people try to enlist in Party, as it also gives a small change to affect something, and all Party's members have a vote - even those, who more often work as janitors, than with administrative work. However, most of those people end up on the lower echelon of the party, or end up doing the dirty work of the Party. Second, while there is a principle of ''one vote for one person'', and in order for President-Governor candidate to be elected, they must pass a 50% threshold, vote rigging, and smear campaigns are nothing unusual, as various fractions within The Party want to get their candidate to win - like the reformist, and conservative wing, along with Old Guard, and ''socialist'' wing. Also, there have been reported cases of intimidation used against Party's members, in order to pressure them to vote for the candidate.
Does the opposition have a realistic chance of gaining support and power through elections? ''No. That doesn't mean, that there aren't much parties, or fractions, however - the UCN Headquarters, or even a single Commonwealth's parliament have lots of seats, mostly for representatives of the ethnic and cultural groups from autonomy regions, or administrative regions. While fractions within the parties usually differ across the regions, the main ones are the old guard, which are more keen on keeping things as they are, and change slowly, if at all, and reformists, which are generally in favor of more progress. Despite all that, reformists and Party's liberal wings for the most part want to change things in system's framework, and keep it, so they still count as being members of government, along with minor ethnic parties. All genuine opposition parties are banned, and groups like libertarians, monarchists, democrats, and anarcho-communists usually have no chance to be elected, as their very presence and beliefs would earn death. For this reason, most of the opposition has resorted to partisan warfare, and have abandoned all hopes of reformism, as it is generally associated with the loathed SC's government. Massacres of officials and their families, bombing up bridges with IEDs, night raids, and propaganda leaflets in rural regions - all of them are pretty common tactics for opposition's partisans. However, even those who claim to fight for democracy often actually support a some sort of hybrid regime or ''benevolent despotism'', as most of them haven't seen actual democracy for decades, and only know about it from black market history books and other files.''
Is voting voluntary? If so, which was the average turnout in recent elections? ''Near 100%, as voting for party's members in Party's elections is compulsory, and trying to avoid it usually will result in fines for Party's members. That said, on a Commonwealth's scale as a whole, the last election was in 2020, when Blake Carter - the leader of reformist wing, and third president of SC, died. Since then, Supercomputer Tom has officially been in charge. Being a President-Governor in other regions is a lifeterm service as well, although a President-Governor can be changed in other ways as well - in case, if they die, resign on their own, or get thrown out of the office, Party's members can elect a new President-Governor from their own ranks. In a collection of totalitarian regimes what SC is, President-Governor doesn't actually have as much power as one might expect - in some cases, they still have quite a lot powers, but in some cases, they are actually puppets of the ruling local Party branches, which run the show collectively - SC is an oligarchy for a reason.''
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? ''To answer the first question - yes, they definitely can develop, and implement new policies, although in some cases, the regional legislature as a whole has more power than a single representative. (For example, in Don-Kuban Union (A cossack region), Veche - the national assembly of the Union, implements most of policies in a vote between its members, including the Red Hetman - leader of the region. Red Hetman can propose new policies, and even implement them, but usually it is the bureaucratic oligarchy, which implements them). That said, none of them are freely elected, as they are either appointed by The Party, or elected in their position by The Party. And, no, government's authority directly only extends for a specifically designed region, called ''Eastern Colombia'' - the rest of territories are ruled by various vassals, and puppet governors, with pretty high autonomy - they can raise their own armies, and in some cases, even enact their own laws. (There are still some laws, that are universal across all of SC, though) Various regions also differ ideologically - some are more socialistic, while others - more leaning towards corporatism. SC employs something similar to Qing tributary system.''
Do foreign powers (democratic or not), or unelected entities (the military, religious or economic oligarchies...) exercise undue influence over the government? ''Foreign powers don't exercise influence over the Silver Commonwealth's government, and territories as a whole. However, the thing is, that there are no foreign powers on SC's Earth in the first place, as all of its territory is nominally under a single banner, and it hasn't found any space empires yet. In SC's case, it is more appropriate to look at the Commonwealth's and Regions - Bigger regions usually have more autonomy from the central government, while smaller regions and ethnic/cultural autonomies are often dependent on special aid from Central Government or bigger regions. While on paper all regions and autonomies are equal in terms of voice and independence of governments, in practice situation is different - bigger regions usually have a significant control over smaller region governments by bribing people in key positions, and ensuring, that the regional governor will side with them. Unelected entities like militarists, state CEOs, Clergy, Scientists, and others definitely have a big influence in decisions of governments, tho, no matter if it is a small autonomy, big region, Central government, or even a single Commonwealth. If anything, a lot of them are members of the Party as well.''
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments? ''Indeed. In fact, various councils are a part of the regional legislatures, and they approve of laws in a vote between Party's members. System can differ across the world, depending on the characteristics of the region. (For example, in Patagonian region, guild councils usually vote for most of ''civilian'' decisions, and are considered as ''Lower House'', while Warchief Councils vote on military decisions, and can either approve, or decline the guild council proposals, as SC's Patagonia is a stratocracy. Also, unlike the Lower House, Upper House's decisions usually can be approved instantly, without being needed to check from either the leader, or a House above) In some regions, the President-Governor themselves can limit the legislature's ability to pass something, and cut its power. However, those cases of governors actually doing it are pretty rare, and legislature often can pass laws, and other decisions without much resistance. In fact, legislature, and both houses (Upper and Lower) are often seen as ''basically the same''... On another note, democracy is considered a ''dead, old world value there'', so... (Old world is basically a name of the entire 20th century in SC's world, although more used for the 50s, and Interwar Period - before SC's rise to power.)''
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or vetoes)? ''Kind of - in some regions, where President-Governor has a larger power in their hands, they could possibly dissolve the legislature, and limit its powers, although it definitely would be met with a high backlash from both army, local Party's branch, proles, and even from other President-Governors, so those, who have more power, typically still don't touch the legislature. In some regions, however, President-Governor is just a bit more than a figurehead, and a puppet, so they can't even dissolve it - if they would try to do so, the ruling Party's branch, together with the regional army, would most likely launch a coup, and kill the President-Governor, and install someone, who's puppet strings would be easier to pull. However, this doesn't mean, that legislatures in SC would be democratic, but rather the opposite - they are usually very tyrannical, and rule with an iron fist - a totalitarian collection of bureaucracies. It is just that the President-Governors are afraid from the bureaucrats, officials, and other politicians, and rightly so.''
From 0-10 (0 = clean, 10 = most corrupt), how pervasive is corruption (in government, business, etc.)? (Small explanation appreciated) ''8. Despite the various anti-corruption campaigns by SC's government, and heavy penalties for it (Death penalty for corruption is an entirely viable option), corruption is still an enormous issue in SC's governments, partly due of the decentralized system, which makes it hard for central government to have a hold on far-off regions, and it sometimes also relies on various governors keeping each other in check, which means, that in such conditions, corruption has good soil. Also, due of SC's bureaucratic blot, citizens, or even other officials often have to use bribes, in order to complete even simple requests, which in result also fuels corruption, as politicians want to receive more. In fact, expensive gifts now are ill-advised to buy for officials, as they are typically associated with governmental corruption. Corruption also chokes the administrative process, and slows SC down. During reformist period, Carter tried to eradicate it, but it never stopped completely, and has experienced a resurgence in last years, after the Scramble for the World, when last remaining territories of Earth were seized by SC, and officials from former other two superstates were recruited.''
From 0-10 (0 = completely opaque, 10 = completely transparent), how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated) ''2. More often than not, Government is like it would be in an ivory tower - disconnected from the rest of populace, and living in its own world. In fact, a lot of information is classified by either central government, or various regional governments on various levels of secrecy, and is inaccessible without a permit from a government's agent. It also prefers to not tell much of what it is doing, both for media, and public. So, there are a lot of rumors, what government might be doing, and what devices are at its disposal, but there have been only a few pieces of confirmed information. Few regional officials, and President-Governors think, that they are responsible of ''reporting anything about the government for Proles'' too. So, transparency of government is not a thing, about which someone thinks there.''
Is there an independent judiciary, or is it subject to political pressure? ''Of course not - if there was, it wouldn't be SC anymore. When it comes to judiciary, it usually is either stacked full with government-aligned judges, or judges with pro-government bias, although it's usually both. When it comes to trials of dissenters, and political opponents, kangaroo courts are nothing out of unusual, and people often don't even receive a lawyer for defense. Sometimes matters get handled to the local courts like Xeer in Somalia, or tribal courts in New Guinea, but they usually are in favor of the regional governors, and fair trial on political cases is something, that hardly ever happens, if at all. While judiciary system can be particularly cruel against criminals like drug smugglers, serial killers, and others, with having lots of punishment methods (For example, RNGOC - one of the two other former superstates, often used ''death by thousand cuts'' as a form of punishment, and it has been adapted by SC's Chinese regions), the system also suffers from corruption, just like government, so someone with enough money, and/or contacts in right places, can possibly bribe the court in their favor, and avoid being punished.''
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media? ''No, not at all - we don't want, that private media ruins the State's monopoly on news. While this is a bit complicated, in short, SC has a single news company - SNN (Silver News Network), but as it would be terribly hard for a single news outlet to cover the entire world on its own, it has various branches, which cover the happenings of multiple regions, and then put the news pieces together in SNN's HQ in United Megastates (Name of America after the region reform, which reduced the amount of states from 50 to 9). It even has a radio broadcast from Antarctica, which tells about the various happenings in colonization of it. (SC has tried to colonize Antarctica for its resources recently) It also has a branch, which works with publishing news in SNN's internet site, and suppressing other news channels, which sometimes pop up in SC's internet, and usually are located in SC's ''dark web''. As SNN is pretty much government's propaganda outlet as well, it should be obvious, that situation of press freedom there is pretty terrible. Journalists, which aren't aligned with one of the many regional governments, are usually treated horribly.''
Is there freedom of religion, including non-belief? ''Well... It is a complicated issue in SC, to say the least. From one side, there are a lot of religions in SC, because it is a world government, and trying to enforce one religion on a world scale would be too much for SC's already enormous government, and in combination of decentralization system, central government would lose much of its power, if it alienated many religious leaders, and zealots of other religions. So, there is a ''religious council'' in SC's regions, where the local religious leaders come together, in order to discuss the newest happenings, and how to counter the opposition of The Party. A lot of religions are represented - Christians, Muslims, militant Buddhists, Hinduists, and even Neo-Pagans. That said, from other side, similarly to ethnic regions, SC also enforces the policy of ''regional religious homogeneity'', which means, that each region has a single set religion, depending on the cultural background, and following a religion outside of the selected regions is strictly punished. (For example, those, who practice neo-paganism outside the specifically designed ''neo-pagan'' regions, are usually punished) Also, SC's religious zealots are very hostile against atheism, and sometimes it is said, that ''hate against atheism is the glue, what keeps the ''religious council'' together''. So, overall the status of religious freedom in SC is pretty bleak.''
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination? ''No - in fact, it is the quite opposite of that, as education system is usually one of the first places, where indoctrination begins. Usually most of the educational system is left in the hands of the regional parties, and sometimes - guilds, and syndicates as well, so a lot of them use indoctrination. In fact, SC is an ideologically very radical entity, which has described itself as ''anti-monarchist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, and anti-capitalist'' - politics in SC's university are usually taught with heavy political bias, with beliefs of jingoism, glorification of warfare, and Hegelian dialectics mixed with ''world revolution'', state-planned economy, and religious evangelism. Even in subjects like maths, physics, sports, and engineering, political messages are usually inserted left and right. Some regions also employ ''Republican Vanguards'' - units similar to Mao's ''Red Guards'', which are supposed to mostly ''fight against pro-monarchist, and pro-atheist'' views. Some regions take a more traditionalist approach for their propaganda, while others are more focused on futurism - an ideology, which is typically referred to as ''a gift from the Old World'' by some people in SC. Due of various different ideologies within the SC's regions, universities, and schools have different curriculum.''
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution? How pervasive is surveillance? ''No, not at all. As SC is basically a police state (Or rather a collection of police states), expressing any other political, or social thought, which is not allowed by the regional parties, and governors, will end pretty badly. While SC's governors don't really like dissent of any kind, they hate monarchists, anarchists, capitalists, and atheists in particular, due of SC's ideology set. Tom also hates ''separatist nationalists'', as he thinks, that ''they make the Commonwealth weak''. If you are caught being a dissenter, you will be either assaulted by vigilantes at a night hour, or be arrested by SCPS - a mix of KGB, Stasi, FBI, and various other security agencies, which has countless branches across the regions, which are subject to the central branch in the Megastates. Punishment can range from 15 years in forced labor camp, to death penalty, depending, on how much of a threat SC's agencies view the dissenter. That said, underground opposition groups haven't been eradicated at all in SC, but rather the other way around - according to SCPS data, ''underground democratic groups keep getting new recruits''.''
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice? ''For the most form, protests of any kind aren't allowed, as they are seen as a form of dissent, and ''something, that should be suppressed''. Police, and army has rights to intervene, in order to stop any protests, both peaceful, and violent. So, no, there is not really a freedom of assembly in any of the states, which compose the SC. There are a few exceptions to this rule, however - protests organized by state labor unions are usually allowed, if they are peaceful, and have been arranged by contacting with local authorities first. However, considering the fact, that those labor unions are under state's control, along with companies themselves, and that independent labor unions practically don't exist in SC, some people say, that ''it defeats the whole purpose of labor unions'', and that SC's labor union ''protests'' are just a ''caricature of a protest'', as ''government is basically protesting against itself'', due of fact, that it controls both state CEOs, and state labor union leaders. There are a few other exceptions like that too, but as those are all related to state services, it could be said, that independent protests aren't allowed.''
Are there basic guarantees of due process (in civil and criminal matters), and are they upheld in practice? ''No, neither SC's ''constitution'', nor any regional laws guarantee a due process, as SC's governments view criminals as the absolute scum, so the courts, government, army, and police have no reason to respect any ''legal rights'', and no person owes them in any of the Commonwealth's regions. Yes, not even a high-level official is spared, if they aren't lucky enough. (That said, a prisoner from ranks of Elites is more likely to be treated well than a Prole). So, for the same reason, they aren't being upheld in practice, because there are no guarantees of due process to speak of in the first place. As said before, kangaroo courts, and unfair trials are nothing uncommon, which also means, that government agents can assassinate a person outside from sanction of law - suspicion alone is an enough reason for government to approve of such operation. However, such blatant disregard has made a lot of citizens to doubt their trust in the system, and despise police, along with judges, in secret, and justice has been hurt severely. (That said, there is also a personality cult around the police, and army as well, as they also have many fanatical supporters.)''
Are independent trade unions and NGOs able to operate freely? ''On paper and in law, no. All legal labor unions are created by government, and it can either be in favor of them or against their will, depending on what it thinks is the best solution in a certain issue. Anyone who tries to create a government unaffiliated issue is usually thrown in a prison, or forced labor, along with political dissenters and criminals. Reason why NGOs are illegal is because The Party thinks, that the ''very concept of NGOs spits in the face of Tomist doctrine, which is based around on centering as much power and responsibility in state's hands as possible''. For example, Non-governmental medical teams like Red Cross aren't allowed to help the injured, as Supercomputer Tom has stated, that ''it is a task for the government medic organizations. Including the monitoring of conditions in war prisoner camps'' (However, Tom also doesn't want the NGOs to help people, which Party has sentenced to bleed to death, or die in an other form of slow death). However, even with the extreme decentralization of power between regions, the countless governments of SC's world still can't reach their hands in everything, so some of NGOs are absorbed in the goverment/party of the region, and are tasked with jobs that aren't considered ''emergency tasks'', like cleaning the environment from trash, organizing soup kitchens, etc.''
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment? ''No, not at all. First, there is not ''international travel'' in SC, due of the fact, that it is a single world government, and no other independent country exists in its world. (Although its regions have very big autonomy, to the point of extreme) However, travel outside the person's region of birth is highly regulated - unless you are an Elite, or your division has been sent to an exercise to an another region, receiving a travel permit is a long, and tedious process. Also, those permits are just temporary - while it theoretically is possible to stay for life in an another region, in practice, it is extremely hard, due of bureaucratic processes. So, an average citizen will often not interact with people outside of their Commonwealth, or even region during their lifetime, with exception of Elites, which travel for a visit, or soldiers, who have been dislocated in the region. If someone tries to leave the region without travel permit, most of regional border checkpoints are heavily guarded, and even if they manage to escape, neighbor regions, or even the entire Commonwealth will be quickly alerted by a network of SCPS regional branches, agents, army, cops, and border guards.''
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearence? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic and sexual violence?)? ''People usually have to conform to a strict dress code - for formal events, a business suit is preferable. For other cases, a 50s attire should be worn instead, depending on each region's traditions (For example, 50s attire in China, and America was quite different from each other) - as SC is very conservative, and even reactionary, most of modern clothing and fashion would be unacceptable there, like short skirts, for an example. (Army-styled jeans are more accepted, though) Dress code is also strictly separated for genders, and in some regions, it is illegal for men to wear female clothing. Marriages are usually arranged by the family, and in some cases - by state itself. In some regions, people sometimes can marry on their own will, but it is pretty rare. So, for the most part, people can't choose their partners. While divorce is theoretically possible, legal process is messy on purpose, in order to reduce the divorce rate. Family structure is traditional, similar to Chinese family structure, and nuclear family model has mostly ceased to be relevant there. While the exact amount of domestic violence cases is hard to calculate, due of SC's sheer size, and lack of data in the newest SC's regions (Former disputed zone), the estimated amount of domestic violence cases is pretty high, even in more developed SC's regions. While some indeed see it as a problem, most of The Party's members brush the statistics off.''
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected? ''Individuals are not allowed to form companies, which could possibly bring competitions to state companies, for an example in weapons sphere - all SC's guns are made by one state-controlled company, along with its countless regional branches. That said, in some cases, small family businesses are allowed, especially in countryside, mostly in spheres like food supply, as state farms not always can supply all of populace with food. That said, collectivization of farmland is still going on, and if SC's authorities deem, that a private business has grown ''too big'', it will be either broken up, or just shut down by SCPS agents. In other words, free market is pretty much non-existent there, and it gets choked instead. As for property rights... While SC offers some protection of private property against individuals, there is little to no protection from the regional governments withing the SC, which can displace you, if they want, and either turn your house into a public building, or build something else in its place - due of that, a lot of people in SC live in Khrushchyovka styled apartments. While confiscated houses are usually not allowed to be used for Party's member personal residences, some have tried to circumvent this.''
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined? Include a brief overview of the naturalization process, if available. ''There are two citizenships - Commonwealth's citizenship, and regional citizenship. Getting Commonwealth's citizenship is very easy - you just have to be born on the godforsaken planet. However, regional citizenship is way more important than Commonwealth's citizenship, as while SC's citizenship represents humanity as a whole, regional citizenship represents the region, from which you come from. In order to get regional citizenship, you not only have to be born there, but you must also be a native to the region by blood, and language - one is tested by DNA test. If you turn out to be genetically closer to a group from another region, you will usually get sent to that region, as SC has both time, and resources for that. For the same reason, citizens from other regions without a travel permit will be usually sent back to their own region. Also, travel permits are usually only temporary, as settling in an another region outside of your home region is practically impossible, due of bureaucratic obstacles.
Who is able to vote in elections, if they exist at all? ''Depends on an election - in Commonwealth's President election, all Party's members, which have reached age of 18, can vote, as they are considered as ''international elections''. In regional Commonwealth's elections, all Party's members, who are 18 or older, and are a member of the said Commonwealth's governments, can vote. (For example, in Canadian Commonwealth's President-Governor elections, only Party's members from Canadian regions (Prairies, Northwest, Greater North, The East, and Ontario) can vote in them). In autonomy's, or one region's elections, only the Party's members of said regions/autonomies can vote in them, as Tom considers it as ''their own matter''. However, in all those elections, only Party's members themselves can vote - which means, that lower classes like Proles can't vote, unless they somehow are the members of Party. It is also the reason, why people like army's generals, clergy, cosmonauts, farmers, etc, often carry the Party's membership card.''
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally in law and in practice? ''No, not really. Due of SC's reactionary, and fascistic nature, LGBT often don't fare there well, and even during reformist period, when SC loosened its anti-socialist stance, and adopted some of their economics, for an example, question of LGBT wasn't touched very much, as SC would better like to brush it below the carpet, even if it is getting really problematic. Gender equality still has a long road to go, due of SC's traditional gender role structure in the society - despite the fact, that many more talented women now have opportunities to succeed in places like army, science field, space exploration, etc, there is still a wide gap between genders, and a lot of regions are outright patriarchal. While treatment of minorities has greatly improved since 80s, when reformist wing reforms gave them a place in government through regional parties, in many cases, they still face persecution outside from their designated autonomies/regions. Societies themselves are also split in three levels - Elites, which usually are the members of the Party, and other well-off individuals, Middle Class, which usually consists from better-off workers, and various officials, which aren't members of the Party, and Proles - usually the poorer workers, who traditionally have made up a large segment of population, but lack influence in politics, and usually do the hard work in factories, and farms.''
Are the above groups well represented in government? ''While ethnic minorities usually have their own designated regions, and political parties, which give them a bit of a voice in the bigger UCN (United Commonwealth Nations) HQ, as they are a part of the larger block made by 13 larger sections of the wide tent, in practice, their voice often gets overshadowed by those political factions (Or rather parties inside parties, like a matryoshka doll), which often have larger influence in SC's politics (Spanish, Afrikaners, Brazilians, Americans, etc.), and SC's high-ranked personnel from both ''first world'', and ''second world'' still thinks, that smaller regional parties are just ''subordinates''. While there have been more women moving in the government during last years, it is a slow process, and men are still an overwhelming majority in regional governments, due of SC's reactionary nature. For the same reason, LGBT are highly underrepresented there as well, and face persecution in almost all SC's regions.''
Do individuals have realistic opportunities for upward social mobility? ''The further opportunities of an individual are usually determined by state colleges, and tests of knowledge and skills (Similar to Fallout's S.P.E.C.I.A.L system). Here's the catch, however - the class in which you are born in will affect the availability of education and new information in middle, and high school. While education is for free in SC, the children of Elites usually can afford more extra courses and info than children of the proles, not even talking about attending college again for increased specialization. Although there are stories of children from prole families who managed to rise to the top, and spoiled children from elite families, who dropped down to prole category by falling out from state colleges, more often than not your social class will affect your future career and situation on the social ladder - Proles usually work at heavy labor either on farms, or in factories, while Elites usually are in high-rank positions like militarists, clergy, scientists, or even politicians. Middle Class citizens usually work at jobs, which aren't as prestige as Elite positions, yet are paid more than most proles (Police officers, doctors, lawyers, skilled proles, etc). State college dropouts usually end up on unqualified labor like janitor, or a furniture carrier. In other words, it is usually really hard to move up on the social ladder, and your future opportunities are pretty much assigned at birth. (In poorer, and recently conquered SC's regions, education opportunities are pretty limited, so competition between local students is even higher, as only the best manage to pass state colleges and guild schools.)''
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? ''Well, yeah... Both in past, and present, we have carried out operations like this, sanctioned by the government. As of now, while there are no active, coordinated attacks on groups going on due of Tomism's pan-human stance, demographic changes, and displacements are still going on - for example, in Balkans, a lot of ethnic groups from other sides get displaced from each other's territories, which SC has deemed as ''ethnic regions''. While SC is a world government, it doesn't aim for multiculturalism at all - instead, it basically creates an ''one big ghetto'', with countless sections being the various regions, and autonomous zones within the Commonwealth's, with borders separating them. Outside from high-ranked personnel, and soldiers, our region average persons don't interact with people from other regions. Also, considering our hatred against other sapient species (asides from robots), if we ever get in the space...''
(OOC:) Any suggestions for future editions of the index? ''Right now, I don't have much complaints or suggestions for the index in mind - I like it as it is.''
✥ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇᴡꜱ ✥
- ꜱɴɴ
- ᴀʀᴄʜɪᴠᴇ
✉ ʀᴀɴᴅᴏᴍ ✉
- ᴀᴅᴍɪɴɪꜱᴛʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ
- ꜱᴛᴏʀɪᴇꜱ
✪ ʟᴇᴀᴅᴇʀꜱʜɪᴘ ✪
- ᴘʀᴇꜱɪᴅᴇɴᴛ ᴛᴏᴍ
- ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ʟᴇᴀᴅᴇʀꜱ
≛ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ≛
- ꜱᴏᴄɪᴇᴛʏ
- ꜱᴛᴜꜰꜰ&ɢᴏᴏᴅꜱ
⚒ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ ʀᴇᴘᴜʙʟɪᴄ ᴏꜰ ꜱɪʟᴠᴇʀ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴᴡᴇᴀʟᴛʜ ⚒
|☐ʜᴏᴍᴇ☐|❖ꜱᴄ ɪɴ ʜᴏɪ4❖|★ꜱᴄ'ꜱ ʀᴀᴅɪᴏ&ʟᴏᴄᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ★|❇ᴄᴏɴꜱᴛɪᴛᴜᴛɪᴏɴ❇|✧ᴍɪʟɪᴛᴀʀʏ✧|✝ᴍᴀᴘꜱ&ɪɴꜰᴏ✝|☢ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀʏ☢|
⚖ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏᴅᴇʀᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜰᴇʟʟ, ʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴄ'ꜱ ᴅᴇᴍᴏᴄʀᴀᴄʏ ꜱᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛᴇʀꜱ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴀ ᴍᴀᴛᴛᴇʀ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴜʀᴠɪᴠᴀʟ ☠
by Plaetopia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:18 am
Silver Commonwealth wrote:(OOC: I will be highlighting the new questions in red, so they could be easier to distinguish and copy in the answers from previous index for the same questions.)Data from Ministry of Foreign and Internal AffairsDemocracy and Freedom Index
ELECTIONS
How was the head of state (or other chief national authority) selected? What powers does the office exercise? ''SC is a totalitarian, decentralized world government (Something like HRE, but on steroids), where President Governor of the Commonwealth gets elected in Party's elections, where the members of the Party across the world come together in UCN HQ in New York, and elect the President (General of Mankind as well). Of course, only Party's members participate in the elections, and common citizens don't have much say there, although they still need to be appeased by populist policies. While President of the Commonwealth is supposed to be an uniting figure, which would make other regions loyal, in reality, central government controls only a small part of land, and the rest of the lands are ruled by various warlords, and regional-governors, creating a complex web of political alliances, and plots. As long as warlords hunt down monarchists, and pay tributes to the capital region, they are free to rule with iron fist in whatever way they want in their own region, or ''fiefdom'', as some warlords boast. Current President - Supercomputer Tom, has added title ''Eternal President'' to himself, as due of fact, that he is a supercomputer, he can theoretically be repaired for as long as necessary.''
How was the head of government selected? What powers does the office exercise? ''Head of Government is selected similarly to the Head of State- with vote between the members of The Party, and the simple principle, that the candidate reaches over 50% of the vote, or in cases when it is not possible - anyone, who has the biggest amount of votes by percentage. However, similarly to Head of State's elections, those elections take place only after the previous Head of Government dies, resigns, gets impeached, or gets taken out in other way from the government. In regions with bigger authority of the Head of State, Head of Government has somewhat equal amount of power, and is considered as a secretary and assistant of some sort for the President-Governor. However, in regions where the power is more split across the party, Head of Government often is the one, who actually takes decisions, but while they are not a bit more than a puppet, if compared to Head of State (Region), there are some things which they still can't do, like declaring a war (Requires a vote between the members of Council of Militarists), or signing science budget on their own (Requires a vote between the members of Council of Scientists). Overall, the electing process and role of the Head of Government is similar across the regions.''
How is the national legislature selected? ''The politicians, and other members of party can be both appointed by a President-Governor (or some other important person), or be elected in their position by the rest of The Party. Of course, common citizens, who aren't members of one of the Party's branches, don't have much say on the appointment of legislature. Each region can freely choose a delegate (Or delegates) to the UCN meetings in New York. Similar system is used in the ''Worker's Syndicates'' in various SC's state companies, and regions, where dominant ideology is national syndicalism - while it theoretically is supposed to serve the workers, in reality, the company's committee, and state's CEO themselves decide, what's the best for the company, along with who is getting appointed, and who on the other hand - demoted. Worker councils, similarly to state labor unions, are there only to serve state's needs.''
Are elections considered free and fair? Are irregularities serious enough that they alter the results significantly? ''No, of course. First, those, who aren't the members of Party, can't even vote in those elections, as The Party doesn't consider the President-Governor elections as ''the matter of the Proles'', as sometimes outright scornfully the Party calls common citizens. This is also the reason, why many people try to enlist in Party, as it also gives a small change to affect something, and all Party's members have a vote - even those, who more often work as janitors, than with administrative work. However, most of those people end up on the lower echelon of the party, or end up doing the dirty work of the Party. Second, while there is a principle of ''one vote for one person'', and in order for President-Governor candidate to be elected, they must pass a 50% threshold, vote rigging, and smear campaigns are nothing unusual, as various fractions within The Party want to get their candidate to win - like the reformist, and conservative wing, along with Old Guard, and ''socialist'' wing. Also, there have been reported cases of intimidation used against Party's members, in order to pressure them to vote for the candidate.
Does the opposition have a realistic chance of gaining support and power through elections? ''No. That doesn't mean, that there aren't much parties, or fractions, however - the UCN Headquarters, or even a single Commonwealth's parliament have lots of seats, mostly for representatives of the ethnic and cultural groups from autonomy regions, or administrative regions. While fractions within the parties usually differ across the regions, the main ones are the old guard, which are more keen on keeping things as they are, and change slowly, if at all, and reformists, which are generally in favor of more progress. Despite all that, reformists and Party's liberal wings for the most part want to change things in system's framework, and keep it, so they still count as being members of government, along with minor ethnic parties. All genuine opposition parties are banned, and groups like libertarians, monarchists, democrats, and anarcho-communists usually have no chance to be elected, as their very presence and beliefs would earn death. For this reason, most of the opposition has resorted to partisan warfare, and have abandoned all hopes of reformism, as it is generally associated with the loathed SC's government. Massacres of officials and their families, bombing up bridges with IEDs, night raids, and propaganda leaflets in rural regions - all of them are pretty common tactics for opposition's partisans. However, even those who claim to fight for democracy often actually support a some sort of hybrid regime or ''benevolent despotism'', as most of them haven't seen actual democracy for decades, and only know about it from black market history books and other files.''
Is voting voluntary? If so, which was the average turnout in recent elections? ''Near 100%, as voting for party's members in Party's elections is compulsory, and trying to avoid it usually will result in fines for Party's members. That said, on a Commonwealth's scale as a whole, the last election was in 2020, when Blake Carter - the leader of reformist wing, and third president of SC, died. Since then, Supercomputer Tom has officially been in charge. Being a President-Governor in other regions is a lifeterm service as well, although a President-Governor can be changed in other ways as well - in case, if they die, resign on their own, or get thrown out of the office, Party's members can elect a new President-Governor from their own ranks. In a collection of totalitarian regimes what SC is, President-Governor doesn't actually have as much power as one might expect - in some cases, they still have quite a lot powers, but in some cases, they are actually puppets of the ruling local Party branches, which run the show collectively - SC is an oligarchy for a reason.''
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? ''To answer the first question - yes, they definitely can develop, and implement new policies, although in some cases, the regional legislature as a whole has more power than a single representative. (For example, in Don-Kuban Union (A cossack region), Veche - the national assembly of the Union, implements most of policies in a vote between its members, including the Red Hetman - leader of the region. Red Hetman can propose new policies, and even implement them, but usually it is the bureaucratic oligarchy, which implements them). That said, none of them are freely elected, as they are either appointed by The Party, or elected in their position by The Party. And, no, government's authority directly only extends for a specifically designed region, called ''Eastern Colombia'' - the rest of territories are ruled by various vassals, and puppet governors, with pretty high autonomy - they can raise their own armies, and in some cases, even enact their own laws. (There are still some laws, that are universal across all of SC, though) Various regions also differ ideologically - some are more socialistic, while others - more leaning towards corporatism. SC employs something similar to Qing tributary system.''
Do foreign powers (democratic or not), or unelected entities (the military, religious or economic oligarchies...) exercise undue influence over the government? ''Foreign powers don't exercise influence over the Silver Commonwealth's government, and territories as a whole. However, the thing is, that there are no foreign powers on SC's Earth in the first place, as all of its territory is nominally under a single banner, and it hasn't found any space empires yet. In SC's case, it is more appropriate to look at the Commonwealth's and Regions - Bigger regions usually have more autonomy from the central government, while smaller regions and ethnic/cultural autonomies are often dependent on special aid from Central Government or bigger regions. While on paper all regions and autonomies are equal in terms of voice and independence of governments, in practice situation is different - bigger regions usually have a significant control over smaller region governments by bribing people in key positions, and ensuring, that the regional governor will side with them. Unelected entities like militarists, state CEOs, Clergy, Scientists, and others definitely have a big influence in decisions of governments, tho, no matter if it is a small autonomy, big region, Central government, or even a single Commonwealth. If anything, a lot of them are members of the Party as well.''
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments? ''Indeed. In fact, various councils are a part of the regional legislatures, and they approve of laws in a vote between Party's members. System can differ across the world, depending on the characteristics of the region. (For example, in Patagonian region, guild councils usually vote for most of ''civilian'' decisions, and are considered as ''Lower House'', while Warchief Councils vote on military decisions, and can either approve, or decline the guild council proposals, as SC's Patagonia is a stratocracy. Also, unlike the Lower House, Upper House's decisions usually can be approved instantly, without being needed to check from either the leader, or a House above) In some regions, the President-Governor themselves can limit the legislature's ability to pass something, and cut its power. However, those cases of governors actually doing it are pretty rare, and legislature often can pass laws, and other decisions without much resistance. In fact, legislature, and both houses (Upper and Lower) are often seen as ''basically the same''... On another note, democracy is considered a ''dead, old world value there'', so... (Old world is basically a name of the entire 20th century in SC's world, although more used for the 50s, and Interwar Period - before SC's rise to power.)''
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or vetoes)? ''Kind of - in some regions, where President-Governor has a larger power in their hands, they could possibly dissolve the legislature, and limit its powers, although it definitely would be met with a high backlash from both army, local Party's branch, proles, and even from other President-Governors, so those, who have more power, typically still don't touch the legislature. In some regions, however, President-Governor is just a bit more than a figurehead, and a puppet, so they can't even dissolve it - if they would try to do so, the ruling Party's branch, together with the regional army, would most likely launch a coup, and kill the President-Governor, and install someone, who's puppet strings would be easier to pull. However, this doesn't mean, that legislatures in SC would be democratic, but rather the opposite - they are usually very tyrannical, and rule with an iron fist - a totalitarian collection of bureaucracies. It is just that the President-Governors are afraid from the bureaucrats, officials, and other politicians, and rightly so.''
From 0-10 (0 = clean, 10 = most corrupt), how pervasive is corruption (in government, business, etc.)? (Small explanation appreciated) ''8. Despite the various anti-corruption campaigns by SC's government, and heavy penalties for it (Death penalty for corruption is an entirely viable option), corruption is still an enormous issue in SC's governments, partly due of the decentralized system, which makes it hard for central government to have a hold on far-off regions, and it sometimes also relies on various governors keeping each other in check, which means, that in such conditions, corruption has good soil. Also, due of SC's bureaucratic blot, citizens, or even other officials often have to use bribes, in order to complete even simple requests, which in result also fuels corruption, as politicians want to receive more. In fact, expensive gifts now are ill-advised to buy for officials, as they are typically associated with governmental corruption. Corruption also chokes the administrative process, and slows SC down. During reformist period, Carter tried to eradicate it, but it never stopped completely, and has experienced a resurgence in last years, after the Scramble for the World, when last remaining territories of Earth were seized by SC, and officials from former other two superstates were recruited.''
From 0-10 (0 = completely opaque, 10 = completely transparent), how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated) ''2. More often than not, Government is like it would be in an ivory tower - disconnected from the rest of populace, and living in its own world. In fact, a lot of information is classified by either central government, or various regional governments on various levels of secrecy, and is inaccessible without a permit from a government's agent. It also prefers to not tell much of what it is doing, both for media, and public. So, there are a lot of rumors, what government might be doing, and what devices are at its disposal, but there have been only a few pieces of confirmed information. Few regional officials, and President-Governors think, that they are responsible of ''reporting anything about the government for Proles'' too. So, transparency of government is not a thing, about which someone thinks there.''
Is there an independent judiciary, or is it subject to political pressure? ''Of course not - if there was, it wouldn't be SC anymore. When it comes to judiciary, it usually is either stacked full with government-aligned judges, or judges with pro-government bias, although it's usually both. When it comes to trials of dissenters, and political opponents, kangaroo courts are nothing out of unusual, and people often don't even receive a lawyer for defense. Sometimes matters get handled to the local courts like Xeer in Somalia, or tribal courts in New Guinea, but they usually are in favor of the regional governors, and fair trial on political cases is something, that hardly ever happens, if at all. While judiciary system can be particularly cruel against criminals like drug smugglers, serial killers, and others, with having lots of punishment methods (For example, RNGOC - one of the two other former superstates, often used ''death by thousand cuts'' as a form of punishment, and it has been adapted by SC's Chinese regions), the system also suffers from corruption, just like government, so someone with enough money, and/or contacts in right places, can possibly bribe the court in their favor, and avoid being punished.''
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media? ''No, not at all - we don't want, that private media ruins the State's monopoly on news. While this is a bit complicated, in short, SC has a single news company - SNN (Silver News Network), but as it would be terribly hard for a single news outlet to cover the entire world on its own, it has various branches, which cover the happenings of multiple regions, and then put the news pieces together in SNN's HQ in United Megastates (Name of America after the region reform, which reduced the amount of states from 50 to 9). It even has a radio broadcast from Antarctica, which tells about the various happenings in colonization of it. (SC has tried to colonize Antarctica for its resources recently) It also has a branch, which works with publishing news in SNN's internet site, and suppressing other news channels, which sometimes pop up in SC's internet, and usually are located in SC's ''dark web''. As SNN is pretty much government's propaganda outlet as well, it should be obvious, that situation of press freedom there is pretty terrible. Journalists, which aren't aligned with one of the many regional governments, are usually treated horribly.''
Is there freedom of religion, including non-belief? ''Well... It is a complicated issue in SC, to say the least. From one side, there are a lot of religions in SC, because it is a world government, and trying to enforce one religion on a world scale would be too much for SC's already enormous government, and in combination of decentralization system, central government would lose much of its power, if it alienated many religious leaders, and zealots of other religions. So, there is a ''religious council'' in SC's regions, where the local religious leaders come together, in order to discuss the newest happenings, and how to counter the opposition of The Party. A lot of religions are represented - Christians, Muslims, militant Buddhists, Hinduists, and even Neo-Pagans. That said, from other side, similarly to ethnic regions, SC also enforces the policy of ''regional religious homogeneity'', which means, that each region has a single set religion, depending on the cultural background, and following a religion outside of the selected regions is strictly punished. (For example, those, who practice neo-paganism outside the specifically designed ''neo-pagan'' regions, are usually punished) Also, SC's religious zealots are very hostile against atheism, and sometimes it is said, that ''hate against atheism is the glue, what keeps the ''religious council'' together''. So, overall the status of religious freedom in SC is pretty bleak.''
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination? ''No - in fact, it is the quite opposite of that, as education system is usually one of the first places, where indoctrination begins. Usually most of the educational system is left in the hands of the regional parties, and sometimes - guilds, and syndicates as well, so a lot of them use indoctrination. In fact, SC is an ideologically very radical entity, which has described itself as ''anti-monarchist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, and anti-capitalist'' - politics in SC's university are usually taught with heavy political bias, with beliefs of jingoism, glorification of warfare, and Hegelian dialectics mixed with ''world revolution'', state-planned economy, and religious evangelism. Even in subjects like maths, physics, sports, and engineering, political messages are usually inserted left and right. Some regions also employ ''Republican Vanguards'' - units similar to Mao's ''Red Guards'', which are supposed to mostly ''fight against pro-monarchist, and pro-atheist'' views. Some regions take a more traditionalist approach for their propaganda, while others are more focused on futurism - an ideology, which is typically referred to as ''a gift from the Old World'' by some people in SC. Due of various different ideologies within the SC's regions, universities, and schools have different curriculum.''
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution? How pervasive is surveillance? ''No, not at all. As SC is basically a police state (Or rather a collection of police states), expressing any other political, or social thought, which is not allowed by the regional parties, and governors, will end pretty badly. While SC's governors don't really like dissent of any kind, they hate monarchists, anarchists, capitalists, and atheists in particular, due of SC's ideology set. Tom also hates ''separatist nationalists'', as he thinks, that ''they make the Commonwealth weak''. If you are caught being a dissenter, you will be either assaulted by vigilantes at a night hour, or be arrested by SCPS - a mix of KGB, Stasi, FBI, and various other security agencies, which has countless branches across the regions, which are subject to the central branch in the Megastates. Punishment can range from 15 years in forced labor camp, to death penalty, depending, on how much of a threat SC's agencies view the dissenter. That said, underground opposition groups haven't been eradicated at all in SC, but rather the other way around - according to SCPS data, ''underground democratic groups keep getting new recruits''.''
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice? ''For the most form, protests of any kind aren't allowed, as they are seen as a form of dissent, and ''something, that should be suppressed''. Police, and army has rights to intervene, in order to stop any protests, both peaceful, and violent. So, no, there is not really a freedom of assembly in any of the states, which compose the SC. There are a few exceptions to this rule, however - protests organized by state labor unions are usually allowed, if they are peaceful, and have been arranged by contacting with local authorities first. However, considering the fact, that those labor unions are under state's control, along with companies themselves, and that independent labor unions practically don't exist in SC, some people say, that ''it defeats the whole purpose of labor unions'', and that SC's labor union ''protests'' are just a ''caricature of a protest'', as ''government is basically protesting against itself'', due of fact, that it controls both state CEOs, and state labor union leaders. There are a few other exceptions like that too, but as those are all related to state services, it could be said, that independent protests aren't allowed.''
Are there basic guarantees of due process (in civil and criminal matters), and are they upheld in practice? ''No, neither SC's ''constitution'', nor any regional laws guarantee a due process, as SC's governments view criminals as the absolute scum, so the courts, government, army, and police have no reason to respect any ''legal rights'', and no person owes them in any of the Commonwealth's regions. Yes, not even a high-level official is spared, if they aren't lucky enough. (That said, a prisoner from ranks of Elites is more likely to be treated well than a Prole). So, for the same reason, they aren't being upheld in practice, because there are no guarantees of due process to speak of in the first place. As said before, kangaroo courts, and unfair trials are nothing uncommon, which also means, that government agents can assassinate a person outside from sanction of law - suspicion alone is an enough reason for government to approve of such operation. However, such blatant disregard has made a lot of citizens to doubt their trust in the system, and despise police, along with judges, in secret, and justice has been hurt severely. (That said, there is also a personality cult around the police, and army as well, as they also have many fanatical supporters.)''
Are independent trade unions and NGOs able to operate freely? ''On paper and in law, no. All legal labor unions are created by government, and it can either be in favor of them or against their will, depending on what it thinks is the best solution in a certain issue. Anyone who tries to create a government unaffiliated issue is usually thrown in a prison, or forced labor, along with political dissenters and criminals. Reason why NGOs are illegal is because The Party thinks, that the ''very concept of NGOs spits in the face of Tomist doctrine, which is based around on centering as much power and responsibility in state's hands as possible''. For example, Non-governmental medical teams like Red Cross aren't allowed to help the injured, as Supercomputer Tom has stated, that ''it is a task for the government medic organizations. Including the monitoring of conditions in war prisoner camps'' (However, Tom also doesn't want the NGOs to help people, which Party has sentenced to bleed to death, or die in an other form of slow death). However, even with the extreme decentralization of power between regions, the countless governments of SC's world still can't reach their hands in everything, so some of NGOs are absorbed in the goverment/party of the region, and are tasked with jobs that aren't considered ''emergency tasks'', like cleaning the environment from trash, organizing soup kitchens, etc.''
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment? ''No, not at all. First, there is not ''international travel'' in SC, due of the fact, that it is a single world government, and no other independent country exists in its world. (Although its regions have very big autonomy, to the point of extreme) However, travel outside the person's region of birth is highly regulated - unless you are an Elite, or your division has been sent to an exercise to an another region, receiving a travel permit is a long, and tedious process. Also, those permits are just temporary - while it theoretically is possible to stay for life in an another region, in practice, it is extremely hard, due of bureaucratic processes. So, an average citizen will often not interact with people outside of their Commonwealth, or even region during their lifetime, with exception of Elites, which travel for a visit, or soldiers, who have been dislocated in the region. If someone tries to leave the region without travel permit, most of regional border checkpoints are heavily guarded, and even if they manage to escape, neighbor regions, or even the entire Commonwealth will be quickly alerted by a network of SCPS regional branches, agents, army, cops, and border guards.''
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearence? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic and sexual violence?)? ''People usually have to conform to a strict dress code - for formal events, a business suit is preferable. For other cases, a 50s attire should be worn instead, depending on each region's traditions (For example, 50s attire in China, and America was quite different from each other) - as SC is very conservative, and even reactionary, most of modern clothing and fashion would be unacceptable there, like short skirts, for an example. (Army-styled jeans are more accepted, though) Dress code is also strictly separated for genders, and in some regions, it is illegal for men to wear female clothing. Marriages are usually arranged by the family, and in some cases - by state itself. In some regions, people sometimes can marry on their own will, but it is pretty rare. So, for the most part, people can't choose their partners. While divorce is theoretically possible, legal process is messy on purpose, in order to reduce the divorce rate. Family structure is traditional, similar to Chinese family structure, and nuclear family model has mostly ceased to be relevant there. While the exact amount of domestic violence cases is hard to calculate, due of SC's sheer size, and lack of data in the newest SC's regions (Former disputed zone), the estimated amount of domestic violence cases is pretty high, even in more developed SC's regions. While some indeed see it as a problem, most of The Party's members brush the statistics off.''
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected? ''Individuals are not allowed to form companies, which could possibly bring competitions to state companies, for an example in weapons sphere - all SC's guns are made by one state-controlled company, along with its countless regional branches. That said, in some cases, small family businesses are allowed, especially in countryside, mostly in spheres like food supply, as state farms not always can supply all of populace with food. That said, collectivization of farmland is still going on, and if SC's authorities deem, that a private business has grown ''too big'', it will be either broken up, or just shut down by SCPS agents. In other words, free market is pretty much non-existent there, and it gets choked instead. As for property rights... While SC offers some protection of private property against individuals, there is little to no protection from the regional governments withing the SC, which can displace you, if they want, and either turn your house into a public building, or build something else in its place - due of that, a lot of people in SC live in Khrushchyovka styled apartments. While confiscated houses are usually not allowed to be used for Party's member personal residences, some have tried to circumvent this.''
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined? Include a brief overview of the naturalization process, if available. ''There are two citizenships - Commonwealth's citizenship, and regional citizenship. Getting Commonwealth's citizenship is very easy - you just have to be born on the godforsaken planet. However, regional citizenship is way more important than Commonwealth's citizenship, as while SC's citizenship represents humanity as a whole, regional citizenship represents the region, from which you come from. In order to get regional citizenship, you not only have to be born there, but you must also be a native to the region by blood, and language - one is tested by DNA test. If you turn out to be genetically closer to a group from another region, you will usually get sent to that region, as SC has both time, and resources for that. For the same reason, citizens from other regions without a travel permit will be usually sent back to their own region. Also, travel permits are usually only temporary, as settling in an another region outside of your home region is practically impossible, due of bureaucratic obstacles.
Who is able to vote in elections, if they exist at all? ''Depends on an election - in Commonwealth's President election, all Party's members, which have reached age of 18, can vote, as they are considered as ''international elections''. In regional Commonwealth's elections, all Party's members, who are 18 or older, and are a member of the said Commonwealth's governments, can vote. (For example, in Canadian Commonwealth's President-Governor elections, only Party's members from Canadian regions (Prairies, Northwest, Greater North, The East, and Ontario) can vote in them). In autonomy's, or one region's elections, only the Party's members of said regions/autonomies can vote in them, as Tom considers it as ''their own matter''. However, in all those elections, only Party's members themselves can vote - which means, that lower classes like Proles can't vote, unless they somehow are the members of Party. It is also the reason, why people like army's generals, clergy, cosmonauts, farmers, etc, often carry the Party's membership card.''
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally in law and in practice? ''No, not really. Due of SC's reactionary, and fascistic nature, LGBT often don't fare there well, and even during reformist period, when SC loosened its anti-socialist stance, and adopted some of their economics, for an example, question of LGBT wasn't touched very much, as SC would better like to brush it below the carpet, even if it is getting really problematic. Gender equality still has a long road to go, due of SC's traditional gender role structure in the society - despite the fact, that many more talented women now have opportunities to succeed in places like army, science field, space exploration, etc, there is still a wide gap between genders, and a lot of regions are outright patriarchal. While treatment of minorities has greatly improved since 80s, when reformist wing reforms gave them a place in government through regional parties, in many cases, they still face persecution outside from their designated autonomies/regions. Societies themselves are also split in three levels - Elites, which usually are the members of the Party, and other well-off individuals, Middle Class, which usually consists from better-off workers, and various officials, which aren't members of the Party, and Proles - usually the poorer workers, who traditionally have made up a large segment of population, but lack influence in politics, and usually do the hard work in factories, and farms.''
Are the above groups well represented in government? ''While ethnic minorities usually have their own designated regions, and political parties, which give them a bit of a voice in the bigger UCN (United Commonwealth Nations) HQ, as they are a part of the larger block made by 13 larger sections of the wide tent, in practice, their voice often gets overshadowed by those political factions (Or rather parties inside parties, like a matryoshka doll), which often have larger influence in SC's politics (Spanish, Afrikaners, Brazilians, Americans, etc.), and SC's high-ranked personnel from both ''first world'', and ''second world'' still thinks, that smaller regional parties are just ''subordinates''. While there have been more women moving in the government during last years, it is a slow process, and men are still an overwhelming majority in regional governments, due of SC's reactionary nature. For the same reason, LGBT are highly underrepresented there as well, and face persecution in almost all SC's regions.''
Do individuals have realistic opportunities for upward social mobility? ''The further opportunities of an individual are usually determined by state colleges, and tests of knowledge and skills (Similar to Fallout's S.P.E.C.I.A.L system). Here's the catch, however - the class in which you are born in will affect the availability of education and new information in middle, and high school. While education is for free in SC, the children of Elites usually can afford more extra courses and info than children of the proles, not even talking about attending college again for increased specialization. Although there are stories of children from prole families who managed to rise to the top, and spoiled children from elite families, who dropped down to prole category by falling out from state colleges, more often than not your social class will affect your future career and situation on the social ladder - Proles usually work at heavy labor either on farms, or in factories, while Elites usually are in high-rank positions like militarists, clergy, scientists, or even politicians. Middle Class citizens usually work at jobs, which aren't as prestige as Elite positions, yet are paid more than most proles (Police officers, doctors, lawyers, skilled proles, etc). State college dropouts usually end up on unqualified labor like janitor, or a furniture carrier. In other words, it is usually really hard to move up on the social ladder, and your future opportunities are pretty much assigned at birth. (In poorer, and recently conquered SC's regions, education opportunities are pretty limited, so competition between local students is even higher, as only the best manage to pass state colleges and guild schools.)''
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? ''Well, yeah... Both in past, and present, we have carried out operations like this, sanctioned by the government. As of now, while there are no active, coordinated attacks on groups going on due of Tomism's pan-human stance, demographic changes, and displacements are still going on - for example, in Balkans, a lot of ethnic groups from other sides get displaced from each other's territories, which SC has deemed as ''ethnic regions''. While SC is a world government, it doesn't aim for multiculturalism at all - instead, it basically creates an ''one big ghetto'', with countless sections being the various regions, and autonomous zones within the Commonwealth's, with borders separating them. Outside from high-ranked personnel, and soldiers, our region average persons don't interact with people from other regions. Also, considering our hatred against other sapient species (asides from robots), if we ever get in the space...''
(OOC:) Any suggestions for future editions of the index? ''Right now, I don't have much complaints or suggestions for the index in mind - I like it as it is.''
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Polata City » Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:21 pm
by Qachuynia » Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:59 pm
by Isla de Flores » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:17 am
by Idoho » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:57 am
by Pax Brasiliana » Tue Jan 21, 2020 10:14 am
Led by a timid Empress and a "tropical Caesar", Pax Brasiliana is a beacon of tradition and aristocratic hope that stands tall in the sea of blood and ruins.
O Pioneiro (March 2024): Headlines - Japanese-Brazilian archeological expedition to the Amazon Rainforest uncovers traces of a "possibly lost" ancient civilization. | Art News - Meet the Neoromantic trend that spawned in Brazil and spread throughout Latin America. | Economy News - "A global recession has already begun", says American specialist following signs of European economic slowdown.
by Plaetopia » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:07 pm
Qachuynia wrote:How was the head of state (or other chief national authority) selected? What powers does the office exercise? The Demarchist Commonwealth has no head of state, but the closest equivalent is the Demarch, which is a purely ceremonial position selected via sortition from the Grand Assembly. They have no additional powers beyond what they possess as a member of the Assembly, but serve as a representative of the acephalous state.
How was the head of government selected? What powers does the office exercise? See above.
How is the national legislature selected? Members of the Grand Assembly are selected via sortition from amongst the members of the Zone Councils, who are themselves selected via sortition from the citizens of the municipalities. All of these appoints serve one-year terms.
Are elections considered free and fair? Are irregularities serious enough that they alter the results significantly? There are no elections in the traditional sense, but the system of sortition is considered to negate fraud and corruption. The direct democratic system used by the municipalities is generally considered to be very open and fair.
Does the opposition have a realistic chance of gaining support and power through elections? There is no opposition in the traditional sense, as political parties do not exist. However it is entirely possible for anyone to acquire political power due to the random selection process of sortition. Their ability to actually get anything done depends on the popularity of their viewpoint and proposed policies.
Is voting voluntary? If so, which was the average turnout in recent elections? Participation in direct democratic processes is voluntary, although generally expected of citizens qualified to do so. Sortition includes all members of this qualified group, and while you can turn down an appointment, it is considered to be unusual. Turnout varies from municipality to municipality, but is generally around the 80% mark.In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? Members of the Grand Assembly are freely able to draft and debate policies and legislation. The federal laws passed by the Assembly apply to all regions of the Commonwealth.
Do foreign powers (democratic or not), or unelected entities (the military, religious or economic oligarchies...) exercise undue influence over the government? The Demarchist system is specifically designed to prevent special interests groups from influencing Qachuynian democracy.
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments? All members of the Assembly can draft and propose laws. Laws can be passed by simple majority vote by the Assembly so long as they are in line with the constitution. Amending the constitution requires a two-thirds majority.
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or vetoes)? The Assembly wields both executive and legislative authority, and cannot subvert itself.
From 0-10 (0 = clean, 10 = most corrupt), how pervasive is corruption (in government, business, etc.)? (Small explanation appreciated) 1. Corruption is very rare within the Commonwealth, due to the sortition system and the absence of wealthy figures able to corrupt public officials due to general economic equality. Should any corruption occur and be discovered, the penalties are most severe, which tends to discourage such behaviours. Most recorded cases were occurring due to the meddling of foreign powers.
From 0-10 (0 = completely opaque, 10 = completely transparent), how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated) 9. All citizens have the constitutional right to know about government activities and programs, with the exception of those deemed secret for reasons of national security, such as military and intelligence projects.
Is there an independent judiciary, or is it subject to political pressure? The judicial branch is entirely seperate from the authority of the Assembly.Is there an independent media? Yes, citizen journalism being particularly common. There are state-run news organisations and the like, but they certainly don't hold a monopoly.
Is there freedom of religion, including non-belief? Most religions are tolerated, including atheism, barring those that involve activities that harm adherents or others, such as human sacrifice or mutilation.
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination? The education system is vernally free of political influence.
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution? How pervasive is surveillance? Freedom of speech is a protected right, so long as said speech does not provoke violence or is intended to do so. Surveillance is very rare but sousveillance is reasonably common. The government is only interested if someone is involved in criminal activity, and surveillance is performed entirely by algorithms scanning the internet and the occasional security camera.
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice? Popular assembly is considered a cornerstone of the Commonwealth's political system, and protests are included as part of that, although most citizens would rather debate than protest.
Are there basic guarantees of due process (in civil and criminal matters), and are they upheld in practice? The courts are bound to adhere to due process and generally do so. Failing to do so will typically result in a criminal investigation.
Are independent trade unions and NGOs able to operate freely? No, due to the nature of the Commonwealth's planned economy, trade unions are deemed unnecessary. It is theoretically legal to form one, but there is no reason to. NGOs vary, but are typically very rare.
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment? Citizens are allowed to travel freely so long as they are not wanted criminals or similar.
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearence? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic and sexual violence?)? Personal freedom is considered an important aspect of Commonwealth society. Most citizens do not get married, with the commune having generally replaced the family as the basic social unit. Domestic and sexual violence is rare, and typically swiftly reported to the authorities.
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected? Personal property is protected, but private property has been abolished, transferred to the public domain so as to be equally shared by all. Private businesses are prohibited due to the nature of the planned economy. It should be noted that citizens are heavily involved in determining the annual economic plan and government expenditures within that plan.How is citizenship determined? Include a brief overview of the naturalization process, if available. Everyone born within the Commonwealth is considered to be a citizen. Foreigners seeking citizenship are required to pass a (reasonably simple) exam to prove that they understand the political and economic system of the Commonwealth and will therefore be able to properly participate,
Who is able to vote in elections, if they exist at all? All citizens deemed to be mentally sound aged sixteen and above.
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally in law and in practice? Yes, the constitution prohibits discrimination and the strongly egalitarian culture ensures that this is upheld.
Are the above groups well represented in government? All citizens are able to participate in government and can be selected via sortition. To percentage represented is usually roughly equivalent to the percentage within the population as a whole.
Do individuals have realistic opportunities for upward social mobility? Upward mobility is a difficult concept within the Commonwealth. All citizens are considered equal, and as such there isn't really an up to go to, and attempting to place oneself above one's fellow citizens is viewed with suspicion. Economic mobility is also restricted due to largely equal pay.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? The Commonwealth has not performed any acts of genocide or ethnic cleansing, and doing so would be considered a heinous crime.
Any suggestions for future editions of the index? None in particular, although I'll be interested to see how you classify me due to my rather unorthodox system of governance.
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Prospesia » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:59 pm
by Mordka » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:17 pm
by Plaetopia » Tue Jan 21, 2020 2:26 pm
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Union of Sovereign States and Republics » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:04 pm
News: BREAKING NEWS: Unceremoniously, USSR officially departs from the European Union 2 years before schedule
by Ostsee Empire » Wed Jan 22, 2020 8:39 am
--------------
--------------
--------------
Baltische Tageblatt: Purposefully refusing to wear masks in public made equal to attempted murder, new emergency executive order decides. | Narwa strikers open negotiations with state government, Estland Energie officials as workers' strike continue into their 11th week. | Jerusalem 'still neutral' in Jewish War for Independence. Haifa liberated by Jews with help from German and Polish soldiers, appointed temporary capital of the State of Judea. | Riots show no sign of 'blowing over' in Ottoman Balkans. Belgrade, Athens, Skopie, Saravejo completely out of state control.
by The Allied Tribe » Wed Jan 22, 2020 8:48 am
2nd Allied Tribe War is over, The Allied Tribe repels an invasion by ATFF | The Allied Tribe officially bans Child Labor, Compulsory Organ Harvesting | The Allied Tribe states that force must be used strictly defensively, begins armed neutrality and cuts aggressive military ties with all nations
by Plaetopia » Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:21 am
The Allied Tribe wrote:ELECTIONS
How was the head of state and the head of government (or other chief national authority) selected?
Citizens vote for our president. The president can serve a maximum of two terms, each term lasts four years.
How is the national legislature selected?
The people vote on who should be selected.
Are elections considered free and fair?
Yes.
Which was the average turnout in recent elections? Is voting mandatory?
92% of people old enough to vote voted last election, compared to 77% before that. Voting is voluntary, but encouraged. Last election, 51% voted for the party currently in office, the Allied Tribe Party, and 47% voted for other parties.
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory?
Yes and no, local people within each city have some powers, such as the ability to choose what to do with criminals.
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments?
Restrictions on the twelve laws in the Allied Tribe Legislation Constitution. Other than that, there are no restrictions.
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or strong limits on legislature's powers)?
It depends.
From 1-10, how pervasive is corruption? (Small explanation appreciated)
Corruption is rare, as the president, as well as most citizens, do not accept bribes, so it’s a 1.
From 1-10, how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated)
The government intervenes, but not that much, so people have the freedom to do what they want to. This is maybe an 8.
Is there an independent judiciary?
Yes.
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media?
Yes.
Is there freedom of religion?
Yes.
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination?
Yes.
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution?
Yes.
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice?
Yes.
Are there basic guarantees of due process, and are they upheld in practice?
Yes.
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment?
Yes.
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearence? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic violence?)?
Yes.
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected?
Mostly yes, but vegetarianism is compulsory here, which also means no leather, gelatin, or rennet.
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined?
All people are allowed as long as they are not drug traffickers or are murderers.
Who is able to vote in elections?
Everybody can, even prisoners.
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally?
Yes.
Are the above groups well represented in government?
Yes.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group?
No.
Any suggestions for future editions of the index?
Nothing, it’s pretty good.
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by The Allied Tribe » Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:50 pm
Plaetopia wrote:Updated.The Allied Tribe wrote:ELECTIONS
How was the head of state and the head of government (or other chief national authority) selected?
Citizens vote for our president. The president can serve a maximum of two terms, each term lasts four years.
How is the national legislature selected?
The people vote on who should be selected.
Are elections considered free and fair?
Yes.
Which was the average turnout in recent elections? Is voting mandatory?
92% of people old enough to vote voted last election, compared to 77% before that. Voting is voluntary, but encouraged. Last election, 51% voted for the party currently in office, the Allied Tribe Party, and 47% voted for other parties.
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory?
Yes and no, local people within each city have some powers, such as the ability to choose what to do with criminals.
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments?
Restrictions on the twelve laws in the Allied Tribe Legislation Constitution. Other than that, there are no restrictions.
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or strong limits on legislature's powers)?
It depends.
From 1-10, how pervasive is corruption? (Small explanation appreciated)
Corruption is rare, as the president, as well as most citizens, do not accept bribes, so it’s a 1.
From 1-10, how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated)
The government intervenes, but not that much, so people have the freedom to do what they want to. This is maybe an 8.
Is there an independent judiciary?
Yes.
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media?
Yes.
Is there freedom of religion?
Yes.
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination?
Yes.
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution?
Yes.
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice?
Yes.
Are there basic guarantees of due process, and are they upheld in practice?
Yes.
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment?
Yes.
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearence? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic violence?)?
Yes.
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected?
Mostly yes, but vegetarianism is compulsory here, which also means no leather, gelatin, or rennet.
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined?
All people are allowed as long as they are not drug traffickers or are murderers.
Who is able to vote in elections?
Everybody can, even prisoners.
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally?
Yes.
Are the above groups well represented in government?
Yes.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group?
No.
Any suggestions for future editions of the index?
Nothing, it’s pretty good.
Simply reposting the answers of the previous index version does NOT make for a valid reply. Questions were changed/added, as was the scoring methodology. Please read the OP before posting and answer all mandatory questions, or The Allied Tribe will not be scored.
2nd Allied Tribe War is over, The Allied Tribe repels an invasion by ATFF | The Allied Tribe officially bans Child Labor, Compulsory Organ Harvesting | The Allied Tribe states that force must be used strictly defensively, begins armed neutrality and cuts aggressive military ties with all nations
by The Allied Tribe » Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:51 pm
2nd Allied Tribe War is over, The Allied Tribe repels an invasion by ATFF | The Allied Tribe officially bans Child Labor, Compulsory Organ Harvesting | The Allied Tribe states that force must be used strictly defensively, begins armed neutrality and cuts aggressive military ties with all nations
by Gandoor » Wed Jan 22, 2020 8:03 pm
by Plaetopia » Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:03 am
Gandoor wrote:snip
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Sajnur » Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:27 am
by Ferlik » Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:35 am
by Novus America Imperium » Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:23 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement