Advertisement
by New East Columbia » Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:54 pm
by Rhodesia-Zimbabwe » Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:16 pm
by Greater States » Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 pm
by Greater Victora » Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:42 pm
by Slavakino » Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:11 pm
by Khataiy » Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:12 pm
by Sebourg » Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:48 pm
by Plaetopia » Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:18 am
New East Columbia wrote:Any suggestions for future editions of the index? Add questions of how law is setup, i.e. common law or civil law or socialist law, etc..
Slavakino wrote:SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments?
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or strong limits on legislature's powers)?
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Slavakino » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:55 am
Plaetopia wrote:There is a problem with your questionnaire: the questions shown above are unreplied.
by Victorious Decepticons » Tue Jun 18, 2019 5:16 am
Newaswa wrote:What is the greatest threat to your nation?Vallermoore wrote:The Victorious Decepticons.Bluquse wrote:Imperialist, aggressive, and genociding aliens or interdimensional beings that would most likely slaughter or enslave us
rather than meet up to have a talk. :(TurtleShroom wrote:Also, like any sane, civilized nation, we always consider the Victorious Decepticons a clear, present, and obvious threat we must respect, honor, and leave alone in all circumstances. Always fear the Victorious Decepticons.
The Huskar Social Union wrote: ... massive empires of genocidal machines.
by Plaetopia » Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:31 am
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Sophistan » Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:42 am
by Silver Commonwealth » Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:55 am
Data from Ministry of Foreign and Internal AffairsDemocracy and Freedom Index
ELECTIONS
How was the head of state and the head of government (or other chief national authority) selected? ''SC is a totalitarian, decentralized world government (Something like HRE, but on steroids), where President Governor of the Commonwealth gets elected in Party's elections, where the members of the Party across the world come together in UCN HQ in New York, and elect the President (General of Mankind as well). Of course, only Party's members participate in the elections, and common citizens don't have much say there, although they still need to be appeased by populist policies. While President of the Commonwealth is supposed to be an uniting figure, which would make other regions loyal, in reality, central government controls only a small part of land, and the rest of the lands are ruled by various warlords, and regional-governors, creating a complex web of political alliances, and plots. As long as warlords hunt down monarchists, and pay tributes to the capital region, they are free to rule with iron fist in whatever way they want in their own region, or ''fiefdom'', as some warlords boast. Current President - Supercomputer Tom, has added title ''Eternal President'' to himself, as due of fact, that he is a supercomputer, he can theoretically be repaired for as long as necessary.''
How is the national legislature selected? ''The politicians, and other members of party can be both appointed by a President-Governor (or some other important person), or be elected in their position by the rest of The Party. Of course, common citizens, who aren't members of one of the Party's branches, don't have much say on the appointment of legislature. Each region can freely choose a delegate (Or delegates) to the UCN meetings in New York. Similar system is used in the ''Worker's Syndicates'' in various SC's state companies, and regions, where dominant ideology is national syndicalism - while it theoretically is supposed to serve the workers, in reality, the company's committee, and state's CEO themselves decide, what's the best for the company, along with who is getting appointed, and who on the other hand - demoted. Worker councils, similarly to state labor unions, are there only to serve state's needs.''
Are elections considered free and fair? ''No, of course. First, those, who aren't the members of Party, can't even vote in those elections, as The Party doesn't consider the President-Governor elections as ''the matter of the Proles'', as sometimes outright scornfully the Party calls common citizens. This is also the reason, why many people try to enlist in Party, as it also gives a small change to affect something, and all Party's members have a vote - even those, who more often work as janitors, than with administrative work. However, most of those people end up on the lower echelon of the party, or end up doing the dirty work of the Party. Second, while there is a principle of ''one vote for one person'', and in order for President-Governor candidate to be elected, they must pass a 50% threshold, vote rigging, and smear campaigns are nothing unusual, as various fractions within The Party want to get their candidate to win - like the reformist, and conservative wing, along with Old Guard, and ''socialist'' wing. Also, there have been reported cases of intimidation used against Party's members, in order to pressure them to vote for the candidate.
Which was the average turnout in recent elections? Is voting mandatory? ''Near 100%, as voting for party's members in Party's elections is compulsory, and trying to avoid it usually will result in fines for Party's members. That said, on a Commonwealth's scale as a whole, the last election was in 2020, when Blake Carter - the leader of reformist wing, and third president of SC, died. Since then, Supercomputer Tom has officially been in charge. Being a President-Governor in other regions is a lifeterm service as well, although a President-Governor can be changed in other ways as well - in case, if they die, resign on their own, or get thrown out of the office, Party's members can elect a new President-Governor from their own ranks. In a collection of totalitarian regimes what SC is, President-Governor doesn't actually have as much power as one might expect - in some cases, they still have quite a lot powers, but in some cases, they are actually puppets of the ruling local Party branches, which run the show collectively - SC is an oligarchy for a reason.''
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? ''To answer the first question - yes, they definitely can develop, and implement new policies, although in some cases, the regional legislature as a whole has more power than a single representative. (For example, in Don-Kuban Union (A cossack region), Veche - the national assembly of the Union, implements most of policies in a vote between its members, including the Red Hetman - leader of the region. Red Hetman can propose new policies, and even implement them, but usually it is the bureaucratic oligarchy, which implements them). That said, none of them are freely elected, as they are either appointed by The Party, or elected in their position by The Party. And, no, government's authority directly only extends for a specifically designed region, called ''Eastern Colombia'' - the rest of territories are ruled by various vassals, and puppet governors, with pretty high autonomy - they can raise their own armies, and in some cases, even enact their own laws. (There are still some laws, that are universal across all of SC, though) Various regions also differ ideologically - some are more socialistic, while others - more leaning towards corporatism. SC employs something similar to Qing tributary system.''
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments? ''Indeed. In fact, various councils are a part of the regional legislatures, and they approve of laws in a vote between Party's members. System can differ across the world, depending on the characteristics of the region. (For example, in Patagonian region, guild councils usually vote for most of ''civilian'' decisions, and are considered as ''Lower House'', while Warchief Councils vote on military decisions, and can either approve, or decline the guild council proposals, as SC's Patagonia is a stratocracy. Also, unlike the Lower House, Upper House's decisions usually can be approved instantly, without being needed to check from either the leader, or a House above) In some regions, the President-Governor themselves can limit the legislature's ability to pass something, and cut its power. However, those cases of governors actually doing it are pretty rare, and legislature often can pass laws, and other decisions without much resistance. In fact, legislature, and both houses (Upper and Lower) are often seen as ''basically the same''... On another note, democracy is considered a ''dead, old world value there'', so... (Old world is basically a name of the entire 20th century in SC's world, although more used for the 50s, and Interwar Period - before SC's rise to power.)''
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or strong limits on legislature's powers)? ''Kind of - in some regions, where President-Governor has a larger power in their hands, they could possibly dissolve the legislature, and limit its powers, although it definitely would be met with a high backlash from both army, local Party's branch, proles, and even from other President-Governors, so those, who have more power, typically still don't touch the legislature. In some regions, however, President-Governor is just a bit more than a figurehead, and a puppet, so they can't even dissolve it - if they would try to do so, the ruling Party's branch, together with the regional army, would most likely launch a coup, and kill the President-Governor, and install someone, who's puppet strings would be easier to pull. However, this doesn't mean, that legislatures in SC would be democratic, but rather the opposite - they are usually very tyrannical, and rule with an iron fist - a totalitarian collection of bureaucracies. It is just that the President-Governors are afraid from the bureaucrats, officials, and other politicians, and rightly so.''
From 1-10, how pervasive is corruption? (Small explanation appreciated) ''8. Despite the various anti-corruption campaigns by SC's government, and heavy penalties for it (Death penalty for corruption is an entirely viable option), corruption is still an enormous issue in SC's governments, partly due of the decentralized system, which makes it hard for central government to have a hold on far-off regions, and it sometimes also relies on various governors keeping each other in check, which means, that in such conditions, corruption has good soil. Also, due of SC's bureaucratic blot, citizens, or even other officials often have to use bribes, in order to complete even simple requests, which in result also fuels corruption, as politicians want to receive more. In fact, expensive gifts now are ill-advised to buy for officials, as they are typically associated with governmental corruption. Corruption also chokes the administrative process, and slows SC down. During reformist period, Carter tried to eradicate it, but it never stopped completely, and has experienced a resurgence in last years, after the Scramble for the World, when last remaining territories of Earth were seized by SC, and officials from former other two superstates were recruited.''
From 1-10, how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated) ''2. More often than not, Government is like it would be in an ivory tower - disconnected from the rest of populace, and living in its own world. In fact, a lot of information is classified by either central government, or various regional governments on various levels of secrecy, and is inaccessible without a permit from a government's agent. It also prefers to not tell much of what it is doing, both for media, and public. So, there are a lot of rumors, what government might be doing, and what devices are at its disposal, but there have been only a few pieces of confirmed information. Few regional officials, and President-Governors think, that they are responsible of ''reporting anything about the government for Proles'' too. So, transparency of government is not a thing, about which someone thinks there.''
Is there an independent judiciary? ''Of course not - if there was, it wouldn't be SC anymore. When it comes to judiciary, it usually is either stacked full with government-aligned judges, or judges with pro-government bias, although it's usually both. When it comes to trials of dissenters, and political opponents, kangaroo courts are nothing out of unusual, and people often don't even receive a lawyer for defense. Sometimes matters get handled to the local courts like Xeer in Somalia, or tribal courts in New Guinea, but they usually are in favor of the regional governors, and fair trial on political cases is something, that hardly ever happens, if at all. While judiciary system can be particularly cruel against criminals like drug smugglers, serial killers, and others, with having lots of punishment methods (For example, RNGOC - one of the two other former superstates, often used ''death by thousand cuts'' as a form of punishment, and it has been adapted by SC's Chinese regions), the system also suffers from corruption, just like government, so someone with enough money, and/or contacts in right places, can possibly bribe the court in their favor, and avoid being punished.''
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media? ''No, not at all - we don't want, that private media ruins the State's monopoly on news. While this is a bit complicated, in short, SC has a single news company - SNN (Silver News Network), but as it would be terribly hard for a single news outlet to cover the entire world on its own, it has various branches, which cover the happenings of multiple regions, and then put the news pieces together in SNN's HQ in United Megastates (Name of America after the region reform, which reduced the amount of states from 50 to 9). It even has a radio broadcast from Antarctica, which tells about the various happenings in colonization of it. (SC has tried to colonize Antarctica for its resources recently) It also has a branch, which works with publishing news in SNN's internet site, and suppressing other news channels, which sometimes pop up in SC's internet, and usually are located in SC's ''dark web''. As SNN is pretty much government's propaganda outlet as well, it should be obvious, that situation of press freedom there is pretty terrible. Journalists, which aren't aligned with one of the many regional governments, are usually treated horribly.''
Is there freedom of religion? ''Well... It is a complicated issue in SC, to say the least. From one side, there are a lot of religions in SC, because it is a world government, and trying to enforce one religion on a world scale would be too much for SC's already enormous government, and in combination of decentralization system, central government would lose much of its power, if it alienated many religious leaders, and zealots of other religions. So, there is a ''religious council'' in SC's regions, where the local religious leaders come together, in order to discuss the newest happenings, and how to counter the opposition of The Party. A lot of religions are represented - Christians, Muslims, militant Buddhists, Hinduists, and even Neo-Pagans. That said, from other side, similarly to ethnic regions, SC also enforces the policy of ''regional religious homogeneity'', which means, that each region has a single set religion, depending on the cultural background, and following a religion outside of the selected regions is strictly punished. (For example, those, who practice neo-paganism outside the specifically designed ''neo-pagan'' regions, are usually punished) Also, SC's religious zealots are very hostile against atheism, and sometimes it is said, that ''hate against atheism is the glue, what keeps the ''religious council'' together''. So, overall the status of religious freedom in SC is pretty bleak.''
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination? ''No - in fact, it is the quite opposite of that, as education system is usually one of the first places, where indoctrination begins. Usually most of the educational system is left in the hands of the regional parties, and sometimes - guilds, and syndicates as well, so a lot of them use indoctrination. In fact, SC is an ideologically very radical entity, which has described itself as ''anti-monarchist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, and anti-capitalist'' - politics in SC's university are usually taught with heavy political bias, with beliefs of jingoism, glorification of warfare, and Hegelian dialectics mixed with ''world revolution'', state-planned economy, and religious evangelism. Even in subjects like maths, physics, sports, and engineering, political messages are usually inserted left and right. Some regions also employ ''Republican Vanguards'' - units similar to Mao's ''Red Guards'', which are supposed to mostly ''fight against pro-monarchist, and pro-atheist'' views. Some regions take a more traditionalist approach for their propaganda, while others are more focused on futurism - an ideology, which is typically referred to as ''a gift from the Old World'' by some people in SC. Due of various different ideologies within the SC's regions, universities, and schools have different curriculum.''
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution? ''No, not at all. As SC is basically a police state (Or rather a collection of police states), expressing any other political, or social thought, which is not allowed by the regional parties, and governors, will end pretty badly. While SC's governors don't really like dissent of any kind, they hate monarchists, anarchists, capitalists, and atheists in particular, due of SC's ideology set. Tom also hates ''separatist nationalists'', as he thinks, that ''they make the Commonwealth weak''. If you are caught being a dissenter, you will be either assaulted by vigilantes at a night hour, or be arrested by SCPS - a mix of KGB, Stasi, FBI, and various other security agencies, which has countless branches across the regions, which are subject to the central branch in the Megastates. Punishment can range from 15 years in forced labor camp, to death penalty, depending, on how much of a threat SC's agencies view the dissenter. That said, underground opposition groups haven't been eradicated at all in SC, but rather the other way around - according to SCPS data, ''underground democratic groups keep getting new recruits''.''
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice? ''For the most form, protests of any kind aren't allowed, as they are seen as a form of dissent, and ''something, that should be suppressed''. Police, and army has rights to intervene, in order to stop any protests, both peaceful, and violent. So, no, there is not really a freedom of assembly in any of the states, which compose the SC. There are a few exceptions to this rule, however - protests organized by state labor unions are usually allowed, if they are peaceful, and have been arranged by contacting with local authorities first. However, considering the fact, that those labor unions are under state's control, along with companies themselves, and that independent labor unions practically don't exist in SC, some people say, that ''it defeats the whole purpose of labor unions'', and that SC's labor union ''protests'' are just a ''caricature of a protest'', as ''government is basically protesting against itself'', due of fact, that it controls both state CEOs, and state labor union leaders. There are a few other exceptions like that too, but as those are all related to state services, it could be said, that independent protests aren't allowed.''
Are there basic guarantees of due process, and are they upheld in practice? ''No, neither SC's ''constitution'', nor any regional laws guarantee a due process, as SC's governments view criminals as the absolute scum, so the courts, government, army, and police have no reason to respect any ''legal rights'', and no person owes them in any of the Commonwealth's regions. Yes, not even a high-level official is spared, if they aren't lucky enough. (That said, a prisoner from ranks of Elites is more likely to be treated well than a Prole). So, for the same reason, they aren't being upheld in practice, because there are no guarantees of due process to speak of in the first place. As said before, kangaroo courts, and unfair trials are nothing uncommon, which also means, that government agents can assassinate a person outside from sanction of law - suspicion alone is an enough reason for government to approve of such operation. However, such blatant disregard has made a lot of citizens to doubt their trust in the system, and despise police, along with judges, in secret, and justice has been hurt severely. (That said, there is also a personality cult around the police, and army as well, as they also have many fanatical supporters.)''
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment? ''No, not at all. First, there is not ''international travel'' in SC, due of the fact, that it is a single world government, and no other independent country exists in its world. (Although its regions have very big autonomy, to the point of extreme) However, travel outside the person's region of birth is highly regulated - unless you are an Elite, or your division has been sent to an exercise to an another region, receiving a travel permit is a long, and tedious process. Also, those permits are just temporary - while it theoretically is possible to stay for life in an another region, in practice, it is extremely hard, due of bureaucratic processes. So, an average citizen will often not interact with people outside of their Commonwealth, or even region during their lifetime, with exception of Elites, which travel for a visit, or soldiers, who have been dislocated in the region. If someone tries to leave the region without travel permit, most of regional border checkpoints are heavily guarded, and even if they manage to escape, neighbor regions, or even the entire Commonwealth will be quickly alerted by a network of SCPS regional branches, agents, army, cops, and border guards.''
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearance? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic violence?)? ''People usually have to conform to a strict dress code - for formal events, a business suit is preferable. For other cases, a 50s attire should be worn instead, depending on each region's traditions (For example, 50s attire in China, and America was quite different from each other) - as SC is very conservative, and even reactionary, most of modern clothing and fashion would be unacceptable there, like short skirts, for an example. (Army-styled jeans are more accepted, though) Dress code is also strictly separated for genders, and in some regions, it is illegal for men to wear female clothing. Marriages are usually arranged by the family, and in some cases - by state itself. In some regions, people sometimes can marry on their own will, but it is pretty rare. So, for the most part, people can't choose their partners. While divorce is theoretically possible, legal process is messy on purpose, in order to reduce the divorce rate. Family structure is traditional, similar to Chinese family structure, and nuclear family model has mostly ceased to be relevant there. While the exact amount of domestic violence cases is hard to calculate, due of SC's sheer size, and lack of data in the newest SC's regions (Former disputed zone), the estimated amount of domestic violence cases is pretty high, even in more developed SC's regions. While some indeed see it as a problem, most of The Party's members brush the statistics off.''
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected? ''Individuals are not allowed to form companies, which could possibly bring competitions to state companies, for an example in weapons sphere - all SC's guns are made by one state-controlled company, along with its countless regional branches. That said, in some cases, small family businesses are allowed, especially in countryside, mostly in spheres like food supply, as state farms not always can supply all of populace with food. That said, collectivization of farmland is still going on, and if SC's authorities deem, that a private business has grown ''too big'', it will be either broken up, or just shut down by SCPS agents. In other words, free market is pretty much non-existent there, and it gets choked instead. As for property rights... While SC offers some protection of private property against individuals, there is little to no protection from the regional governments withing the SC, which can displace you, if they want, and either turn your house into a public building, or build something else in its place - due of that, a lot of people in SC live in Khrushchyovka styled apartments. While confiscated houses are usually not allowed to be used for Party's member personal residences, some have tried to circumvent this.''
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined? ''There are two citizenships - Commonwealth's citizenship, and regional citizenship. Getting Commonwealth's citizenship is very easy - you just have to be born on the godforsaken planet. However, regional citizenship is way more important than Commonwealth's citizenship, as while SC's citizenship represents humanity as a whole, regional citizenship represents the region, from which you come from. In order to get regional citizenship, you not only have to be born there, but you must also be a native to the region by blood, and language - one is tested by DNA test. If you turn out to be genetically closer to a group from another region, you will usually get sent to that region, as SC has both time, and resources for that. For the same reason, citizens from other regions without a travel permit will be usually sent back to their own region. Also, travel permits are usually only temporary, as settling in an another region outside of your home region is practically impossible, due of bureaucratic obstacles.
Who is able to vote in elections? ''Depends on an election - in Commonwealth's President election, all Party's members, which have reached age of 18, can vote, as they are considered as ''international elections''. In regional Commonwealth's elections, all Party's members, who are 18 or older, and are a member of the said Commonwealth's governments, can vote. (For example, in Canadian Commonwealth's President-Governor elections, only Party's members from Canadian regions (Prairies, Northwest, Greater North, The East, and Ontario) can vote in them). In autonomy's, or one region's elections, only the Party's members of said regions/autonomies can vote in them, as Tom considers it as ''their own matter''. However, in all those elections, only Party's members themselves can vote - which means, that lower classes like Proles can't vote, unless they somehow are the members of Party. It is also the reason, why people like army's generals, clergy, cosmonauts, farmers, etc, often carry the Party's membership card.''
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally? ''No, not really. Due of SC's reactionary, and fascistic nature, LGBT often don't fare there well, and even during reformist period, when SC loosened its anti-socialist stance, and adopted some of their economics, for an example, question of LGBT wasn't touched very much, as SC would better like to brush it below the carpet, even if it is getting really problematic. Gender equality still has a long road to go, due of SC's traditional gender role structure in the society - despite the fact, that many more talented women now have opportunities to succeed in places like army, science field, space exploration, etc, there is still a wide gap between genders, and a lot of regions are outright patriarchal. While treatment of minorities has greatly improved since 80s, when reformist wing reforms gave them a place in government through regional parties, in many cases, they still face persecution outside from their designated autonomies/regions. Societies themselves are also split in three levels - Elites, which usually are the members of the Party, and other well-off individuals, Middle Class, which usually consists from better-off workers, and various officials, which aren't members of the Party, and Proles - usually the poorer workers, who traditionally have made up a large segment of population, but lack influence in politics, and usually do the hard work in factories, and farms.''
Are the above groups well represented in government? ''While ethnic minorities usually have their own designated regions, and political parties, which give them a bit of a voice in the bigger UCN (United Commonwealth Nations) HQ, as they are a part of the larger block made by 13 larger sections of the wide tent, in practice, their voice often gets overshadowed by those political factions (Or rather parties inside parties, like a matryoshka doll), which often have larger influence in SC's politics (Spanish, Afrikaners, Brazilians, Americans, etc.), and SC's high-ranked personnel from both ''first world'', and ''second world'' still thinks, that smaller regional parties are just ''subordinates''. While there have been more women moving in the government during last years, it is a slow process, and men are still an overwhelming majority in regional governments, due of SC's reactionary nature. For the same reason, LGBT are highly underrepresented there as well, and face persecution in almost all SC's regions.''
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? ''Well, yeah... Both in past, and present, we have carried out operations like this, sanctioned by the government. As of now, while there are no active, coordinated attacks on groups going on due of Tomism's pan-human stance, demographic changes, and displacements are still going on - for example, in Balkans, a lot of ethnic groups from other sides get displaced from each other's territories, which SC has deemed as ''ethnic regions''. While SC is a world government, it doesn't aim for multiculturalism at all - instead, it basically creates an ''one big ghetto'', with countless sections being the various regions, and autonomous zones within the Commonwealth's, with borders separating them. Outside from high-ranked personnel, and soldiers, our region average persons don't interact with people from other regions. Also, considering our hatred against other sapient species (asides from robots), if we ever get in the space...''
(OOC:) Any suggestions for future editions of the index? ''No, I don't really have any suggestions at the moment, sorry. Although, perhaps a separate ranking of categories like civil liberties, and elections alongside with overall total ranking would be nice?''
✥ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇᴡꜱ ✥
- ꜱɴɴ
- ᴀʀᴄʜɪᴠᴇ
✉ ʀᴀɴᴅᴏᴍ ✉
- ᴀᴅᴍɪɴɪꜱᴛʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ
- ꜱᴛᴏʀɪᴇꜱ
✪ ʟᴇᴀᴅᴇʀꜱʜɪᴘ ✪
- ᴘʀᴇꜱɪᴅᴇɴᴛ ᴛᴏᴍ
- ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ʟᴇᴀᴅᴇʀꜱ
≛ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ≛
- ꜱᴏᴄɪᴇᴛʏ
- ꜱᴛᴜꜰꜰ&ɢᴏᴏᴅꜱ
⚒ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ ʀᴇᴘᴜʙʟɪᴄ ᴏꜰ ꜱɪʟᴠᴇʀ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴᴡᴇᴀʟᴛʜ ⚒
|☐ʜᴏᴍᴇ☐|❖ꜱᴄ ɪɴ ʜᴏɪ4❖|★ꜱᴄ'ꜱ ʀᴀᴅɪᴏ&ʟᴏᴄᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ★|❇ᴄᴏɴꜱᴛɪᴛᴜᴛɪᴏɴ❇|✧ᴍɪʟɪᴛᴀʀʏ✧|✝ᴍᴀᴘꜱ&ɪɴꜰᴏ✝|☢ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀʏ☢|
⚖ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏᴅᴇʀᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜰᴇʟʟ, ʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴀʟɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴄ'ꜱ ᴅᴇᴍᴏᴄʀᴀᴄʏ ꜱᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛᴇʀꜱ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴀ ᴍᴀᴛᴛᴇʀ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴜʀᴠɪᴠᴀʟ ☠
by Draycora » Tue Jun 18, 2019 12:48 pm
by Plaetopia » Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:47 pm
Silver Commonwealth wrote:OOC: I hope you don't mind my posting style - I wanted it to look a bit like a document, or review. Also, sorry for the long post ahead- I just like to go in details.Data from Ministry of Foreign and Internal AffairsDemocracy and Freedom Index
]ELECTIONS
How was the head of state and the head of government (or other chief national authority) selected? ''SC is a totalitarian, decentralized world government (Something like HRE, but on steroids), where President Governor of the Commonwealth gets elected in Party's elections, where the members of the Party across the world come together in UCN HQ in New York, and elect the President (General of Mankind as well). Of course, only Party's members participate in the elections, and common citizens don't have much say there, although they still need to be appeased by populist policies. While President of the Commonwealth is supposed to be an uniting figure, which would make other regions loyal, in reality, central government controls only a small part of land, and the rest of the lands are ruled by various warlords, and regional-governors, creating a complex web of political alliances, and plots. As long as warlords hunt down monarchists, and pay tributes to the capital region, they are free to rule with iron fist in whatever way they want in their own region, or ''fiefdom'', as some warlords boast. Current President - Supercomputer Tom, has added title ''Eternal President'' to himself, as due of fact, that he is a supercomputer, he can theoretically be repaired for as long as necessary.''
How is the national legislature selected? ''The politicians, and other members of party can be both appointed by a President-Governor (or some other important person), or be elected in their position by the rest of The Party. Of course, common citizens, who aren't members of one of the Party's branches, don't have much say on the appointment of legislature. Each region can freely choose a delegate (Or delegates) to the UCN meetings in New York. Similar system is used in the ''Worker's Syndicates'' in various SC's state companies, and regions, where dominant ideology is national syndicalism - while it theoretically is supposed to serve the workers, in reality, the company's committee, and state's CEO themselves decide, what's the best for the company, along with who is getting appointed, and who on the other hand - demoted. Worker councils, similarly to state labor unions, are there only to serve state's needs.''
Are elections considered free and fair? ''No, of course. First, those, who aren't the members of Party, can't even vote in those elections, as The Party doesn't consider the President-Governor elections as ''the matter of the Proles'', as sometimes outright scornfully the Party calls common citizens. This is also the reason, why many people try to enlist in Party, as it also gives a small change to affect something, and all Party's members have a vote - even those, who more often work as janitors, than with administrative work. However, most of those people end up on the lower echelon of the party, or end up doing the dirty work of the Party. Second, while there is a principle of ''one vote for one person'', and in order for President-Governor candidate to be elected, they must pass a 50% threshold, vote rigging, and smear campaigns are nothing unusual, as various fractions within The Party want to get their candidate to win - like the reformist, and conservative wing, along with Old Guard, and ''socialist'' wing. Also, there have been reported cases of intimidation used against Party's members, in order to pressure them to vote for the candidate.
Which was the average turnout in recent elections? Is voting mandatory? ''Near 100%, as voting for party's members in Party's elections is compulsory, and trying to avoid it usually will result in fines for Party's members. That said, on a Commonwealth's scale as a whole, the last election was in 2020, when Blake Carter - the leader of reformist wing, and third president of SC, died. Since then, Supercomputer Tom has officially been in charge. Being a President-Governor in other regions is a lifeterm service as well, although a President-Governor can be changed in other ways as well - in case, if they die, resign on their own, or get thrown out of the office, Party's members can elect a new President-Governor from their own ranks. In a collection of totalitarian regimes what SC is, President-Governor doesn't actually have as much power as one might expect - in some cases, they still have quite a lot powers, but in some cases, they are actually puppets of the ruling local Party branches, which run the show collectively - SC is an oligarchy for a reason.''
SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT
In case national representatives were freely elected, are they able to succesfully develop and implement new policies? Does government authority extend over the full national territory? ''To answer the first question - yes, they definitely can develop, and implement new policies, although in some cases, the regional legislature as a whole has more power than a single representative. (For example, in Don-Kuban Union (A cossack region), Veche - the national assembly of the Union, implements most of policies in a vote between its members, including the Red Hetman - leader of the region. Red Hetman can propose new policies, and even implement them, but usually it is the bureaucratic oligarchy, which implements them). That said, none of them are freely elected, as they are either appointed by The Party, or elected in their position by The Party. And, no, government's authority directly only extends for a specifically designed region, called ''Eastern Colombia'' - the rest of territories are ruled by various vassals, and puppet governors, with pretty high autonomy - they can raise their own armies, and in some cases, even enact their own laws. (There are still some laws, that are universal across all of SC, though) Various regions also differ ideologically - some are more socialistic, while others - more leaning towards corporatism. SC employs something similar to Qing tributary system.''
Does the legislature have the legislative initiative? What restrictions are placed on its ability to pass laws, including constitutional amendments? ''Indeed. In fact, various councils are a part of the regional legislatures, and they approve of laws in a vote between Party's members. System can differ across the world, depending on the characteristics of the region. (For example, in Patagonian region, guild councils usually vote for most of ''civilian'' decisions, and are considered as ''Lower House'', while Warchief Councils vote on military decisions, and can either approve, or decline the guild council proposals, as SC's Patagonia is a stratocracy. Also, unlike the Lower House, Upper House's decisions usually can be approved instantly, without being needed to check from either the leader, or a House above) In some regions, the President-Governor themselves can limit the legislature's ability to pass something, and cut its power. However, those cases of governors actually doing it are pretty rare, and legislature often can pass laws, and other decisions without much resistance. In fact, legislature, and both houses (Upper and Lower) are often seen as ''basically the same''... On another note, democracy is considered a ''dead, old world value there'', so... (Old world is basically a name of the entire 20th century in SC's world, although more used for the 50s, and Interwar Period - before SC's rise to power.)''
Is the executive able to subvert the legislature through legal or extralegal means (such as arbitrary dissolutions, lack of an adequate budget, or strong limits on legislature's powers)? ''Kind of - in some regions, where President-Governor has a larger power in their hands, they could possibly dissolve the legislature, and limit its powers, although it definitely would be met with a high backlash from both army, local Party's branch, proles, and even from other President-Governors, so those, who have more power, typically still don't touch the legislature. In some regions, however, President-Governor is just a bit more than a figurehead, and a puppet, so they can't even dissolve it - if they would try to do so, the ruling Party's branch, together with the regional army, would most likely launch a coup, and kill the President-Governor, and install someone, who's puppet strings would be easier to pull. However, this doesn't mean, that legislatures in SC would be democratic, but rather the opposite - they are usually very tyrannical, and rule with an iron fist - a totalitarian collection of bureaucracies. It is just that the President-Governors are afraid from the bureaucrats, officials, and other politicians, and rightly so.''
From 1-10, how pervasive is corruption? (Small explanation appreciated) ''8. Despite the various anti-corruption campaigns by SC's government, and heavy penalties for it (Death penalty for corruption is an entirely viable option), corruption is still an enormous issue in SC's governments, partly due of the decentralized system, which makes it hard for central government to have a hold on far-off regions, and it sometimes also relies on various governors keeping each other in check, which means, that in such conditions, corruption has good soil. Also, due of SC's bureaucratic blot, citizens, or even other officials often have to use bribes, in order to complete even simple requests, which in result also fuels corruption, as politicians want to receive more. In fact, expensive gifts now are ill-advised to buy for officials, as they are typically associated with governmental corruption. Corruption also chokes the administrative process, and slows SC down. During reformist period, Carter tried to eradicate it, but it never stopped completely, and has experienced a resurgence in last years, after the Scramble for the World, when last remaining territories of Earth were seized by SC, and officials from former other two superstates were recruited.''
From 1-10, how transparent is government activity? (Small explanation appreciated) ''2. More often than not, Government is like it would be in an ivory tower - disconnected from the rest of populace, and living in its own world. In fact, a lot of information is classified by either central government, or various regional governments on various levels of secrecy, and is inaccessible without a permit from a government's agent. It also prefers to not tell much of what it is doing, both for media, and public. So, there are a lot of rumors, what government might be doing, and what devices are at its disposal, but there have been only a few pieces of confirmed information. Few regional officials, and President-Governors think, that they are responsible of ''reporting anything about the government for Proles'' too. So, transparency of government is not a thing, about which someone thinks there.''
Is there an independent judiciary? ''Of course not - if there was, it wouldn't be SC anymore. When it comes to judiciary, it usually is either stacked full with government-aligned judges, or judges with pro-government bias, although it's usually both. When it comes to trials of dissenters, and political opponents, kangaroo courts are nothing out of unusual, and people often don't even receive a lawyer for defense. Sometimes matters get handled to the local courts like Xeer in Somalia, or tribal courts in New Guinea, but they usually are in favor of the regional governors, and fair trial on political cases is something, that hardly ever happens, if at all. While judiciary system can be particularly cruel against criminals like drug smugglers, serial killers, and others, with having lots of punishment methods (For example, RNGOC - one of the two other former superstates, often used ''death by thousand cuts'' as a form of punishment, and it has been adapted by SC's Chinese regions), the system also suffers from corruption, just like government, so someone with enough money, and/or contacts in right places, can possibly bribe the court in their favor, and avoid being punished.''
CIVIL LIBERTIES
Is there an independent media? ''No, not at all - we don't want, that private media ruins the State's monopoly on news. While this is a bit complicated, in short, SC has a single news company - SNN (Silver News Network), but as it would be terribly hard for a single news outlet to cover the entire world on its own, it has various branches, which cover the happenings of multiple regions, and then put the news pieces together in SNN's HQ in United Megastates (Name of America after the region reform, which reduced the amount of states from 50 to 9). It even has a radio broadcast from Antarctica, which tells about the various happenings in colonization of it. (SC has tried to colonize Antarctica for its resources recently) It also has a branch, which works with publishing news in SNN's internet site, and suppressing other news channels, which sometimes pop up in SC's internet, and usually are located in SC's ''dark web''. As SNN is pretty much government's propaganda outlet as well, it should be obvious, that situation of press freedom there is pretty terrible. Journalists, which aren't aligned with one of the many regional governments, are usually treated horribly.''
Is there freedom of religion? ''Well... It is a complicated issue in SC, to say the least. From one side, there are a lot of religions in SC, because it is a world government, and trying to enforce one religion on a world scale would be too much for SC's already enormous government, and in combination of decentralization system, central government would lose much of its power, if it alienated many religious leaders, and zealots of other religions. So, there is a ''religious council'' in SC's regions, where the local religious leaders come together, in order to discuss the newest happenings, and how to counter the opposition of The Party. A lot of religions are represented - Christians, Muslims, militant Buddhists, Hinduists, and even Neo-Pagans. That said, from other side, similarly to ethnic regions, SC also enforces the policy of ''regional religious homogeneity'', which means, that each region has a single set religion, depending on the cultural background, and following a religion outside of the selected regions is strictly punished. (For example, those, who practice neo-paganism outside the specifically designed ''neo-pagan'' regions, are usually punished) Also, SC's religious zealots are very hostile against atheism, and sometimes it is said, that ''hate against atheism is the glue, what keeps the ''religious council'' together''. So, overall the status of religious freedom in SC is pretty bleak.''
Is education free of political interference or indoctrination? ''No - in fact, it is the quite opposite of that, as education system is usually one of the first places, where indoctrination begins. Usually most of the educational system is left in the hands of the regional parties, and sometimes - guilds, and syndicates as well, so a lot of them use indoctrination. In fact, SC is an ideologically very radical entity, which has described itself as ''anti-monarchist, anti-atheist, anti-democratic, and anti-capitalist'' - politics in SC's university are usually taught with heavy political bias, with beliefs of jingoism, glorification of warfare, and Hegelian dialectics mixed with ''world revolution'', state-planned economy, and religious evangelism. Even in subjects like maths, physics, sports, and engineering, political messages are usually inserted left and right. Some regions also employ ''Republican Vanguards'' - units similar to Mao's ''Red Guards'', which are supposed to mostly ''fight against pro-monarchist, and pro-atheist'' views. Some regions take a more traditionalist approach for their propaganda, while others are more focused on futurism - an ideology, which is typically referred to as ''a gift from the Old World'' by some people in SC. Due of various different ideologies within the SC's regions, universities, and schools have different curriculum.''
Are citizens able to express dissent in practice, without fearing retribution? ''No, not at all. As SC is basically a police state (Or rather a collection of police states), expressing any other political, or social thought, which is not allowed by the regional parties, and governors, will end pretty badly. While SC's governors don't really like dissent of any kind, they hate monarchists, anarchists, capitalists, and atheists in particular, due of SC's ideology set. Tom also hates ''separatist nationalists'', as he thinks, that ''they make the Commonwealth weak''. If you are caught being a dissenter, you will be either assaulted by vigilantes at a night hour, or be arrested by SCPS - a mix of KGB, Stasi, FBI, and various other security agencies, which has countless branches across the regions, which are subject to the central branch in the Megastates. Punishment can range from 15 years in forced labor camp, to death penalty, depending, on how much of a threat SC's agencies view the dissenter. That said, underground opposition groups haven't been eradicated at all in SC, but rather the other way around - according to SCPS data, ''underground democratic groups keep getting new recruits''.''
Is there freedom of assembly? Are peaceful protests allowed, and are they able to proceed in practice? ''For the most form, protests of any kind aren't allowed, as they are seen as a form of dissent, and ''something, that should be suppressed''. Police, and army has rights to intervene, in order to stop any protests, both peaceful, and violent. So, no, there is not really a freedom of assembly in any of the states, which compose the SC. There are a few exceptions to this rule, however - protests organized by state labor unions are usually allowed, if they are peaceful, and have been arranged by contacting with local authorities first. However, considering the fact, that those labor unions are under state's control, along with companies themselves, and that independent labor unions practically don't exist in SC, some people say, that ''it defeats the whole purpose of labor unions'', and that SC's labor union ''protests'' are just a ''caricature of a protest'', as ''government is basically protesting against itself'', due of fact, that it controls both state CEOs, and state labor union leaders. There are a few other exceptions like that too, but as those are all related to state services, it could be said, that independent protests aren't allowed.''
Are there basic guarantees of due process, and are they upheld in practice? ''No, neither SC's ''constitution'', nor any regional laws guarantee a due process, as SC's governments view criminals as the absolute scum, so the courts, government, army, and police have no reason to respect any ''legal rights'', and no person owes them in any of the Commonwealth's regions. Yes, not even a high-level official is spared, if they aren't lucky enough. (That said, a prisoner from ranks of Elites is more likely to be treated well than a Prole). So, for the same reason, they aren't being upheld in practice, because there are no guarantees of due process to speak of in the first place. As said before, kangaroo courts, and unfair trials are nothing uncommon, which also means, that government agents can assassinate a person outside from sanction of law - suspicion alone is an enough reason for government to approve of such operation. However, such blatant disregard has made a lot of citizens to doubt their trust in the system, and despise police, along with judges, in secret, and justice has been hurt severely. (That said, there is also a personality cult around the police, and army as well, as they also have many fanatical supporters.)''
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement inside the country and of international travel, including in education, residence or employment? ''No, not at all. First, there is not ''international travel'' in SC, due of the fact, that it is a single world government, and no other independent country exists in its world. (Although its regions have very big autonomy, to the point of extreme) However, travel outside the person's region of birth is highly regulated - unless you are an Elite, or your division has been sent to an exercise to an another region, receiving a travel permit is a long, and tedious process. Also, those permits are just temporary - while it theoretically is possible to stay for life in an another region, in practice, it is extremely hard, due of bureaucratic processes. So, an average citizen will often not interact with people outside of their Commonwealth, or even region during their lifetime, with exception of Elites, which travel for a visit, or soldiers, who have been dislocated in the region. If someone tries to leave the region without travel permit, most of regional border checkpoints are heavily guarded, and even if they manage to escape, neighbor regions, or even the entire Commonwealth will be quickly alerted by a network of SCPS regional branches, agents, army, cops, and border guards.''
Do individuals enjoy basic social freedoms (do they have control over appearance? are they able to freely choose marriage partners and size of family? how common is domestic violence?)? ''People usually have to conform to a strict dress code - for formal events, a business suit is preferable. For other cases, a 50s attire should be worn instead, depending on each region's traditions (For example, 50s attire in China, and America was quite different from each other) - as SC is very conservative, and even reactionary, most of modern clothing and fashion would be unacceptable there, like short skirts, for an example. (Army-styled jeans are more accepted, though) Dress code is also strictly separated for genders, and in some regions, it is illegal for men to wear female clothing. Marriages are usually arranged by the family, and in some cases - by state itself. In some regions, people sometimes can marry on their own will, but it is pretty rare. So, for the most part, people can't choose their partners. While divorce is theoretically possible, legal process is messy on purpose, in order to reduce the divorce rate. Family structure is traditional, similar to Chinese family structure, and nuclear family model has mostly ceased to be relevant there. While the exact amount of domestic violence cases is hard to calculate, due of SC's sheer size, and lack of data in the newest SC's regions (Former disputed zone), the estimated amount of domestic violence cases is pretty high, even in more developed SC's regions. While some indeed see it as a problem, most of The Party's members brush the statistics off.''
Are individuals able to freely set up their own business? Are property rights adequately protected? ''Individuals are not allowed to form companies, which could possibly bring competitions to state companies, for an example in weapons sphere - all SC's guns are made by one state-controlled company, along with its countless regional branches. That said, in some cases, small family businesses are allowed, especially in countryside, mostly in spheres like food supply, as state farms not always can supply all of populace with food. That said, collectivization of farmland is still going on, and if SC's authorities deem, that a private business has grown ''too big'', it will be either broken up, or just shut down by SCPS agents. In other words, free market is pretty much non-existent there, and it gets choked instead. As for property rights... While SC offers some protection of private property against individuals, there is little to no protection from the regional governments withing the SC, which can displace you, if they want, and either turn your house into a public building, or build something else in its place - due of that, a lot of people in SC live in Khrushchyovka styled apartments. While confiscated houses are usually not allowed to be used for Party's member personal residences, some have tried to circumvent this.''
PARTICIPATION AND GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY
How is citizenship determined? ''There are two citizenships - Commonwealth's citizenship, and regional citizenship. Getting Commonwealth's citizenship is very easy - you just have to be born on the godforsaken planet. However, regional citizenship is way more important than Commonwealth's citizenship, as while SC's citizenship represents humanity as a whole, regional citizenship represents the region, from which you come from. In order to get regional citizenship, you not only have to be born there, but you must also be a native to the region by blood, and language - one is tested by DNA test. If you turn out to be genetically closer to a group from another region, you will usually get sent to that region, as SC has both time, and resources for that. For the same reason, citizens from other regions without a travel permit will be usually sent back to their own region. Also, travel permits are usually only temporary, as settling in an another region outside of your home region is practically impossible, due of bureaucratic obstacles.
Who is able to vote in elections? ''Depends on an election - in Commonwealth's President election, all Party's members, which have reached age of 18, can vote, as they are considered as ''international elections''. In regional Commonwealth's elections, all Party's members, who are 18 or older, and are a member of the said Commonwealth's governments, can vote. (For example, in Canadian Commonwealth's President-Governor elections, only Party's members from Canadian regions (Prairies, Northwest, Greater North, The East, and Ontario) can vote in them). In autonomy's, or one region's elections, only the Party's members of said regions/autonomies can vote in them, as Tom considers it as ''their own matter''. However, in all those elections, only Party's members themselves can vote - which means, that lower classes like Proles can't vote, unless they somehow are the members of Party. It is also the reason, why people like army's generals, clergy, cosmonauts, farmers, etc, often carry the Party's membership card.''
Are different segments of the population (men, women, the LGBT community, ethnic minorities...) treated equally? ''No, not really. Due of SC's reactionary, and fascistic nature, LGBT often don't fare there well, and even during reformist period, when SC loosened its anti-socialist stance, and adopted some of their economics, for an example, question of LGBT wasn't touched very much, as SC would better like to brush it below the carpet, even if it is getting really problematic. Gender equality still has a long road to go, due of SC's traditional gender role structure in the society - despite the fact, that many more talented women now have opportunities to succeed in places like army, science field, space exploration, etc, there is still a wide gap between genders, and a lot of regions are outright patriarchal. While treatment of minorities has greatly improved since 80s, when reformist wing reforms gave them a place in government through regional parties, in many cases, they still face persecution outside from their designated autonomies/regions. Societies themselves are also split in three levels - Elites, which usually are the members of the Party, and other well-off individuals, Middle Class, which usually consists from better-off workers, and various officials, which aren't members of the Party, and Proles - usually the poorer workers, who traditionally have made up a large segment of population, but lack influence in politics, and usually do the hard work in factories, and farms.''
Are the above groups well represented in government? ''While ethnic minorities usually have their own designated regions, and political parties, which give them a bit of a voice in the bigger UCN (United Commonwealth Nations) HQ, as they are a part of the larger block made by 13 larger sections of the wide tent, in practice, their voice often gets overshadowed by those political factions (Or rather parties inside parties, like a matryoshka doll), which often have larger influence in SC's politics (Spanish, Afrikaners, Brazilians, Americans, etc.), and SC's high-ranked personnel from both ''first world'', and ''second world'' still thinks, that smaller regional parties are just ''subordinates''. While there have been more women moving in the government during last years, it is a slow process, and men are still an overwhelming majority in regional governments, due of SC's reactionary nature. For the same reason, LGBT are highly underrepresented there as well, and face persecution in almost all SC's regions.''
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? ''Well, yeah... Both in past, and present, we have carried out operations like this, sanctioned by the government. As of now, while there are no active, coordinated attacks on groups going on due of Tomism's pan-human stance, demographic changes, and displacements are still going on - for example, in Balkans, a lot of ethnic groups from other sides get displaced from each other's territories, which SC has deemed as ''ethnic regions''. While SC is a world government, it doesn't aim for multiculturalism at all - instead, it basically creates an ''one big ghetto'', with countless sections being the various regions, and autonomous zones within the Commonwealth's, with borders separating them. Outside from high-ranked personnel, and soldiers, our region average persons don't interact with people from other regions. Also, considering our hatred against other sapient species (asides from robots), if we ever get in the space...''
(OOC:) Any suggestions for future editions of the index? ''No, I don't really have any suggestions at the moment, sorry. Although, perhaps a separate ranking of categories like civil liberties, and elections alongside with overall total ranking would be nice?"
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Palmyrion » Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:59 pm
by Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:05 pm
by Plaetopia » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:20 pm
Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia wrote:OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
Are the government or nonstate groups deliberately and systematically changing the demographics of the country so as to dilute or eliminate a particular group? Are you kidding me?! Of course not! That is tantamount to genocide and it is in no way acceptable or permissible!
Plaetopia Post: Plaetopian economy slowly recovering | A new law passed by the Federal Assembly explicitly recognizes persecution because of sexual orientation as a valid reason for asylum in Plaetopia
by Maineiacs » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:25 pm
by Nokelon » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:29 pm
by Blueflarst » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:35 pm
by Maineiacs » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:47 pm
by Alpes a Septentrionali Imperium » Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:51 pm
by First American Empire » Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:35 pm
by Soldeg » Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:27 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Galactic Powers, Niwe England, The Crooked Beat
Advertisement