Evaluation of Your Nation

[Minotzia]

I will evaluate your nation if you wish, and classify it according to economic, political, civil, military, and religious regulation. This opinion is equivalent to the position Minotzia has in foreign policy, though you don't have to count it for RP reasons unless you want to. Also, I would appreciate if you evaluated my country along lines you see fit. Use my factbook, located in my signature, because I don't particularly care about my "gameplay" nation.

[La Repubblica Fascista]

Me

[Jakobia Minor]

we would be curious to see your evaluation...

[Frenca]

We would be curious, Minotzia. Please evaluate my nation.

[Kalakda]

Yes, evaluate Kalakda, please.

[Avenio]

Indeed, I'm curious as well. If you have time, could you please evaluate Avenio?

EDIT: An evaluation of Minotzia is coming as soon as I have time.

EDIT2: Argh, I just realized Avenio doesn't have a factbook. Hang on and I'll dredge something up...

[Rejistania]

I'd be interested as well. My factbook is here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=18374

[Minotzia]

Please post a link to your factbooks, as I will not evaluate game versions of your nation but only RP ones.

Minotzia finds that the history of Rejistania is very unstable, but that the current government is in an acceptable state. Most of the policies promoted by their government are at least tolerable. Foreign policy isn't particularly outlined, so Minotzia has to form an opinion based on their domestic structure. The Rejistanian government seems to be too idealistic and based in religious values for a secular government, and realist policy (as far as we can tell) has evaporated from their legislative body. If given an opportunity for diplomatic talks, Minotzia would stress the importance of increasing foreign direct investment into the Rejistanian economy, and giving tax breaks to large businesses in order to attract that investment.

[Frenca]

Please post a link to your factbooks, as I will not evaluate game versions of your nation but only RP ones.

Minotzia finds that the history of Rejistania is very unstable, but that the current government is in an acceptable state. Most of the policies promoted by their government are at least tolerable. Foreign policy isn't particularly outlined, so Minotzia has to form an opinion based on their domestic structure. The Rejistanian government seems to be too idealistic and based in religious values for a secular government, and realist policy (as far as we can tell) has evaporated from their legislative body. If given an opportunity for diplomatic talks, Minotzia would stress the importance of increasing foreign direct investment into the Rejistanian economy, and giving tax breaks to large businesses in order to attract that investment.

My factbook is in my sig.

[The Resurgent Dream]

I'll bite. What do you think of us?

[United Southernours]

I am also interested. My factbook is in the sig.

[Von Amerika]

Feel free to evaluate our nation. We are interested to see how our large and powerful nation compares in the NS world. We would like to build our nations factbook based on this evaluation.

[Minotzia]

Please post a link to your factbooks, as I will not evaluate game versions of your nation but only RP ones.

Minotzia finds that the history of Rejistania is very unstable, but that the current government is in an acceptable state. Most of the policies promoted by their government are at least tolerable. Foreign policy isn't particularly outlined, so Minotzia has to form an opinion based on their domestic structure. The Rejistanian government seems to be too idealistic and based in religious values for a secular government, and realist policy (as far as we can tell) has evaporated from their legislative body. If given an opportunity for diplomatic talks, Minotzia would stress the importance of increasing foreign direct investment into the Rejistanian economy, and giving tax breaks to large businesses in order to attract that investment.

My factbook is in my sig.

The clearly socialistic structure of the Republic, and support for socialist practices, despite the claim of being capitalistic, would force Minotzia to take a direct neoconservative approach to Frenca. The goal of Minotzian foreign policy towards Frenca would be supporting subversive elements within the socialist party to dismantle their ability to compete effectively. Most of the diplomatic agreements with Frenca would be of necessity economic, as military arrangements with a nation that has the potential for both internal and external conflict would simply bog down relations. Primarily the intelligence agencies of Minotzia would work to keep capitalists in power by any means, and to promote the expansion of neoconservative rhetoric and policy among future candidates.

[JJ Place]

I'll play; sign me up. JJ Place's Factbook is still in the works; yet, you get the basic jist about what JJ Place is all about, and there might be a few forum posts of mine in regards to JJ Place you might have randomly struggled across.

[Frenca]

Please post a link to your factbooks, as I will not evaluate game versions of your nation but only RP ones.

Minotzia finds that the history of Rejistania is very unstable, but that the current government is in an acceptable state. Most of the policies promoted by their government are at least tolerable. Foreign policy isn't particularly outlined, so Minotzia has to form an opinion based on their domestic structure. The Rejistanian government seems to be too idealistic and based in religious values for a secular government, and realist policy (as far as we can tell) has evaporated from their legislative body. If given an opportunity for diplomatic talks, Minotzia would stress the importance of increasing foreign direct investment into the Rejistanian economy, and giving tax breaks to large businesses in order to attract that investment.

My factbook is in my sig.

The clearly socialistic structure of the Republic, and support for socialist practices, despite the claim of being capitalistic, would force Minotzia to take a direct neoconservative approach to Frenca. The goal of Minotzian foreign policy towards Frenca would be supporting subversive elements within the socialist party to dismantle their ability to compete effectively. Most of the diplomatic agreements with Frenca would be of necessity economic, as military arrangements with a nation that has the potential for both internal and external conflict would simply bog down relations. Primarily the intelligence agencies of Minotzia would work to keep capitalists in power by any means, and to promote the expansion of neoconservative rhetoric and policy among future candidates.

So... Basically my nation is socialist pretending to be a capitalist? Wrong. It's part socialist and capitalist (mostly capitalist). And the Democratic Party is currently in power, not the Socialist party.

[Minotzia]

I am also interested. My factbook is in the sig.

Minotzia finds the practice of slavery to be morally evil, but we are willing to overlook it due to the dominating presence of Roman Catholics and Conservative elements in the United Southern government. Foreign policy towards the CSA would be directed at expanding economic, and possibly military pacts, that would focus on eliminating potential socialist movements. Relations with the CSA would be warm, though due to the moral and political polarization that slavery creates, they would most likely be kept out of the public eye. Economically we approve of the CSA, and would attempt to get foreign direct investment from some of the CSA's corporations.

[Unified Western States]

I'd be interested.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=45553&p=1871038#p1871038

[Minotzia]

So... Basically my nation is socialist pretending to be a capitalist? Wrong. It's part socialist and capitalist (mostly capitalist). And the Democratic Party is currently in power, not the Socialist party.

We consider you to be far too leftist on the mixed economic scale, and the presence of a large Socialist party doesn't require Frenca to be controlled by them, it just means we have to take precautions when dealing with you. The government could become Socialistic in a time of crisis, and that in turn could force Minotzia to defend its ideological practices which would create tensions that could be avoided by simply maintaining the capitalist status quo via neoconservative policy.

[Frenca]

So... Basically my nation is socialist pretending to be a capitalist? Wrong. It's part socialist and capitalist (mostly capitalist). And the Democratic Party is currently in power, not the Socialist party.

We consider you to be far too leftist on the mixed economic scale, and the presence of a large Socialist party doesn't require Frenca to be controlled by them, it just means we have to take precautions when dealing with you. The government could become Socialistic in a time of crisis, and that in turn could force Minotzia to defend its ideological practices which would create tensions that could be avoided by simply maintaining the capitalist status quo via neoconservative policy.

Trust me, the Socialists here are medium-sized, and in our last election, they only got 0.56% of the vote. (about 1-2 million) And it's easy to maintain the capitalist government. Rven though the economy is the socialist-capitalist mix, most are about 99.5% capitalist and 0.5% socialist.

[Minotzia]

I'd be interested.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=45553&p=1871038#p1871038

The Unified Western States represent the dystopia that Minotzia hopes to avoid at all costs. Relations with the UWS would be strained, if not openly hostile, due to the strong socialist and communist elements, as well as the proliferation of liberal social policy throughout. Most foreign policy would be directed at covert attempts to inspire capitalistic methodologies and policies in the UWS government. Support for Conservative and neoconservative leaders would be the official stance of Minotzia towards the UWS, and any meeting between the Minotzian government and UWS leaders would need to take place under close mediation by a third party.

[Unified Western States]

I'd be interested.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=45553&p=1871038#p1871038

The Unified Western States represent the dystopia that Minotzia hopes to avoid at all costs. Relations with the UWS would be strained, if not openly hostile, due to the strong socialist and communist elements, as well as the proliferation of liberal social policy throughout. Most foreign policy would be directed at covert attempts to inspire capitalistic methodologies and policies in the UWS government. Support for Conservative and neoconservative leaders would be the official stance of Minotzia towards the UWS, and any meeting between the Minotzian government and UWS leaders would need to take place under close mediation by a third party.

Socialist yes, but communist no. If you'll notice, the communists have no seats anywhere and they're power is nearly negligible. And the newly elected president isn't a member of the socialist party, but of the liberal party. Not that that will make things much better.

Edited: Also, "covert attempts to inspire capitalistic methodologies"? I'd be interested to see how that would work.

[The Resurgent Dream]

I have always considered NSWiki a much better, more navigable, more flexible source for nation information than the factbook forum. Therefore, most of my serious fact recording takes place there.

http://www.nswiki.net/index.php?title=T ... gent_Dream

[Minotzia]

I'll play; sign me up. JJ Place's Factbook is still in the works; yet, you get the basic jist about what JJ Place is all about, and there might be a few forum posts of mine in regards to JJ Place you might have randomly struggled across.

Minotzian relations towards JJ Place would be cool, mainly because of the extremely leftist social policy. Economic incentives for JJ Place businesses would be the primary function of Minotzian foreign policy. Because of its incomprehendable appreciation for a hyper-individualistic and consumer society, Minotzia would struggle to find common ground diplomatically. Most neoconservative action on JJ Place would focus on the establishment of a powerful state to manage the relations of business towards foreign entities.

[Eulor]

please evaluate Eulor

[Haiz]

Haiz requests your evaluation based on this: http://sites.google.com/site/haizrp