Clarified Thread Requirements for F&NI
Though this is already posted in the Welcome Thread, given such a clarification on standing policy, an announcement for the board has been made to bring players up to date and ensure they are informed.
Over the years, Factbooks & National Information has struggled with finding a comfortable balance between being an open place for factbooking and worldbuilding discussion, and having topics which actually promote qualitative and substantial discussion. In an effort to help promote discussion and restrict spam, Moderation has defined the following as requirements threads must meet in F&NI, or they risk being locked as insufficient. Before you create a thread, please review the requirements below and be certain that your thread - regardless of its form - meets these requirements.
As always, pure spam, not topical, or insubstantial threads will be locked.
Over the years, Factbooks & National Information has struggled with finding a comfortable balance between being an open place for factbooking and worldbuilding discussion, and having topics which actually promote qualitative and substantial discussion. In an effort to help promote discussion and restrict spam, Moderation has defined the following as requirements threads must meet in F&NI, or they risk being locked as insufficient. Before you create a thread, please review the requirements below and be certain that your thread - regardless of its form - meets these requirements.
- 1. Threads must begin with a substantive opening post.
"Works-in-progress" are permitted, but must contain substantial information on their own. Do not open a thread with an OP that simply states "Work-in-progress" or similar. Do not open a thread that is simply a survey, questionnaire, or resource registry with no explanation. Do not open a "Your Nation"/"Your Leader"/other discussion topic without substantial information to actually promote discussion - that includes opening posts that amount to "see title."
2. Discussion threads must cover a topic which otherwise has a substantial likelihood of promoting discussion, and not simply invite spam or "drive-by posting."
Not every tiny detail - from light bulb wattage to whether salt or pepper is preferred - needs a thread; expand upon your initial idea to include broader points of related discussion and/or otherwise ensure that enough information can be provided as for discussion to grow. (Such as "domestic and neighborhood infrastructure" or "herbs, spices, and cultural cuisine.") If you cannot do this, do not open a thread, as it will be locked; instead, look for another thread that fits your desired topic - which is a good recommendation to do in general - or post the topical question/survey in the Miscellaneous Worldbuilding Thread. Non-discussion threads (such as factbooks, embassies, news threads, etc.) must otherwise stand on their own merits with respect to the context of their purpose(s) and otherwise be of appreciable substance. Threads otherwise lacking content will be locked.
Kyrusia wrote:As to "Rule #2": We're not looking for "it has to be x-words long" or it has to be "of such and such" quality (excusing obvious spam, of course); what we are looking for is that topics that are presented are actually beginning with a substantial OP, and the topics in question actually have room to grow for discussion.
3. Threads must otherwise adhere to the rules and otherwise not promote spam, baiting, trolling, or other actionable behaviors.
As always, pure spam, not topical, or insubstantial threads will be locked.