NATION

PASSWORD

The State of Gandvik (Factbook (AMW))

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]
User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

The State of Gandvik (Factbook (AMW))

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:11 pm

People and Society

Overview: Gandvik, by a comfortable margin the planet's largest nation if rated according to contiguous land area, is also and perhaps accordingly one if its most heterogeneous in human terms. Five hundred years of largely uninterrupted, often murderous eastward expansion from a core of early principalities, bishoprics, and chivalric order-states clustered along the Baltic Sea's eastern littoral and its adjoining inland waterways to the far Pacific shore, joined in its later stages by a colonial foray into the East Indies, served to bring under direct or indirect Gandvian authority a diverse and disparate range of groups. When taken together, these constitute a national community which, however ineffectively and incompletely integrated, has proven surprisingly durable despite episodes of tension. An official nationalities policy once characterized by the frequently violent assertion of Lutheran, European Gandvik's cultural and political supremacy over a variety of dissident religious and non-European communities treated, for their own part, as decidedly subject elements, has over the course of the twentieth century's latter half shifted gradually, if nonetheless emphatically, toward a permissive and tolerant pluralism which tends to rest on extensive linguistic autonomy and local self-government. This apparent relinquishment of European Gandvik's former dominance has not, however, met with anything like universal popularity, and, indeed, counts powerful, vocal detractors in virtually every segment of Gandvian society. Nor has it proven entirely successful as an antidote to inter-communal strife, as numerous instances of rioting, disorder, and political crisis will readily attest. Whether Gandvik's ethnic-linguistic crazy-quilt, held together at times, it seems, by nothing stronger than an albeit dense bureaucratic mesh colored by various more or less sincere expressions of goodwill and an increasingly hollow insistence on a shared Uralic heritage, will prove equal to twenty-first-century challenges is, as yet, anyone's guess. Some commentators have even sought to explain a fundamentally conservative, deeply-rooted armed forces establishment's evidently wholehearted embrace of explicit socialism as an attempt to use that universalizing doctrine against the nation's problematic internal contradictions. Any such attempt, of course, runs up against stubborn obstacles in Tataria's perennial, ethnically- and religiously-tinted industrial strife, a flat refusal by many European Gandvians to endorse a program that repudiates their preeminence in government and society, and Depkazi leader Chingiz Khagan's militant, ascendant brand of Turkic nationalism. Gandvik's profoundly inefficient, confused, byzantine apparatus of government would scarcely be expected to strike an outside observer as an organization particularly well-suited to confront such challenges, and a distinct sense of foreboding would have to be acknowledged within the corridors of power themselves.

Demographic classifications can be drawn, in modern Gandvik, along a number of different and, sometimes, somewhat contradictory lines, depending upon whether linguistic, ethnic, or religious qualities are emphasized. A simple majority of Gandvians might be classed as White Europeans, while a varied collection of Turkic groups, most numerous of which is the community of Jaizar Tatars, makes up the second-largest share of the national population, followed by Joeson people. Just under two percent of Gandvians are East Indian immigrants or their descendants, at least in part, though accurate data for that particular group, subject as it is to a virtually-indecipherable and, more often than not, arbitrarily-applied code on residence and citizenship, is difficult to obtain. Official statistics, at least, claim that virtually every adult Gandvian can speak, read, and write the Fennic official language, though when primary spoken language is taken into consideration the picture becomes more complex. Approximately 80% of Gandvians are, according to available data, multilingual, of which nearly half, or 40% of the population as a whole, uses as their first language something other than official Gandvian. Speakers of Tungusic languages constitute a plurality of that sub-total, followed closely by Turkic- and German-speakers, the former chiefly to be found along the Jaizar and abutting regions, the latter along the Baltic coastline. A small if, politically, quite significant population of Shieldian speakers is to be found in the region between the middle Jaizar and the Ural mountains, and this is perhaps the only linguistic category in Gandvik which also corresponds closely with a religious affiliation. A comfortable majority, rather more than seventy percent, of all Gandvians belong at least nominally to the Lutheran state church, for which at least some credit must be assigned to policies of forced Christianization pursued off and on, and with greater or lesser stringency, between about 1500 and 1900, and just under twenty percent identify as practicing Muslims, the vast majority Hanafi Sunni. Centuries of official discrimination, veering at times into outright massacre, have left modern Gandvik with only minuscule remnants of what were once substantial Catholic and Jewish communities, and much the same can be said of Buddhism or the various interrelated animist faiths belonging to Siberia and the high Arctic. Forced conversion affected Muslims too, of course, though outright persecution was suspended in the mid-1800s as part of an effort, less than wholly successful, to undermine Shieldian rule in Gallaga and Central Asia. Movers, Calvinists, and adherents of other reformed Christian doctrines add up to a statistically small though uniquely cohesive and politically-active element on Gandvik's religious landscape, and while discrimination of any sort on religious grounds, abolished by 1914's since-suspended republican constitution, has never been restored, relations between that particular collection of churches and the official Gandvian state are far from warm.

Gandvik itself, as a name, derives from an ancient term for the Gulf of Bothnia, used by Nibelung chroniclers during the Middle Ages to describe that region's inhabitants. A variety of Fennic-Uralic groups had spread throughout much of Northern and Northeastern Europe by approximately 300 BCE, and as of the first century ACE these had developed certain commonalities in language and religious practice. Prior to 1200 ACE, nearly all Gandvians adhered to a polytheistic faith that venerated a central pantheon of nature spirits, whose exact composition, size, relative importance, and methods of worship varied from place to place according to local conditions and preferences. Christianity, however, began to make inroads during the 1100s as a result of scattered missionary activity, with the first mass conversions taking place between 1100 and 1150 in modern-day Estland. Edwy's Northern Crusade, followed by a number of similar ventures conducted with or without Rome's sanction by a string of Nibelung and Shieldian noblemen, accelerated this process greatly, and within about a century most major Gandvian peoples had adopted the Christian religion. Christianity's doctrinal coherence and regimentation has been cited by many scholars as an important centralizing influence on what had previously been a loose, semi-confederated collection of independent principalities and duchies, though Gandvik's Baltic societies, apart from being quickest to Christianize, had also amassed considerable mercantile wealth, and leveraged this, along with their higher populations and control of major trade routes, to extend their authority over inland territories.

This history stands in stark contrast to narratives propounded by nationalist elements in modern Gandvik emphasizing the existence of a quintessentially Gandvian ethnic identity, as at its roots the modern Gandvian state can more properly be described as halfway a creation of German and Shieldian mercenaries, and halfway a self-conscious imitation of those same foreign customs by a patchwork of native leaders whose repudiation of their earlier identities was rarely less than total. Within a remarkably short time, any ready distinction between conqueror and conquered disappeared, and a new ruling aristocracy which grew out of this fusion took up the Crusading mantle with great ardor, if less than iron-clad Papal sanction, in a series of savage wars against the Uralic and Slavic peoples inhabiting the Jaizar's upper reaches. It is an uncomfortable fact that a cultural and linguistic identity which claims for itself ancient roots in prehistoric, certainly pre-Christian Europe is actually, for the most part, a creation of nineteenth-century romantic nationalists the likes of which assembled from decidedly patchy and selective anthropological and ethnographic researches something that purported to be a rediscovered, authentic Gandvian.

Early Gandvik's subjugation of those loosely-organized polytheistic peoples along its immediate Eastern frontier and around the head-waters of the Jaizar brought it, almost by default, into conflict with a Shieldian Grand Empire from which the Gandvian aristocracy, its origins notwithstanding, was growing steadily more distinct, and a string of well-established, if, often, mutually-antagonistic, Muslim-Turkic principalities along the middle and lower Jaizar, tributaries of the Depkazi Khaganate. This vicious three-sided struggle would largely shape the course of subsequent Gandvian history, and while Gandvik tended to fare poorly, sometimes disastrously so, against a Shieldian Grand Empire then at the height of its power, Depkazia and its Tatar allies, beset simultaneously by Gandvik and the Shield, suffered an incomparably worse fate. Where most of Islamic Central Asia fell at a steady rate under increasingly more direct Shieldian dominance, Gandvik, left to nibble around the edges of Shieldian conquests, absorbed ever larger numbers of Muslims as it pushed east in what many began to see as a race to the Pacific.

Population: 122,261,815 (best estimate)

Population Growth Rate: -0.01%
Age Structure: 0-14 years: 14.5%
15-64 years: 68.2%
64- years: 17.3%

Life Expectancy at Birth: Total Population: 73.05
Male: 67.4
Female: 78.7

Ethnic-Linguistic Groups: Gandvian (majority), Turkic, Shieldian, German, Udmurt, Komi, Nenets

Languages: Gandvian (official, Balto-Fennic) and related dialects, Omalian, Zyrian, Tatar, Shieldian, German (main second language), English, Other

Religions: Lutheranism (state religion) (85.5%), Islam (7.8%), Reformed Protestantism (3.35%), Moverism (1.4%), Other/Unrecorded (>2%)

Literacy: Total Population: 99% (official), 89.25% (best estimate)
Male: 92.8% (best estimate)
Female: 85.7% (best estimate)[/spoiler]

Religion

Pre-Christianity

Religious belief of a universal and systematically-organized character first developed in Gandvik along familiar polytheistic lines, and by 1000 ACE what began as an innumerable set of localized customs and rituals had coalesced around a central pantheon of nature deities, a sky god, an element held in common across many Uralic cultures, occupying its preeminent position. While local preferences still dictated exact modes and objects, and while there did not exist any single, entirely coherent doctrine, in their primary features animist and shamanist beliefs eventually acquired enough of a recognizable similarity and a mutually-intelligible set of tenets as to build throughout much of Scandinavia and northeastern Europe the foundations of what would later turn into a national culture. Pre-Christian Gandvian peoples shared their environment with a multitude of spirits, deities, ghosts, and mystical beings which in their dizzying variety watched over each facet of nature, and which could intercede in daily life for good or for ill. Worship revolved, generally, around the veneration of shrines and holy places believed to hold special significance for a particular spirit, at which offerings were made and ceremonies performed, usually presided-over by a Shaman, to ensure that metaphysical forces remained in balance and that the community would continue to enjoy the spirit world’s favor. Certain animals were also assigned sacred status, chief among them the bear and the elk, and attributed supernatural, miraculous powers.

Roman Catholicism

After 1100 ACE, however, traditional polytheism fell into a sharp and at times cataclysmically violent decline as Christianity in its Roman form, already dominant in continental Europe, spread inexorably north and east. Missionaries drawn from Nibelung dioceses first began to appear in Ingria and Savonia early in the 11th century, and, having prudently chosen to focus their proselytization efforts on the local nobility and merchant classes, soon succeeded in winning a number of important converts, of which the Grand Duke of Holmgard, baptized in 1181 and later canonized for his troubles, was probably their greatest conquest.

By 1200, Christian faith had already managed to root itself deeply within elite culture along the Baltic Sea’s northern and eastern shores, even if its overall following remained, at that stage, quite limited. Over the following century a combination of economic and political motivations, accompanied by guarantees of Papal legitimation for Crusades of murderous brutality against communities still clinging to their traditional beliefs, largely completed the process of Christianization in Holmgard, Ingria, Savonia, and Livonia, those territories which were shortly thereafter welded, by war, marriage, religion, and mercantile interest, into the first self-identifying Gandvian state.

As often occurred elsewhere in Europe, Roman Catholicism, in spite of its absolute status as solitary recognized and permissible form of religious expression, soon took on a distinctly local flavor, and a church whose expansion throughout western and central Gandvik undoubtedly owed a great deal to political and dynastic imperatives was, from its earliest days, manipulated openly by Gandvian rulers to decidedly secular ends. As crusading ardor diminished with the virtual elimination of competing belief systems, and as pre-Gandvian duchies and principalities became more deeply entangled in Shieldian affairs, relations with Rome, separated from its local agents by vast distances to begin with, grew contentious. Gandvik’s royal leadership routinely obstructed initiatives and ignored missives issued by a Papacy widely seen to favor Shieldian over Gandvian interests over a record of disharmony which was ultimately to include more than one bull of excommunication issued against a King of Gandvik. This official defiance tended, among its numerous other consequences, to create a relatively permissive environment for heterodox beliefs of wide and varied character, one result of which is frequently identified as Gandvik’s readiness to split from Roman obedience altogether during the 16th century, though true attitudes to doctrines regarded as heresy by Roman church officials tended to reverse themselves with often dangerous regularity.

State Church of Gandvik

Reformation doctrines as they are widely understood appeared in Gandvik quite soon after Martin Luther’s iconic Wittenberg protest, and found in a ruling establishment long disillusioned with successive hostile Papacies a receptive audience. Noblemen in Curonia, Estland, and Savonia, in regular contact with North German merchants, were among the first to adopt Lutheran teachings, and their influence at court, at a time when Gandvian monarchs, up to that point traditionally military-minded men who tended to be absent on campaign for years on end, proved decisive in the elevation, in 1558, of Lutheranism in its local embodiment to the status of state church. Queen Eleanora III, raised in an environment highly sympathetic to Lutheran doctrines, and educated by none other than Petrus Browallius, future archbishop of Turku and erstwhile student of Luther himself, proved an immensely enthusiastic champion of Protestantism and focused most of her formidable energies on ensuring its spread. That religious reformation provided a convenient rallying-point for popular emotion during Gandvik’s long, ultimately fruitless, involvement in the Shieldian Great Brothers War guaranteed it official favor even under several of Eleanora’s notoriously un-pious successors, and in spite of occasional violent Catholic reaction, rising to a level that ostensibly ignited a civil war between approximately 1665 and 1678, its preeminence was never seriously threatened.

It is often argued that Lutheranism’s most attractive character, where the greater share of Gandvian monarchs were concerned, was its ability to impose a degree of uniformity on a religious landscape that, as late as 1500, was in places Catholic, even Christian, in name only, and colored by a patchwork of heresies and de facto independent churches. Christian belief in Gandvik’s northern and eastern reaches brushed up against both surviving pockets of pre-Christian animism and a militant Islam, and where beliefs coexisted in regular contact their interaction often spawned yet additional lines of speculation, usually tending in the direction of syncretism. Whether or not they actually saw Lutheranism as an agent of Gandvian national identity, Gandvian rulers undoubtedly valued its regularizing character, and its status as solitary permissible mode of religious expression was over following centuries vigorously asserted.

Reformed Protestantism

Like many Lutheran churches, the Church of Gandvik retained a definite resemblance to the Catholic institutions that it supplanted, the new State Church reveling in ornament and iconography to a degree that Protestant visitors from elsewhere in Europe found nothing short of scandalous. A source of still more controversy was a continued predilection for corrupt administrative practices, sale of church offices and political manipulation of church appointments remaining widespread, much to the horror of religious intellectuals. Belief in the incompleteness of Gandvik’s reformation, by no means entirely unfounded if it were measured against standards set elsewhere in Europe, regularly found expression in dissent, and while never particularly widespread, Calvinism and Calvinist-inspired teachings did attract a significant number of adherents, many of them well-placed, during the difficult decades that followed defeat in the Great Brothers War. Indeed, Pietari I, usually given the honorific Suuri, or ‘the Great,’ for his military, bureaucratic, and architectural achievements, narrowly survived an attempt on his life by disgruntled Calvinist nobles, and Pietari’s resulting violent crackdown on religious nonconformance only partially succeeded.

Government

Overview
Gandvik is described by its ruling regime as a Principality, where supreme authority resides in the Prince's person, though real power rests with the so-called Chairman of the Council of State. An appointed Council of Deputies serves, ostensibly, to represent popular interests in state policy-making. There are very few institutional avenues by which independent actors can influence government decisions and opportunities for public participation in political life are extremely rare, but extensive patronage networks stemming from the Prince's cabinet and various state departments ensure that key officials are at least somewhat responsive to popular pressures, and they generally move to head-off potential sources of unrest through a mixture of financial incentives and outright repression. Soft measures, an official euphemism that refers to slander and disinformation, are also used widely, though officials must be careful that they do not make outrageous or obviously false claims against their target. The post of Chairman is theoretically determined by Princely appointment, but who exactly receives that appointment is usually decided by a process of infighting among powerful government officials that might take place over a period of several years. A given Chairman might designate his preferred successor, and those recommendations have been honored without exception by Gandvik's princely rulers, but currying favor and constituency-building can be long and dangerous processes. Chairmen are appointed for life, and although they are legally subject to dismissal by the Prince, the ruling Berdichyiv family is well aware of its dependent position and rarely interferes with internal politics. An interesting feature of government in Gandvik is its judiciary, which consists of both traditional legal professionals, supposed to interpret laws and offer rulings impartially, and a highly political Procuracy, intended to handle criminal investigations, prosecution of defendants, and judicial oversight functions as well.

Country Name: Conventional Long Form: Principality of Gandvik
Conventional Short Form: Gandvik
Abbreviation: GP (unofficial)
Local Country Name:

Government Type: Constitutional Monarchy

Capital: Riga (706,413)
Time Zone: UTC+1/2/3/4

Other Major Cities: Vitstenkyrka (Moscow), Ingermanburg, Paavali Tarsolainen (Arkhangelsk), Kullansarvi (Vladivostok), Menesk (Minsk), Oshel (Nizhny Novgorod), Voruta (Vilnius), Rääveli (Tallinn), Helsingfors (Helsinki), Molyhew (Mogliev), Vitbav (Vitebsk), Muurman, Miliniska (Smolensk), Alanko (Bryansk), Holmkarta (Novgorod), Pleskau (Pskov), Dinaburg (Daugavpils), Stora Slingrar (Velikiye Luki), Libava (Liepaja), Pirilinn (Kaluga), Hautakumpu (Yaroslavl), Laiskama (Vologda), Kotkalinna (Oryol), Olettamus (Tula), Brahe (Tolyatti), Tapana (Samara), Rautakestävyys (Ulyanovsk), Orjalinna (Orenburg), Tura (Ufa), Perem

Administrative Divisions: 18 Governates (Smaland, Rogaland, Trondelag, Bothnia, East Ruthenia, Estland, Curonia, Voronia, Nyensholm, Holmgard, Savonia, West Ruthenia, Polesia, Tataria, Keyserling Land, Nenetsia, Laponia)

Administrative Languages:

Independence: Gandvik emerged as a recognizable national entity during the 15th century ACE, and has remained so ever since in one form or another, discounting intermittent foreign occupations and annexations. Significant amounts of territory have been lost to, and regained from, the Shield and various Turkic and Nibelung states throughout history.

Public Holidays: New Year's Day, Epiphany (6 January), Good Friday (Moveable), Easter Sunday (Moveable), Easter Monday (Moveable), St. Valburg's Day (1 May), Ascension Day (Moveable), Pentecost (Moveable), Midsummer (Moveable), All Saints' Day (Moveable), National Day (6 December), Christmas (24/25 December), St. Stephen's Day (26 December)

Constitution: Articles of State signed by religious and military officials on 5 October 1927 replaced republican constitution of 1915.

Legal System: Civil Law: Judges rule on particular cases in accordance with official statutes and provisions set down in the national Civil Code and the Articles of State.

Suffrage: A Gandvian subject is considered legally and morally responsible at age 15, can be conscripted at age 18, and is eligible for compulsory military service until age 50. Candidates for parish and county-level political office are elected according to universal suffrage from a list of individuals approved by the provincial governor, and anyone over 20 and in good legal standing can participate.

Executive Branch: Chief of State: Adalbert Stefan Ludvig Bertil, Prince Adalbert II
Head of Government: Chancellor Antero Idman (acting)
Cabinet: 18-member Council of State, selected by Prince in consultation with Council Chairman
Elections:

Legislative Branch: dual-headed legislature, consisting of: Kuvernöörineuvostolla, or council of governors; Valtiopäivät, or diet

Political Parties: Political parties are expressly prohibited by the Articles of State. Several underground organizations exist, espousing a wide range of different programs, but these have, so far, been successfully repressed by state security forces and generally retain only limited, regional constituencies.

Judicial Branch: 5-member High Court appointed by Council of State for life terms, though subject to dismissal.

Flag Description: Green Nordic cross on yellow background with blue heraldic shield centered within cross

Economy

Overview
At its most recent valuation, Gandvik's gross domestic product stood at some 2.7 trillion English Pounds or just over 268 trillion Gandvian Marks, placing just ahead of Walmington and behind Rome for the position of fourth-largest world economy. Still in many respects backward-looking and insular, yet to embrace free-market thinking to any serious degree and marked by an often staggering level of corruption in business circles, Gandvik does not always seem like or act like a wealthy country, but is well-placed to benefit from its nearness to central Europe's hungry markets and a generous range of natural resources. Profitable fuel, mineral, and finished exports, bolstered by high tariff barriers and an artificially-devalued currency and paired with low unemployment and price controls on staple goods, have largely succeeded in maintaining a standard of living that, while not nearly so high as is encountered in nations like Rome, Nibelunc, Valendia, or Amerique, is historically unprecedented within Gandvik itself. Heavy industry, in particular metallurgy, automobile manufacturing, aerospace technology, and shipbuilding, remains as Gandvik's commercial backbone in spite of its declining importance relative to years past, and an increasing focus on domestic rather than export customers. Light industry, traditionally a neglected sector in an economy shaped to a large extent by central planning, has acquired an enhanced stature as of recent decades thanks to technological advances and typically low labor costs, and now accounts for a considerable share of national export earnings. The development of oil and natural gas deposits located both inland and offshore has also turned Gandvik into a major energy producer and a vital source of heating fuel for central Europe, while most pipelines and transport infrastructure connecting Europe with productive fields further east cross through Gandvian territory and generate further economic activity through their construction and upkeep. Significant reserves of coal, iron ore, titanium, nickel, platinum, uranium, zinc, rare earth elements, and numerous other minerals are mined for domestic industrial use and export as well, mainly in far northern and far eastern Gandvik. Much of Ruthenia and Tataria, covered by rolling steppe, is ideal for large-scale agriculture and both of those regions grow substantial cereal crops, mostly for domestic consumption.

Gandvik adheres to a hybrid economic model, one fundamentally statist in its emphasis on central control and government ownership but peripherally influenced by both capitalist and socialist elements. The Ministry of Trade and Industry, a mammoth technocratic entity headquartered in Ingermanburg, cooperates with the National Central Bank, the Kansallinen Keskuspankki or KKG, to manipulate and manage economic forces within Gandvik and negotiate trade agreements with other nations, and also plays a role in major infrastructure projects. Punitive tariffs are levied extensively in order to protect domestic industry from foreign competition, a measure intended both to guarantee maximum possible levels of employment and to safeguard a politically significant class of business owners and economic bureaucrats, though some tentative steps have recently been taken to liberalize Gandvik's trade regime in spite of staunch opposition from within and outside government. Corruption is an inescapable feature of economic activity in Gandvik, which, as in nearly all aspects of public affairs, is unofficially governed by a colossal web of patronage with its center on Riga Castle. At a major cost in terms of efficiency and accountability, this system provides a reasonable level of security for those who operate within its informal parameters, and failure to abide by set customs can spell disaster for any would-be businessman.

Labor relations in Gandvik are governed by a corporatist arrangement, in which workers' and employers' associations, centrally organized and managed by the Ministry of Trade and Industry, represent their collective interests in a routinized process of wage and regulatory negotiations. One of Gandvian fascism's most lasting political legacies, corporatism was initially seen by state authorities as a means to tame and co-opt radical elements on both sides of the ideological spectrum and to build popular support behind a ruling establishment whose outlook, at a time of great social upheaval, was fundamentally rooted in conservatism and traditionalism. Today, confederated labor and business groups function largely as channels for patronage and graft, though their large membership, extensive resources, and broad reach make them formidable political actors in their own right and they tend to exert a great deal of informal influence on economic policy.

Nominal GDP (Purchasing Power Parity): 3,07 billion pounds

GDP Per Capita (PPP): 25,104 pounds

GDP Composition by Sector:

Labor Force: (est.)
By Occupation:

Unemployment Rate: Official: 1.5%; Unofficial Estimate: 5-6% national, 25-27% among 18-25 yr. olds

Agriculture/Aquaculture Products: potatoes, vegetables, grain, sugar beets, livestock, dairy products, eggs, poultry, fish

Principal Industries: oil extraction, mining, metallurgy, energy, manufacturing, agriculture, food processing, fishing, forestry, brewing and distilling

Electricity Production by Source:

Export Commodities: crude oil, natural gas, steel, aluminum, fertilizer, transportation equipment, ships, aircraft, machine tools, construction equipment, mining equipment

Import Commodities: electronic equipment, high-quality textiles, foodstuffs, optical equipment, chemical products

Major Trade Partners: Valendia, Amerique, Depkazia, The Commonwealth of Socialist Republics

Currency: Mark (MK)

Exchange Rates: Marks per Walmingtonian Pound: 98.3

Transport and Communications

Overview
As one of Europe's largest nations in terms of land area, Gandvik relies upon an extensive network of transportation and communications infrastructure for both its economic vitality and political cohesion. Road, rail, and air routes link major population centers with one another in a far-reaching national grid, while canals and inland waterways enable barge traffic between the Baltic Sea, White Sea, and Roskus (Volga) River. Prior to 1900 Gandvik rated as one of Europe's less-developed nations, late to industrialize and difficult to traverse quickly, but a growing manufacturing base, coupled with an expanding population and rising GDP, sparked an exponential increase in road-building and rail-laying after about 1880, which, after tapering-off before 1939, picked up again after 1945 with the construction of a national highway system. Telecommunications have also evolved from Morse code telegraphy into a modern public switched telephone network, with recent developments focusing on greater digitization and use of fiber-optic cables for improved transmission speeds and capacities. Cell phones are still something of a rarity in Gandvik, as government tariffs ensure that they are priced above the means of most working-class people, and much the same can be said for private computers, but cell towers have sprung up near many large cities nonetheless. Lack of agreement on protocols, coupled with a desire to limit the Principality's exposure to foreign ideas and information, means that few Gandvians have access to the internet in anything approaching a modern form, though Telnet remains in widespread use among academic, and to a lesser extent private, circles.

The Ministry of Transport, which occupies a sprawling complex on the banks of the Daugava in central Riga, is responsible for implementing state policy regarding roads, railways, waterways and air routes. Day-to-day operations, maintenance, and physical implementation falls to four nationwide sub-agencies; the Gandvian Maritime Service or Merenkulkulaitos, the Rail Administration or Ratahallintokeskus, the Road Administration or Tiehallinto, and the Aviation Administration or Ilmailulaitos. Those four organizations regulate transport in Gandvik by issuing vehicular permits and ensuring that routes meet minimum standards in terms of safety and efficiency. They are civilian agencies, and their employees would not be considered combatants in wartime, but each does possess an important national defense function in its responsibility for keeping-open lines of communication. The Merenkulkulaitos, usually abbreviated MKL, operates a large share of Gandvik's all-important icebreaker fleet, essential for clearing shipping routes through the Gulf of Bothnia and Gulf of Nyensholm in winter months, and for protecting shipping in the White and Barents Seas from drifting ice. A total of seventeen hulls are currently in service, the largest of which is Pohjantähti, a nuclear-powered behemoth of 23,000 tons displacement famous for its numerous trips into the high Arctic. Gandvian railways are mainly used by Valtion Rautatiet, a state-owned rail transport monopoly that operates both passenger and cargo routes, the latter often stretching far into sub-Polar regions. VR also maintains a fleet of semi-trailer trucks for road haulage, but a greater degree of private competition is permitted in this arena. Domestic and international ferry services link many Baltic destinations, Gandvia Lauttalinjoja accounting for most of Gandvik's market share with its fleet of ten ships.

Other important Gandvian transport companies include national shipping conglomerate VKV, and flag air-carrier Gandvia Aero.

Communications

Telephones: Main Lines in Use: 1.78 million
Mobile Cellular: 44,605

Radio Broadcast Stations: AM 18, FM 31

Television Broadcast Stations: 11

Internet Country Code: .gv

Transportation

Airports:

Airports With Paved Runways:

Airports With Unpaved Runways:

Waterways:

Merchant Marine: Total: 85 ships (1,000 GRT or over) 768,121 GRT
By Type: bulk carrier 5, large container 3, tanker 4, chemical tanker 4, coastal cargo 47, ferry 8, cable layer 2, dredger 3, icebreaker 7

Ports and Terminals: Windau, Libava, Riga, Reval, Ingermanburg, Murman, Petsamo

Railways: Total:
Broad Gauge: (1676mm "Indian Gauge")
Standard Gauge: (1435mm)
Narrow Gauge: (1000mm)

Roadways: Total:
Paved:
Unpaved:

Drives on The: Left

Geography

Location
Northeastern Europe and Eurasia, between the Atlantic Ocean and West Siberian Plain.

Land Area
Total:
Contiguous: (including coastal islands)

Land Boundaries (in order of length)
The Gull Flag Republic, Depkazia, The Republic of Editraequan, The Walmingtonian Empire, (?)

Maritime Claims
12nm territorial waters, 12nm contiguous zone to hypothetical mean line when applicable, 200nm exclusive economic zone

Climate Zones
In order of decreasing latitude: Tundra, Subarctic, Humid Continental

Terrain
Most of Gandvik resides within the vast North European Plain, a landscape of gently-rolling hills and lowlands that rises to an average elevation of between 100 and 200 meters above sea level, and is cut by several large international rivers and hundreds of smaller water-courses. Forest cover thickens considerably with increasing latitude, before giving way to Tundra north of the Arctic Circle. The Scandinavian and Ural mountains, both relatively low-lying ranges if quite steep in certain locations, define Western and Eastern Gandvik respectively, while Savonia and Karelia, regions frequently associated with early Gandvian culture, contain thousands of small lakes and marshes.

Major Rivers
Atal (Volga), Tanais (Don), Nevajoki (Neva), Vienanjoki (Dvina), Aparajoki (Dnieper), Väinäjoki (Daugava)

Major Lakes
Note: Europe's nine largest natural, fresh-water lakes are located within Gandvian territory.
Ladoga, Ääninen (Onega), Venneri (Vanern), Saimaa, Peipsijärvi (Peipus), Vetteri (Vattern), Valgetjärvi (Beloye), Uikujärvi (Vygozero), Malaren, Päijänne

Elevation Extremes


Natural Resources
oil shale, peat, dolomite, limestone, amber, hydropower, timber, clay

Natural Hazards
Low-lying terrain vulnerable to occasional flooding, winters can become extremely cold in some areas, wildfires possible during particularly dry summers

Environmental Overview
Gandvik's natural environment is characterized by what is often a striking measure of beauty, with its deep, dark forests, sunny, flower-flecked grasslands, and meandering rivers. Industrial development, however, has brought about a substantial degree of degradation in recent decades, as anti-pollution codes are lax or non-existent and can usually be circumvented through bribery. Oil shale extraction on Gandvik's northern coastline is a major single source of pollutants, and efforts aimed at cleaning-up that particular industry have so far never advanced beyond their planning stages. Coastal waters are heavily polluted, while significant areas of natural habitat were flooded during the 1960s as part of a dam-building drive. In spite of this, large areas of Gandvik remain essentially undisturbed, while Lake Pikhva, Europe's fifth-largest lake and relatively untouched by industrial runoff, remains an exceedingly popular destination for Gandvian vacationers.

Military

Overview

Gandvik maintains one of the largest and most lavishly-funded militaries currently in existence, one which combines significant capabilities in conventional warfare and a powerful nuclear deterrent to yield a force of global consequence. The Armed Forces as a collective body constitute what is arguably Gandvik's preeminent state institution, and its influence over both the legitimate and informal political processes is immense. At no time in the nation’s history has effective civilian control ever been exercised over a military establishment which both is perceived and perceives itself as a fundamental pillar of Gandvian statehood, and it can be remarkably difficult to determine where exactly the respective spheres of authority, civil as opposed to military, stop. Affairs pertaining to geopolitical strategy and national security are, at least on paper, managed by an aptly-named National Security Council, a subset of the Council of State, whose membership, while it includes nominally civilian office-holders such as the State Chancellor and Foreign Minister, is otherwise composed of uniformed personnel, namely the Interior Minister and Security Police Director, both of whom are Generals of police, inspectors-general of the combined services and civil defense, individual service chiefs-of-staff, Home Guard commander, and commander of the Military Intelligence Service or STO. This arrangement, a result of particular historical developments in national politics, means that the Armed Forces are effectively self-governing and self-regulated, while their politicization has encouraged senior officers to cultivate substantial patronage networks within and outside the armed forces structure. In spite of its status as a virtual state within the Gandvian state, however, the military has seldom managed to exercise unchallenged or even necessarily coherent control over government administration, and such senior officers as have served in the past and present as heads of state, have only done so with the support and cooperation of civilian notables on a large scale. As with almost all large bureaucracies, after all, the Gandvian military is riven by innumerable internal conflicts and antagonisms both large and small, and can seldom be relied-upon to present a united front on any substantive issue pertinent to either domestic or international politics.

As, in the main, a terrestrial rather than a maritime power, Gandvik has always tended to prioritize its land army at the expense of its navy and, to a lesser extent, its air force, and as a rule the most senior posts in the joint armed forces structure are occupied by Army officers.


In order to adequately provide for Gandvik's considerable security requirements, every male Gandvian is subject to a 550-day term of mandatory military service and a ten-year reserve commitment, the latter split into two five-year stages. Most conscripts receive their call-up orders within six months of their eighteenth birthday, though students enrolled in certain university programs can defer their service obligation until after their basic course of studies has been completed. Newly-inducted conscripts undergo ten weeks of basic instruction in drill, bearing and discipline at one of several regional depots before their assignment to a particular active-duty formation, where they are trained further in practical and operational matters and gain military experience for the remainder of their service. Conscripts who possess certain academic or vocational qualifications may be selected for additional training in trades and technical specialties.

Upon their release from active service, former conscripts are automatically transferred to the Active Reserves for a five-year term, during which time they remain, in most cases, on the establishment of their original service regiment or other unit. Active reserve status mandates participation in week-long regimental maneuvers twice each year and one month-long higher-formation exercise every other year, and requires a reservist to present himself at his regimental garrison or designated muster location within 48 hours of a call-up order. Gandvik relies on its high-readiness active reservists to bring its standing force up to full strength quickly, and reservists still serving-out their active commitment are in many ways only a few steps removed from fully active condition, subject to mobilization on short notice and for indefinite periods. Recently, for instance, some Gandvian reservists have, in light of intermittent crises and disputes with the Gull Flag Republic, spent almost two additional years under arms, and while individuals mobilized for unusually long stretches are guaranteed credit for time served and pension bonuses, few if any special deferments can be considered exempt from emergency decrees.

After five years, most active reservists are transferred to the Territorial Army, which administers a theoretically quite large force of units up to Army size, composed, in general terms, of low-strength or strictly skeletal reserve regiments linked to standing-force formations. Most territorial servicemen move on to one of their active service regiment's Territorial Army affiliates, though certain individuals may be reallocated depending on their experience or qualifications. Territorial service requires participation in four weekend refresher training courses each year and a week-long regimental exercise every other year for a term of five years. Men whose five-year training commitments have lapsed remain on the Territorial Army's muster rolls until age 50, or 60 in the case of officers, senior NCOs and certain technical specialists, but are the last to receive call-up papers and, under most circumstances, the first to receive deferments or exemptions.

Conscripts in good disciplinary standing can elect to remain in the armed forces beyond their national service obligation, a course which often leads to training as a non-commissioned officer and, for a small minority, nomination to an officer-candidate program. Male Gandvians aged seventeen to twenty-eight are permitted to enlist voluntarily, either prior to their call-up for national service or while a reservist, for a minimum four-year contractual term plus full reserve commitment. Volunteers can expect a wider degree of choice in their service assignments and are often favored for promotion, and some elite and politically-significant units, primarily airborne forces and the gendarmerie, are recruited exclusively from among voluntary servicemen or conscripts who request and gain admission to their ranks.

Officers are chiefly drawn from several large cadet training centers, run by each branch of service according to its specific requirements and designed to provide each officer-candidate with an education in leadership and military science while eliminating, through rigorous disciplinary and academic standards, unsuitable individuals. University graduates, eligible to proceed directly to officer school after basic training, and conscripts who pass an entry exam account for the largest single share of cadets. NCOs can also be nominated for officer training by their immediate superiors, though direct promotion from the lower ranks is relatively rare. Military preparatory schools, which automatically award their attendees a junior lieutenant's commission at matriculation, provide another, albeit more limited, source of commissioned personnel, and are widely if not always correctly held to produce a higher quality of officer. Where cadet training establishments typically conduct courses lasting from fifteen to thirty weeks, focused on matters of direct tactical and technical import, preparatory schools, selective to begin with, offer a comprehensive, high-quality education that combines traditional academics with an exhaustive program of military studies, and their graduates are disproportionally represented among senior officer ranks.

Beyond their basic cadet-officer programs, all of Gandvik's armed services operate their own staff colleges and numerous specialized academies that offer advanced training in subjects that range from armored warfare to meteorology. Successful attendance at one, often many, of these schools is held to be an essential prerequisite for officers seeking professional advancement, though minimum standards are routinely overlooked for well-connected individuals, who can sometimes bypass certain requirements entirely. In practice, client relationships matter a great deal more to an officer's career prospects than does academic or operational performance, and while this has not prevented some genuinely competent and talented individuals from attaining important commands, the quality of senior officers in Gandvik's armed forces has often been described as uneven.

Women are permitted to enlist in the Armed Forces Medical Corps only and are not subject to any compulsory service requirement in peacetime, but may be required to carry out noncombatant duties in civil defense organizations during a declared national emergency.


Manpower Fit for Service: male citizens ages 15-49:
Manpower Serving: 805,561 959,513 active; 1,621,703 reservists; 5,405,712 territorials
Expressed as a Percentage of Total Population: Active Forces: 0.71%, Reserve: 1.2%, Territorial Force: 5%
Dispersion of Personnel by Branch: Army: 525,183 (930,255 reservists)
Air Force: 181,057 (347,144 reservists)
Navy: 53,208 (157,054 reservists)
Internal Security Forces (incl. Civil Guard, Border Guard): 200,065 (187,250 reservists)

Military Expenditures: 5.7% of GDP; 182.4 billion (pound-equivalent)

Note: Personnel belonging to the Gendarmerie and Border Guard operate under the Interior Minister's authority in peacetime, and are partially funded through Interior Ministry allocations.

Royal Army (Kuninkaallinen Maavoimat)
With half a million men on active service, and close to another million in immediate reserve, the Gandvian Royal Army is one of Europe’s largest military organizations, and, having been in continuous existence since the 16th century, one of its oldest as well. Gandvik, whose interests have traditionally been confined to its regional neighborhood, has relied upon a strong standing army to defend its territorial integrity and coerce foreign states throughout history, and continues to prioritize its land forces in preference to an oceangoing navy and strategic air power. The modern Royal Army trains and operates in accordance with the principles of integrated, all-arms warfare, and looks to tanks and armored troops as its key combat elements.

Royal Air Force (Kuninkaallinen Ilmavoimat)
The Ilmavoimat, which gained independence from direct Army control in 1932, is Gandvik’s youngest military branch, and has remained throughout its history effectively subordinate to the requirements of a much larger and, in official eyes, more important land forces establishment. Prevented, by a mixture of technical skepticism and budgetary insufficiency, from ever developing a true strategic capability, the Gandvian Air Force concentrates upon tactical and territorial air defense roles, and defines its central mission as the support and protection of ground operations and infrastructure. Air Force aircraft provide Gandvik with an important means of nuclear weapons delivery, however, and have also increasingly been called upon to perform coastal defense tasks.

Royal Navy (Kuninkaallinen Merivoimat)
Traditionally the smallest and least-influential of Gandvik’s armed services, the Navy has seen its role reduced in recent decades to little more than that of a coast-defense force thanks to persistent lobbying by Army and Air Force officers, and by a belief that Gandvik cannot afford to field both a world-class navy and a land force equal to its strategic needs. Since its last full-size destroyer was decommissioned in 1994, the Gandvian Royal Navy has operated a surface fleet composed entirely of coastal combatants, though its submarine service is comparatively strong by international standards and includes a number of nuclear-powered boats. Roughly one-quarter of all active and over half of all reserve Navy personnel belong to the Coastal Artillery. Navy pilots also fly with Air Force maritime bomber and patrol squadrons. The Navy operates its own helicopter service for coastal anti-submarine, patrol, and rescue work, but current legislation places all fixed-wing aviation under Air Force command.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sun Sep 02, 2018 3:39 pm, edited 8 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:28 pm

Travel in Gandvik: A Practical Guide

Introduction
Any prospective foreign visitor must accept before starting out that traveling in Gandvik will not be easy, and may at times prove downright frustrating or even frightening. A certain measure of discomfort must be expected, and, as an outsider, one should also be prepared to endure some degree of hassling from authorities eager to get their hands on foreign currency, especially Nibelunc Thalers. Corruption in Gandvik is widespread and practically unavoidable, so most foreign visitors will inevitably end up paying-off some kind of public official depending on what exactly it is that they are up to. But travelers who arrive in Gandvik with an open mind and a hardy constitution may well find themselves struck by the nation's considerable natural beauty and its remarkably friendly, generous, and good-natured population.

Preparing for Your Visit
Before visiting Gandvik, one must first obtain a visa from one of several embassies and consulates abroad. This in and of itself can be a long, expensive, and difficult process, which has been known to take up to six months. Gandvik's autocratic government is extremely leery of foreign travelers, especially those from western democracies, and every visa applicant is extensively vetted for security concerns. Those engaged in any kind of left-wing political or social activism can expect their (non-refundable) visa application to be turned down. Relatives of Gandvian expatriates are cautioned not to visit their ancestral homeland, as the regime's phobia of Nibelung-sponsored coup attempts will almost certainly land them in detention for up to a year if their origins are discovered.

As with most things Gandvian, however, a bribe will make things proceed a great deal more smoothly. Visas officially cost the equivalent of 250 Thalers, but 500T will reliably cut two months off the vetting process, while visas for security-neutral individuals can be obtained in as little as one month with a bribe of 1000T. Rumor has it that, for 15-20,000T, Gandvik's passport control department will grant a visa no questions asked in one month, but such sums are usually outside the average traveler's means. Bribes should be submitted in cash to a given consulate or embassy's chief passport control officer, who will usually distribute his takings among his employees, keeping a larger share for him or, rarely, herself.

Foreigners can enter Gandvik through either Ridenzburg's international airport or Windau's shipping terminal. Lufthansa, British Airways, and Air France all fly into Ridenzburg, while Gandvik's national carrier, BaltAir, maintains routes between most European capitals on an intermittent basis. In common with most things Gandvian, BaltAir is by far the cheapest option, but passenger comfort is wanting, while spending several hours in aircraft that are almost uniformly several decades old, and which are not maintained to strictly modern standards, can sometimes be a harrowing experience. Gandvian passenger ferries plying domestic routes to Gotland and Bornholm often stop at Lubeck and Rostock on their return leg, where foreigners might board, but a cheaper option is to book passage aboard a Gandvik-flagged coastal merchant bound for home, examples of which can be spotted at practically all of Europe's major port cities. Passengers who can cook, or who possess some kind of technical qualification, can often obtain transport for free.

What to Bring
It's best to travel light in Gandvik, as conspicuous displays of wealth and abundance are usually taken as an invitation to extortion. Basic toiletries are strongly recommended, as many of those items are either not available in Gandvik or are of markedly inferior quality as compared to western examples. Some camping equipment can also come in handy, especially if travel in rural areas is planned. Some foreign currency should be taken along, but travelers should take care not to bring too much, and to change most of their funds into local Ducats.

Where to Stay
Owing to Gandvik's closed borders and minimal internet exposure, it is practically impossible for casual travelers to pre-book hotel space. Fortunately, accommodations are not scarce even if high-end hotels are almost wholly reserved for business and diplomatic visitors. Most Gandvian cities are home to a number of hostels and inns which, though very spartan, are cheap, clean, and often serve a complementary breakfast. Most restaurants and public houses have rooms for rent, and these, while more expensive than most hostels, are private and typically include their own water closet and stove, while reasonably-priced food is only a short walk away. For an additional charge, many restaurants will provide their tenants with three packaged meals for the duration of their stay.

Accommodation outside the major cities is a good deal more difficult to locate, though again pubs are usually a safe bet. Army-surplus tents, while often of indifferent quality, are cheap and abundant, so in summer months it is often possible to camp out. Most Gandvians take a casual view when it comes to land rights, so any suitable piece of ground that is not already clearly in use, and which is respectfully distant from the nearest established dwelling, will usually do. In rural areas peasant families will frequently try to sell travelers their agricultural produce, which can either be bought outright or bartered. High-quality western consumer goods, things like watches, sneakers, and designer sunglasses, are in particular demand. Such items can also make excellent gifts, and if left behind at a campsite will usually make a very positive impression on the landowner concerned.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:40 pm

Storms, Clouds, and Trials: 1939-1954

(work in progress)
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:40 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:41 pm

The Democratic Revolution in Gandvik: 1913-15

The Stumholmen Incident

Ordered as part of an 1895 naval appropriations directive, five Sveaborg Class coastal battleships were commissioned between 1899 and 1903. Designed to operate in shallow, confined Baltic waters, these ships, which followed an earlier class of five similarly-tasked vessels built between 1885 and 1890, attempted to combine heavy armor and armament with a relatively small displacement and minimal draught. Contemporary thinking held that such coastal defense ships would still, with their large-caliber main armament, be able to trade shots with proper battleships and heavy cruisers while retaining greater freedom of movement, crossing shoals and shallows where a larger opponent might run aground. Later experience proved this concept to be more or less a sound one, but the Sveaborg Class would never fire a shot in anger, and all examples had been withdrawn from service by 1935. Stumholmen, third-of-class, is remembered chiefly for her role in Gandvik's political history. In July of 1913, while moored off Kronstadt in preparation for annual naval maneuvers, Stumholmen's company launched a mutiny. Captain Henrik, in command when the mutiny took place, had over a long and generally undistinguished career in Gandvik's Royal Navy developed a reputation as a cruel tyrant. Corporal punishment would not be abolished in the armed services until 1915, but flogging had largely gone out of fashion during the previous decade. Henrik, however, employed the cat liberally. A sailor under his authority could expect to receive ten lashes for even very minor infractions, and it was not uncommon for sentences of up to and over 50 lashes to be pronounced on a regular basis. One of Henrik's most dreaded attributes was his habit, when running drills, to flog men he considered slow or awkward in attending to their stations. One day, after a particularly disappointing performance in gunnery practice, made worse by uncommonly hot and humid weather, Henrik's short temper ran out and, in a fit of frustration, he had a certain Patrik Jacobus, an elderly sailor often in trouble for drunkenness, strung-up, and sentenced him to no less than three hundred lashes. Jacobus endured two thirds of his sentence before his body gave out, but Henrik, at a height of righteous anger, ordered the bosun to continue, drawing, in contravention of all naval discipline, shouts of derision from the assembled crew.

Captain Henrik ordered his marines to seize several of Stumholmen's senior enlisted rates, but this attempt was vigorously opposed by an increasingly incensed ship's company. Amid a confused tangle of shoving, struggling arms and a cacaphony of furious voices, several marines had their rifles taken from them. It suddenly dawned on Henrik that he was losing control, and in a desperate attempt to re-assert his authority he instructed his marines to fire into the mass of sailors, drawing his own pistol at the same moment. This order fell on deaf ears, and the marines stood by as the assembled crew, led by several older petty officers, stormed the fantail, throwing Henrik, his officers, and most midshipmen overboard.

This incident did not pass unnoticed. Stumholmen was anchored among most of Gandvik's Baltic Fleet, and within moments surrounding captains realized what was taking place. Several nearby ships quickly lowered boats full of marines in expectation of having to fight the mutineers, though many captains observed, much to their concern, that enlisted saliors on many other vessels appeared sympathetic to Stumholmen's company. Having taken place on what was normally a make-and-mend day, during which most sailors enjoyed a weekly spell of free time, the mutiny aboard Stumholmen attracted thousands of spectators, many of whom attempted to contact friends aboard Henrik's former command with mirrors and placards.

In charge of Gandvik's Baltic Fleet at that point in time was Admiral Willem Rogge, and news of Stumholmen's predicament reached his headquarters at Kotlin within minutes of Henrik's being picked up by circling boats. Rogge immediately realized that a situation with extremely grave potential was developing, and, fearing that Stumholmen's example might prompt serious unrest aboard other vessels, moved to contain matters before they spiralled out of hand. Surprising many of his subordinate officers, Admiral Rogge boarded a motor launch and made his way across the roadstead, his coxwain hooking onto Stumholmen's gang-way several minutes later, returning after briefly meeting with a group of Petty Officers, a hastily-written manifesto, signed by most of the ship's company, in hand. This letter explained, or at least attempted to explain, what had taken place and why, and provided a detailed, often lurid, list of grievances against Captain Henrik. During his short summit with the mutineers, Rogge managed to negotiate the release of several midshipmen being detained belowdecks in exchange for taking Jacobus, half-alive after his ordeal, ashore for intensive treatment. Three marines, injured during that initial scuffle on the fantail, were taken to hospital as well, but a handful of wounded mutineers elected to remain on board for fear of being arrested, should they leave the relative safety of their ship. After an uneasy exchange of boats, Krondstadt Harbor settled back to what more or less resembled its normal routine while Rogge contemplated his next move and awaited orders from Riga.

Unlike most of his contemporaries, Rogge was not an arch-conservative, and saw the mutinous sailors' concerns as, if not legitimate, at least understandable. He was aware of prevailing conditions in Gandvik's overall political climate, and wanted above all to avoid a violent, polarizing stand-off. Moreover, Rogge was well acquainted with Captain Henrik, and knew that his harsh reputation was far from baseless. Instructions from Riga, when they did finally arive, raised more questions than they answered. The Navy Board clearly desired that the mutiny be brought to a rapid and decisive conclusion, but its members, while less than entirely sympathetito the mutineers themselves, were also concerned that an overly forceful reaction might upset the nation's delicate political balance at a time when republican ideologies appeared to pose a very real threat to traditional sources of authority. Riga Castle did not want to make any martyrs, and by bloodily suppressing Stumholmen's mutineers, it would do exactly that. Rogge, then, was instructed to continue on his initial track.

Over the next several days, Rogge continued to negotiate with Stumholmen's crew while Captain Henrik and his officers sulked on shore, glumly awaiting the inevitable board of inquiry and trying to devise some means of salvaging their badly damaged professional reputations. Most of the mutineers' demands centered around discipline, the infliction of corporal punishment in particular, and while their daily communiques and manifestoes indicated a significant degree of leftist influence, theirs was basically a call for reform, rather than revolution. The more Rogge talked with the mutineers, the more he accepted that their mutiny was largely a spontaneous act, motivated by a punishment that even deeply reactionary senior officers considered excessive. Thanks to Krondstadt's relative isolation, Rogge was able to keep journalists from nearby Ingermanburg at arm's length throughout the crisis, but this did not prevent news of the mutiny from leaking out. Ingermanburg's large and active trade union movement staged a number of work stoppages and demonstrations as a means of showing solidarity with Stumholmen's sailors. They, for their own part, demanded the abolition of flogging and starting, improved mechanisms for punishing officers and petty officers who abused their subordinates, and courts-martial for Captain Henrik and his first lieutenant.

Matters took a strongly positive turn when news arrived that Jacobus, admitted to Krondstadt's naval hospital, was recovering admirably from his wounds. As a show of good faith Rogge allowed a delegation of sailors to visit their convalescing ship-mate, a measure that did a great deal to relax what had been, understandably, a tense emotional climate. On the mutiny's fifth day, an afternoon meeting between Admiral Rogge and the mutineers generated a great deal of excited discussion upon its conclusion, sailors ashore learning from the Admiral's barge-men that an agreement had been reached. This was confirmed within hours, when Rogge circulated a general order banning corporal punishment in the Baltic Fleet. A subsequent communique explained that events aboard Stumholmen would not actually be treated as a mutiny in an official sense, but rather as an act of "collective indiscipline," which implied a very different set of consequences. The ship's company in turn agreed to accept a new captain and set of officers, who faced responsibility for restoring a degree of naval normality, and submitted to a token punishment, losing about two weeks' pay.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:42 pm

History of Gandvik, 1945-Present

The Post-War Crisis

As a leading Aventine power, Gandvik played a central part in that alliance's war effort against Oakist Europe and sustained a significant share of victory's ultimate cost. Nearly 900,000 Gandvians, approximately 750,000 servicemen and 150,000 noncombatants, perished as a result of the Great War, and while several states suffered far more gravely, a particularly important segment of the national population was decimated. Legions of war wounded, in many cases physically incapacitated or psychologically destroyed, placed added strain on a nation which had already endured successive upheavals throughout living memory. Financial pressures imposed by the global conflict and its resulting military demands had also driven Gandvik deeply into debt, and peace brought with it increasing demands on behalf of Walmingtonian, Californian, American, and Nibelung banks for repayment of wartime loans, which together amounted to a substantial sum, at a time when Riga struggled to fund its ordinary functions. Demobilization, prompted by the government's manifest inability to sustain a military which had grown to nearly eight million men at its peak strength, further complicated matters, as an economy precariously close to an all-out collapse attempted to reintegrate millions of war veterans. And although high unemployment, combined with inflation and overall economic decline, were hardly conditions unique to Gandvik on a war-ravaged continent, a divided and uncertain political climate greatly exacerbated existing vulnerabilities.

Government in Gandvik since General Strandmann's coup d'état of 1927 depended to a significant extent upon a delicate balance between often-overlapping military, aristocratic, business, radical, and reactionary interests. The Council of State, composed of senior armed forces officers and civilian appointees selected by the ruling elite, represented a broad spectrum of traditional conservative and centrist elements. Its legitimacy stemmed from a patriotically-justified imperative for order within a civic environment characterized by revolutionary sentiment on both right and left, and before 1939 the regime had largely managed to cement its position within Gandvian society thanks to its success in managing street violence and economic instability. Oakist aggression triggered a nationalistic reaction that initially suppressed dissent across Gandvik, but a series of early reverses, followed by the difficulty encountered in bringing about a final Oakist defeat, shook public confidence and eroded morale at a steady rate, and war-weariness caused by a mounting human toll, coupled with chronic shortages of basic goods, constituted, by 1945, a tremendously important source of discontent.

Gandvik's relationship with the Aventine alliance as a whole, characterized at its best by considerable friction, deteriorated sharply after the Oakist surrender as Riga sought to press a raft of territorial claims against a defeated Shield, on top of agreed-upon reparation payments. Field Marshal Albin Katz, de facto wartime head of state, had in fact promised during a conference with Walmington's CIGS in late 1944 to spurn the revanchist ambitions held by many within his own government, in return for partial renunciation of Gandvik's war debt and normalization of Anglo-Gandvian diplomatic ties, but Katz and a number of his liberally-inclined supporters were forced out of power early in 1946 and official mention of a future European 'consensus,' as had been promoted by Katz, promptly ceased. To many Gandvians, former soldiers especially, it seemed virtually unthinkable that a defeated Ianapalis should retain a number of highly sought-after regions, and Aventine insistence on Shieldian territorial integrity was widely taken as an affront to national dignity, a betrayal of Gandvik's sacrifice. Under intense pressure from most of Europe and North America, Gandvian troops withdrew from most of Weshield, Shadoran, Gallaga, and Thortraia between 1946 and 1948, but Riga's refusal to hand over Polesia, an area of majority Fennic settlement, precipitated a major diplomatic rupture and nearly placed Gandvik and its wartime allies in open conflict. Outright war was avoided, but the dispute brought about Gandvik’s official break with Aventine Europe and eliminated any chance of economic assistance from the relatively untouched economies of North America and Northwest Europe.

Contention over Polesia was followed promptly by a decision to halt interest payments on foreign loans in 1949, a measure which caused outrage among the major banking houses and which resulted in Gandvik’s virtual economic isolation from Western Europe. In part a self-consciously populist step intended to rally support around an increasingly shaky regime, and in part a reflection of very sharp budgetary shortfalls, Riga’s default guaranteed that certain social services would continue to function, but otherwise set off a period of rampant inflation, deepened wartime scarcities, and practically reversed some tentative steps toward recovery and reconstruction made since 1945 in war-ravaged Voronia, Polesia, Curonia, and Ruthenia. Foreign trade declined as a result of retaliatory tariffs and embargoes, while a succession of poor harvests drove food prices above their already-high level and brought about a further reduction in the bread ration.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:43 pm

Slow Train Coming: Gandvian Society in Transformation 1815-1914

Gandvik in its full geographical vastness encompassed, some twenty-seven years after Bonaparte’s death in exile, as diverse a set of population groups as could be claimed by any country in Europe. United in a colorful and ever-evolving patchwork were a staggering variety of languages and religions, scattered across distances equally staggering, and under such conditions national government definitively oriented to central Europe could only ever hope to exert a distant measure of control, or so it seemed to most contemporary observers. A ruling aristocracy deeply self-conscious over its questionable European-ness to begin with, moreover, had for centuries clung aggressively to Germanic cultural modes, and it has been stated, by no means unfairly, that prior to 1800 a genuinely Gandvian national spirit simply did not exist. Oddly enough, it was that same obsession with all things German, to which Gandvik’s ruling class clung so fiercely, which provided impetus for a fundamental shift in attitudes.

Ideology, of course, was only one element in a very complex equation, and Gandvik’s stunning variety of peoples and terrains was to a considerable extent mirrored in administrative practice. By no means unlike other European great powers, Gandvik’s external borders enclosed, as of 1800, disparate hereditary duchies, baronies, parishes, archbishoprics, principalities and other assorted quasi-feudal domains in their middle-hundreds, all entitled to their own particular rights and privileges as established by custom and contract and subject to a central authority whose control, under a succession of uninspiring monarchs, was cursory at best and seemed at times little more than theoretical. Widespread tax-farming and endemic absentee landownership tended to de-incentivize any serious efforts at agricultural modernization, and aristocratic landlords almost universally regarded the peasants of Ruthenia and Tataria as belonging to a race entirely different from their own.

Twenty years of Napoleon, and for Gandvik an almost unbroken chain of military catastrophe, appeared to prove that which many individuals had already started to say, namely that stagnation and backwardness threatened to evict Gandvik from the ranks of Europe’s leading states. Napoleon’s example was sufficiently strong to motivate no fewer than five military coups d’état between 1805, when King Johann VII was forced to abdicate in favor of his son Christian Frederick, and 1822, when Army officers deposed Christian Frederick’s own heir Karl XI, all expressly designed to remove as an obstacle to what were considered desperately-needed corrective measures a monarchy which had shown itself implacably obstructionist. Wishing to rid themselves of a troublesome and uncooperative royal dynasty, which seemed moreover incapable of producing male descendants fit for any form of serious responsibility, the coup plotters enlisted Peter Berdichyiv, a widely-respected landowner, former general, and minister of state to rule as Prince.

Prince Peter I was carried to power by a wave of sentiment both Napoleonic and Romantic in inspiration. Those officers who evicted Karl XI shared not only a belief in the material importance of a rationalized administration for reasons of financial solvency and military efficiency, but also a faith in the esoteric concept of a Gandvian national identity, one distinct and organic rather than one imported from abroad. This, they reasoned, was just as vital a part of any thoroughgoing project of national rejuvenation as any changes in tax practices or military structure. And while Peter I would in many respects prove almost as hostile to certain courses of reform as his predecessors, cultural forces were unleashed that would over the next century blossom in a profusion of literary and visual art, ethnography, and exploration, in a quest to capture and to define an intrinsically Gandvian nationhood as distinct from what the movement’s leading thinkers characterized as a stale and alien Germanism.

After a long and frustrating struggle against a powerful counter-current of conservative opposition, reformers in Prince Peter’s government, represented most visibly by Count Tuomas Fleming, managed to enact the much-celebrated Territorial Law of 1835. In its central aspects the Territorial Law closely resembled Valendian land reform measures undertaken earlier in the century, and sought at its core to convert the masses of Gandvik’s rural population, the vast majority of which lived as bonded laborers on the landed gentry’s agricultural estates, into a class of independent smallholders, yeoman farmers approximately in line with the Walmingtonian model. The summary abolition of feudal labor obligations and occupational prohibitions was simultaneously accompanied by what, at least as it was written, amounted to a vast program of land reform, which set aside fully two-thirds of all estate and common land for allocation to peasant households while landowners were to retain the last third in compensation for their relinquished holdings. Inheritance laws were changed as well, to discourage the practice, previously commonplace, of dividing a parcel of land among male descendants, as it was reasoned that this inevitably resulted in plots too small to be productive. Land instead was to be inherited by a given landholder’s eldest male descendant, who would then be in a position to profitably sustain himself through agriculture.

Progressive though it certainly was in design, the Territorial Law of 1835 was implemented in such a way that many of its base assumptions and implied provisions were undermined, and on a timetable which gentry interests managed to have extended from its original five years first to ten, and then to fifteen. Patchy enforcement and limited enforcement, carried out as it was by an Interior Ministry of decidedly aristocratic leanings, meant that many landowners were left to interpret the content of reform decrees more or less for themselves, inevitably to the detriment of their erstwhile bondsmen. Fraud and corruption on a universal scale meant that aristocratic landowners were almost always able to keep the best productive land for themselves, and frequently conspired to create circumstances where economic necessity would force many newly-emancipated serfs back into quasi-bondage. The great transformative processes had, nonetheless, been set in motion, however sloppily and ineffectively, and while full development of the new rural system as pictured by Count Fleming would take until early in the following century, feudalism had been decisively unseated as organizing principle of Gandvian agriculture.

One of the Territorial Law’s most immediate consequences, and from an official perspective one of its most worrying, was a precipitous increase in rates of migration to urban areas, as the enclosure of common lands, together with revised inheritance laws, directed those unable to support themselves on the land toward an expanding manufacturing sector. While rates of urban in-migration, driven as they were by an industrial engine that would not reach central European levels of output until after 1950, fell significantly short of similar phenomena elsewhere in both proportional and absolute terms, factory cities rapidly outgrew their sanitation infrastructure and housing stock, and material squalor, exacerbated by chronically low wages, soon gave rise to discontent.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:43 pm

The Battlecruiser Fiasco: 1912-1939

As is seemingly their ancestral habit, whenever confronted by news or information that threatens to challenge their preconceived base assumptions, political and military officials in Riga greeted Dreadnought’s launching in 1906 with only minor interest, and like many other national policy-makers were at first entirely ready to dismiss Walmingtonian claims as to their new super-battleship’s performance as certain fabrications. That Dreadnought rendered obsolete at a stroke every single line-of-battle ship afloat prior to her advent, a fact well understood by modern historians, was too dreadful a thought for Gandvian minds to contemplate, and an Admiralty which otherwise would have been forced to admit that its most modern and powerful vessels, procured only after lengthy controversy and at considerable public expense, were now a full generation out of date simply refused to acknowledge any of Dreadnought’s superlative qualities. Indeed, Grand Admiral Baron von Kleber went so far as to arrange on spurious charges of sedition the arrest of a journalist whose dispatches from Portsmouth were judged to strike an excessively awe-struck tone. Official denials, however, fooled almost no one, and before long, as the revolutionary battleship’s true significance became patently clear, the popular clamor for a Gandvian dreadnought was such that Riga, ready as its senior Admirals still were to avert their gaze, could not safely ignore it.

From the outset, it was abundantly obvious that Gandvik could never hope to win the dreadnought race which promptly broke-out among Europe’s leading powers and before long accelerated to a reckless pace. Gandvik in the twentieth century’s first decade remained predominantly an agricultural economy, and while the manufacturing sector had grown exponentially over the prior fifty years, domestic industrial output would not even approach corresponding figures for states like Walmington, Valendia, and Amerique for another fifty. A fractious political environment, which threatened to grow even more so, imposed additional obstacles to any thorough naval re-armament program, and alongside a diverse set of opponents which included such mutually-antagonistic parties as left-wing internationalists, pacifist religious reformers, and taxation-averse landowners, Navy leaders had to contend with the implacable hostility of a dominant Army establishment which would consent to only the most modest increases in naval expenditure.

Nonetheless, it was evident that even Gandvik’s peripheral maritime position would be made virtually untenable without dreadnoughts of its own, and in 1909 work began on Kustaa I, first of four 24,000-ton battleships fated to form the core of Gandvian sea-going power, such as it was, through to the atomic age. These efficient and reliable ships, fast, well-armed, and adequately protected for their day, in and of themselves represented a technical and industrial challenge of colossal magnitude, and their ever-increasing construction costs taxed limited Navy finances to their limit. This did not, however, prevent Admiralty officials from contemplating a far more ambitious construction program, one which, in their calculations, would give Gandvik a working parity, under most foreseeable operational scenarios, with a Royal Walmingtonian Navy which had grown into the world’s largest.

Admiralty planners were realistic enough to discount their chances of victory in a high-seas engagement against Walmington’s full naval might, or that of Valendia, another important continental rival, which were building against one another at an exhausting pace. Yet the very intensity of Anglo-Valendian strategic competition appeared to Gandvian admirals a factor that worked very much in their favor, as neither power, for fear of its chief competitor, could afford to concentrate its full strength against a secondary fleet lest it leave itself open to an opportunistic attack, at least according to Admiralty reckoning. And when the balance of forces was calculated in relative rather than absolute terms, the result was a great deal less unfavorable to Gandvik. This so-called Squadron Battle doctrine dominated Gandvian naval strategy until the dawning of the Oakist War in 1939, and helped Navy leaders, aided by a relatively small though vocal and well-funded colonial lobby, to justify a program of battleship-building against Army opposition.

Successful though the Kustaa I class was, in armor and gun power it was soon eclipsed by Walmingtonian designs, and Gandvian naval architects, operating under a tacit assumption that any future battle would see their full line of battle pitted against only a part of any enemy’s, reasoned that Gandvik could bear the cost of a very powerful vessel built in small numbers. In 1912, after a prolonged inter-ministerial battle, the Admiralty was finally able to extract approval for a quartet of what were for political purposes designated battlecruisers, albeit battlecruisers superior in many respects to foreign battleships. While their particulars had yet to be finalized, nor, as it happened, would they ever be, these battlecruisers were to surpass in speed, gun power, and protection anything then afloat, qualities which would, it was hoped, allow them to accept or decline battle at will, frustrating a more numerous enemy squadron by enveloping part of its battle line and then withdrawing before those greater numbers could be brought to bear.

Clear enough by themselves, those design objectives proved a great deal more difficult to meet in strictly technical terms, and as projected displacement soared above 30,000 tons, on a hull larger than any existing domestic shipyard could accommodate, the battlecruiser project began to lose momentum. A host of engineering details remained unresolved when in August of 1914 Gandvik was swept by a wave of unrest that toppled the Princely government and saw installed in its place a rather shaky parliamentary democracy. Changes of personnel in the Admiralty, including the dismissal of Grand Admiral Kleber, the battlecruiser project’s strongest backer, stalled progress for a full year, and when in early 1916 a commission of inquiry recommended, to the Army Chief-of-Staff’s horror, that the battlecruisers be completed after all, it was estimated that the first hull could not be launched any earlier than 1920. Materials had scarcely been gathered for planned first-of-class Inmar when, in 1917, news reached the Gandvian Admiralty of Walmington’s Admiral-class battlecruisers, which, if available information was to be taken as valid, would exceed the Gandvian battlecruisers on nearly every point of comparison. Army officers and their parliamentary allies immediately seized on these developments as a pretext to cancel the project altogether, and amid acrimonious legislative debate Inmar, which had at last been laid down at Walden-Vulcan’s enlarged Ingermanburg yard in March of 1917, progressed at a crawl. Ballistic testing revealed serious defects in Inmar’s hull armor, which cracked under fire from 305mm artillery and would obviously offer no measure of protection against capital ship armament of ever larger calibers, and work was again stalled for nearly a full year while Admiralty engineers devised structural alterations. Had this become public knowledge, modern observers have opined, the battlecruisers would undoubtedly have been cancelled then and there, but thanks to an uncharacteristic concern for security the Admiralty was able to keep its difficulties in that respect secret for several crucial years. Then again, by 1920 and after eight frustrating and exceedingly expensive years, with only a partially-completed steel skeleton and a handful of new 356mm guns to show for their trouble, many Navy officers despaired of Inmar, to say nothing of her three planned sisters, ever taking to sea.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:44 pm

The March of Progress: Gandvian Politics and Society 1914-1939

By 1900, few words could strike quite so much fear among those groups and individuals which broadly constituted Gandvian polite society as revolution, a term inevitably accompanied, in official discourse, by additional descriptors such as anarchy, rebellion, chaos, and catastrophe, and connected wherever possible, and by however thin a pretext, to a Shieldian Grand Empire still seen as foreign enemy number one. Undoubtedly official Gandvik, its Princely government and its aristocratic ruling class, could find in their civic circumstances a great deal to worry about, and nearly a full century of alternating reform and reaction, of policies ostensibly progressive in character watered-down or overturned, cast alongside a limited, though nationally quite significant, growth in manufacturing and consequently high rates of urban in-migration, had succeeded in accumulating combustible material in quantities highly conducive to a general conflagration. All that seemed necessary was a suitable ignition source, and after numerous false starts one was duly found in summer of 1914.

Oddly enough, mutiny aboard the coastal defense ship Stumholmen, a response to excessively harsh disciplinary measures and almost certainly spontaneous in origin, was dealt with relatively quickly and bloodlessly and in so humane a manner that foreign observers, accustomed to a Gandvian principality whose key political feature was a steadfast adherence to absolutist principles, could scarcely contain their surprise. Admiral Willem Rogge’s willingness to accommodate the mutineers’ demands, nearly in their entirety, shocked both enlisted men and those in government, of whom the former were quick to heap Rogge with praise and the latter with scorn, though in light of the admiral’s overnight popularity Princely officials dared not remove him from command. Rogge’s treatment of the Stumholmen mutineers stood sharply against the fashion in which a large contingent of demonstrators, brought out onto Ingermanburg streets to express their solidarity with the sailors on Retusaari, was dealt with ashore, however. Documentary evidence suggests a decision to crack down severely on street protests in what was then still Gandvik’s capital city, was explicitly a reaction to what most in government considered a far-too-kindly approach on Rogge’s part, and a desire to re-impose discipline at a critical moment, before demonstrations were given a chance to grow.

It was a measure which had succeeded, before, at times, and at times backfired, though never before had it backfired so spectacularly. Dragoon regiments brought in from reliable garrisons had scarcely begun their mopping-up when, fired by news of violent repressions being wrought against what was, initially, a contingent of protesters predominantly female and elderly in composition, Ingermanburg trade unions turned out in vast numbers, to the utter amazement of Dragoon officers and of Prince Ernest, who had evidently believed that decisive action would prevent such a frightful scenario from becoming reality, to do battle with government security forces. Over a chaotic and confused afternoon, into a long summer’s night, dragoons found themselves losing control, and, under a sort of pressure which they were in no way prepared to face, retreated from Ingermanburg’s central districts.

There followed a dark comedy of error, miscalculation, cowardice, and opportunism of a type so often found in Gandvian history. As his dragoon officers panicked, so too did Prince Ernest, who having recently acceded as a boy of only 15 years to a throne vacated by his sickly father was still just eighteen years old and fatally bereft of either experience or resolution, and after two indecision-filled days Ernest, informed somewhat precipitously that all was lost, fled to Reval, and thence to Riga, Amberland, abdication, and exile. It was, for Gandvik as a whole, perhaps most of all for Ernest’s bewildered cabinet ministers, a stunning piece of news, and Ingermanburg’s crowds were as shocked to learn of their apparent victory as were the dragoons sabering them just a few days earlier. Jubilation quickly turned into confusion, as it became clear that a revolt which few had actually intended and fewer still had planned for, had seemingly against all common sense succeeded, and leading domestic reformers could not figure out just how to respond. As a varied cast of characters drawn from across the spectrum of liberal intelligentsia and the long-suppressed trade union movement descended on Ingermanburg, where Ernest’s jilted cabinet actually continued to hold session, though was disinclined to do much of anything for so long as a well-stocked larder and abundant stores of fine cigars and brandy held out, an incomparable character stepped into the spotlight.

Jacob Wuhlburn belonged to a multiplying class of new men in Gandvik, a sector of society which, having held only a peripheral significance for centuries, had suddenly catapulted itself to the very forefront of political and commercial life. Unlike those aristocratic and ecclesiastical personages memorized and cataloged by generations of bored schoolchildren, memorized still, credited with the greatest and most notable deeds in a long and undeniably quite eventful national history, Wuhlburn, for all his later significance, emerged from decidedly humble if far from impoverished origins. Offspring of a Ruthenian peasant family which was lucky enough to see itself lifted into a middling sort of prosperity by a Territorial Law whose effects were otherwise uneven at best, Wuhlburn if nothing else demonstrated a prodigious capacity for work and an unnatural genius for facts and figures. From his youthful apprenticeship to a Menesk cobbler Wuhlburn rose inexorably, making, selling, and saving until a series of fortuitous investments in the novel rail-transport industry paid off so spectacularly as to make the 31-year-old Wuhlburn at a stroke one of Gandvik’s richest men. By 1914, the seemingly boundless scope of his business activities encompassed everything from steel to confectionaries, and a personal habit of modesty and frugality concealed vast wealth.

Where Prince Ernest was opulent, Wuhlburn was ambitious, and circumstances in summer of 1914 offered him an opportunity that, however unlooked-for, he could never have let escape. Respectability, in that age, demanded aloofness from politics or at most a proper sort of basic patriotism, and Wuhlburn had not, prior to Ernest’s abdication, gone beyond just that in his public utterances. Privately, however, Wulhburn harbored a deep contempt for Gandvik’s idle and reactionary ruling class that was by no means uncommon among a blossoming bourgeoisie. Absolutism of a virulent and reflexive sort, held-to all the more fiercely as threats to its existence multiplied, offered no meaningful role in politics to a class which saw itself, not altogether unreasonably, as the true engine of national prosperity, and Wuhlburn like most of those businessmen and industrialists whose base parentage barred them from positions of power, yet whose wealth and initiative were of such vital significance to Gandvik as a modern state, desired nothing more fervently than to unseat a system which seemed to revel in its own backwardness and torpor. Wuhlburn carefully kept himself abreast of political developments which he did not necessarily take a direct part in, and through informal contacts had built a large network of like-minded individuals, hundreds if not thousands of which were to be found in an industrial city like Ingermanburg.

Pivotal in the events which followed abdicating Ernest was Wulhburn’s control of a somewhat sensational, though widely-read, broadsheet paper, the now-infamous Isänmaanystävä, or Patriot. Prior to August of 1914, the paper had specialized in highly jingoistic screeds calculated to kindle and capitalize on Gandvians’ ancestral hostility to Shieldians and their interests, intermixed with a familiar form of tabloid journalism that fed on scandalous rumor from high society, virtually a guarantee of high readership.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:45 pm

The Gandvian Armed Forces

Land Force
14 Armies
5 Fortified Regions
25 Tank Divisions (5 Active, 20 Reserve)
20 Mechanized Divisions (10 Active, 10 Reserve)
15 Coastal Artillery Divisions (8 Active, 7 Reserve)
5 Mountain Divisions (5 Active)
3 Airborne Divisions (3 Active)

Internal Security Forces
-1 Civil Guard Mechanized Division
-8 Civil Guard Independent Mechanized Regiments
-19 Regional Contingents
-10 Border Guard Districts
-37 Mobile Squadrons (battalion-equivalent)

General Staff-Army
Army Aviation Command
Strategic Forces Command
-1. Rocket Division
-2. Rocket Division
-3. Rocket Division
-4. Rocket Division
-5. Rocket Division
Airborne Forces Command (Holmgard)
33. Airborne Division
50. Airborne Division
161. Airborne Division
1. Military District (Murman)
11. Fortified Region
12. Fortified Region
Operational Group M (Murman)
752. Mountain Division
322. Mountain Division
168. Coastal Artillery Division
Operational Group L (Rovaniemi)
168. Infantry Division
240. Armored Division
423. Coastal Artillery Division
-JR 417 (MR-W)
2. Military District (Vitstenkyrka)
21. Army
22. Army
23. Army
24. Army
5. Army (Lehmola)
50. Armored Division
81. Armored Division
36. Armored Division
12. Infantry Division
15. Army (Kotkafastning)
1. Armored Division
75. Armored Division
41. Armored Division
35. Infantry Division
3. Military District (Riga)
XVIII. Army
9. Fortified Region
19. Army (Rääveli)
18. Coastal Artillery Division
26. Coastal Artillery Division
443. Infantry Division
285. Armored Division
1. Army (Ylisleniimi)
2. Armored Division
15. Armored Division
17. Armored Division
8. Infantry Division
11. Army (Altien)
47. Armored Division
25. Armored Division
3. Armored Division
10. Infantry Division
14. Army (Mozyrius) 5. Infantry Division
11. Armored Division
21. Armored Division
220. Armored Division
109. Infantry Division
4. Military District (Brahe)
28. Fortified Region
5. Fortified Region
2. Army
40. Armored Division
202. Armored Division
83. Armored Division
129. Infantry Division
4. Army
52. Infantry Division
7. Infantry Division
3. Mountain Division
410. Infantry Division
5. Military District (Eushta)
7. Army
9. Infantry Division
18. Armored Division
87. Armored Division
23. Infantry Division
94. Infantry Division
8. Army
95. Infantry Division
27. Infantry Division
70. Armored Division
187. Armored Division
6. Military District (Kullansarvi)
27. Army
50. Infantry Division
227. Infantry Division
434. Coastal Artillery Division
327. Coastal Artillery Division
124. Armored Division
Operational Group S
511. Coastal Artillery Division
98. Coastal Artillery Division
Operational Group K
24. Mountain Division)
63. Mountain Division
199. Infantry Division
High Command-Air Force (Gen. Lars von Frankivsk)
Reserve Air Fleet
80. Patrol Regt.
83. Reconnaissance Regt. (HQ Vitstenkyrka)
-I/83. Photo-Reconnaissance Sqdn.
-II/83. Radio Reconnaissance Sqdn.
-III/83. Radio Reconnaissance Sqdn. (ground station)
-IV/83. Radio Reconnaissance Sqdn. (ground station)
-V/83. Reconnaissance Sqdn. (satellite)
-VI/83. Reconnaissance Sqdn. (satellite)
-VII/83. Reconnaissance Sqdn. (satellite)
-VIII/83. Reconnaissance Sqdn. (satellite)
87. Early Warning Regiment
-I/87. Radar Sqdn. (ground station)
-II/87. Radar Sqdn. (ground station)
-III/87. Radar Sqdn. (ground station)
-IV/87. Radar Sqdn. (ground station)
-V/87. Radar Sqdn.
195. Strategic Air Defense Regiment
202. Strategic Air Defense Regiment
44. Transport Regiment (HQ Vitstenkyrka)
-I/44 Airlift Sqdn.
-II/44 Airlift Sqdn.
-III/44 Airlift Sqdn.
-IV/44 Airlift Sqdn.
45. Transport Regiment (HQ Ingermanburg)
-I/45. Airlift Sqdn.
-II/45. Airlift Sqdn.
-III/45. Airlift Sqdn.
Air Training Command (HQ Upsala)
-Upsala Air Officer School
-Vitstenkyrka Air Officer School
1. Air Fleet (HQ Vilna)
-9. Fighter Regt.
-14. Fighter Regt.
-12. Fighter Regt.
-3. Fighter Regt.
-43. Attack Regt.
-47. Attack Regt.
-51. Electronic Warfare Regt.
-101. Air Defense Regt.
-115. Air Defense Regt.
-109. Air Defense Regt.
-106. Air Defense Regt.
2. Air Fleet (HQ Menesk)
-1. Fighter Regt.
-7. Fighter Regt.
-18. Attack Regt.
-2. Attack Regt.
-I/51. Electronic Warfare Sqdn.
-100. Air Defense Regt.
-111. Air Defense Regt.
-121. Air Defense Regt.
4. Air Fleet (HQ Smalandsk)
-21. Fighter Regt.
-19. Fighter Regt.
-17. Attack Regt.
-94. Attack Regt.
-33. Attack Regt.
-II/51. Electronic Warfare Sqdn.
-II/71. Air Surveillance Sqdn.
-125. Air Defense Regt.
-104. Air Defense Regt.
-117. Air Defense Regt.
-108. Air Defense Regt.
5. Air Fleet (HQ Lehmola)
-5. Fighter Regt.
-8. Fighter Regt.
-22. Attack Regt.
-15. Attack Regt.
-45. Light Attack Regt.
-122. Air Defense Regt.
High Command-Navy
-Training Command
-Repair and Maintenance Command
-Supply and Transport Command
Baltic Fleet
Northern Fleet
Pacific Fleet


Small Arms
-5,44 RK 79 assault rifle/carbine
-7,62 RK 60 assault rifle
-7,62 AK 57 semi-automatic rifle
-7,62 KKVK 60 section automatic weapon
-7,62 KKV 57 general-purpose machine gun
-7,62 TKV 85 bolt-action sniper rifle
-8,6 TKV 90 bolt-action sniper rifle
-13,2 TKV 99 bolt-action anti-materiel rifle
-9 KP 31submachine gun
-9 KP 45 submachine gun
-9 P 07 semi-automatic pistol
-9 P 35 semi-automatic pistol
-9 P 44 semi-automatic pistol
-9 P 90 semi-automatic pistol
-40 KRH 78 under-barrel grenade launcher

Crew-served and Antitank Weapons
-13,2 KKV 58 heavy machine gun
-40 AKRH 81 automatic grenade launcher
-81 KRH 73 medium mortar
-120 KRH 41 heavy mortar
-120 KRH 90 heavy mortar
-80 KKES 51 antitank rocket launcher
-74 KKES 74 disposable antitank rocket launcher
-84 KKES 84 disposable antitank rocket launcher
-84 RKES 49 recoilless rifle
-95 S 58 recoilless rifle
-R279 short-range antitank missile
-R251 medium-range antitank missile
-R278 medium-range antitank missile

Tanks
-4,710 PAV 89 main battle tanks
-4,450 PAV 74 main battle tanks (no longer in active service)
-2,140 KPAV 77 armored reconnaissance vehicles

Personnel Carriers and Armored Cars
-7,380 PMKV 65 tracked armored personnel carriers (no longer in active service)
-5,530 RKPV 98 tracked infantry fighting vehicles
-7,250 KPA 87 wheeled armored personnel carriers (including all variants)

Engineer Equipment
-AKA-K tracked amphibious transporter
-PS 79 pontoon bridge
-PS 91 pontoon bridge
-AL 70 wheeled amphibious ferry
-AL 96 tracked amphibious ferry
-Monark-Albin Leguaani self-propelled bridging system
-VAT RT-55Y 6x6 amphibious transporter
-MV 89 4x4 shovel/ditching machine
-RVP 89 armored recovery vehicle
-RVP 74 armored recovery vehicle
-RVP 98 armored recovery vehicle
-PP 74 combat engineer vehicle
-PP 64M mine-clearance vehicle
-RPV 83 armored recovery vehicle
-SPV 89 bridging tank
-SPV 74 bridging tank
-PP 89 combat engineer vehicle

Unarmored Vehicles
-Pavojarvi 4A bicycle
-Nilfisk Type G motorcycle
-VAT MBV-110/120/140 articulated all-terrain transporter
-Nilfisk 20 series 4x4 utility truck
-Nilfisk 30 series 6x6 utility truck
-Nilfisk 40 series 6x6 utility truck
-Nilfisk 80 series 8x8 utility truck/communications carrier
-VAT B2-140 4x4 utility truck/prime mover
-VAT B2-150 4x4 utility truck/prime mover
-VAT KKB-240 6x6 utility truck/prime mover
-VAT E9-300 8x8 utility truck/chassis
-VAT E9-330 8x8 utility truck/chassis

Air Defense Equipment
-730 ITPSV 77 armored self-propelled twin 37mm AA guns
-790 ITPSV 01 armored self-propelled short-range SAM launchers
-485 ITPSV 80 self-propelled short-range SAM launchers
-219 ITJ 78 self-propelled short-range SAM launchers
-97 ITJ 82 towed short-range SAM launchers
-290 ITJ 98 towed/self-propelled medium-range SAM launchers
-344 ITJ 84 fixed long-range SAM launchers
-S138 short-range infantry-portable SAM launcher

Field Artillery
-340 160 KKRH 58 towed heavy mortars
-782 105 H 37-61 towed field howitzers
-2,295 155 KK 83 towed field howitzers
-1,340 155 KK 98 towed field howitzers
-2,830 155 PH 81 self-propelled field howitzers
-722 120 TELKRH 89 self-propelled mortars
-1,580 120mm TELKRH 95 self-propelled mortars
-350 280mm TELRAKH 83 self-propelled multiple rocket launchers
-470 145mm TELRAKH 78 self-propelled multiple rocket launchers

Tactical Missile Launchers
-45 RSRAKH 83 mobile tactical ballistic missile launchers
-70 T228 mobile medium-range AShM launchers
-84 T220 mobile medium-range AShM launchers
-550 R225 short-range ballistic missile launchers

Fixed-Wing Combat Aircraft
-412 VL-39B single-engine multi-role fighters
-182 VL-39C single-engine multi-role fighters
-178 VL-37H twin-engine multi-role fighters

Trainers
-107 VL-39D single-engine combat-capable conversion trainers
-245 VL-38B single-engine advanced jet trainers
-238 PTO-104 single-engine intermediate/advanced turboprop trainers
-190 PTO-70 single-engine introductory piston-engine trainers
-8 PTO-172 navigation/multi-engine trainers
-Ja-103 training gliders

Electronic Warfare Aircraft and Airborne Sensor Platforms
-45 VL-39E electronic countermeasures aircraft
-30 VL-37I electronic countermeasures aircraft
-12 PTO-182 electronic countermeasures/ELINT aircraft
-12 VL-37G long-range reconnaissance/ground surveillance aircraft
-10 PTO-178 AEW aircraft
-21 PTO-173 AEW aircraft
-38 PTO-178 ELINT aircraft
-7 PTO-182 ground surveillance aircraft
-25 HW-43 ECM/ELINT helicopters
-47 PTO-187 maritime patrol aircraft

Helicopters
-150 HW-55 medium transport helicopters
-153 HW-50 training/light utility helicopters
-158 HW-43 medium transport helicopters
-127 HW-41 heavy-lift helicopters
-41 HW-41 anti-submarine/search-and-rescue helicopters
-78 HW-55 anti-submarine/search-and-rescue helicopters

Fleet Air Wing
-41 HW-41 anti-submarine/search-and-rescue helicopters
-78 HW-55 anti-submarine/search-and-rescue helicopters

Transports/Tankers
-129 PTO-173 medium-range jet airlifters
-53 PTO-181 STOL transports
-25 PTO-172 jet utility transports
-20 PTO-187 turboprop utility transports
-10 PTO-182 long-range utility transports
-17 PTO-182 aerial refueling tankers

Large Surface Combatants
-21 F104 Class general-purpose frigates (Wachtmeister, Schauman, Klenberg, Van Kinsbergen, Hendrickszoon, Lindman, Gyllenhielm, Essen, Folkersam, Kanerva, Niebaum, Sotamaa, Tallberg, Rechardt, Hubertus, Kessel, Worek, Hansa, Fleming, Marienborg, Nieroth)
-4 F101 Class antisubmarine frigates (Losch, Thelott, Reuterholm, Westling)
-2 F106 Class antisubmarine frigates (Narva, Daugava)
-4 F110 Class general-purpose frigates (Voru, Valga, Vohma, Torva)

Fast Attack Craft
-9 OV118 Class missile attack craft (Kotka, Vesimies, Alttari, Oinas, Ajomies, Karhunvartija, Kentauri, Valaskala, Joutsen, Leijona)
-10 OV117 Class missile attack craft (Korsnäs, Malax, Korsholm, Oravainen, Vasa, Vöyri-Maksamaa, Isokyrö, Kronoby, Laihia, Vähäkyrö)
-10 OV110 Class missile attack craft (Sorokka, Karhumäki, Uhtua, Kostamus, Sortavala, Pitkäranta, Villmanstrand, Lempäälä, Mikkulainen, Rääpyvä )
-28 VMV280 Class coastal patrol gunboats (VMV280-VMV307)


Mine Warfare Ships
-5 ML110 Class minelayer-escorts (Reval, Windau, Visby, Arensburg, Viapori)
-3 ML108 Class mine ferries (Ruhnu, Kihnu, Muhu)
-10 ML112 Class inshore minelayers (ML90-ML99)
-21 MR115 Class mine countermeasures vessels (Ragervik, Rapala, Turi, Talsi, Virtsu, Vaivara, Lohusuu, Ambla, Jarva, Haljaja, Alavo, Esbo, Aspsjö, Tavastehus, Fredrikshamn, Hango, Iisalmi, Pietarsaari, Strömsdal, Järvenpää, Villmanstrand)
-22 MR107 Class coastal minesweepers (MR47-MR69)

Submarines
-2 Proteus Class SSKs (SV-115, SV-116)
-15 Neptune Class SSKs (SV-120 - SV-134)

Amphibious Shipping and Auxiliaries
-3 Replenishment Oilers (Moonsund, Ingerman, Ahvenanrauma)
-1 Diving Support Ship (Repola)
-2 Submarine Tenders/Rescue Vessels (Tarjanne, Toisvesi)
-1 Icebreaker/Transport (Venden)
-3 Icebreakers (Sorokka, Vienan, Kantalahti)
-2 Hydrographic Survey Cutters (Perseus, Pegasus)
-4 Small Craft Tenders (Metso, Pyy, Riekko, Teeri)
-4 Tank Landing Ships (Brando, Finstrom, Foglo, Eckero)
-25 Work Boats (U520-U544)
-110 Medium Transport Boats (U700-U809)
-50 Large Transport Boats (U561-U580)
-19 Naval Ferry Barges (G800-G818)


General Notes on Presentation
In most cases, unarmored vehicles and crew-served infantry weapons have been omitted from equipment totals, except where specified, and statements of personnel strength should be taken as approximate.

General Notes on Organization and Readiness
Each active regiment contains a depot battalion, which, barring exceptional circumstances, functions as an administrative command only. Depot battalions are not organized for operational deployment, being intended rather to collect, train, and process replacement personnel destined for allocation to the regiment’s maneuver battalions and various mobile elements.

A significant disparity exists between the numbers of corps, divisions, and regiments that form the Royal Army’s permanent order of battle, and the number of personnel available under normal conditions. Most formations, therefore, maintain a skeletal standing force that consists of conscripts in training, reservists mobilized for yearly maneuvers, and a cadre of professional officers and NCOs, which can be brought up to full strength relatively rapidly by its majority component of reservists. An effort is made to provide each regiment with sufficient personnel for a reinforced battalion group, plus headquarters and administrative functions, at all times for training and familiarization purposes, and in order to guarantee some measure of security against surprise attack. Units attached to divisional or corps headquarters routinely operate on ten to twenty percent of their full authorized establishment, a total primarily composed of conscripts. Each Army headquarters does, however, have at its disposal at least one independent regiment, maintained continuously at full strength and, at least in theory, high readiness, and these units, in addition to providing at least some level of rapid-reaction capability, are often used to play the 'enemy' in training maneuvers. Two parachute divisions, organized into an operationally-independent Airborne Forces Command which reports directly to Armed Forces Supreme Headquarters, are the only formations above regimental size kept permanently active, and as compensation for the parachute forces' much longer minimum term of enlistment, seven years as against 450 days for all other conscripts, airborne personnel are excused from service in the mobilization reserve after their first enlistment and would only be called up in an emergency.

Small-Scale Organizations
The Gandvian infantry company, regardless of its type or role, is organized into a headquarters, three rifle or maneuver platoons, and one support or weapons platoon, each of which breaks down into a headquarters element plus three sections. Exact company-level organization is highly flexible, and while companies are not, in the Gandvian Army, permanent structures of combined arms, cross-attachment of tank and infantry platoons would take place under nearly any conceivable tactical scenario as a matter of course. Platoons, however, are customarily treated as fixed, for the simple reason that efforts to form all-arms groups under junior commanders have tended to founder upon the typical platoon leader's inexperience and restricted span of control. An effort is made to place at least one career NCO in each mobilized platoon, either as platoon leader if no lieutenants are available or as second-in-command, an indispensable source of help and guidance for any newly-minted officer. A standard nine-man rifle section, a platoon's basic building-block, is composed of two fireteams and a section leader or, in an armored infantry section, a vehicle team, with the section leader serving also as vehicle commander. The platoon's command element, the platoon leader and second-in-command, a runner or signaler, and, except in armored infantry platoons, a three-man light mortar crew, round out personnel strength. Support platoons break down along similar lines and, in addition to a headquarters element, include a mortar section with two 81mm or 60mm tubes, a machine gun section with three or four GPMGs, and an antitank section with two missile launchers. Whereas drivers of section trucks or battle-taxi armored personnel carriers, in neither case considered a combat vehicle, are not counted as part of a section's personnel establishment, belonging instead to the company trains, this is not the case for crews of infantry fighting vehicles, whose effectiveness in battle would depend on close and constant cooperation with the section's infantry dismounts. It is generally assumed that the IFV's heavy firepower and built-in antitank utility would provide ample compensation for the necessary reduction in dismounted strength.

In keeping with the Army's stringently-enforced policy of standardization, armament and equipment issue is nearly identical across all categories of infantry, excepting of course specialists like paratroopers and vehicle crews, and all section-level weapons are chambered for either 9mm Parabellum or the 7.62x40mm intermediate cartridge used universally from the early 1960s. While the rifle section's standard-issue individual weapons, the RK 60 assault rifle and KVKK 60 light machine gun, are both approaching six decades of continuous service, a combination of general adequacy and sheer ubiquity has so far derailed all efforts to provide a more up-to-date replacement. Body armor and kevlar helmets, albeit of far from excessively ergonomic design, are standard-issue for all frontline personnel, and fairly strenuous efforts have been made over recent years to increase considerably the supply of infantry night-vision devices. Radios are also available in quantity, issued to every platoon leader, and while again not excessively modern or advanced most Gandvian battlefield communications equipment is reliable and durable, the sheer volume of low-level, short-range traffic being expected to negate any advantages that might be gained by eavesdropping.

Gandvik’s particular geography and climate compel a heavy focus on operations in snow and extreme cold. An effort is usually made to train at least one platoon in each company, and all dismounted reconnaissance troops, in cross-country skiing and snowshoeing, skills with which many newly-inducted conscripts, especially those from northern localities, are already familiar, and most Gandvian troops are as a rule accustomed to cold weather. Personnel assigned to 7. Mountain Division receive further instruction in Arctic survival and mountaineering.

Tank/Armored Infantry Division
-Major-General commanding
-14,500-17,500 personnel

Equipment Totals
Tanks:
Infantry Fighting Vehicles:
Self-Propelled Mortars:
Manportable Air Defense Systems:
Armored Scout Vehicles:
Self-Propelled Howitzers:
Self-Propelled Multiple Rocket Launchers:
Self-Propelled Antiaircraft Guns:
Self-Propelled Antiaircraft Missile Systems:

Divisional HQ

HQ Company (2xMBT)
Signal Battalion
Electronic Warfare and Surveillance Battalion
Chemical Protection Company
Reconnaissance Battalion
Engineer Battalion (4xAPC, 12xCEV, 24xAET, 12xMBV, 24xAVLB, 12xDT, 12xEMV, 4xARV)
Air Defense Battalion (11xACV, 15xAPC, 36xSPAAG, 24xSP-SAM)
Helicopter Squadron (attached)

Divisional Support Regiment

Transport and Supply Battalion
Maintenance Battalion

(3x) Regimental Group
-Colonel commanding
-4,500-5,500 personnel

Regimental HQ
-HQ and HQ Company (2xMBT, 3xACV, 3xMANPADS)
-Electronic Warfare & Intelligence Platoon (3xACV)
-Chemical Protection Platoon (3xAPC)
-Reconnaissance Company (12xASV, 12xMBT, 27xMC, 7xAPC, 4xSP 120, 3xMANPADS)
-Air Defense Battery (1xACV, 9xAPC, 12xIFV-AD, 12xMANPADS, 1xARV)
Support Battalion
-Medical Company
-Regimental Maintenance & Workshops (5xARV)
-Transport Company
-Military Police Company
-Signals Company (3xACV)
-Engineer Company (1xAPC, 3xCEV, 6xAET, 3xMBV, 6xAVLB, 3xDT, 3xEMV, 1xARV)
2 or 1xTank Battalion (47xMBT, 16xIFV, 2xACV, 7xASV, 4xARV, 7xAPC, 3xIFV-AD, 9xSP 120)
1 or 2xArmored Infantry Battalion (16xMBT, 45xIFV, 2xACV, 7xAPC, 3xIFV-AD, 9xSP 120)
Self-Propelled Artillery Battalion (24xSP 155, 14xACV, 8xFOV, 14xAPC, 9xMANPADS)

Equipment totals: (Tank Regiment): 124xMBT, 77xIFV, 33xASV, 21xIFV-AD, 27xMANPADS, 31xSP 120, 24xSP 155
(Armored Infantry Regiment): 77xMBT, 118xIFV, 42xMANPADS, 24xSP 120, 24xSP 155, 12xSPAAG

Tank/Armored Infantry Battalion
-Major/Lieutenant-Colonel commanding
-780-980 personnel

HQ and HQ Company
-HQ Group (1xIFV, 2xMBT, 1xACV)
-Reconnaissance Platoon (7xASV, 9xMC)
-Signals Section (1xACV)
-Medical Section (1xAPC)
-Air Defense Platoon (1xAPC, 3xIFV-AD)
-Mortar Platoon (4xAPC, 9xSP 120)
-Maintenance Platoon (1xAPC, 4xARV)
-Supply Platoon
1-3xTank Company (15xMBT)
-Coy. HQ (3xMBT)
-1st Platoon (3xMBT)
-2nd Platoon (3xMBT)
-3rd Platoon (3xMBT)
-4th Platoon (3xMBT)
1-3xRifle Company (15xIFV)
-Coy. HQ (3xIFV)
-1st Platoon (3xIFV)
-2nd Platoon (3xIFV)
-3rd Platoon (3xIFV)
-4th Platoon (3xIFV)

Equipment Totals: (Tank) 47xMBT, 16xIFV, 2xACV, 7xASV, 4xARV, 7xAPC, 3xIFV-AD, 9xSP 120
(Armored Infantry): 16xMBT, 45xIFV, 2xACV, 7xAPC, 3xIFV-AD, 9xSP 120

Regimental Self-Propelled Field Artillery Battalion
-Major/Lt. Colonel commanding
-770-800 personnel

HQ and HQ Battery
-HQ Group (3xACV)
-Signals Section (2xACV)
-Medical Section
-Supply Platoon
-Maintenance Platoon (3xARV)
-Air Defense Platoon (3xAPC, 9xMANPADS)
-Radar Platoon (1xACV, 3xCBR)
3xSelf-Propelled Artillery Battery (1xACV, 3xAPC, 4xFOV, 8xSP 155)
-Battery Command Post (1xACV, 2xAPC)
-Forward Observer Section (4xFOV)
-1st Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 4xSP 155)
-2nd Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 4xSP 155)

Equipment Totals: 24xSP 155, 9xACV, 3xARV, 12xFOV, 12xAPC, 9xMANPADS, 3xCBR

Divisional Field Artillery Regiment

HQ and HQ Battalion
Fire Control and Targeting Battalion (5xRPV, 3xALR-MR, 2xALR-LR, 11xSR-SR)
2xField Artillery Battalion (24x155, 14xACV, 8xFOV, 14xAPC, 9xMANPADS)

Equipment Totals: 5xRPV, 3xALR-MR, 2xALR-LR, 11xSR-SR, 48x155, 8xFOV, 9xMANPADS

Divisional Armored Reconnaissance Battalion
-Lt. Colonel commanding
-800-850 personnel

HQ and HQ Company
-HQ Group (3xACV)
-Signals Section (1xACV)
-Medical Section
-Supply Platoon
-Maintenance Platoon (4xARV)
-Air Defense Platoon (3xAPC, 9xMANPADS)
-Motorcycle Platoon (15xMC)
RPV Company (3xACV)
3xHeavy Company (17xMBT, 17xASV, 2xAPC, 4xSP 120)
-Coy. HQ (1xMBT, 2xASV, 2xAPC, 4xSP 120)
-1st Platoon (4xASV, 4xMBT)
-2nd Platoon (4xASV, 4xMBT)
-3rd Platoon (4xASV, 4xMBT)
-4th Platoon (4xASV, 4xMBT)

Equipment Totals: 51xMBT, 51xASV, 9xAPC, 7xASV, 9xMANPADS, 12xSP 120, 15xMC

Divisional Electronic Warfare and Surveillance Battalion
-Major/Lt.Colonel commanding
-450-500 personnel

HQ and Operational Company
General Support Company
Transport and Supply Company
Remotely-Piloted Vehicle Company
Aviation Company

Divisional Air Defense Artillery Battalion
-Major/Lt. Colonel commanding
-830-850 personnel

HQ and HQ Battery
-HQ Group (3xACV)
-Signals Section
-Medical Section
-Supply Platoon
-Air Surveillance Radar Platoon (1xACV, 4xMRR)
-Air Defense Coordination Center (3xACV)
3xSelf-Propelled AA Gun Battery (1xACV, 1xARV, 3xAPC, 12xSPAAG)
-Battery Command Post (1xACV)
-Maintenance Section (1xARV)
-1st Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 3xSPAAG)
-2nd Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 3xSPAAG)
-3rd Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 3xSPAAG)
-4th Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 3xSPAAG)
2xSelf-Propelled SAM Battery (1xACV, 1xARV, 3xAPC, 12xSP-SAM, 12xMANPADS)
-Battery Command Post (1xACV)
-Maintenance Section (1xARV)
-1st Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 4xSP-SAM)
-2nd Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 4xSP-SAM)
-3rd Firing Platoon (1xAPC, 4xSP-SAM)

Equipment Totals: 11xACV, 15xAPC, 36xSPAAG, 24xSP-SAM

Divisional Engineer Battalion
-Lt. Colonel commanding
-1,100-1,150 personnel

HQ and HQ Company
4xPioneer Company (1xAPC, 3xCEV, 6xAET, 3xMBV, 6xAVLB, 3xDT, 3xEMV, 1xARV)
-Coy. HQ (1xAPC)
-1st Pioneer Platoon (1xCEV, 2xAET)
-2nd Pioneer Platoon (1xCEV, 2xAET)
-3rd Pioneer Platoon (1xCEV, 2xAET)
-Obstacle Breaching Platoon (3xMBV, 6xAVLB)
-Support Platoon (3xDT, 3xEMV, 1xARV)
Ribbon Bridge Company

Equipment Totals: 4xAPC, 12xCEV, 24xAET, 12xMBV, 24xAVLB, 12xDT, 12xEMV, 4xARV

Notes

1.The armored infantry or, in official Gandvian usage, Panssarikrenatööri battalion is a central pillar of combined-arms warfare at the regimental level. Armored infantry battalions, employed either as whole units or as a source of company attachments to tank-heavy task groups, provide a highly mobile, survivable, versatile and powerful rifle complement to tank forces. The tank regiment’s armored infantry battalion is customarily, though not invariably, split up among the tank battalions to create three or four all-arms groups. In an armored infantry regiment, where the ratio of tank to rifle battalions is reversed, tank companies are typically parceled-out among the rifle battalions in a similar manner. While Gandvian battalions are, as a rule, rather smaller than those of Western European and North American armies, and lack any meaningful degree of administrative independence from their parent regiment, they are nonetheless seen as principal building-blocks of all-arms task forces under regimental auspices. Battalions of all types are structured so as to maximize their suitability for independent or at least quasi-independent operations, and contain all the rudimentary combined-arms ingredients on a miniature scale, including air defense, indirect-fire, and reconnaissance support. Battalions, when deployed, are almost inevitably reinforced by attachments from their parent regiments, to a point where they might easily expand to twice their list strength in personnel. Each armored infantry battalion is itself designed to break down fairly readily into three company groups, each with its own air defense, long-range antitank, and limited engineer support resources. The twelve-tube battalion mortar platoon is also neatly divisible into three mortar platoons, available for attachment to company groups if necessary.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:56 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:49 pm

(reserved for future use)
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:16 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:53 pm

Modern Gandvian Society

Religion

There can be no doubt that, in modern Gandvik, religion, religious institutions particularly, continues to occupy a place of great importance in everyday life and exerts a significant influence on notions of self-identity in a nation that, while arguably more homogeneous than at any time previously, still maintains a remarkably diverse ethnic and linguistic character. At least 95 percent of all Gandvians describe themselves as possessing some religious affiliation, rates of atheism or agnosticism having remained reliably under five percent since 2000, and in spite of a common perception, especially among foreigners, of considerable laxness in actual religious observance, regular church or mosque attendance is seen as a key mark of respectability and belonging, and the clergy is, generally, treated in a highly deferential manner. Revolutionary anti-clericalism as observed between 1900 and 1950 has, of late, disappeared as a widespread social force, though it is of course very much in fashion among a small communist minority.

Roughly forty-five percent of Gandvians belong to the Church of Gandvik, a Lutheran organization which enjoys the status of state religion and confers its ceremonial rites on important state occasions. A consequence of Gandvik’s decisive break from Roman obedience during Reformation times, the Church of Gandvik emphasizes austerity and simplicity in its Church architecture and ornamentation, if not to the same degree as Calvinist or other Reformed churches, and preaches its services in lay Gandvian or in German, rather than in Latin. The closely-related, though administratively independent, Church of Bohemia contains another statistically-significant number of Lutherans, albeit Lutherans who conduct their church services in Celtic. Calvinism, Methodism, and other related faiths account for another twenty percent of Gandvian believers of whom most are to be found in quasi-independent Pomerania, exempt from the religious prohibitions that, for fear of revolutionary Moverism, kept Calvinism and its doctrinal descendants underground in Gandvik proper until 1935. By a comfortable margin the majority faith in Pomerania and Bohemia, Reformed Protestantism is elsewhere geographically diffuse, existing most prominently in Gandvik’s major cities, in Polesia, and in rural East Ruthenia, where Calvinists deported from elsewhere were resettled as part of an attempt to shift demographics in what had previously been a Muslim-majority region.

Islam survived a number of at times murderous attempts at its destruction to claim, at present, another roughly twenty percent of religiously-active Gandvians, three-quarters of them Sunni and another quarter followers of various Sufi traditions. Forced resettlement and, later on, economic migration, worked to ensure that no single province or Governorate now contains a Muslim majority, though majority-Muslim counties and parishes are strongly evident in East Ruthenia, and there exists a not-insignificant community of Lutherans whose maintenance of Tatar and Turkic cultural traditions keeps them in close contact with Islam.

A small and, inevitably, much-harried Jewish population is mostly concentrated in Baltic-coast cities, and while since 1950 freed from all legal constraints on movement, employment, and government service, outward signs of religious expression are after centuries of persecution decidedly muted. Antisemitism, if no longer enshrined in law and state policy, is hardly extinct in modern Gandvik, and Jewish individuals can often face a degree of discrimination in society second only to that meted-out to Movers.

Moverism, which enjoyed a brief though meteoric rise in popularity among peasant communities between 1890 and 1920, was for much of modern Gandvian history seen as an antisocial force nearly equal to communism in its severity, and although Moverism per se became legal in 1960, governments continued to employ antiterrorist and anti-espionage laws against Mover churches and institutions through 1990. Most one-time Movers accordingly drifted to Calvinism or Methodism, doctrines which bore a degree of similarity to Mover beliefs, but a small and fervent core of committed believers, thought to number perhaps one hundred thousand individuals, remains active in Polesia, subject, if not to legal restrictions, then certainly to close government scrutiny.

Lutheran, Reformed, and Muslim institutions in open and legal operation all enjoy considerable state patronage, are exempted from tax levies, and are permitted to run their own schools for both religious lay education and for aspiring clergy, in return for which they largely adhere to a government line on major contemporary issues and promote loyalty to state institutions. Clerical dissidents tend, accordingly, to face censure from within their own church bureaucracies, oftentimes pursued without Riga’s obvious insistence, and although it is far from clear as to how seriously average Gandvians take patriotic exhortations as delivered by their priests or imams, few of those attempting to deliver unapproved political messages from the pulpit have found much support from among their parishioners.

Levels of personal religious conviction among Gandvians are, naturally, quite difficult to measure, and in a society where free speech exists much more in theory than in practice most people have become adept at telling strangers, government officials especially, exactly what it seems they want to hear. On a functional level, Church and Mosque offer a convenient focal point for community life and social organization, sponsoring fairs, banquets, festivals, outings and a range of other relatively innocuous leisure activities. Religious organizations are also permitted to administer certain charity and social-support programs, and maintain a close relationship with the national health service.

Education

Education in modern Gandvik through secondary-level is both free and compulsory, and has been so ever since 1955. After a most often Church-run preschool, most children start their formal education at age six, and leave, for the workforce, university, or the military, at age seventeen or eighteen. School quality and content, of course, varies enormously across Gandvik, rural localities suffering more often than not from considerable neglect while densely-populated urban districts are customarily badly overcrowded, but by graduation most Gandvians will have acquired literacy, a basic grasp of mathematics, and in most cases a vocational skill. The much-dreaded Generalized Attainment Evaluator, otherwise known more simply as the Exam, is probably the pivotal moment in a Gandvian’s school career, as, administered in the final year of primary schooling when most students are ten or eleven years of age, it determines whether a given individual moves on to a General school, a grammar school in Walmingtonian parlance, or a trades school. In essence, a child’s scores on the Exam play perhaps an overriding part in deciding their future employment prospects and indeed their broad course through life. Some educators have since criticized the Evaluator as a fundamentally unfair and erroneous method of ranking student aptitude, one which, in spite of its ostensibly meritocratic character, still very much favors children from middle- and upper-class backgrounds, those whose parents can afford private coaching, over those from working-class families, though after General Huntzinger’s bureaucratic reforms a traditionally lower-class career is no longer the barrier to social and financial attainment that it once was.

Male students who pass their Evaluator with high-enough marks can choose to attend one of several dozen state-run military preparatory academies in preference to a General school, an option which, theoretically open to those from all social backgrounds, inevitably selects a disproportionate amount of applicants from upper-middle and upper-classes, and from among the children and descendants of serving Army officers. In most cases these are boarding schools, entirely male in composition, and award graduates a lieutenant’s commission at the end of their final year. Attendance at a military academy is virtually a requirement for anyone aspiring to a senior post in the military or government, though such status can now be arrived-at through bureaucratic advancement as well.

Only about twenty percent of Gandvians go on to university after their secondary-school graduation, and most of those attend technical or engineering programs. The humanities, while not exactly discouraged, definitely represent a more challenging and a potentially less rewarding field of specialization in terms of their attached careers. All other things being equal, of two equally-weighted diplomas, one in a scientific, mathematical, or engineering specialty tends to qualify a university graduate for higher-paying, more prestigious careers with better opportunities for advancement. One study found, for instance, that most Gandvians with doctorates in the humanities go on to become primary or secondary-school teachers, a tendency reinforced by the simple fact that a professorship, in Gandvik’s subtly politicized university system, is generally only given to those deemed unlikely to ask difficult questions.

Clubs and Associations

Social life for most Gandvians revolves around their club, hobbyist group, or community association. According to the latest available data 71% of Gandvian adults, a staggering 95.5% of men and 48.1% of women, belong to and regularly attend meetings of a club or association, and many of those surveyed listed membership in several. Arguably the most common variety is the workplace association, frequently associated with and sponsored by a particular labor or occupational union, and often counting among its membership both workers and lower-level management. Most workplace associations maintain a clubhouse or hall, sometimes maintained by its own specialized employees, and these provide members and their families with a communal gathering-place at which to observe holidays and special occasions free from the boisterousness of a typical public house. Workingmen’s clubs are favored for their custom of allowing members free beer, habitually up to eight pints a head, on Christmas and other important feast days, and might also play host to concerts or workplace darts or dominoes tournaments.

Clubs might otherwise be organized around hobby and craft interests, one of Gandvik’s largest being its National Gardeners’ and Horticulturalists’ Society, around a Church or local religious institution, or around military service. The stereotypical regimental club, after all, is maintained by all of the Royal Army’s dozens of regimental formations, and reunites former servicemen for occasions of drunken revelry with scrupulously-observed regularity.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:54 pm

Cities of Gandvik

Riga
Image

Capital city of Gandvik since 1873, and administrative seat of Curonia Governate since 1910, Riga consistently ranks as one of Europe's most unique and beautiful cities, one that boasts a strange mix of charm and squalor. Riga is the epicenter of cultural and political life in Gandvik, playing host to a number of well-regarded conservatories, theaters, and museums in addition to state buildings. As, arguably, the Principality's most cosmopolitan city, one with stronger than average links to Europe as a whole, Riga tends to attract artists and intellectuals of all stripes to a greater extent than other, more isolated settlements such as Ingermanburg or Menesk. Compared to many of its Baltic and continental peers, the Gandvian capital often appears to be frozen in time, its streetscape having changed remarkably little since a major reconstruction ordered in 1870, which was intended to prepare Riga for its new-found administrative functions. Many medieval buildings still stand, no few of them performing their original functions even today, while a great deal of infrastructure dating to Riga's commercial heyday has yet to be replaced or even given a thorough overhaul. This means that large sections of the city are effectively inaccessible to automobiles, giving Riga a decidedly old-fashioned feel that adds significantly to its urban character, inconvenient though it may be. One of Riga's most striking physical features is its numerous well-preserved examples of Art Nouveau architecture, which was considered extremely fashionable between about 1900 and 1920. Many of the city's most important and recognizable modern-day landmarks, such as the National Opera and the Polytechnical Institute, were built in that style.

Riga's geographic locality is known to have contained permanent human inhabitants since well before the advent of complex societies. It was not however until Chirven tribes arrived in the western part of modern-day Gandvik, between 250-500 ACE, that Riga really started to take shape as a settlement. Located on a broad harbor formed by Vina River as it meets the Baltic Sea, Riga was ideally-situated for commerce and grew steadily through the middle ages. The city's prosperity, in turn, attracted large communities of resident foreigners that, over time, became fully incorporated into Riga's social fabric and which continue to add their own distinct flavor today. Baltic Nibelungs and Dutch-Pomerians comprise Riga's largest immigrant or distinct national groups today, while a once-thriving Jewish community has largely dissipated, moving to western Europe in several waves following the enactment of discriminatory legislation in 1955.

Modern Riga contains over 700,000 residents within its city limits and a further three million within its sprawling metropolitan area, a landscape dominated by industrial combines and drab row houses. Most of its inhabitants are employed in industry or municipal services, and live in crowded tenements or apartment buildings that do not typically exceed eight stories in height. Riga features a limited subway system and more extensive above-ground trolley network, but most citizens travel by bicycle or small motorbike. A large proportion of the mammoth Nymans industrial combine is sited just beyond the Riga city limits. Long-distance train and ferry services are maintained between Riga and Gandvik's other major urban areas, while an eponymous international airport is located some distance outside the city itself.

Menesk
Image

Ingermanburg
Home to approximately five million residents at last estimate, Ingermanburg, whose name translates to “Ingrian City” in German, is Gandvik’s second most populous urban agglomeration, and arguably its most important cultural, economic, and political center as well. Ingermanburg was founded in 1703 to replace Turku as seat of government for a nation engaged in a process of rapid territorial expansion east and south. Built on reclaimed swampland to a plan drawn up personally by King Pietari III, with much help from German engineers and architects, the new city occupied an advantageous position along trade and transport routes between eastern and western Gandvik and offered an excellent harbor, but grew slowly at first thanks to its malarial surroundings and a shortage of potential colonists. Settlers, when they did begin to arrive in numbers, hailed mainly from the Nibelung states or from newly-conquered Turkic principalities, where a mixture of forced religious conversion policies and widespread land seizures by Gandvian nobles had created a large itinerant population. After 1800, former peasants from across western Gandvik flocked to Ingrermanburg in response to a changing rural economy, and provided the nation’s first industrial workforce as mills and factories multiplied during the 19th century’s second half. Low wages, overcrowding, and insufficient employment combined to radicalize local politics, and left-wing organizations which took root in Ingermanburg formed the vanguard of a long-running struggle against Princely autocracy.

Modern Ingermanburg retains its prominent position in commerce thanks to a profusion of large and small manufacturing firms within and just outside its city limits, particularly those specializing in automobiles and shipbuilding. Organized labor continues to play a deciding role in municipal politics, while Ingermanburg’s mayor, due to his considerable bureaucratic and patronage resources, tends to exert a great deal of influence upon government at a national level.

Vitstenkyrka
The administrative capital of West Ruthenia is both Gandvik’s most populous city and Europe’s, counting eleven million inhabitants within its municipal boundaries and sixteen million individuals in its greater metropolitan area. Vitstenkyrka began to appear in written records during the twelfth century as a fortified town on the Muska river, its Nordic-origin name, one of several applied through history, translating to ‘white stone church.’ The city served as capital for the Mordvin principalities, rivals to early Gandvian kingdoms, before its sacking and occupation by a succession of Turkic conquerors between approximately 1300 and 1500,

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:55 pm

Internal Security Services: Sakerhetspoliisi

The Sakerhetspoliisi (Security Police), or Sapo for short, is a cabinet-level agency with broad and poorly-defined responsibilities which is mainly employed to suppress internal subversion and apprehend foreign agents on Gandvian soil. Officially categorized as an internal security service, the Sapo effectively functions as a secret police, operating beyond normal judicial oversight and wielding powers far in excess of those authorized to civilian law enforcement agencies, and answers for its activities to the Council of State directly. The Security Police is arguably Gandvik's least-loved government department, and its role as both a weapon against political dissenters and as a means of discreetly monitoring other state agencies has contributed to its negative reputation in official and popular circles alike. Actual Sapo capabilities fall far below what public opinion would credit, however, and a sharp rise in domestic agitation by anti-government groups brought on by the Gull Flag Revolution, coupled with what is believed to be an extensive campaign of foreign infiltration, has placed severe strain on an organization that suffers from chronic personnel shortages, serious structural deficiencies, and a constant preoccupation with internal and inter-agency vendettas.

Every Gandvian government to date, not excluding the short-lived Republic, has maintained some kind of secretive internal intelligence agency, but the Sapo in its modern form emerged shortly after General Strandmann's coup d'etat as an evolution of the Republican-era Special Directorate of the State Police. Cobbled-together, in turn, from elements of the previous regime's various ad hoc intelligence sections, black cabinets, and municipal special branches, the Special Directorate, known by its Gandvian-language initials EOVP, was formed in an effort to curtail a veritable constellation of political extremist groups that, taken together, posed a serious threat to domestic stability. Throughout its existence, however, the EOVP remained a haven for reactionary and monarchist elements, and abandoned Prime Minister Alfred Jelling's government wholeheartedly in favor of Strandmann and his allies. During the first years of General Strandmann's dictatorship, the newly-renamed, if largely unaltered, Security Police concentrated its efforts on the destruction of anti-regime elements, and to that end Sapo officials cultivated strong relationships with several groups belonging to Gandvik's then-thriving fascist movement. Through its secret alliances with several far-right militias, the Sapo acquired a weapon with which to beat and intimidate communists and leftist labor unions that did not necessarily implicate the government itself in acts of rioting and street hooliganism, an important consideration at a time when Strandmann and his Berdichyiv allies were attempting to establish themselves as a force for centrism and moderation in a society rife with revolutionary tension. These same activities simultaneously helped to weaken and co-opt fascist parties, as they tended to separate-out reactionary, chauvinist elements from those that held more radical beliefs, and made certain that Riga's eventual attempt to dismantle those same groups met with little resistance. Though never proven, Sapo involvement was also widely suspected in the assassinations of Alfred Jelling, Gandvik's last republican prime minister, and Nils Oddershelde, a prominent philosopher and impressionist painter. Both crimes were eventually attributed to a small far-left terrorist cell, but many key aspects of the government's case fell apart under close scrutiny, and accusations of a cover-up were given added weight when all five suspects escaped from custody during transfer from court to prison, apparently from right under the noses of their guards. Some even suspected that a contemporary border dispute with the Shield was deliberately manufactured in order to draw attention away from what would almost certainly have been a major scandal.

As inter-European rivalries escalated prior to the Great War, the Security Police's counter-espionage role acquired greater importance, and from the mid-1930s Sapo resources were increasingly employed in a search for enemy agents, real or imagined. Prompted by perceived emergecy requirements, the Council of State also enacted a secret directive that gave the Sapo wide-ranging legal freedoms and effective immunity from prosecution under Gandvik's civil code. These provisions, which have never been withdrawn, allowed Sapo personnel to operate without regard to prohibitions against torture, arbitrary arrest, indefinite detention, blackmail, slander, and other similar excesses supposedly denied to civil police, and permitted warrantless wire-tap and microphone surveillance, though to a significant extent Riga's directive only served to officially sanction measures that the Security Police had already taken on its own initiative. Actual spies proved relatively few in number, so most of the Sapo's energies were directed instead at domestic pacifists and antiwar intellectuals, whose influence Riga saw as in many cases more harmful than that of foreign infiltrators, and under emergency legislation hundreds of people were arrested, tortured, and in some cases imprisoned for years, often without being informed of the charges levelled against them.

Sapo activities intensified greatly after hostilities broke out in mid-1939 as thousands of new personnel were taken-on and agent networks expanded. In addition to its continuing counterintelligence function, the Sapo began to closely monitor civilian morale through telephone intercepts and informers, and identified individuals guilty, in official eyes, of spreading defeatism or enemy propaganda for punishment under emergency decrees. Many modern-day historians believe that the Sapo's often clumsy and by no means pervasive domestic-surveillance efforts did more to harm than to help Gandvik's war effort, as arrests were often made on strength of minimal evidence and rarely targeted anyone with a significant following or actual treasonous intent, but this was not a view shared by the Council of State, which exempted Security Police personnel from military conscription, and steadily increased the Sapo's budgetary allocation each year from 1939 to 1945. Peace offered no respite as Gandvik struggled to reintegrate millions of demobilized servicemen, many of them long held prisoner by Cassanos and Bohemia, and as Gandvik's fragile political compact between military, industrial, and labor interests began to show signs of fraying. In spite of its status as a victorious power, Riga's insistence on pressing its territorial claims against the Shield soon caused Gandvik to fall out with its former Aventine allies, a state of affairs that perpetuated wartime scarcities and slowed economic regrowth.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:56 pm

Automotive Industry of Gandvik

Monarck-Albin Company

Known primarily for its line of mammoth wheeled transporters, Monarck-Albin is a cornerstone of Ruthenian industry and Gandvik's premier manufacturer of heavy transportation equipment, including coach buses, trolleybuses, road tractors, tank transporters, and other large vehicles, many of which have upwards of four axles. Monarck-Albin, currently headquartered in Menesk, was founded in 1908 to build rolling stock, later branching-out into automobiles as technology and engineering talent became available. Its eponymous founders, a pair of well-heeled Baltic businessmen, were staunch royalists and played an important part in organizing rightist opposition to Gandvik's short-lived republic, for which they were handsomely rewarded with a near-endless stream of government contracts after 1927. During the Great War, Monarck-Albin built tens of thousands of heavy trucks and artillery tractors for Gandvik's armed forces, and having benefited from both lend-lease Walmingtonian equipment and captured Oakist vehicles, was able to make a major technological leap post-war, developing not only copies of other nations' trucks and tractors but some truly groundbreaking and versatile designs of its own devising.

Among Monarck-Albin's best-known products are its series of four-axle heavy trucks, also known as the Pyorremyrsky, able to haul over 22,000 kilograms and frequently seen carrying tactical ballistic missiles, heavy artillery rockets, AShMs, and radars, and its even larger seven-axle MAY-7917, built to transport Gandvik's heaviest ballistic missiles and also used for resource exploration in far northern climes. MA vehicles have been widely exported, particularly to nations that would otherwise be unable to obtain similar platforms from elsewhere.

Riga Autobus Factory (RAF)

Initially a relatively unsuccessful manufacturer of household appliances and light machinery, known as Wuhlbern & Sons, Riga Autobus Factory started down a different track in 1947, when its owner Karl Wuhlbern purchased several hundred war-surplus trucks for conversion into share taxis. This turned out to be a profitable enterprise, and after its success in re-purposing military vehicles Wuhlbern ordered his engineering team to come up with a design of their own, simultaneously renaming the company with its present-day moniker in order to signify a break with its previous, and less productive, iteration. RAF's first major all-original product, the RAF-977, appeared in 1958, and within a few years had become a staple of motor transport in Gandvik. Granted, serious competition from foreign designs did not really factor into Gandvik's closed economy, but the 977 was a competent vehicle in its own right that could take often-primitive local road conditions in stride, and which could be maintained effectively with only a modicum of mechanical skill. Many were manufactured, and a large share of those remain in active use, both domestically and abroad.

Even more successful than the 977, and still in production, was the RAF-2203, a more modern, less heavily-built minibus that took over for many 977s in inner-city routes. 2203s also found favor as ambulances thanks to their spacious internal accommodations and forgiving handling, though 977 aficionados criticized their tacky internal styling and use of cheaply-made, breakage-prone plastic components in many areas. 2203s, depending on their year of manufacture, also have a tendency to rust, though this is not so much of a problem in arid climates. Thousands are believed to have been exported abroad, mostly as share taxis and ambulances, while others are used by Gandvik's armed forces for personnel transport and liaison, and by the notorious Sapo, which uses 2203s, often marked as delivery or mail vans, for surveillance and for carrying covert-action groups. In 1994, RAF was absorbed by the Nymans industrial combine, which currently controls most industrial activity in and around Riga. In addition to their typical van-type configuration, 2203s are also available with pickup beds, a version aimed at movers and small-scale vendors.

Pohjoisvaha Autotehtaan (PA)

First constituted in 1946 as a manufacturing plant for peat-digging machinery, Pohjoisvaha Autotehtaan, or North Ruthenia Automobile Plant, branched out into road-building and agricultural machinery starting in 1951, acquiring its present-day name that same year. During the late 1950s it was decided to turn the plant towards heavy construction and earth-moving equipment exclusively, and since that time PA has become best-known for its oversized dump trucks designed for use in open-pit mining operations. Located about fifty kilometers north of Menesk, Ruthenia's administrative capital, PA's factory employs some 11,000 people, and has to date built over 100,000 vehicles according to its own records.

PA is currently marketing its newest product, a 360 metric ton capacity mining dump truck designated the 7560 series, to Depkazi operators in particular. The company also builds a wide range of other specialized vehicles for mining operations, including those designed to work in underground tunnels, metallurgical transports for foundries and steel mills, heavy-duty aircraft tugs, and railway freight cars.

Nilfisk Auto

Based in Ingermanburg, where it occupies a sprawling and grimy factory complex notorious for its high output of air, soil, and water pollutants, Nilfisk is Gandvik's largest producer of two-wheeled motorized equipment, including an iconic marque of motorcycle and tens of thousands of cheaply-made motor scooters, which provide many Gandvians with their primary means of medium-distance transportation. Nilfisk can claim a fairly impressive pedigree, having been founded in 1705 as a manufacturer of naval stores, later building loom machinery to feed Gandvik's gradual industrialization after about 1840. The company began making motorcycles in 1934, when it acquired a production license for the DKW RT 125, and during the Great War supplied most of the Gandvian Army's needs in that category, simultaneously turning-out small arms and all manner of light manufactured goods. Most of Nilfisk's early motorcycle designs were copies of Nibelung models captured between 1939 and 1945, or of North American varieties provided via lend-lease, but in 1954 it introduced the definitive N 125, so designated for its engine displacement, which remained in series production until 1987. Practically unavoidable on Gandvian roads, N 125s were also widely exported, and developed a loyal customer base in many countries by virtue of their simplicity and ruggedness.

In addition to its more recognizable motorcycle and motor-scooter series, Nilfisk builds several types of relatively unappealing microcars intended for narrow city streets as are encountered in most of Gandvik's major Baltic-coast urban areas, which generally use motorcycle or moped powerplants and major automotive components wherever possible. Nilfisk also builds the Safari, an amphibious 4x4 off-road vehicle popular with military and government operators. Consumer electronics, household appliances, and power tools fall under the Nilfisk umbrella as well.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:57 pm

Nuclear Technology in Gandvik

Overview

As one of Europe's major powers, possessing advanced scientific-industrial means and a substantial supply of mineral resources, Gandvik makes widespread use of nuclear technology in both civilian and military capacities. Gandvik's state-run nuclear program can trace its origins to 1931, when the Ingermanburg-based Fysikaalis-Tekninen Instituutti (FTI) opened its first nuclear research laboratory, under the capable direction of Dr. Kari L. Browallius, a brilliant young physicist and a student of pioneering quantum theorist Vilho Gadolin. Browallius and his engineering team finished building a basic cyclotron in 1935, and this quickly became a source of much valuable data on the interactions of atomic and sub-atomic particles. Gandvik's political and military leadership, however, tended to view Browallius' research as a side-project with no practical application, and even after Nibelung scientists Hahn and Strassmann's discovery of nuclear fission in 1938, afforded the FTI's work a low priority at a time when national attention was focused squarely on a major European war. Hahn and Strassmann's breakthrough, coupled with their own work, quickly convinced most Gandvian nuclear physicists of fission's destructive possibilities, but it was not until 1945, by which time smuggled documents had revealed the true extent of foreign progress, that government officials began to take atomic research seriously.

Riga Castle's response to evidence that scientific teams in Walmington, Valendia, and the Nibelung states were nearing a functional nuclear device was constrained by wartime financial and personnel pressures. Embroiled in a major continental land war, Gandvik concentrated nearly all of its resources on weaponry of a conventional nature, and its nuclear program did not receive a supply of funds or trained specialists sufficient for any substantial forward progress until after 1945. Uranium mining began in earnest at Sillamae a year later, with a view to finding enough material for a fissile core, but Gandvik's relatively poorly-developed advanced-industrial and metallurgical sectors proved a constant obstacle and forced scientists working on the project, code-named E-Tutkimus or E-Survey, to develop some new alloys and casting techniques themselves. Browallius was finally able to commission a working nuclear reactor in 1947, and by 1953 had produced enough highly-enriched uranium to permit construction of a bomb. A civilian nuclear program, named W-Survey, was split from E-Survey in 1950, and advanced in parallel with its parent effort.

On May 29, 1955, Operation Green took place at a remote location in central Keyserling Land. Mounted on a large test stand, Gandvik's first nuclear bomb detonated with a force equal to 22 thousand tons of TNT, flattening a wide circular swath of forest and sending a towering mushroom cloud almost twelve kilometers into the atmosphere. Next to subsequent explosions, Operation Green released comparatively small quantities of radioactive fallout, but foreign powers quickly detected evidence of a nuclear test and this discovery, it is thought, exerted a major influence on Nibelunc's decision to test an atomic weapon of its own a year later. Browallius was on hand to observe the detonation along with a team of some three hundred scientists and technicians, and was much surprised when Prince Albrycht I paid the test site a low-profile visit several days later. Operation Green marked a pivotal moment in Gandvian history and that of Europe as a whole, and under a climate of deep mutual suspicion between Europe's key states, improved Gandvik's strategic position immeasurably.

At about this same time, Gandvian experiments with ballistic missiles were also beginning to show real promise. Using components salvaged from crashed and captured Nibelung V-2 rockets, a team of aeronautical engineers led by Dr. Hugo Lexell of VLK conducted dozens of test firings from a location south of Paavali Tarsolainen on the White Sea from 1946, and by 1955 had succeeded in moving beyond the V-2's relatively primitive design to create rockets capable of significantly longer ranges and greater payloads. Until 1961, however, when Lexell's design group built a rocket with sufficient power to lift the heavy nuclear warheads then available, Gandvik relied on its aviation forces for deterrence. Approximately 200 PTO-16 jet bombers were built between 1952 and 1960, and while they lacked true strategic range, they could attack almost any target within continental Europe from bases in western Gandvik with a nuclear payload. In 1960 they were joined by 74 supersonic KOD-36 bombers, but these lacked the larger PTO-16's versatility and most had been withdrawn from front-line service by 1970.

Another major milestone in Gandvik's nuclear program occurred early in 1956, when W-Survey, recently brought under VSV authority, began operations at nuclear power station YV-1, southwest of Vitstenkyrka, generating electricity for West Ruthenia's regional grid. YV-1 itself remained on-line until 2002, according to many foreign observers lasting far longer than was safe or advisable owing to serious faults in its reactor design, but nonetheless managed to avoid any serious accidents over a very long career.

Even before the Operation Green test, Gandvian engineers were at work on methods of deriving greater explosive power from nuclear warheads of an ever more compact size, and it was not long before E-Survey scientists hit upon the possibility of using nuclear fission to initiate a secondary fusion process. This idea was developed into a workable design by Anders Lonnrot, a gifted physicist and disciple of Browallius', in a landmark paper first circulated among Gandvian nuclear scientists in 1951, and tested on a small scale during Operation Apollo, a series of four nuclear detonations that took place between 1958 and 1959. With his basic concept proven by the Apollo tests, Lonnrot began work on a fully-fledged thermonuclear bomb, which was first tested in 1961. Known as the Tarta, or layer-cake, Lonnrot's thermonuclear bomb initially consisted of a fissile Uranium core surrounded by sections of lithium as fuel for nuclear fusion, and while its explosive yield of 400 kilotons, when tested in 1962, was Gandvik's largest to date, this fell short of expectations and prompted Lonnrot to embark upon a substantial re-design. Ultimately, layering was abandoned in favor of a radiation-implosion system that promised vastly higher yields, invented independently by Lonnrot and a number of foreign nuclear researchers between approximately 1950 and 1965.

Operation Saturn, which inaugurated a new Hanhimaa test site in 1964, demonstrated the radiation-implosion bomb's fearsome potential when a parachute-delayed bomb dropped by a specially-modified PTO-16 bomber exploded with a force of 1.6 megatons, setting a new national record. A further 25 thermonuclear tests took place on Hanhimaa during the 1960s and early 1970s, culminating in the spectacular Herald operation of 1968-69. Seeking to explore the limits of nuclear weapon design, and ordered by Gandvik's political leadership to put-on a demonstration of national power aimed primarily at Walmington and Nibelunc, Lonnrot's design team constructed a mammoth thermonuclear bomb weighing some 22,000 kilograms. Preliminary estimates placed the Herald bomb's theoretical yield at an unmanageable 100 megatons, so in order to limit fallout tampers of Uranium-235 in the bomb's second and third stages were replaced with lead. Still, when it was finally tested over southern Hanhimaa in early 1969, the Herald bomb detonated with a force equal to some 57 tons of TNT, making it by far humankind's most powerful explosive device. Observers watching the Herald test at a distance of 170 kilometers reported seeing a blinding flash of light, visible through heavy thermal goggles, accompanied by a blast of extreme heat, while some personnel manning stations closer-in received minor burns even under protective clothing. The Herald bomb threw-up a mushroom cloud 64 kilometers high and 40 kilometers wide, and could be seen and felt in Paavali Tarsolainen, nearly one thousand kilometers away.

In spite of its spectacular detonation, the Herald bomb was not itself practical as a weapon owing to its prohibitive weight, and only one example, plus an inert ballast for flight testing, was ever built. Although much less powerful in absolute terms, a missile carrying several independent warheads could deal considerably greater damage than a large unitary bomb, especially when fired on a built-up target area. Operation Herald served, in some ways, as a sobering experience for Gandvian nuclear scientists, many of whom were shaken by their first-hand experience of the Herald bomb's terrific destructive potential. Though nuclear testing would continue at Hanhimaa, and at several sites on Gandvik's European mainland, for another thirty years, none would approach Operation Herald in terms of yield. Anders Lonnrot, responsible to a greater degree than any other individual for Gandvik's thermonuclear weapons program, began to express doubt in his research soon after witnessing the Herald test and its effects on local indigenous peoples, and eventually became a leading advocate for nuclear disarmament, much to Riga's displeasure. Operation Herald drew a curtain on what some historians later referred to as Gandvik's nuclear golden age, but there are no plans to substantially draw-down a declared stockpile of some 840 nuclear warheads, and related production facilities remain fully operational.

Nuclear Power

National electrical company Valtion Sähkötehon Virasto (VSV) currently operates a network of 47 reactors which together generate 29.6% of Gandvik's electrical power, with a further 11 plants under construction and four planned. A number of jointly-administered test and enrichment reactors are also in service at several sites around Gandvik, while the Ministry of Defense maintains several smaller nuclear powerplants for training purposes and in order to provide electricity for remote bases.

VSV-built nuclear powerplants mainly use either graphite-moderated GRK or VVER pressurized water reactors, with a handful of newer examples in limited use. First installed at YV-1 in 1956, GRK-series reactors represented a design effort aimed at simplicity and economy, and used a core of natural uranium rather than substantially more expensive enriched uranium. Most GRKs were connected to a pair of 500-megawatt turbogenerators, with some later plants featuring a twin 700-megawatt installation. Some 15 GRK-type reactors were built between 1956 and 1980, and seven of these remain operational, but the design itself was found to contain a number of potentially very serious flaws that impeded control, especially when running at low power, and this led to a series of hasty modifications being carried out on all GRK-equipped power stations between 1972 and 1984. In spite of their unfavorable characteristics, all 15 GRK reactors have so far managed to avoid any serious accidents over service lives that, in some cases, are approaching four decades in length.

Predictably, however, experience with the GRK, coupled with increasing availability of more highly-enriched uranium, prompted W-Survey engineers to abandoned graphite-moderated designs in favor of a pressurized-water model designated VVER, or Vesijäähdytteinen Vesi-valvottu Energian Reaktoriin, which began operations at YV-11 in 1978. While less powerful than GRK reactors, developing, on average, 440 megawatts, the VVER featured a much more thorough range of safety and control features, and to date no VVER reactor has suffered a major accident or unplanned shutdown. Confidence in the design was high enough for VSV to market VVER reactors abroad, with Gandvian financial and technical expertise helping to build VVER-equipped nuclear plants in several foreign countries.

Apart from widespread GRK and VVER designs, three NJNH sodium-cooled fast-breeder reactors have been constructed at power stations in Smaland, Nyensholm, and West Ruthenia. Often treated as a stepping-stone to projected fourth-generation nuclear reactors, NJNH models offer more extensive safety and control features, higher power outputs, and greater efficiency than preceding reactor types. VSV's NJNH program has attracted a significant amount of international interest, and there are plans to offer an improved NJNH series for export by 2017.

Nuclear Weapons

As of its most recent published declaration, Gandvik maintains a nuclear arsenal of some 950 warheads and associated delivery systems. Gandvian policy proscribes using nuclear weapons offensively, or against a nation without a nuclear arsenal of its own, but guidelines are otherwise vague, and most experts agree that Riga would consider a nuclear first-strike, with tactical weapons at least, if its conventional forces ever proved unable to contain a large-scale foreign invasion, or in response to an enemy's use of chemical or biological agents. Political control of Gandvik's nuclear forces is exercised by the Council of State, and any launch order requires the Chairman of the Council of State, Deputy Chairman, and Minister of Defense to give their simultaneous consent. Attack instructions are subsequently communicated to the Armed Forces General Headquarters, and from there down to individual firing units. If the Council of State becomes incapacitated or loses communications in a nuclear emergency, its authority transfers to the next-highest level of command according to a list of succession, down, if need be, to missile battery commanders and crews.

Gandvik's nuclear forces include land, air, and sea-based components, utilizing free-fall bombs, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and artillery shells, and are disposed in a manner thought to allow some second-strike capability in the event of a surprise nuclear attack. A comparatively small number of land-based ICBMs are in service, with most nuclear missiles oriented against European targets.

Distribution of Warheads
Strategic: 430
150 warheads of 250kt yield for silo-based ICBMs
56 warheads of 1.4mt yield for silo-based ICBMs
224 warheads of 270kt yield for road-mobile IRBMs

Pre-Strategic: 520
250 warheads of variable yield (50-100kt) for road-mobile SRBMs
270 warheads of variable yield (15-200kt) for cruise missiles

50 E900 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
-Launch Weight: 47,100kg
-Range: 11,000km
-CEP: 200m
-4-7 warheads of 150-250kt

110 E228 Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missiles
-Launch Weight: 37,100kg
-Range: 5,500kg
-CEP: 150-450m
-3 warheads of 150-250kt
-carried aboard wheeled TEL

RakH.79/E230 Short-Range Ballistic Missile
-Launch Weight: 4,360kg
-Range: 500km
-CEP: 30-150m
-single warhead of 50-100kt
-carried aboard wheeled amphibious TEL
-can use conventional explosive

RakH.76/E129 Tactical Ballistic Missile
-Launch Weight: 2,010kg
-Range: 185km
-CEP: 95m
-single warhead of 10-100kt
-carried aboard wheeled amphibious TEL
-can use conventional explosive

MTO-101/E101 Cruise Missile
-Launch Weight: 1,650kg-2,400kg
-Range: 2,500km
-CEP: 15m
-single warhead of 200kt
-mainly launched from 6-round TEL
-can use conventional explosive
-combination INS and terrain-following radar guidance



(OCC: Format blatantly ripped-off from Cass's nuclear weapons factbook post.)
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:58 pm

Government and Governance in Gandvik

Overview

A very large nation both in terms of population and in terms of land area, immensely rich in natural resources, and home to a powerful industrial economy, Gandvik has long been regarded as a true great power and a strategic actor of international significance. Hemmed-in for much of its formative history by an ascendant Shieldian Empire, a patchwork of Turkic and rival Ugric kingdoms, and various Nibelung states, and later divided by internal upheavals, modern Gandvik emerged from its extended and tumultuous developmental phase with a thriving manufacturing sector that not only supported significant military might, but also brought about comprehensive changes in Gandvian society. Nuclear breakthroughs followed rapidly on victory in the Great War, and helped to secure for Gandvik a preeminent position in the global hierarchy. Simultaneously, Gandvik's very size and complexity, coupled with its unique historical evolution and myriad of social complaints, poses immense administrative challenges, and this has given rise to what is arguably Europe's least well-understood political system, one whose exact character, composition, and structure continues to fuel intense debate in academic circles, and among its own adherents.

Gandvik's peculiar blend of ideological influences has consistently confounded foreign and domestic observers alike. Though clearly not a democracy, there exists within Gandvik a strong competitive element, and a multitude of informal channels by which interest groups not only voice their concerns, but exert considerable influence on government policy. Avowedly anti-communist, Gandvik nonetheless maintains an expansive welfare and public health system, and offers what is, by some standards, Europe's most generous spread of national holidays and guaranteed vacation time. Orders of nobility, long considered an exclusive preserve, have been thrown open to factory managers, civil servants, political bosses, and all manner of powerful individuals without regard for their ancestry, and at ceremonial occasions gruff labor union leaders and nouveau-riche businessmen rub elbows with castle-dwelling dukes and barons from ancient lines. At its most basic level, many experts argue, Gandvik's government is structured as a means of distributing state resources among core supporters, while others describe Gandvian politics as a struggle between monstrous bureaucratic entities competing for greater influence, and still others see evidence of a thinly-veiled military junta. One condition upon which most observers agree is that Gandvik exhibits an often staggering disregard for its own laws, with actual or perceived opportunities for personal enrichment exerting a hugely important influence over official decision-making.

Basic Structure

Gandvik is run by dozens of governmental departments and institutions on a national level, and many hundreds more on a local and provincial scale. Though specific responsibilities and prerogatives often overlap, and have been subject to considerable realignment through history, these diverse elements have at their core the Council of State, Diet, and High Court, most senior and most powerful in their respective legal, consultative, and legislative-executive arenas. By a significant margin this system's key actor is the Council of State, which exercises what amounts to supreme authority over all elements of national policy and is in turn controlled, for all practical purposes, by military chiefs of staff, though both the Diet and High Court play important, if less formidable, roles in their own right. Presiding over government in its entirety is the Prince, who serves as head of state, though, with almost no political responsibilities or constitutional powers, his function is largely ceremonial. Actual executive authority resides with the Chancellor, official head of government and most senior member of the State Council. This basic pattern is repeated through nearly all of Gandvik's internal administrative decisions, from province, to county, and on to parish-level administration, with deeply-rooted noble families often playing an almost monarchical role at lower levels of government.

The Monarchy

Albrycht Stefanos Ludvig Berdichyiv, Prince Albrycht II, currently serves as Gandvik's constitutional monarch, and is latest in a line of Berdichyiv princes that stretches back to 1817. Save for a thirteen-year stretch of republican rule, between 1914 and 1927, and three years of provisional military government that immediately followed, Gandvik has always been ruled by a hereditary figure, but Royal powers have been eroded at a steady rate since 1930, when Prince Casper I was brought back to Riga and General Strandmann's junta officially dissolved. Prince Casper, whose years in foreign exile had prevented his establishment of a strong personal following, agreed to return under conditions dictated entirely by military and industrial interests, and his restoration as a figurehead monarch marked the birth of Gandvik's current political system. Strandmann continued to act as de facto national leader until his retirement in 1936, and his successors perpetuated an arrangement that vested all significant decision-making authority with the State Council and its Chancellor.

Prince Albrycht is charged with presiding at official ceremonies, bestowing honors, hosting foreign heads of state and conducting occasional state visits himself, but otherwise his role in government is limited. In strictly constitutional terms, he must also review and approve state edicts and pronouncements prior to their implementation, though a legal instrument introduced in 1957 allowed the Council of State to sign documents in the Prince's name, without actually obtaining his consent, and in practice without informing him at all. Arguably the Prince's most important remaining duty is that of appointing a Chancellor, but even this amounts, in practice, to his either approving or rejecting a name put forward by the Council of State, whose candidate can also assume office as Chancellor-designate without Princely approval, under a tacit assumption that his assent would eventually be forthcoming.

Under Gandvik's first two post-restoration monarchs, who maintained close personal contact with their Chancellors and State Council ministers and shared their ideological outlook, this system functioned smoothly and helped to exert a unifying influence over domestic rightist forces, but Prince Albrycht II's relationship with his Council of State is widely believed to be fairly cold. In part, this can be attributed to Albrycht II's suspected liberal leanings, and while he has never publicly called into question any official act, many observers have read into his refusal to comment on political matters an implied disapproval of current Chancellor Mikalous Andres-Kletsk's policy program. Among regime officials, there also exists a strong suspicion of Albrycht II's sometimes off-putting informality, his overriding musical and mathematical interests, and his contacts with foreign intellectual circles.

Mitau Palace, an elegant Baroque structure sited on the Suurijoki river several dozen kilometers southwest of Riga proper, serves as Albrycht's official residence.

The Council of State

Gandvik's premier governmental institution, the Council of State grew out of General Konstantin Strandmann's Provisional Guiding Council, a mixed committee of military officers and civilian notables assembled to take charge of national affairs following the 1927 coup d'état, which replaced a parliamentary system with a sort of bureaucratic oligarchy that remains in place, more or less in its original form, today. The Council of State, in effect, wields absolute authority over policy matters, and while the Diet does possess a legal right to question and review decisions taken on a State Council level, this is rarely exercised and cannot compel the Council of State to take any action. Free from both legislative and judicial oversight or accountability, the State Council does however serve a representative function in its own strange way, and, according to many observers, operates under an array of informal constraints and obligations that reach directly from influential interest groups and regime backers to Gandvik's supreme power, entirely circumventing established, regulated channels.

At its most fundamental level, the Council of State brings-together leaders of administrative departments to formulate and implement official plans and acts on a national scale. At present, 24 ministers sit on the State Council, though this number can vary in line with changing political needs and does not necessarily correspond to the number of government ministries, ranging in size from 32 members under General Strandmann, to a mere 14 individuals between 1950 and 1956, at a time when an attempt had been made to amalgamate a number of previously-independent ministerial domains. State Council proceedings are chaired by a Chancellor, who also acts as head of government and manages all interactions between Council and monarch. Chancellors are usually selected from among serving state council ministers by their peers, though the former Chancellor's recommendation, arrived-at in consultation with or under pressure from senior generals, is almost invariably honored.

Most often, Chancellors are drawn from a narrow set of core ministries, mainly those concerned with security or economic issues, which command a predominant share of domestic political clout and sufficiently wide-ranging administrative responsibilities. Ostensibly, the Chancellor ranks as first among equals and, apart from agenda-setting and procedural duties, is primarily meant to act as a force for building consensus among state councilors on any particular issue, or to cast a determining vote when a common decision cannot be reached. The exact nature of a Chancellor's relationship with their state council colleagues, however, is largely a question of that Chancellor's personal character and political background, and for one so disposed a spread of attached powers, especially those governing state appointments, offer plenty of room for despotism. Generally, Chancellors have sought to pack the state council with their own political vassals and allies in order to increase their freedom of action, a trend which has helped to maintain a sort of successional line from one leader to his chosen replacement, but inter-ministerial intrigues . By unanimous consent, and with Princely approval, state councilors can evict a sitting Chancellor, but this has never occurred and, to date, only one Chancellor has ever served while a former holder of that office, forced by old age and illness into early retirement, remained alive.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:58 pm

Corporations of Gandvik

Manufacturers

Valtion Metallitehtaat (VMT): Sprawling multi-industrial conglomerate that accounts for nearly all of Gandvik’s steel production and iron ore mining, and which also builds heavy machinery for industrial and mining operations, automobiles, rail equipment, tractors, trams and trolleybuses, diesel engines, small arms, and appliances. In line with national economic policy, and due to its perceived strategic importance, VMT is mostly state-owned.

Svelgfossen Electro-Metallurgiayritys: Vertically-integrated light metals company, leading national producer of aluminum. Partly state-owned.

Rosengren-Lilius: Propulsion and power systems company that specializes in aeronautical engines, industrial gas turbines, and rockets.

Valtion Lentokonemoottoreidenyritys Oy (VLM): Second major Gandvian aero-engine producer, focused on piston, turboprop, and turboshaft designs.

Yleinen Sähköyhtiön: General Electrical Company, builder of electric motors, generators, power plants, transformers, alternators, and other machinery.

Strömberg Oy: Producer of electrical appliances, components, civilian telecommunications equipment.

Elektroniikkalaitteita Kehitysyhtiö (EKY): Electronics Equipment Development Corporation, state-owned company established to design and build radars for the armed forces, now expanded to deal in defense-related electronics, computers, and communications systems more generally.

Olettamus Väline Suunnittelutoimisto Oy (OVS): Precision-engineering company specializing in military projects, primary source of automatic cannons, grenade launchers, anti-tank missiles and unguided rocket launchers for the Gandvian armed forces.

Nilfisk Oy: Ingermanburg-based manufacturer of light transportation equipment, including motorcycles, motor scooters, personal automobiles, minibuses, and trams.

Walden-Vulcan: Nationalized shipbuilding monopolist, a significant producer of coastal cargo ships, icebreakers, ferries, RO/RO vessels, and fishing trawlers. Subsidiary of VMT.

Keiller Telakat Oy: Boat-builder and repair yard based in Gothenburg, numerous satellite yards along Gandvik’s Baltic coast.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:58 pm

Gandvik’s Political Environment

Overview

For well over one hundred years, across what have variously been described as three to six distinct types of government, political life in Gandvik has remained, in its basic features, relatively stable and consistent. Unlike many of their continental peers and rivals, Gandvian monarchs never managed to impose absolute rule in any lasting fashion, and this legacy of a relatively weak central power, its survival dependent upon its ability to mobilize regional and class interests, continues to characterize the modern Gandvian state.

Gandvik’s present-day system of government owes its shape and configuration, most directly, to General Konstantinus Strandmann and his attempt to create, after overthrowing parliamentary rule, a structure that provided for an adequate balance of power among a diverse set of powerful groups, one which could protect noble and military prerogatives while simultaneously absorbing social pressures brought about by economic and demographic forces. What emerged was an establishment that, while opaque and unaccountable, was also pluralistic, pragmatic, and surprisingly adaptable, based to an overwhelming extent upon patronage and co-option. Strandmann positioned the military, an institution which enjoyed, and still enjoys, a reputation for impartiality, to act as mediator between capital, gentry, and labor, and disbursed state funds and offices in a manner intended to neutralize potentially troublesome national groups through their incorporation into the state’s bureaucratic and distributional framework.

Arguably Strandmann’s most important achievement, during his tenure as State Chancellor, was his undeniable success in taming organized labor. Possessed of a mandate for radical action which no Republic-era government ever managed to acquire, and assured of support from industrialists and landowning nobles, Strandmann built a corporatist consensus that, among its numerous effects, for all intents and purposes bureaucratized labor unions and placed them firmly within the government camp.

Post-war depression led to an era of resurgent labor activism which nearly undermined Strandmann’s corporatist solution, though deeper crisis was eventually avoided through an effective mixture of rhetorical nationalism and administrative innovation. In a measure calculated to court left-wing backing, Chancellor Alois Huntzinger oversaw a wide-reaching program that, as part of a wider re-development strategy, introduced a reinforced labor relations code and reserved for unions a greater role in economic policy-making and policy implementation. State-sponsored sectorial unions acquired an added function as a career vehicle, as union members, through selection for successively responsible posts within their organization, could eventually attain civil service rank. Many bureaucratic posts within the mammoth Ministry of Trade and Industry were subsequently filled through union-based selection.

Movement in the direction of political decentralization, a trend underway since Strandmann’s coup and its heavy reliance on the support of local notables, continued during Huntzinger’s chancellorship as a result of new economic initiatives and limited electoral reforms. These placed considerable emphasis on lower-level authority as an intermediary between Riga and its subject population, and attempted to foster a set of institutions among provincial regimes that, in many cases, directly paralleled those in place at a national level. Regional governors, independent to a large degree yet linked to central power through a dependence upon financial patronage and state coercive resources, had long served as agents of stability and control over a nation that had proven, at numerous junctures, highly resistant to Riga’s direct attentions, a relationship which Huntzinger’s reforms, continued by his successor Mikalous Andres-Kletsk, served to strengthen.

Changing economic circumstances, brought about by the discovery and opening of large new oil and natural gas deposits during the 1960s and 1970s, and an upsurge in resource-exploitation more generally, carried important consequences for a domestic political landscape structured, to a considerable extent, by bargaining between an elite government and mass interests, as exemplified by industrial labor unions and their various overt and underground allies. Gandvik’s natural resource boom launched an era of rapid and precipitous economic growth whose effects were felt across society as a whole, though in a manner that was far from even. Local authorities who controlled productive regions or vital transport corridors benefitted massively from an unprecedented influx of foreign currency, which allowed certain figures to carve-out a considerable degree of political influence. Chancellor Mikalous Andres-Kletsk depended heavily upon the support of regional governors and notables involved in resource-extraction industries in his bid to succeed Huntzinger, and rewarded their backing through both extensive payments from the national treasury, and the allowance of greater fiscal independence from Riga.

For traditional manufacturing industries, especially those not directly relevant to extractive enterprises, Gandvik’s new-found focus on resource exports proved a very mixed blessing. An increase in capital investment brought about by higher state revenues was counterbalanced by embezzlement and waste, as many factory owners and economic administrators saw little reason to take efficiency-boosting measures at a time when high tariff barriers provided insurance against external competition in domestic markets, and channeled funds meant for that purpose into their own pockets and those of their clients. Simultaneously, those in a position to take advantage of the trade in fuel and minerals often used their resulting wealth to finance a lively commerce in smuggled consumer goods from Central Europe and North America, to the detriment of domestic producers.

Vigorous protectionism, coupled with certain relative advantages in niche sectors and rampant subsidization, means that Gandvian manufacturing is still fairly viable, though urban industrial labor, which accounts for the single largest share of Gandvik’s national workforce, has suffered from a declining share of influence on government and a political system which, oiled by patronage, has lost many features which previously provided for a measure of responsiveness to working-class concerns. Oil and natural gas revenues, controlled by a relatively small share of the national bureaucracy, and collected by means of an industry which, for all its profitability, employs relatively few workers directly, have removed, to a significant extent, local administration’s reliance on the cooperation of mass groups. In modern Gandvik, an arrangement prevails in which oil, mineral, and natural gas revenues are used to maintain a minimum standard of living among elements considered prone to discontent, and where gaining access to those same resources amounts to the principal goal of what is considered normal or legal political activity.

The Ruling Coalition

Titled Nobility
For much of Gandvian history an immensely important political force, the nobility lost much of its coherence as a distinct class, set against merchants, capitalists, and bureaucrats, during the twentieth century, when many noblemen took to business themselves or, having squandered their fortunes and sold or downsized estates, took posts within the national civil service. Predominantly of German or Germanized origins, nobles in Gandvik tend to oppose programs of linguistic and ethnic nationalism as have been put forward by other domestic forces, though their unease, at first, over the populist and fascist ideologies that attracted many well-heeled commoners during Gandvik’s revolutionary years was surpassed by a fear of communist usurpation. Today, noble families continue to enjoy special status as an original pillar of the ruling establishment, though their corporate identity has in most cases been subordinated to other loyalties.

Organized Labor
All legal trade union activity in modern-day Gandvik takes place under the auspices of the National Central Organization of Trade Unions, or Valtion Ammattiliittojen Keskusjärjestö, commonly abbreviated VAK, which represents worker interests in periodical negotiations with the Union of Industries and Employers, or Teollisuuden ja Työnantajain Keskusliitto. Both bodies are nominally independent of direct government control, but the former depends for a large part of its operating budget on support from the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and maintains very close links with an institution that draws much of its staff from the ranks of former union officers. In effect, the VAK functions as a security mechanism against working-class unrest by distributing patronage, offering a route to civil service employment, and providing a safety-valve for popular grievances.

The Executive Power in Gandvik

National Security Council

Permanent Membership
State Chancellor Antero Idman
-Chief of Staff of the Combined Services Field Marshal Edmund Kniephof
-Minister of the Interior General Yrjö Wuorenheimo
-Inspector-General of Civil Defense General Johan Augustin Söderhjälm
-Chief of Staff of the Air Force General Lars von Frankvisk
-Chief of Staff of the Navy Admiral Matthaus Allerberger
-Minister of Supply and Production General Karl Weissmann von Weissenstein
-Minister of State Security Rudolf Fagerholm
-Minister of Transport Valde Päivärinta
-Military Governor of Polesia General Gustav Jarnefelt

May be Included
-Foreign Minister Paul von Nesselrode-Dellingshausen
-Minister of Trade and Industry Nestor Relander
-Minister of Justice Waldemar Serlachius
-Minister of the Treasury Department Lennart Renvall

Council of State

State Chancellor Antero Idman
-Deputy Chancellor General Yrjö Wuorenheimo
-Chairman of the Army Board Field Marshal Edmund Kniephof
-Minister of the Interior General Yrjö Wuorenheimo
-Air Minister General Lars von Frankvisk
-First Secretary of the Admiralty Admiral Matthaus Allerberger
-Minister of Supply and Production General Karl Weissmann von Weissenstein
-Minister of State Security Rudolf Fagerholm
-Minister of Transport Valde Päivärinta
-Foreign Minister Paul von Nesselrode-Dellingshausen
-Deputy Foreign Minister Mattias Joseph Ungern von Sternberg
-Minister of Trade and Industry Nestor Relander
-Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry for Labor Magnus Granfelt
-Minister of Justice Waldemar Serlachius
-Minister of Finance Lennart Renvall
-Minister of Administrative Affairs Torsten Gezelius
-Minister of Housing and Social Affairs Felix Soininen
-Minister of Information August Ehrnrooth
-Minister of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bernhard Collan
-Minister of Health Teuvo Lindh
-Minister of Education Heikki Pohjanpalo
-Minister of the Environment and Fisheries Hjalmar Raatikainen
-Minister of Mines and Petroleum Eino Sotilander
-President of the Council of Governors Count Fabien Oxenstierna (rotating)
-Minister of Regional Affairs Oskar Lavonius
-Military Governor of Polesia General Gustav Jarnefelt
-Minister Without Portfolio Hannes Wuhlburn
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sun Feb 03, 2019 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 3:59 pm

Missiles and Ordnance of Gandvik

Guided Munitions of Gandvik

Note: Engineering development and initial testing of missiles and guided weapons for all three Gandvian armed services is conducted under the Ministry of Supply’s administrative auspices, typically in close cooperation with those arms of service likely to operate any given future system. The Ministry of Supply is responsible also for awarding production contracts, and for managing production once underway, the latter task including quality-control and cost-control measures in addition to the disbursement of newly-manufactured weapons to their intended recipient services. Missile systems and submunitions are customarily referred-to in official usage by their Ministry of Supply project designations, more or less randomly-generated three-digit numbers prefixed by a single letter to indicate type. Standard type indicators are, for instance: A, strategic/nuclear; B, pre-strategic/nuclear; E, air-launched surface-attack; L, air-to-air; R, Army surface-to-surface; S, surface-to-air; T, Navy surface-to-surface; V, terminal-homing submunition.

Air-to-Air Missiles

L372
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 3
Range: 30-40km
Weight: 110kg
Guidance: infra-red homing
Variants: B/C/D/E all feature graduated improvements in speed, range, seeker performance and ECCM
Production: 1978-present
Notes: The L372 is a very agile short-to-medium range air-to-air missile notable for its ability to acquire and engage targets at high ‘off-boresight’ angles. The missile is most often aimed using a helmet-mounted sight, so as to take full advantage of the gimballed IR seeker’s performance. First introduced to squadron service in 1980, the L372 is today one of the most important missile systems in Royal Air Force service, and upgrades are planned to guarantee its viability against all air targets up to perhaps 2040. The L372 was developed parallel to the much lighter L374, details for which can be found in a separate entry.

L374
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 3
Range: 8km
Weight: 60kg
Guidance: infra-red homing
Variants: B/C feature graduated improvements in speed, range, seeker performance and ECCM
Production: 1980-present
Notes: The L374 is a lightweight, very-short-range derivative of the L372 missile, intended to arm aircraft and helicopters upon which the relatively heavy L372 would impose an excessive burden. Seeker performance is closely comparable, and both missiles employ the same method of thrust-vectoring maneuver control.

L340
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 2.5-4
Range: 20-50km
Weight: 200kg
Guidance: semi-active/active radar homing
Variants: B/C/D/E feature graduated improvements in range, seeker performance, and ECCM
F is equipped with active radar seeker
Production: 1962-2005
Notes: The L340 was Gandvik’s first beyond-visual-range air intercept missile, and while initial variants suffered from chronic unreliability and somewhat limited overall performance, successive upgrade programs eventually managed to attain a reasonable standard on both of those counts. Later variants can be regarded as fully credible weapons systems. An active radar-homing variant, the F, was produced in moderate quantities as a stop-gap measure while difficulties with the L373 program were being addressed.

L373
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 4
Range: 185km
Weight: 172kg
Guidance: active radar homing with mid-course inertial guidance
Variants: B/C feature extended range, improved ECCM
Production: 1993-present
Notes: The L373 is a long-range, active-radar-homing air intercept missile for which is claimed high effectiveness against all types of airborne targets at both high and low altitude. While it was hoped to have the L373, as a replacement for the L340, in service by the late 1980s, technical challenges, particularly as they pertained to seeker design, proved a source of far more difficulty than had been anticipated, and a suitable production standard was not reached until several years into the next decade. For engagements at shorter ranges, the active radar seeker guides the missile throughout its flight path. For long-range engagements, the missile follows an optimized course plotted with reference to the carrier aircraft’s initial radar fix on the target, modified if necessary by mid-course corrections, the active seeker head being turned on for final acquisition and homing once the range has closed sufficiently. It is planned to replace the L373 with a very-long-range, low-observable, ramjet-powered weapon, though development is proceeding slowly, and the L373 is likely to remain in front-line inventories well into the 21st century.

Air-to-Surface Missiles

E483
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: 1,500kph
Range: 10km
Weight: 57kg
Guidance: imaging infra-red/millimeter-wave radar
Variants: B/C are improved IIR missiles, D/E are fitted with radar seekers
Production: 1983-present
Notes: The E483 is an air-launched surface attack missile suitable for carriage aboard most Gandvian fixed-wing military aircraft and helicopters, and intended mainly for the antitank role. Initial target acquisition is typically performed, aboard fixed-wing aircraft, by a PX701 FLIR pod. A millimeter-wave radar seeker, featuring greater precision and improved immunity to countermeasures, has replaced the original variants’ imaging infra-red guidance equipment in recent production, though both versions are in widespread service. In either case, once locked onto a target, the seeker will guide the E483 on an interception course autonomously, without any need for additional guidance inputs from the launcher aircraft.

E205
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: supersonic
Range: 9-20km
Weight: 305kg
Guidance: radio command line-of-sight/TV/laser-homing/IIR
Variants: B introduced automatic command guidance, C is TV-guided variant, D extended-range TV, E is laser-homing version, F is anti-radar variant, G/H are fire-and-forget IIR variants
Production: 1969-present
Notes: The E205 is an impressively long-lived air-to-surface missile chiefly meant to be fired from fast jets against point targets, though it is also of some use against armor and light shipping. Since its introduction in the early 1970s, the E205 has been upgraded progressively so as to preserve its military effectiveness, and while the original command-guided variants have almost all been discarded, versions equipped with TV guidance or imaging infra-red seekers, in the latter case adapted from electronics used aboard the E483 missile, might still be considered credible modern weapons.

E258
Manufacturer: EKY
Speed: supersonic
Range: 100km
Weight: 270kg
Guidance: passive/active radar homing/home-on-jam/inertial
Variants: B/C feature extended range, D equipped with field-reprogrammable seeker, E introduces inertial navigation system, F fitted with secondary MMW seeker
Production: 1985-present
Notes: The E258 has largely if not quite entirely replaced the cheaper and simpler, though necessarily far less capable, E205F as the standard anti-radar missile in Air Force service, and attempts have been made to improve its performance with a series of major upgrades. The latest of these, building on the E258D’s ability to fly an inertial intercept course against a radar emitter which has stopped transmitting after its initial acquisition, introduces a millimeter-wave radar seeker for precise detection and engagement of hostile radar equipment operating passively.

E228
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 2
Range: 190-250km
Weight: 850kg
Guidance: active radar homing/home-on-jam/mid-course inertial navigation system
Variants: T228 is surface-launched variant, B features extended range, C introduces land-attack capability, D introduces new propulsion system for 250km maximum range
Production: 1991-present
Notes: The E228 is a supersonic anti-ship missile intended as a response to the growing capabilities of naval point-defense missile and gun systems as introduced during the 1980s, and its sea-skimming flight profile, coupled with its very high speed, is calculated to give it the best possible chance of defeating a modern, layered anti-missile scheme. The missile borrows heavily from the contemporary E237 program, employing for instance a very similar rocket-ramjet propulsion arrangement. Later variants can also be fired against land targets. In its surface-launched configuration, the E228 is assigned a T prefix, and is customarily fired from a splinter-protected rectangular box which also serves as transport and storage container.

E220
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 0.8
Range: 70-150km
Weight: 560-577kg
Guidance: active radar homing/mid-course inertial navigation system
Variants: B/C/D/E feature range, seeker, and ECCM improvements, T220 is surface-launched variant
Production: 1980-present
Notes: The E220 started out as a turbojet-powered derivative of the E179, Gandvik’s earliest practicable air-launched anti-ship missiles, though differences quickly multiplied to a point where a separate designation was deemed necessary. It currently serves as a lighter and cheaper complement to the high-performance E228, and has been progressively upgraded since its introduction in 1980. The surface-launched T220 is somewhat heavier if otherwise virtually indistinguishable, and is fired, like the E228, from a self-contained, splinter-protected rectangular container which can be fitted to a variety of different maritime and land-based platforms.

E218
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 0.7
Range: 25-55km
Weight: 330-370kg
Guidance: passive infra-red/radar altimeter/mid-course inertial navigation
Variants: B/C/D feature increased range, improved seeker performance and ECCM characteristics
Production: 1972-present
Notes: The E218 is a short- to medium-range antiship missile particularly suitable for use aboard small surface combatants and helicopters by virtue of its relatively light weight and compact dimensions. It is a fire-and-forget weapon, requiring no further external command inputs after target range and bearing have been programmed into its inertial navigation system. Final interception once the missile reaches the predicted target area is performed by its passive infra-red seeker, which is claimed to possess an advantage over the more commonplace active radar method in that it emits no electromagnetic radiation detectable by passive radar-warning equipment. The surface-launched variant, designated T218, is somewhat larger and heavier than the E218 due to its more powerful booster motor, though otherwise scarcely distinguishable, and is typically fired from a splinter-protected, self-contained box launcher which can be installed with minimal preparation aboard fast patrol vessels or trucks.

E272
Manufacturer: EKY
Speed: Mach 0.7
Range: 185-350km
Weight: 900kg
Guidance: imaging infra-red/inertial navigation
Variants: B/C/D feature extended range, seeker improvements; E experimental very-long-range modification
Production: 1996-present
Notes: The E272 is a medium- to long-range cruise missile intended for point attacks on protected targets, such as bridges, hardened aircraft shelters, and command posts. Where Gandvik’s other primary air-launched cruise missile, the E237, relies upon a combination of very high speed and a terrain-following flight path to overcome enemy anti-missile defenses, the E272 incorporates features intended to minimize its radar cross-section and to reduce as far as possible the chances of its being detected by that means at ranges sufficient for useful early warning. The E272 was Gandvik’s first fully-operational ‘stealth’ weapons system, and remains, in no small part as a consequence of its exceptionally high development cost, the only example of that particular technology to reach widespread service.

E/B237
Manufacturer: EKY
Speed: Mach 4.5
Range: 400-500km
Weight: 1,200kg
Guidance: preprogrammed inertial navigation with radar altimeter
Variants: B/C feature extended range
Production: 1985-present
Notes: Primarily reserved for use as a stand-off nuclear weapon, small enough to be carried aboard most Air Force combat aircraft, the B237 can also be fitted with a conventional warhead, and is assigned an ‘E’ prefix in the non-nuclear role. Propulsion is by means of a novel rocket-ramjet system, whereby the missile is accelerated by a solid rocket motor to supersonic speed, at which point the ramjet cruise engine kicks-in.

Surface-to-Surface Missiles

R/B151
Manufacturer: Rosengren-Lilius/EKY
Speed: Mach 8
Range: 750km
Weight: 4,700kg
Guidance: ballistic/inertial navigation
Variants: no major variants apart from reliability improvements not deemed to justify separate designation
Production: 1983-present
Notes: The two-stage, solid-fuel R/B151 was designed as a replacement for the largely successful, if by the 1980s somewhat obsolete, R/B104, which had been accepted into service in 1960 as Gandvik’s first operational short-range ballistic missile. At no significant gain in weight or bulk over its predecessor, the R/B151 introduced greatly improved safety features and much superior accuracy, and at present accounts for a substantial proportion of Gandvik’s nuclear deterrent. Most of the missiles built to date are equipped with nuclear warheads ranging in yield from 60 to 400kt, though a variety of conventional payloads have been designed as well, and when so equipped the missile is assigned an R prefix. The R/B151 is fired from a tracked transporter-erector-launcher which shares its major automotive components in common with the PAV 74 main battle tank, and which provides protection for its crew from shell fragments, small-arms fire, and nuclear-biological-chemical contaminants.

R225
Manufacturer: Rosengren-Lilius/EKY
Speed:
Range: 350km
Weight: 1,850kg
Guidance: ballistic/inertial navigation
Variants: no major variants apart from reliability improvements not deemed to justify separate designation
Production: 1990-present: 550 launchers in service
Notes: The decision to reserve R/B151 missiles for strategic tasks prompted development of a cheaper, shorter-range battlefield support weapon for conventional payloads, such as large numbers of unguided and sensor-fused submunitions or heavy unitary high-explosive warheads. The R225 is typically carried in a dual installation aboard a wheeled transporter-erector-launcher trailer towed by the standard Army prime mover. While neither amphibious nor armored against anything beyond small-arms fire and shell splinters, this combination tractor-trailer arrangement is highly road-mobile, possesses reasonable cross-country characteristics, and can be airlifted readily. Propulsion is by means of a single-stage, solid-fuel rocket motor derived from that found on the R/B151.

R251
Manufacturer: Stromberg
Speed: high subsonic
Range: 2,500-4,500m
Weight: 15.5kg (complete system including missile in container and control unit)
Guidance: laser beam-riding
Variants: B is extended-range variant
Production: 1987-present
Notes: The R251 is a medium-range antitank missile intended to provide infantry and light mechanized forces with a reasonably effective means of defense against heavily-protected modern MBTs. The R251 as it eventually appeared is a substantially different weapon from that which was outlined in the original specification, and a decision to abandon the requirement for full fire-and-forget capability proved controversial. Nonetheless, it was clear that a missile exhibiting all hoped-for characteristics would be unacceptably costly, and the advantages of a laser beam-riding system in that particular arena were felt to outweigh its inherent drawbacks. The R251 employs the increasingly commonplace overfly-top-attack flight profile so as to gain the best possible chance of striking a main battle tank where its armor is thinnest. Once the missile’s magnetic proximity fuse determines that the target has been reached, a pair of charges detonates to direct two explosively-formed projectiles against what would ideally be the target vehicle’s turret top. Perhaps the R251’s main deficiency, apart from its obvious lack of fire-and-forget performance, is its limited usefulness against unarmored vehicles and buildings, though it should be mentioned that Gandvian tactical prescriptions do not consider such targets as appropriate for expensive and, ostensibly, specialized guided weapons. The standard infantry-portable R251A is among the lighter weapons in its class currently available, weighing-in at just 15.5 kilograms. The extended-range B variant, fitted with a larger booster though otherwise little changed, is fielded at present exclusively aboard infantry fighting vehicles. Slated for eventual replacement in most first-line roles by the fire-and-forget R278/R279 combination, the R251 as a reasonably effective and relatively cheap system is unlikely to disappear from service for some time, and sizable stocks of missiles remain on hand.

R278
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: subsonic
Range: 4,500m
Weight: 21kg (missile in firing tube)
Guidance: imaging infra-red with fiber-optic command link
Variants: only one major variant to date
Production: 2014-present
Notes: After extensive experimentation with a ground-launched version of the E483 missile failed to yield satisfactory results, the Ministry of Supply, responsible for guided weapons development in Gandvik, was compelled to admit the inevitability of starting from scratch on an entirely new design in order to meet the Army’s specification for a next-generation antitank missile, a weapon which, most importantly, would need to combine an adequate level of portability with fire-and-forget performance. The resulting R278 was subsequently accepted for service in 2015, over a decade after development began in earnest, and it is gradually replacing the R251’s long-range variants in vehicle-mounted roles. In a typically Gandvian compromise between the weapon’s fire-and-forget specification and a desire to keep unit costs within manageable limits, the missile itself contains only the barest minimum of seeker electronics, signal processing and guidance functions being performed on the sight/guidance unit and transmitted to the missile via fiber-optic command link. As a consequence the R278 is, arguably, not a true fire-and-forget missile, though it is somewhat cheaper than many similar foreign offerings, and features both automatic and manual guidance modes. Due to the system’s considerable weight, which, inclusive of a missile in launch container and sight/control unit, approaches 50 kilograms, it is not considered especially suitable for use with dismounted infantry, who will instead be equipped with the short-range R279.

R279
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: subsonic
Range: 1,500m
Weight: 17.5kg (complete system)
Guidance: imaging infra-red
Variants: only one major variant to date
Production: 2014-present
Notes: The R279 was developed as a cheaper, more readily man-portable complement to the substantially heavier, long-range R278. Qualities including technical simplicity, low cost, and light weight, in the latter measure not far in excess of the R251A, were in the Army’s view more than sufficient compensation for the limitations of its relatively low-performance uncooled seeker, which renders the R279 rather more susceptible to countermeasures and unfavorable weather conditions than its long-range counterpart. Like the R278, the R279 also employs a diving top-attack flight profile so as to give its tandem shaped-charge warhead the best possible chance of success against a tank’s turret top or engine deck. Current equipment tables allocate three R279 launchers to each infantry platoon, and to a variety of other small-scale organizations thought to possess some requirement for a means of emergency antitank defense.

Surface-to-Air Missiles

S129
Manufacturer: EKY/Stromberg
Speed: 550-850m/s (version dependent)
Range: 500-8,000/10,000m (depending on variant and target type)
Weight: 54.5kg
Guidance: automatic command line-of-site by radio command link
Variants: missile: B/C/D: incremental improvements in speed, reaction time, and countermeasures resistance
launcher: ITPSV 74 uses PAV 68 chassis, ITPSV 80 uses PAV 74 chassis, ITJ 78 uses 8x8 truck chassis, ITJ 82 is towed system, ITJ 77 is the shipboard variant (minor alterations designated with a number after the variant letter, for instance S129C3)
Production: 1973-1998 (reconstruction work for upgrades is ongoing)
Notes: The search for an advanced low-altitude air defense system remains one of Gandvik’s most convoluted and expensive military procurement programs, one which nonetheless survived numerous threats of cancellation to eventually deliver a fairly effective and reliable weapon. In most respects the S129 is quite similar to contemporary foreign missiles like the Roland and Crotale, having been designed with the engagement of very high-speed, low-altitude targets, at very short notice, as its primary mission. It is capable of fully autonomous operation, all of the necessary search, acquisition, and fire-control electronics being carried on the self-propelled launcher itself, though an S129 battery customarily includes a command center for centralized coordination among different launchers and some manner of longer-range search radar. In addition to its original land-based role, the ITO 74 has also been adapted for shipboard point-defense and can be encountered aboard all but the very latest Gandvian surface warships. Later variants of the S129 system are capable of night and all-weather operation, and are fitted with a secondary electro-optical guidance system, often backed up by a thermal imager, for use when radar silence is required. Early variants carried four missiles, two on either side of the central radar turret, for immediate use, a total later increased to eight. Land-based S129 systems, including the latest upgraded versions, must be reloaded manually once all ready-use missiles have been fired, whereas most shipboard launchers are replenished automatically from a revolver magazine, customarily located beneath the launcher installation itself.

S138
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: Mach 3.5-4
Range: 5,000-8,000m
Weight: 11kg (missile)/18kg (missile in launch tube)
Guidance: laser beam-riding
Variants: B/C/D/E/F feature progressive improvements in booster, warhead, and guidance command link
Production: 1991-present
Notes: The S138 is a short-range, beam-riding missile designed to provide a readily portable and easy-to-use means of low-altitude air defense for ground troops. In its program to replace the heat-seeking S186, a limited all-aspect weapon no longer, by the mid-1980s, equal to modern air-defense challenges, the Ministry of Supply settled upon a very fast laser beam-rider design as offering the best compromise between performance and cost, as it required none of the expensive and, necessarily, disposable seeker electronics the development of which tended to bedevil foreign programs. Against the S138’s dependence for accuracy on an operator’s eyesight and steady aim were counted near-immediate reaction time, it needing no warm-up period or lock-on, immunity to spoofing-type countermeasures, and, arguably most crucial of all, a decidedly reasonable price-tag. It was appreciated, moreover, that a weapon like the S138 could easily be operated in conjunction with an array of fire-control systems diverse in their complexity, ranging from the original man-portable variant’s simple day-only optical sight to semi-automatic infra-red or millimeter-wave radar trackers, and that these would be far cheaper and easier to upgrade than electronics located on a missile itself. Numerous launching arrangements have been developed over the span of the missile’s career in service, and while the simple shoulder-launched type is by far the most common, the S138 can also be found in multiple installations on self-propelled platforms like the tracked ITPSV 01, aboard ship, and as a lightweight air-to-air missile for helicopters.

S149
Manufacturer: Westerlund Sähkötekninen Yhtiö Oy
Speed: 900-1,100m/s
Range: 20-65km
Weight: 125-240kg
Guidance: infra-red homing/active radar
Variants: A/B are short-range IR-homing missiles, C/E are extended-range IR-homing, D/F/G are long-range active-radar
Production: 1998-present
Notes: The S149/ITO 98 is a versatile short- and medium-range air-defense missile system based to a considerable extent on technologies developed for the contemporary L372 and L373 AAM programs, chiefly the former’s thrust-vectoring maneuver control and sensitive wide-angle IR seeker, and the latter’s active radar homing electronics. In line with its intended role as a supplement to and eventual replacement for the long-serving S129, the S149 is meant to combine its predecessor’s mobility and quick reaction time with fire-and-forget performance and the ability to carry out multiple simultaneous engagements, up to ten for the latest E, F, and G variants. The S149 also offers a credible means of defense against tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and small unmanned aerial vehicles, in addition to the traditional range of fixed and rotary-wing targets. IR-homing A, B, C, and E installations consist of eight ready-to-launch missiles in two banks of four retractable vertical canisters, typically protected from shell fragments and small-arms fire by light armor, on either a tracked MBV-140 chassis or, more commonly, 6x6 or 8x8 all-terrain trucks. These variants are capable of autonomous operation under local control if necessary, though it is normal for control to be exercised by a central battery command post, equipped with some manner of early-warning radar. S149D, F, and G launchers, consisting also of eight ready-use missiles in vertical canisters carried by an 8x8 truck, are however not equipped with their own independent fire-control equipment, being instead linked to an IT3155 three-dimensional radar which is itself typically self-propelled aboard an 8x8 all-terrain truck. S149 missiles are also deployed aboard ship in vertical-launch canisters.


105mm 105 MK 55
Barrel Length: 62 calibers
Weight: 24t
Range: 18,500m
Elevation: -7/+85
Rate of Fire: 40-50 rounds/minute
Notes: Gandvik’s first operational automatic medium-caliber naval gun was designed in response to the new threat posed to warships by jet-powered attack aircraft, which the preexisting combination of semi-automatic DP guns and short-range autocannons, it was believed, could not effectively counter. While it was apparent that a more modern point-defense antiaircraft weapon would be needed as well, a requirement belatedly fulfilled by the 37 ITK 64, a medium-caliber automatic gun offered several important advantages in that it would enjoy, by virtue of its greater reach, a much longer window in which to engage a high-speed, low-level target, and would be of a sufficient caliber to fire proximity-fuse ammunition. First fitted to the 1952-design destroyer, the 105 MK 55 armed most medium and large surface combatants built for the Gandvian Navy over the following thirty years and is still in limited service. The 105 MK 55 was intended from the outset for remote power control, and the gun can be operated with the above-deck gunhouse itself entirely unmanned until the 56 rounds of ready-use ammunition, held in two hoppers, are spent. As an automatic replenishment system, frequently discussed, was ultimately never developed, the ready-use hoppers must however be reloaded manually, and when the gun is expected to be in action for an extended period a turret crew is usually assigned to ensure a continuous ammunition supply. A local control cabin is also present on the mounting for emergency use.

105mm 105 MK 84
Barrel Length: 55 calibers
Weight: 21t (complete installation including gunhouse, hoist, and magazine, exclusive of FCS)
Range: 17,200m maximum, 12,000m practical
Elevation: -10/+85
Rate of Fire: 90 rounds/minute maximum
Notes: Development of an entirely new dual-purpose gun was initiated by the Admiralty Staff in the mid-1970s, chiefly in response to the new threat posed by saturation-type attacks by sea-skimming missiles, the successful engagement of which, it seemed, would demand a weapon with quicker response times and a more rapid rate of fire than the otherwise effective 105 MK 55 could deliver. The resulting 105 MK 84 is capable of unmanned operation thanks to its completely automatic ammunition replenishment system and large ready-use magazine, and can be ready to open fire within ten seconds of initial activation. In Gandvian service the gun is invariably controlled by some version of the EKY LT212 director, a combined radar/electro-optical installation intended to provide all-weather target tracking at medium to low altitudes.

105mm 105 MK 08
Barrel Length: 45 calibers
Weight: 3-5t
Range: 12,000m
Elevation: -10/+30/+80
Rate of Fire: 15 rounds/minute
Notes: The 105 MK 08’s horizontal sliding breechblock made it a very modern gun when introduced, and its practical firing rate of up to fifteen rounds per minute was not notably surpassed by any foreign offering. It served as the Royal Navy’s primary destroyer gun and as secondary armament on battleships and cruisers until displaced in those roles by the 130 MK 24, and continued to arm smaller warships and auxiliaries into the 1950s. The unshielded pedestal mount used initially was soon replaced by a variety of partially-enclosed mountings, all of which were manually-worked. Model 1908 guns aboard the 1917-series fleet destroyers were equipped later in their careers with on-mount range and bearing indicators which made possible a rudimentary form of remote fire control, the trainer, in theory, needing only to aim the gun in accordance with the gunnery officer’s telegraphed commands in order to achieve a concentrated salvo. A number of high-angle modifications were made as well from the mid-1930s, though as the guns thus altered were seldom under control of a high-angle director their main value as antiaircraft weapons was psychological.

105mm 105 MK 31
Barrel Length: 50 calibers
Weight: 22.1t
Range: 18,200m
Elevation: -10/+85
Rate of Fire: 15 rounds/barrel/minute
Notes: The 105 MK 31 was originally designed as a dual-purpose replacement for the secondary battery of barbette-mounted 150mm low-angle guns aboard Patria and Karl XII-class battleships, which were removed during a series of major reconstructions between 1930 and 1938. It also armed Saarenmaa-class heavy cruisers in lieu of a planned 130mm DP gun, development of which was subsequently abandoned, and was often substituted for the low-angle twin 130 MK 24C aboard 1932-type fleet destroyers. Hydraulically-operated automatic shell rammers permitted the standard twin mounting, which accounted for nearly the entire production total, to maintain a very rapid rate of fire even at high elevations. Its performance as an antiaircraft weapon was otherwise hampered, however, by the inadequacies of Gandvik’s standard high-angle director, good only for barrage fire against straight-and-level targets, and by the manually-operated mounting’s slow rate of traverse. The installation of remote power control machinery once it became available in sufficient quantities, together with the use of more effective radar-based fire control systems, largely cured these deficiencies and allowed the gun to remain in service with at least some semblance of credibility into the 1980s.

80mm 80 ITK 30
Barrel Length: 50 calibers
Weight: (towed variant) 4,200kg in traveling order, 3,300kg emplaced for firing
Range: 14,000m against surface targets, 9,800m against aircraft (5,000m maximum effective range)
Elevation: -10/+80
Rate of Fire: 12-15 rounds/minute/barrel
Notes: Improvements in aircraft performance, maximum speed and flight ceiling particularly, prompted development of a replacement for the reliable and ubiquitous though increasingly obsolescent 75 ITK 15, itself a high-angle adaptation of the 75 KK 11 field gun. The resulting 80 ITK 30 was accepted by the Army in 1930, and in spite of its relative ineffectiveness against a new generation of high-speed piston-engine aircraft, to say nothing of jets, it remained the Army’s principal heavy antiaircraft gun until supplanted in the mid-1950s by a combination of medium-caliber autocannons and missiles. The gun met with rather more success as an extemporized anti-tank weapon, where its flat trajectory and high muzzle-velocity were greatly valued. The 80 ITK 30 first went to sea aboard the new Jalopeura-class aviation cruisers in 1932, and over the next fifteen years it was fitted to nearly every type of Gandvian war vessel, from minesweeper to battleship, in a variety of single and twin installations. Increases in aircraft speed, however, soon made the gun obsolete in its intended role, and from the mid-1940s it was progressively replaced with medium-caliber autocannons, felt to represent a better use of available topweight and deck-space, on most vessels, with the notable exception of Type 1940, Type 1942, and Type 1944 minesweepers. The 80 ITK 30 was the largest dual-purpose gun available to these 800-ton ships, and it remained in service as their primary armament until they were taken out of commission in the late 1970s.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sun Feb 03, 2019 4:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 4:00 pm

The Gandvian Ground Force

Few individual weapons systems have exerted such a marked impact on twentieth-century warfare as the tank. Armored against small-arms fire, able to shoot back with decisive effect against almost any target, and granted remarkable terrain-crossing characteristics thanks to a pair of caterpillar treads, tanks restored maneuver to a modern battlefield that, swept by machine guns and cratered by artillery, presented an infantryman or cavalryman with any number of lethal hazards. Today, Europe's leading militaries are ranked in large part according to their strength in armored vehicles, and a fleet of more than seven thousand universal-role machines accords Gandvik definite great-power status. Today a wholehearted proponent of combined arms, wielding armor, mobile infantry, engineers, and artillery in concert, it took a catastrophic mass conflict to overturn the Royal Army's deeply-entrenched orthodoxy regarding proper methods of conducting military operations. Foreign observers have often opined that Gandvik's land army remained fundamentally out of date in terms of equipment and doctrinal outlook until after 1960, by which time a new generation of vehicles, and more importantly a new type of officer and NCO, had been fully integrated into the armed forces structure. It would not be unfair to characterize Gandvik's development of a mechanized interarm force as a haphazard, convoluted process, fraught with setbacks and false starts, but this same endeavor also yielded some moments of true inspiration, and fostered a cadre of forward-looking individuals whose innovative ideas, while not widely appreciated in their country of origin, would play an important part in shaping attitudes elsewhere in Europe.

The Renault Years

More than any other power, it was Geletia which inaugurated, with its swift and shockingly one-sided war against its neighbors Tsalland and Byzantium, the era of modern, industrialized, high-technology warfare. The Saimonas War, which resulted in Tsalland's extinction as an independent state and utter humiliation for Byzantium, provided Europe with its strongest and clearest demonstration to date of what decisive sorts of outcomes could be obtained when new techniques and technologies were employed in a closely-coordinated and carefully planned manner. Nearly every major power attempted to absorb lessons taught by the Saimonas conflict in their own way, to differing ends, and in this respect Gandvik was of course no different, hurriedly embarking on a program of military modernization meant to transform an organization made inert and inefficient by nearly sixty years of international peace. Between 1916 and 1920, Gandvik's Royal Army grew, by no means without complaint, from a force steeped in nineteenth-century beliefs and practices to one at least superficially able to face external foes with some hope of success.

A key aspect of this reform program, and perhaps its most controversial component, involved a modest purchase of Renault FT light tanks from Valendia, which together formed the Hyökkäysvaunurykmentti, or HVR, under command of then-Lieutenant Colonel Nils Sture. The low regard in which Sture was held by Gandvik's more traditional military men was perhaps understandable in light of his origins, and where most of his peers owed their ranks and stations to either political favoritism, or years of steady if in most cases unremarkable service at various provincial garrisons, Sture had advanced from Captain to Lieutenant Colonel in just four years, blindingly quick by normal standards, largely on strength of his reputation as an author. Sture had served as a military attache on the Tsag general staff during Geletia's lightning campaign, and was so struck by the effectiveness of Celtic tactics that wielded infantry, artillery, cavalry, aircraft and armored cars in close concert to outgun, outmaneuver, and overwhelm Tsalland's own immobile and inflexible soldiery, that in a flash of inspiration he wrote a comprehensive and immensely readable, if somewhat inaccurate, history of the Saimonas conflict whose central purpose was to extoll the virtues of what Sture himself initially called 'High-Speed Warfare.' Sture's book was consumed widely both at home and abroad, and captured the imaginations of Republican politicians who saw in Sture's futuristic vision a perfect antidote to Gandvik's bloated and deeply-politicized military establishment, a professional army whose strengths lay in extreme mobility and technological sophistication, one led, perhaps most attractively of all, by a new type of specialist officer.

Political patronage, coupled with his own seemingly boundless enthusiasm and drive, soon resulted in Sture being given authority over Gandvik's fledgling tank force, and he immediately set about turning the HVR into a smoothly-functioning and highly proficient demonstration unit. In this he was very much aided by the FT itself, arguably the first modern tank, which impressed and terrified in roughly equal measure with its immunity from rifle fire and shrapnel and its ability to cross ground that other motorized vehicles found impassable. When first allowed to partake in large-scale maneuvers, in Spring of 1921, Sture's HVR proved so powerful and effective even at a reduced strength that umpires, concerned that the planned schedule of exercises would be irrevocably disrupted, barred it from participation after a few days.

To a very real extent, however, the HVR was a victim of its own success, and as its commander's reputation grew, so did resistance from infantrymen and cavalrymen who looked upon Sture as an upstart, and who resented tanks as a threat to their own status and prerogatives at a time of falling budgets. Many Royal Army officers saw Sture as what, in a sense, he certainly was, namely the vanguard of an assault on military traditionalism by a Republic that found itself virtually a prisoner to its own senior generals, and his promotion to Major-General in 1925, at the Defense Minister's explicit insistence, only seemed to confirm the General Staff's fears. For his own part, Sture repaid Republican favoritism by publishing a number of friendly pamphlets and articles, most of which drew an explicit connection between representative democracy and military modernization. In 1926, despite a gathering political crisis and economic depression, Sture, aware of discussions in Britain that would lead to the formation of a so-called Experimental Mechanized Force the following year, received permission to form a Motor-Mechanized Division that united the HVR, which by then had nearly two hundred machines on strength, with a battalion of lorried infantry, an armored car squadron, several motorized artillery batteries and an air observation flight. Cutting-edge in conception, and intended by Sture to test and showcase his theories on an altogether larger scale, the Motor-Mechanized Division was overtaken by political developments before it had a chance to assemble, and when in 1927 General Konstantinus Strandmann overthrew Alfred Jelling's beleaguered ministry, Army officers jumped at the chance to disband Sture's troublesome formation.

Cavalry-Driven Mechanization

Cavalry Armor to Armored Cavalry

The Nuclear Battlefield

Combined Arms Revisited: In Search of the Ideal Armored Force

The Army of the Future

Renault FT: About 100 examples purchased from Valendia 1919-1921, kept manufacturer's designation in Royal Army service. Discarded by 1930.

HV-A: Practically a carbon copy of the Renault FT, differing in no major aspect. 155 built by State Artillery Factory (VTT) 1923-1926, discarded or relegated to second-line roles by 1935.

HV-B: Redesigned HV-A with sprung suspension, 78 built by VTT 1924-1927, discarded by 1935.

HV-C: First domestically-designed tank, though closely patterned after Renault NC. 8.5t, short-barrel 37mm gun. 80 built 1929-1932 by VTT, discarded by 1939.

HV-D: Copy of Carden Loyd tankette. 350 built by multiple manufacturers 1929-1933, discarded or relegated to second-line roles by 1939.

HV-E: Copy of Vickers-Carden Loyd Light Amphibious Tank. 200 built by multiple manufacturers 1932-1935, brief wartime service.

HV-F: Convertible wheel-track light tank. 11t, 37mm gun. 25 built by VTT 1932, design concept not pursued due to unreliability and excessive mechanical sophistication.

Pav.1: 10.5t infantry support vehicle, short 47mm gun, 3 MGs, 35mm armor. 410 built by multiple manufacturers 1933-1938, most examples lost by 1941.

Pav.2: MG-armed 4.5t light tank intended for service with new mechanized divisions. 2-man crew. 250 built 1935-1940, most lost by 1941.

Pav.3: enlarged 5t cavalry light tank, armed with 13.2mm machine gun. Sprung suspension gave good cross-country performance, but armor protected against rifle-caliber fire only. 2-man crew. 285 built 1935-1940, most lost by 1941.

Pav.4: 7.5t cavalry light tank with 3-man crew, 2-man turret, 20mm cannon in early variants later exchanged for 37mm gun. High speed, good reliability, and long range counterbalanced by thin armor. 550 built 1936-1941, last examples withdrawn from front-line service 1943.

Pav.5: 8.5t cavalry light tank based on Pav.4, 15mm max. armor, 37mm gun, good reliability, speed, and range but thin armor. Equipped first Gandvian armored divisions. Later variants increased armor to 50mm max. with applique plates. 3,500 built 1937-1943, remained in service as reconnaissance vehicle until 1951.

Pav.6: 15t cavalry cruiser, 47mm gun, 45mm max. armor, 5-man crew. Only true medium tank available to the Royal Army in 1939, sufficient armor and reasonably effective main gun offset by propensity for track breakages and very poor mechanical reliability. 1,550 built 1938-1942, withdrawn from front-line service 1944.

Pav.7: 21t medium tank based on Pav.6, main wartime Gandvian armored vehicle. 60mm max. armor, 47mm gun later exchanged for 57mm, 4-man crew. Close-support variant with short-barreled 75mm gun also produced. Initially a competitive design, drawbacks included chronic automotive unreliability, high silhouette, and small-diameter turret ring that prevented installation of high-velocity 75mm pieces. 7,700 built 1940-1945.

Pav.8: 30t medium tank, an entirely new, 'clean-slate' design featuring well-sloped hull and turret plate, high-velocity 75mm gun, 3-man turret. 70mm max. armor. A significant advance on its predecessors in all respects, and a close match to contemporary foreign machines. Production continued postwar in spite of inferiority to new generation of ‘universal’ tanks. 9,500 built 1944-1952.

Pav.9: 17t medium/light tank, last series-numbered Gandvian AFV. Intended to replace Pav.5 in armored reconnaissance role, though not available until postwar. Served until 1960 despite insufficient performance of 57mm gun. Chassis used for tracked open-topped armored personnel carrier. 2,250 built 1945-1951.


Pav.A1: American M3 light tank, approximately 800 delivered 1941-1943. While neither particularly well-protected nor heavily-armed, the M3 light was free from the sorts of mechanical problems that tended to plague most war-built Gandvian designs. Only a handful survived wartime service, and, with the notable exception of two companies deployed to Sumatra, which lingered on into the 1970s, these had all been discarded by 1947.

Pav.A2: American M3 medium, approximately 1,000 examples of which were purchased cheaply between 1942 and 1945 after the type's replacement in its country of origin by the greatly superior M4. Generally considered adequate for conditions prevailing in Weshield and Shadoran, if well past its technological prime by the date of its introduction to Royal Army service. The M3's 75mm gun was a very useful feature, particularly as no Gandvian tank carried a weapon of comparable performance until 1944, though most of the machines delivered to Gandvik were found to be in a parlous state of repair and many, deemed beyond recovery, were cannibalized for spare parts. Of those issued to field forces, most had been lost or written-off by 1945, and those remaining were promptly scrapped.

Pav.A3: American M4 medium, roughly 2,500 bought between 1943 and 1948. Gandvian tankers found the M4 significantly more effective in battle than any domestic tank design save for the Pav.9, and much more dependable from an automotive standpoint, though as with the M3, many of those tanks received were in such poor condition as to be effectively unusable. Available only in limited numbers during wartime, most Gandvian M4s were delivered postwar after their withdrawal from front-line service in their country of origin and at a time when Royal Army planners feared a resumption of hostilities in Europe. Several hundred machines served on with the East Indies Army until the mid-1980s, though the M4 had disappeared entirely from the Royal Army's first-line armored divisions by 1960.
Last edited by The Crooked Beat on Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 4:14 pm

Famous Gandvians

Monarchs and Politicians

Eerik II (Punainen)
1417 b. – 1474 d.

Eerik II, called Punainen, ‘the Red,’ for his ample ginger-colored beard, became Gandvik’s first king upon his marriage, in 1431, to Grand Dutchess Eleanora of Holmgard, an act which served to unite Eerik’s own hereditary domains in modern-day Ingria, Savonia, and Estland with an inland political unit of vast territory and considerable wealth, albeit one under considerable threat from Turkic and Shieldian depredations. An enigmatic and controversial figure even in his lifetime, Eerik continues to inspire sometimes heated debate in academic circles, especially as contemporary chroniclers tend either to adopt a tone of fawning praise or vilification. Undoubtedly Eerik, a successful and brave battlefield commander, enjoyed violence for its own sake, and while many of the more lurid accusations thrown about by his detractors are most likely false, there are grounds for modern historians to believe that his character exhibited a definite sadistic streak. Then again, he was also by most accounts a soft and caring father, and one whose memory was recalled with genuine affection by his son and heir, Eerik III.

Eerik III
1432 b. – 1498 d.

A famously pious and devout individual, Eerik III, crowned at a relatively advanced age, is chiefly remembered for his great interest in church-building, and many of Gandvik’s most grandiose religious structures and monuments date from his reign. In successive attempts to pry portions of Ruthenia from Depkazi control, however, he was much less successful, and some modern historians have detected in written records implied accusations of cowardice, evidently stemming from Eerik’s frequent reluctance to become personally involved in battle.

Kustaa I (Suuri)
1478 b. – 1551 d.

As one of Gandvik’s longest-lived monarchs, Kustaa I, more commonly known as Gustavus in his lifetime and customarily awarded the honorific ‘Suuri,’ or ‘the Great,’ played a central role in the construction of what eventually turned into the modern-day Principality, and presided over an unprecedented wave of territorial expansion. Highly literate, cultured, energetic, and utterly fearless in battle, Gustavus immersed himself in every aspect of his kingdom’s affairs, leaving behind him a mountain of personal correspondence for future historians, and his interests ranged from military engineering to music and poetry, touching on all points between. Kustaa arguably also whetted Gandvik’s appetite for Shieldian territory, however, and launched with an opportunistic invasion of Weshield what would become a centuries-long record of mutual hostility.

Kaarle I
1497 b. – 1574 d.

Kuusta’s designated heir, Kaarle inherited a state which, though by then one of Europe’s largest, faced enemies on almost every frontier, and most of his twenty-three-year reign was spent at war. Administration at home, it has been argued, suffered for want of attention, and in the role played by courtiers and advisers during his frequent, lengthy absences can almost be seen a prototype of the modern-day Council of State. Protestantism, introduced by Hanseatic merchants and a number of Gandvian returnees from Martin Luther’s Wittenberg, began to take root in a serious fashion during Kaarle’s kingship as well, facilitated in its spread and guaranteed, at least initially, official sanction by a sympathetic atmosphere at court and by a soured relationship with the Papacy.

Eleanora II
1543 b. – 1589 d.

After Kaarle’s death without a clearly-designated male heir, a brief succession dispute, flavored extensively by new religious tensions, was resolved in favor of his eldest daughter, Eleanora, who upon her coronation became Gandvik’s first, and so far only, female monarch. As an early enthusiast for Protestant teachings and a fervent Lutheran, Queen Eleanora pursued a relentless campaign against Roman influence which, although a significant source of political instability and occasionally pressed forward with a murderous fanaticism, shattered Catholic institutional power and set Gandvik on an irreversible religious course.

Eerik IV
1562 b. – 1624 d.

Like his great uncle, Eerik IV is best recalled as a military leader, and has often been numbered among history’s great commanders for his prodigious abilities in that line. Eerik built what was widely regarded as one of Europe’s finest armies, its Savonian light cavalry winning particular distinction, and under his direction Gandvik undertook what was at first a highly successful intervention in the Great Brothers’ War. Battlefield victories, however, were not supported by any viable political or dynastic framework, and after decades of ruinous warfare that laid waste both to Weshield and to the Gandvian treasury, Eerik had in fact accomplished relatively little. Still, his death from wounds sustained on the field set back Gandvik’s cause in that conflict immeasurably, and his successor, though not for want of trying, proved entirely unable to restore Gandvian fortunes.

Eerik V
1598 b. – 1657 d.

Perhaps not altogether fairly, Eerik V is frequently rated as one of Gandvik’s least-outstanding monarchs, and his memory still carries a strong negative connotation in a political context. Although immensely courageous, Eerik committed a series of strategic and political blunders that, together with sheer bad luck, placed Gandvian goals in Weshield out of reach, and after almost two more decades of intermittent, increasingly pointless warfare, his armies were thrown out of Weshield altogether. The humiliating peace treaty which he was then forced to sign, under pressure from both Shieldian arms and his own war-weary retainers, helped to launch the Grand Empire on its way to great-power status and inaugurated a lengthy period of decline and stagnation for Gandvik itself.

Gandvian Biographies Continued: Political Leaders of the Republic and Second Principality

Konstantinus Strandmann
1860 b. – 1938 d.

Arguably no individual played more direct or central of a role in creating Gandvik’s present-day political structure than General Konstantinus Fabian von Strandmann, who in 1927 carved-out a slice of historical immortality through his leadership of a coup d’etat, albeit one remarkably free of major violence, which toppled Alfred Jelling’s teetering republican administration. In spite of his intimate association with what was rightly taken as a bold reassertion by traditionalist and conservatively-minded elements of their power after a brief progressive interlude, Strandmann remained throughout his long career a pragmatist, and for a man who for much of his life led one of Europe’s principal states, his ideological leanings were never more than ambiguous at best. Of modest, middle-class origins, his father owner of a reasonably profitable cordage factory in Vitstenkyrka, Strandmann gained entry into the prestigious Vignerot du Plessis military academy at age 10, and graduated seven years later at the top of his class, having proven himself an uncommonly bright and studious cadet and a gifted mathematician. While his excellent marks guaranteed him admission into virtually any regiment of his choosing, he defied expectations and, in what was according to his memoirs a self-consciously Napoleonic gesture, applied for a commission in the field artillery. At a time when so many young men of his age and qualifications were prone to dive headlong into the debauched lifestyle of the well-heeled peacetime officer, Strandmann’s application and earnestness set him apart, and when posts demanding successively higher levels of responsibility became vacant, he was invariably the first choice to fill them.

Promotion in 1912 to Major-General seemed to confirm Strandmann’s destiny as a distinguished if otherwise unremarkable career officer in a Royal Army which had already endured fifty years of inactivity and seemed, by its character and disposition, poised to mark fifty more. After 1914, however, a rate of advancement through the ranks which had been quite rapid turned meteoric, and amid the wave of administrative reshuffling that followed Prince Ärnesti’s abdication, Strandmann traded a general staff office first for divisional, then corps, and then fortress region command, before in 1925 being appointed to lead the Civil Guard, an immensely important post at a time of chronic political instability. As fatal a decision as it may appear in hindsight, Prime Minister Alfred Jelling chose Strandmann principally due to his strictly professional and steadfastly apolitical demeanor, and where many of his contemporaries did not hesitate to make their ideological dispositions known, Strandmann, in what would develop into a trademark fashion, kept his thoughts to himself.

Official histories characterize Strandmann’s decision to dissolve parliament and dismiss Alfred Jelling as a last-resort effort to preempt what is described with equal consistency as an impending communist takeover, evidence of which Meri’s government, under pressure from right as well as left-wing forces and reliant on at least a measure of left-wing support, refused to accept. Certainly a more radical faction of the Gandvian left had indeed begun active planning for an armed uprising, timed to begin late in 1927 or early in 1928, but those same leftists argued similarly that their own designs aimed to forestall a military coup d’etat, and in the absence of credible evidence it is impossible to corroborate either view. Most foreign commentators would attribute a critical loss of confidence in the parliamentary system to both polarities, Army leaders and civilian conservatives having simply put their plans into action more quickly.

Strandmann, at any rate, was a logical leader for any such measure, both as a consequence of his control over the Civil Guard, an essential piece of any bid to capture power at a time when the average Army infantryman was not thought sufficiently dependable in political terms, and of his spotless public record, deemed equally important as a means of winning support from elements of a more central tendency. Strandmann delivered splendidly on both accounts, and in a carefully-planned, almost entirely bloodless operation, Civil Guard elements moved to establish control over all state institutions and communications infrastructure against no opposition more formidable than a handful of spontaneous street protests.

The combined civil-military junta which took power in the Jelling government’s wake undoubtedly owed its initial success in large part to Strandmann’s particular personal qualities, and his steadfast refusal to become a politicized figure even as his government cracked down heavily on the nation’s more militant left-wing parties. He was careful to act with considerable restraint, and took important steps to co-opt what his government termed ‘responsible’ leftists and republicans with positions in his junta, and by implementing a policy program whose ostensible aim was to tame the threat of class conflict by creating conditions which were bearable for all Gandvians. The relative readiness with which average Gandvians were prepared to accept the return from exile of Prince Ärnesti’s unpopular son Kaspar can be credited to one of Strandmann’s radio addresses, in which he carefully outlined the restored monarchy’s constitutional role and all but promised to abandon the experiment if it proved unsuccessful, a statement which did little to reassure Kaspar as he reoccupied his birthright.

Gandvik under Strandmann’s junta enjoyed a stretch of unprecedented civic peace and economic prosperity, albeit one which was far from entirely or even largely of its own making, and Strandmann today is discussed approvingly by left and right alike. In his restraint, his disdain for partisan rhetoric, his careful maintenance of a low ideological temperature, and his focus on achieving social balance, he established a pattern for future Gandvian governments, which have so far managed to guarantee their subjects domestic peace, decent levels of personal freedom, and a bearable standard of living throughout a tumultuous century. Equally Strandmann’s legacy, of course, is a patronage system which has grown to assume monstrous proportions, and which flagrantly subverts institutional mechanisms of government.

Gandvian Biographies Continued: Military Leaders

Jarl Lotman
1897 b. – 1958 d.

For an officer who achieved such important feats during Gandvik’s darkest hours, and who commanded such immense respect from his subordinates and colleagues, Jarl Lotman is remembered scarcely at all outside academic circles, and although he eventually rose to command an entire field army, his name seldom appears in any of innumerable popular histories about Gandvik’s Great War. Indeed, many such accounts make wanton alterations and omissions simply to avoid any mention of Lotman, and even semi-restricted Royal Army surveys, essential educational resources for officer-cadets, tend to focus on his performance as a regimental and divisional leader, and tend to observe a strict silence on his later wartime record. Then again, Lotman’s scandalously low historical profile is no accident. He suffered, to begin with, the supreme disadvantage of Jewish ancestry at a time when prejudice against Jews was very much in vogue, was in fact professed quite openly by some of the nation’s chief public figures, including a virulently anti-Semitic Prince Kaspar. And his professional advancement, too, owed a great deal to the goodwill and support of wartime Army chief-of-staff Albin Katz, who was forced out of office in 1946 under decidedly messy circumstances, and who took with him in his fall, entirely unintentionally, many of those who had enjoyed his backing. Lotman also one of very few Royal Army officers to attract positive comment among Gandvik’s foreign allies, and as relations between the former Aventine powers fell apart postwar, memories of his close working relationship with the leaders of Walmington’s expeditionary force turned embarrassing for a government which sought to tarnish that particular power’s domestic image. Still, any realistic assessment would undoubtedly confirm Lotman’s status as one of the Royal Army’s outstanding general officers, and it is a reflection of his very genuine talents that his wartime accomplishments continue to figure prominently in the command courses and leadership studies used to condition modern-day military commanders.

Carl Morner
1895 b. – 1971 d.

Much like General Lotman, though for somewhat different reasons, Carl Morner remains a controversial figure in modern Gandvik, and one whose actual role in Gandvian military history has been downplayed as a result. As the well-connected descendant of a family which traced its traditions of Royal Army service back generations, Morner advanced quickly through the ranks as a young officer, favored for posts in the Army’s most prestigious cavalry regiments. He rose to battalion command just in time for the brief Atal War of 1923, during which he won considerable renown, and over the course of several campaigns against Mover and Depkazi militancy on Gandvik’s southeastern frontier he added impressively to his record and public profile. His vocal and active support for Gandvian fascist parties did not, after 1927, seriously damage his career prospects, and in 1939 Morner had gained command of an entire cavalry army, the principal striking element in Riga’s planned war-ending offensive against the Shieldian Grand Empire.

Where most of the Royal Army’s pre-war senior commanders met with disaster in those first few months of war, from July of 1939, Morner, with, a force that had nearly been halved in strength to shore-up a collapsing Thortraian front, dealt the invading Grand Empire a decisive and shattering defeat in what was perhaps the largest cavalry encounter in history, and managed to press far into Weshield before a mixture of supply shortages, persistent poaching for reinforcements by badly cut-up commands elsewhere, and the arrival of a large and spirited Geletian army opposite his lead elements compelled Morner to retreat. Furious at having been frustrated so near to his objective, Morner launched a concerted campaign against Army Group commander Field-Marshal Gebhardt, and strong pressure exerted by friendly press outlets eventually secured Gebhardt’s dismissal by a General Staff acutely conscious of flagging public confidence in what had so far been a catastrophic war effort. Eager to show that something was being done about under-performing commanders, Gandvik’s general staff quickly promoted Morner to Field Marshal, by far the Royal Army’s youngest, and gave him command over the entire Weshield-Shadoran front, a post which Morner would hold for the remainder of the war.

User avatar
The Crooked Beat
Diplomat
 
Posts: 707
Founded: Feb 22, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Crooked Beat » Sat Mar 17, 2018 4:18 pm

Historical Aircraft of Gandvik

Manufacturer Directory
Valtion Lentokonetehtaat (State Aviation Industries): 1955-present (to 1971: Valtion Lentokonetehdas)
Post, Tooma, Org: 1918-present (to 1928: Post & Neudorf, to 1940: Post, Org, Neudorf)
Hansa-Wennstrom: 1924-present (to 1947: Wennstrom)
Lauk: 1919-1929
Ilmailuvoimien Lentokonetehdas (I.V.L.): 1921-1955 (merged into VL)
Veljekset Tervonen (Tervonen Brothers): 1924-1968 (merged into PTO)
Aviotehdas: 1916-1955 (to 1930: Aviotyöpaja, merged into VL)
Jarmann: 1965-present
Kosminen-Daugava: 1920-1954 (merged into PTO)
Turun Veneveistämö Lentokonetehdas (Turku Shipyards Aircraft Works): 1922-1950
Oy Andrée & Rosenqvist (Andros): 1911-1931 (aircraft only; built aero-engines 1914-1960, maritime engines 1906-1975) (consolidated with Lokomo to form VLM in 1961)
Wichmann-Rörstrand: 1928-1955 (merged into VL)
Vulcan: 1925-1947
Lokomo: 1934-1958 (mainly powerplant manufacturer; consolidated with Andros in 1961 to form VLM)
Rosengren-Lilius: 1913-1928 (exclusively powerplant manufacturer at present)

Wennstrom H.4

George Hansa, a senior engineer at the Wennstrom works, later to become company head after Hendrik Wennstrom's death in 1947, had presented his first workable helicopter prototype early in 1940, and in five years had refined the design's basic elements to a point where Air Ministry officials were prepared to order a limited production run for operational testing. Wennstrom accordingly manufactured a series of ten two-seat H.4s, two-seat aircraft intended for observation missions, which carried their twin rotors and radial engines on outriggers to each side of a steel-truss fuselage, and while none of these were completed in time to see action during the Great War, several did briefly participate in security operations against Mover militants. Although the helicopters seemed to offer no immediate improvement over existing fixed-wing types in the observation and liaison role, their vertical-flight capabilities having been generously compensated-for by low speed, loudness, and mechanical complexity, they did at least succeed in demonstrating that a rotary-wing aircraft could be put to practical use, and helped to justify further helicopter development.

Hansa-Wennstrom H.10

After a succession of helicopter designs that were, in effect, not far removed in most attributes from his first experimental prototypes, George Hansa was finally able, in 1947, to present a machine intended for general service in both military and civilian capacities. While it retained the so-far characteristic lateral twin-rotor configuration used on earlier helicopters, the H.10, an altogether cleaner and neater aircraft, was substantially larger than its predecessors, and could carry up to three seated passengers, two stretchers, or 200 kilograms of cargo within its fully-enclosed fuselage, in addition to a two-person flight crew. It also dispensed with open-truss outriggers in favor of an aerodynamic shoulder wing for extra lift in forward flight, a feature that helped to boost range and payload. In spite of a very favorable performance in competitive fly-offs against a competing I.V.L. design, the H.10 was only produced in limited numbers before the Air Ministry decided to halt all work on lateral tandem-rotor helicopters and adopt instead, with few exceptions, the now-commonplace Bankfield rotor system.

Post & Neudorf T.4

The Post & Neudorf T.4, a twin-engine sesquiplane of all-wooden construction, was Gandvik's first domestically-designed heavy bomber and the machine which helped to establish Post & Neudorf, later to become PTO, as the Principality's leading manufacturer of large aircraft. First flown in 1927, the T.4, with its relatively long range and large payload, promised to grant the Ilmavoimat the rudiments of a strategic-bombardment capability, the likes of which it had never before possessed, but strong opposition from a Royal Army staff that remained strongly critical of air-power theories then current limited production to less than one hundred examples, and within a short time advances in aeronautical technology had rendered the type obsolete in its intended role. Most, however, were retained in various capacities into the 1940s, in many cases fitted with floats for maritime search-and-rescue, or pressed into civil service on mail and passenger routes.

Kosminen-Daugava F.25

Franz Kosminen's F.25, selected in 1947 to fulfill an Air Ministry requirement, as part of industrial redevelopment plans, for an entirely new short-haul airliner capable of operating along feeder routes and into small or remote airfields, was manufactured in quantity between 1948 and 1954, and played a prominent role in bringing about the vast expansion of domestic air transport networks during that first postwar decade. Very much like the legendary Californian DC-3, with which it shared a certain visual resemblance, the F.25 was an elegant, all-metal, twin-engine aircraft of semi-monocoque construction, well-regarded for its responsive flight controls and good engine-out characteristics. In addition to its standard passenger variant, the F.25 was also produced as a freighter with strengthened cargo deck and enlarged door, while a military version could fit a powered dorsal turret for a defensive machine gun. Relatively unsuccessful in an international market crowded with war-surplus machines, the F.25 nonetheless remained a common sight in Gandvian skies through the 1960s, and served with the Ilmavoimat in navigation trainer, radar calibration, and general-duties roles until 1985.

Wichmann-Rörstrand S.8

The spruce-and-plywood S.8, a fully aerobatic, low-wing aircraft powered by a four-cylinder inline engine, was originally designed for an Ilmavoimat basic trainer specification, and in the years immediately after its introduction attracted a great deal of notice abroad for its strong showing in a number of continental air races and exhibitions. It went on to serve as the Gandvian Royal Air Force's principal introductory flight trainer for nearly two decades, and met with success as a civilian touring aircraft as well.

I.V.L. H.17
Type: single-seat monoplane fighter (later ground-attack aircraft and advanced trainer)
First Flight: 1934
In Service: 1935-1948
Production: 1934-1941: 2,400 (approx.)
Notes: Magnus Heskelman’s elegant and sprightly gull-winged monoplane fighter represented the dawn of a new technological phase in Gandvian aeronautics. It was the nation’s first mass-produced design to incorporate such cutting-edge features as a single, unbraced wing and a fully-enclosed cockpit, though its albeit cleanly-faired fixed landing gear and mixed steel-tube and fabric construction were undeniably backward-looking elements. When first flown in 1934 the aircraft nonetheless ranked as one of the world’s most advanced, prototypes demonstrating a maximum speed in level flight just shy of 300 miles per hour coupled with superb maneuverability and climb performance. With the addition of service equipment level speed fell to a still highly competitive 275 MPH, a figure comfortably on par with most other transitional monoplane fighters, and the Air Ministry quickly obliged I.V.L. with a production contract the scale of which would guarantee the H.17’s place as premier Ilmavoimat fighter for a crucial span of years.

The H.17 was powered by an air-cooled, 9-cylinder Lokomo radial engine mounted so that it could be swung out from the fuselage body for ease of maintenance. Later variants added a supercharger for better performance at altitude. Visibility from the aircraft’s teardrop canopy, carried well forward, was regarded as excellent, and this, together with a set of stout, widely-spaced landing gear legs which could be relied upon to withstand rough landings, soon gained the H.17 a highly positive reputation among Air Force fliers. Near-viceless handling meant that it was both an easy aircraft for novice pilots to master, and an easy one for more experienced airmen to extract the best possible performance from. These prized qualities, however, tended to distract Air Force officers and commanders from the type’s growing obsolescence in the face of advances in airframe and powerplant design, and contributed to a dangerous delay in the start of serious work on a successor.

Wartime experience tended to highlight a set of deficiencies common to most similar aircraft, namely insufficient straight-line speed, excessively light construction, and an ineffective rifle-caliber armament. Four 8mm machine guns could seldom be relied-upon to down heavier aircraft, or to seriously discomfort ground targets, while the lack of cockpit armor and self-sealing fuel tanks, features to be seen as effectively mandatory on later designs, meant that the aircraft could not stand up to very much battle damage. Skilled pilots nonetheless could often take advantage of the H.17’s superb agility to outfly opponents superior in speed and firepower, so that losses were not so severe as they might otherwise have been. The aircraft’s sheer friendliness to mass-production, together with its low requirement for strategic materials like aluminum and reliance on a simple and abundant radial engine virtually guaranteed it a place in squadron service past its point of obsolescence, and I.V.L. continued to build the type until 1941, by which time the manufacturing techniques and infrastructure necessary for working in all-metal monocoque structures had been sufficiently well-established. Withdrawn from Ilmavoimat fighter squadrons in 1942, the type continued to operate as a ground-attacker in subsidiary theaters, typically armed with a quartet of 15kg or a pair of 50kg bombs, until 1945. Flight training establishments did not fully retire the H.17 until 1948, by which time it was serving alongside Gandvik’s first operational jet aircraft.

Aviotehdas E.14
Type: single-seat monoplane fighter
First Flight: 1935
In Service: 1937-1947
Production: 1936-1942: 5,900 (approx.)
Notes: The Hawker Hurricane’s 1935 debut in Britain focused the attention of Gandvian aircraft manufacturers on the rapid pace of change in aeronautical technology and promptly led the Air Ministry to issue a specification for an aircraft of similar attributes and performance, chief among these being a level speed in excess of 300 MPH and performance at altitude sufficient to intercept modern high-speed bombers in the 200-MPH class. It was, however, painfully clear to both airframe manufacturers and the Air Ministry that Gandvik could not expect to have use of a modern high-power V12 aero-engine in the same class as Rolls-Royce’s legendary Merlin for at least another two years, and with license negotiations for the Hispano-Suiza dragging on interminably, a radial engine, inherently less ideal for a high-speed aircraft than an inline powerplant due to its necessarily much larger frontal area, represented the only practical short-term option. Aviotehdas managed in spite of those constraints to present a prototype which met the Air Ministry’s full specification, and this was ordered into production as a matter of urgency in 1936. Initial impressions of the Aviotehdas design were largely positive, and while it could not quite match the I.V.L. H.17 in turn and initial rate of climb, it was some thirty miles per hour faster and superior in roll rate. This achievement was all the more impressive in that the two aircraft used what was essentially the same 9-cylinder Lokomo radial, the key difference being that the E.14 was equipped from the outset with a supercharger. A fully-retractable undercarriage marked a definite technological step forward, though, unlike the H.17, the E.14 did not in fact feature a fully-enclosed cockpit in deference to test-pilot complaints about visibility, the H.17 having perhaps set an unrealistic standard in that respect.

Arguably the E.14’s most significant attribute, as it pertained to Gandvik’s aeronautical industry as a whole, was its all-metal monocoque construction, a first for an Ilmavoimat combat aircraft though also a technology which the Air Ministry of the time was determined to apply on a much wider scale. Growing confidence in the working of finely-machined aluminum made possible the use of a technique which promised significant improvements over traditional wood- or steel tube-and-fabric construction in the article of streamlining, structural strength, and weight savings, and early experience with the E.14 prototypes largely served to bear out these predictions. Mass-production, however, was another matter entirely, and Aviotehdas, whose plant was accustomed to working in the long-established fashion, initially struggled to assimilate the new procedures and machinery necessary for building in aluminum on an industrial scale. The pace of manufacture was therefore deeply disappointing, and by the middle of 1937, a full year after the E.14 had been ordered into production, a scanty 57 airframes had been delivered to Ilmavoimat fighter squadrons. This, when set against the H.17, clearly fell far short of requirements, and by 1939 the E.14 equipped at most a quarter of all Gandvian air-defense squadrons.

Production did ramp-up quite quickly after 1939, to a point where, by late 1940, it had surpassed the albeit obsolete H.17 as the Air Force’s primary single-engine fighter type, though when ranked against contemporary foreign designs the E.14 clearly offered little scope for future development. Like the H.17 it was a small aircraft, though consequently a very agile one, with no margin for any significant increase in engine power. While uprated variants of the Lokomo radial eventually permitted the E.14 to top 330 MPH at best altitude, by the end of 1941 this was no longer sufficient, and as the I.V.L. B.9 became available in quantity the E.14 was steadily withdrawn. Although the aircraft might conceivably have made a much more important contribution if more had been available in 1939 and 1940, it was, at any rate, for some time Gandvik’s most capable and advanced single-engine warplane, one largely equal to the demands of its day, and remained popular with pilots throughout its career. Whatever it might have lacked, in the article of maneuverability, relative to the H.17, the E.14 more than made up for in speed and in its far more effective armament of two 8mm and two 13.2mm machine guns.

I.V.L. B.9
Type: single-seat monoplane fighter (later ground-attack/close-support aircraft)
First Flight: 1939
In Service: 1941-1951
Production: 1940-1945: 8,500
Notes: As Gandvik’s search for a viable and competitive inline V12 aero-engine continued to drag on without any encouraging result, manufacturers confronted with urgent requirements for greater and greater performance were compelled to rely on less-risky if inherently somewhat less suitable radials. This had not, so far, proven an insuperable obstacle to the design of effective high-speed aircraft, and the advent of the Rosengren-Lilius 14R4 14-cylinder radial, which promised to deliver comfortably more than one thousand horsepower, prompted work on a new single-seater to take advantage of the new engine’s high power output. In spite of Aviotehdas’ high level of hard-won experience with all-metal construction, that firm’s preoccupation with the twin-engine G.4 heavy fighter prompted the Air Ministry to assign responsibility for a new high-performance single-engine type to I.V.L. Main requirements were still-higher level speed, at least 370 MPH at altitude, coupled with better altitude performance to counteract higher-flying bomber types while retaining the best possible turn and climb characteristics.

I.V.L. under the temporary leadership of Karl Berglund, promoted to Magnus Heskelman’s position as chief designer during the latter’s absence for medical leave, largely succeeded in delivering on the Air Ministry’s exacting set of requirements, and the resulting B.9, an aircraft of clean, graceful lines reminiscent in some respects of the highly successful Supermarine Spitfire, managed to retain its predecessors’ excellent handling characteristics while simultaneously offering a maximum level speed of some 376 miles per hour in the first production variants, later to be boosted past 400 MPH with uprated versions of the Rosengren-Lilius radial. The B.9 was also the first Gandvian fighter equipped from the outset with cockpit armor and self-sealing fuel tanks, features which, largely overlooked by design teams in peacetime, had been proven indispensable by actual combat experience. Probably the B.9’s greatest drawback was its relative unsuitability for quick and simple mass-production, as its elliptical wing and rounded tail surfaces, though central to its aerodynamic design, demanded far more time and attention on the factory floor than would have been ideal under wartime conditions. I.V.L. and subsidiary firms still managed to build nearly nine thousand examples over a five-year production run, and the B.9 remained by a large margin the Ilmavoimat’s most effective fighter at low and medium altitudes until the immensely powerful H.21 appeared late in 1945.

The B.9’s radial powerplant, by its nature less susceptible to crippling damage from enemy action and also somewhat easier to maintain than an inline V12, also gave the type a productive secondary career as a fighter-bomber. Initial variants carried a quartet of 13.2mm machine guns which were reasonably effective against unarmored ground targets, and later marks, optimized for the fighter-bomber mission, substituted two of these for 20mm cannons. Several dozen aircraft even carried a pair of 47mm antitank guns in underwing gondolas, though the performance penalty which these bulky and slow-firing weapons imposed was deemed excessive. Typical loadout in the ground-attack role consisted, at first, of two to four bombs on underwing stations, later largely superseded by high-velocity rockets, and it was in the fighter-bomber mission that the last B.9s saw out their operational careers.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads