Kassaran wrote:-snip-
It isn't really any of that, since "generations" only refers to MBTs in the same way that current fighter generations don't include P-51 or the Sopwith Camel but start with the jet age.
You can just go and look up a list of tanks and their generation, although it's worth noting that unlike fighter generations, tank generations aren't nearly as widely used nor are they quite as clearly defined. Current generation tanks are generally defined by their use of bulging plate armor, a higher caliber main gun (120-125 mm), integrated passive thermal sights, the end of the tradeoff between speed and armor (AMX 30 vs. Chieftain), etc. Not every single modern tank has these traits, but they will have most of them.
The problem is that aside from a crew in hull arrangement nothing that Armata does is new. The Russians already had APS. They already had add-on "stealth" plating (which they didn't bother to use). And even the crew in hull arrangement isn't really new, the Russians are just the first ones to think about putting it into production.
It gets even odder when Roski tries to compare it to K2 Black Panther as "another" fourth generation tank (which no one IRL is claiming) because K2 doesn't have a crew in hull arrangement so there is literally no feature or set of features that can be used to define the new generation.
Roskian Federation wrote:the tank has data-link communication
And? It isn't a new capability.