Purpelia wrote:Free-Don wrote:I feel like I'm starting to wake from a strange fever dream. That or I'm dying of malaria.
I think with just that little hint of cross pin over the magazine we may realize that one of the first things I proposed kinda what we're both looking for as a solution. A metal piece that prevents the bolt from ride far back enough to strip a bullet from the magazine right?
No, that is what you are looking at.
What I am looking at is a little piece of metal, a few millimeters thick that pivots sideways. And when pushed into the gun it pushes the first round in the magazine those few mm down and that prevents the bolt from picking it up. That way the bolt can still close and cycle fine. It just can't touch the bullets.
And the primary reason why I am looking at this specific arrangement is because it is something that would have been intimately familiar to firearms designers at the time and would have done a decent job as a safety in this case.Unless you're gonna go back to something about pushing the bullets in the magazine down (21 or 31 magazine loaded with only 20 or 30 boolets would be a minimum requirement) or for some reason I remember you talking about having the magazine cut off after every 5 rounds (can't find where I might have heard that) then we're in agreement. Just a button and a rib.
I do not think you understand how magazine cutoffs work. So just watch: https://youtu.be/1ACVQKUMfoI?t=2m20s
Yeah what I was hearing for some reason was a automatic magazine cut off (currently backtracking to find where I heard that from but I still ain't got a clue). Where after 5 rounds the magazine and the rounds were pushed down.
Good clarification on possibly not needing a round out to cut the magazine off but does that work with a larger capacity magazine that's under quite a bit more spring tension.
All I care about now is realizing I'm in the wrong and that my dog and I haven't gotten a shower since I got back from the Philippines.







