NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation Mk X

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Vaduz
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Vaduz » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:37 pm

Hi I was wondering if it is possible to put a larger gun on the BMP-1/2 chassis. A direct fire weapon that is low velocity like the old 73mm Grom, maybe something like a 90mm gun? I don't want it to be too large so as to tempt the crew to use it on tanks, but still capable of supporting infantry like the old Grom and the new Russian 100mm is meant to be.

I like the way the Scorpion tank was up gunned to 90mm, but I'm not sure how that conversion for the BMP would work.

I RP as a country which used to be a former Soviet client but is switching over to all Western type arms, hence I think a NATO standard gun on the BMP is a good idea but I'm not sure. Can the chassis take the weight and the recoil? Would there be enough storage space for the ammunition and still seat a full infantry section? Is the turret ring large enough to support an up gunning? And Do I have to replace the whole turret or just the gun?
Byzantium, the eternal. The unchanging. The centre of the world. Sprawling empire that was born of Greece and Rome, surpassing even that ancient glory. For over 1,000 years the heirs of the Caesars ruled from their capital on the Bosphorus. There were dark days of terror and despair, many lands were lost to foes, but in the end the triumph was theirs. An empire that was lost, had been regained. A flame long snuffed out, was rekindled. A glory once tarnished, had been reborn.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:58 pm

The 90mm you're thinking of was used on the AML/Eland, which barely broke six tons. A BMP will be fine, it's not that powerful of a gun. That being said the BMP-2's gun doesn't really need replacing and a better way for the BMP-1 is probably some kind of one-man turret or remote weapons station with a better autocannon like 2A42 (if you have spares) or Bushmaster.
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
New Vaduz
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Vaduz » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:53 pm

Taihei Tengoku wrote:The 90mm you're thinking of was used on the AML/Eland, which barely broke six tons. A BMP will be fine, it's not that powerful of a gun. That being said the BMP-2's gun doesn't really need replacing and a better way for the BMP-1 is probably some kind of one-man turret or remote weapons station with a better autocannon like 2A42 (if you have spares) or Bushmaster.


I did not know that is the same gun as the one on the Scorpion. What are the stats on it?

Anyway I do not favour 25mm autocannon and the like because they are better suited to taking on other armour and suppressing infantry.

I plan to do urban combat with my nation's BMPs and something like the 73mm only more powerful and firing a larger shell, yet smaller than a bulky tank cannon which will pose greater risk to dismounted infantry around it when used at close quarters and is harder to traverse in narrow streets.

The big shell will be able to penetrate concrete structures more effectively than a 40mm grenade launcher of the Bushmaster.
Last edited by New Vaduz on Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Byzantium, the eternal. The unchanging. The centre of the world. Sprawling empire that was born of Greece and Rome, surpassing even that ancient glory. For over 1,000 years the heirs of the Caesars ruled from their capital on the Bosphorus. There were dark days of terror and despair, many lands were lost to foes, but in the end the triumph was theirs. An empire that was lost, had been regained. A flame long snuffed out, was rekindled. A glory once tarnished, had been reborn.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:09 pm

An autocannon will be able to elevate and depress like Grom or Cockerill can't (a must in urban warfare), and any lack of punch it has against the Grom it can make up for by firing at 200rpm vice 7. There is probably a reason why Russia is abandoning the 100mm gun for just a 2A42 in the Kurganets and Armata, with all the experience it had in the post-Soviet street fights.

Bushmaster comes in 30 and 35mm as well as 25mm, although the 25mm Bushmaster will also do just fine chewing up concrete walls and the infantry behind them.
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26057
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:32 pm

The Grom doesn't have all that punch, anyway. It's not a 'cannon' in the conventional sense - it shoot the same rocket as the SPG-9 does.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Fryske Ryk
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Apr 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Fryske Ryk » Sun Apr 30, 2017 12:14 am

Image

it grow

b = befel
m = mortier
ra = radar
elo = electromagnetic combat
gob = gun/artillery observer
ljoanra = light anti-tank rocket
kan = cannon
anlokan = anti-aircraft cannon
swianra = heavy anti-tank rocket
anlora = anti-aircraft rocket

last two might possibly be a fitter vehicle and a self-propelled howitzer
Last edited by Fryske Ryk on Sun Apr 30, 2017 12:19 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Sun Apr 30, 2017 6:52 am

I'm so proud of you right now Gallia, it's bringing tears to my eyes.

;_;
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 6:58 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Two questions:
1. Whats the lightest smallest armored vehicle that I could mount an autocanon in 40mm Bofors (40×364mmR) on?
2. Whats the lightest smallest armored vehicle that I could mount a single shot gun in ye-old 40mm Bofors (40×311mmR) on?

Assume a decently long barrel too.


You might find that something perfectly doable that would satisfy your first or second condition simply hasn't been done IRL. As far as I'm aware, there hasn't been a whole lot of interest in light/ultralight AFVs mounting 40mm autocannons, so incidentally you just won't see them IRL.

With that being said, if you're willing to sacrifice some protection or other things there's nothing saying that a lighter vehicle than seen IRL wouldn't be feasible.

For reference #2 would be a WW2 era light tank. I ideally want something similar to the T-50 but I really, really just want to push it to the limit with being light. Like, pistol proof is good enough.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:03 am

Image

3 tons

User avatar
Chinevion
Minister
 
Posts: 2376
Founded: May 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinevion » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:11 am

Elektrograd wrote:(Image)
(Image)

I have been advised by a certain someone to post here to get some critique, have someone look at it with fresh eyes.
It's a simple mockup so a bunch of things you see are still a subject to change, like proper DUKE antenna, suspension or RWS.

It's basically Object 490a Buntar on a different chassis, this time with a fully unmanned turret and waaay thicker armour. Whole crew sits in the front, a'la Armata. Two hatches on the side of the turret, one under the main gun. Whole thing would enter service in late 90's, armed with 140mm cannon. Overkill for sure, but whatever, I need to escape cartoon :not:leo2s.

So gud man. loving the turret design.

Also on a side note does anyone have a 1px:1inch track I can borrow? I will give credit.

Side side not. GErman and Americans tankers of warthunder. If you want the mbt 70/kpz 70 support this thread: Kpz-70/mbt-70 warthunder suggestion

User avatar
Chinevion
Minister
 
Posts: 2376
Founded: May 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinevion » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:16 am

If the mbt-70 had been completed instead of being cancelled what do you guys think modern tanks would look like in USA

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:33 am

Chinevion wrote: Also on a side note does anyone have a 1px:1inch track I can borrow? I will give credit.


Novorden/ Risen Britannia had some, i dunno where they are though.

Chinevion wrote:If the mbt-70 had been completed instead of being cancelled what do you guys think modern tanks would look like in USA


in all likelihood they would still be using MBT-70s, but would possibly have begun development of lighter modern 120mm smoothbore armed tank in the vein of the Leclerc, K2, and Altay

User avatar
Federated Kingdom of Prussia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 149
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Federated Kingdom of Prussia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:36 am

Why did the T-34 and Tiger I both have so much armor on their rear? Especially in the case of the well-sloped T-34's rear, it seems like a wasteful design choice.

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:39 am

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:Why did the T-34 and Tiger I both have so much armor on their rear? Especially in the case of the well-sloped T-34's rear, it seems like a wasteful design choice.


encase some uncouth rapscallion decided to do the ungentlemanly thing and shoot them in the arse

User avatar
Our Ladia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Ladia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:34 am

Laritaia wrote:(Image)

3 tons


What vehicle is that?
Nope, Our Ladia has yet to go to war with anyone.

Norcourtian Armouries (defunct)

Alliance Talk between Finnian Bastada and The Protectorate: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=365136


A PROUD MEMBER OF THE FEDERATION OF ALLIES!

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!

User avatar
Our Ladia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Ladia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:35 am

So what made halftracks cheaper then full tracked vehicles of similar weight?
Nope, Our Ladia has yet to go to war with anyone.

Norcourtian Armouries (defunct)

Alliance Talk between Finnian Bastada and The Protectorate: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=365136


A PROUD MEMBER OF THE FEDERATION OF ALLIES!

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:40 am

Our Ladia wrote:
Laritaia wrote:(Image)

3 tons


What vehicle is that?


it's a local pattern Universal Carrier with a 2lber gun

Our Ladia wrote:So what made halftracks cheaper then full tracked vehicles of similar weight?

easier driver training and simpler and cheaper engine and transmission


User avatar
Our Ladia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Ladia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:42 am

Laritaia wrote:
Our Ladia wrote:
What vehicle is that?


it's a local pattern Universal Carrier with a 2lber gun

Our Ladia wrote:So what made halftracks cheaper then full tracked vehicles of similar weight?

easier driver training and simpler and cheaper engine and transmission


Thank you.

What made the engine and drivetrain easier?
Nope, Our Ladia has yet to go to war with anyone.

Norcourtian Armouries (defunct)

Alliance Talk between Finnian Bastada and The Protectorate: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=365136


A PROUD MEMBER OF THE FEDERATION OF ALLIES!

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:46 am

Gallia- wrote:"Local pattern"?

UK?


Local Pattern is what they called universal carriers produced in Australia

Our Ladia wrote:What made the engine and drivetrain easier?

it was literally a regular truck drivetrain mated to a set of tracks


User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:16 am

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:Why did the T-34 and Tiger I both have so much armor on their rear? Especially in the case of the well-sloped T-34's rear, it seems like a wasteful design choice.

Relevant
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:59 pm

Fryske Ryk wrote:(Image)

it grow

b = befel
m = mortier
ra = radar
elo = electromagnetic combat
gob = gun/artillery observer
ljoanra = light anti-tank rocket
kan = cannon
anlokan = anti-aircraft cannon
swianra = heavy anti-tank rocket
anlora = anti-aircraft rocket

last two might possibly be a fitter vehicle and a self-propelled howitzer


nice m3 half-tracks with new body kits when will we see the m8 grayhounds with the toucan ii turrets?
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

User avatar
Fryske Ryk
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Apr 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Fryske Ryk » Sun Apr 30, 2017 2:00 pm

For one thing the suspension resembles AMX-10P, not M3. Notice lack of HVSS or whatever.

For another, (((wheeled death trucks))). Finally I'll change the words to be three letters max for variants.

When I get around to it I'll find something suitably stupid. Probably Oto Melara Capraia or Gorgona.
Last edited by Fryske Ryk on Sun Apr 30, 2017 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Sun Apr 30, 2017 2:21 pm

its cool
Image

it isn't as cute as this tho
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Quincy, Tumbra

Advertisement

Remove ads