NATION

PASSWORD

Infantry Discussion Thread 10: Shovel Edition [NO FWORDS]

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Fri Jul 21, 2017 6:11 pm

i suggest a high neck approach

User avatar
Khornatenreich
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1162
Founded: Jun 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Khornatenreich » Fri Jul 21, 2017 6:12 pm

Just amputate the whole body at this point, might as well become a block of silicon with a brain in a jar attached to it.
Last edited by Khornatenreich on Fri Jul 21, 2017 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NS Mods are Huxlian Parasites, don't do a badthink goys!
Member of the Committee for Proletarian Morality
Serbia, Hungary, Austria & Finland have the right idea, preserve European Ethnic & Cultural Integrity against the southern hordes for future generations!
Multikulti ist ein Krebsgeschwür, brenne es die Hölle aus!

User avatar
Pentaga Giudici
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Feb 13, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Pentaga Giudici » Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:02 pm

There is talk in the US Military of using a .338 Norma Magnum for moments you need to hump a .50 cal by infantry, but you don't want to hump a .50 cal with your infantry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweig ... achine_Gun

Thoughts? Do you have something like this in your military?

What about replacing the M2 in the CROWS systems or mounted on vehicles, since the round has effects against vehicles but weights a lot less?
Last edited by Pentaga Giudici on Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pentagonal Armaments
Sometimes you just need something to protect yourself with.


People talking without speaking. People hearing without listening.

I'm surprised too, maybe it's a sign things are looking up.

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:04 pm

No.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:09 pm

Pentaga Giudici wrote:There is talk in the US Military of using a .338 Norma Magnum for moments you need to hump a .50 cal by infantry, but you don't want to hump a .50 cal with your infantry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweig ... achine_Gun

Thoughts? Do you have something like this in your military?

What about replacing the M2 in the CROWS systems or mounted on vehicles, since the round has effects against vehicles but weights a lot less?

An M82 will do the job better and long range fire from a .30 caliber machine gun is entirely possible. On a vehicle it's entirely useless, since nobody cares how much a machine gun weighs on it.
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:22 pm

Pentaga Giudici wrote:There is talk in the US Military of using a .338 Norma Magnum for moments you need to hump a .50 cal by infantry, but you don't want to hump a .50 cal with your infantry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweig ... achine_Gun

Thoughts? Do you have something like this in your military?

What about replacing the M2 in the CROWS systems or mounted on vehicles, since the round has effects against vehicles but weights a lot less?

old news

it's going to be tested for 10 years, get a contract, have that contract cancelled right before it's delivered and then die

just like everything else the army touches
Unreachable.

User avatar
Free-Don
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 437
Founded: Apr 24, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Free-Don » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:30 pm

Pentaga Giudici wrote:There is talk in the US Military of using a .338 Norma Magnum for moments you need to hump a .50 cal by infantry, but you don't want to hump a .50 cal with your infantry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweig ... achine_Gun

Thoughts? Do you have something like this in your military?

What about replacing the M2 in the CROWS systems or mounted on vehicles, since the round has effects against vehicles but weights a lot less?


Already got full power rifles, IARs, LMGs, MMGs, and regular heavy machine guns. We could probably match the effectiveness of the gun with standard rifles and IARs with numerical volume.

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10940
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:36 pm

"we want a medium machine gun"
*armourer points to M240*
"No, a lightweight medium machine gun"
*Armourer points to M60*
"No, we want to shoot to 1700 meters"
*Armourer points to M2*
"No, we want a machine gun, that is medium, but lightweight, but only lightweight when compared to the M2, but can shoot to 1700 meters, but also is smaller than .50 caliber, but not .30 caliber"
"And also we want it in .338 Norma"
*Someone from the back of the room says something about hyperburst*
*Armourer questions his career choice and wonders if drinking bleach is really THAT bad*
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:11 pm

Puzikas wrote:"we want a medium machine gun"
*armourer points to M240*
"No, a lightweight medium machine gun"
*Armourer points to M60*
"No, we want to shoot to 1700 meters"
*Armourer points to M2*
"No, we want a machine gun, that is medium, but lightweight, but only lightweight when compared to the M2, but can shoot to 1700 meters, but also is smaller than .50 caliber, but not .30 caliber"
"And also we want it in .338 Norma"
*Someone from the back of the room says something about hyperburst*
*Armourer questions his career choice and wonders if drinking bleach is really THAT bad*


:nua corada:

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:14 pm

wew lad
Unreachable.

User avatar
Crsca
Attaché
 
Posts: 82
Founded: Jun 19, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Crsca » Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:36 pm

What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?
POPULÁRNÍ LIDOVÁ REPUBLIKA CRSCÁ
eco-fascist necrocratic right-wing socialists ruled by dead female hoxha, also vertical farms and ultranationalist phalanstères



User avatar
Greater United American Republics
Envoy
 
Posts: 204
Founded: May 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater United American Republics » Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:39 pm

Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?



Don't
Did you vote Federalist Citizen?

"Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her."
- G.K. Chesterton

Fallout's Lore blended with the USCMC from Aliens and an America that both won the war of 1812 & never suffered a War Between the states, Custer brought his Gatlings alongside a winchester or thirty & America strove to adopt the Lewis Gun alongside a thousand other minor (and major) alterations to the American Timeline.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Sat Jul 22, 2017 12:07 am

Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?

Haha! Not this time, Mr. NSA!
Unreachable.

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10822
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crookfur » Sat Jul 22, 2017 12:33 am

Puzikas wrote:Sometimes they still have a gag reflex
Some forms of shock caused by blast, GSW or other trauma common in military settings can render a person to a GCS of 5-6 where a gag reflex might still be present even if the person is for all intents and purposes not A&O.

Fordorsia wrote:puz my left knee is garbage sometimes there's a very noticeable and uncomfortable ache throughout the day and sometimes if I run up stairs it will give a bit and there will be a sudden pain in it. No change in the dull ache regardless of movement. Do I need a new robit leg.


I'm not your personal physician you have free healthcare go ask them

And unless it's like 1 or 2 obvious things his GP will just shrug and give him a referral to the physiotherapist team.
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Sat Jul 22, 2017 12:37 am

Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?

oh hey it's swedecuck

short answer: look it up on Wikipedia you lazy arse oh wait
long answer: read this

TL;DR Use a method of spraying to deploy the agent (i.e. use a industrial insecticide sprayer). You can also try bombs, artillery shells, and mortars - to quote the above link however: "Other types of delivery systems for biological agents have been designed by various countries. These include bombs or bomblets that release the agent by exploding (generally very inefficient delivery systems)". You can also try using land/sea mines. If you're a insurgent group and/or the IRA, pipe bombs are also a method worth considering. You should probably first consider however if you really need to be bringing brucellosis into the field.

Also yay I did something useful.

User avatar
Crsca
Attaché
 
Posts: 82
Founded: Jun 19, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Crsca » Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:28 am

Western Pacific Territories wrote:
Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?

oh hey it's swedecuck

short answer: look it up on Wikipedia you lazy arse oh wait
long answer: read this

TL;DR Use a method of spraying to deploy the agent (i.e. use a industrial insecticide sprayer). You can also try bombs, artillery shells, and mortars - to quote the above link however: "Other types of delivery systems for biological agents have been designed by various countries. These include bombs or bomblets that release the agent by exploding (generally very inefficient delivery systems)". You can also try using land/sea mines. If you're a insurgent group and/or the IRA, pipe bombs are also a method worth considering. You should probably first consider however if you really need to be bringing brucellosis into the field.

Also yay I did something useful.

like that time when you suggested me to produce uranium from vertically farmed bananas

how about flettner rotor bomblets?
Last edited by Crsca on Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
POPULÁRNÍ LIDOVÁ REPUBLIKA CRSCÁ
eco-fascist necrocratic right-wing socialists ruled by dead female hoxha, also vertical farms and ultranationalist phalanstères



User avatar
Pentaga Giudici
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Feb 13, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Pentaga Giudici » Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:32 am

Puzikas wrote:"we want a medium machine gun"
*armourer points to M240*
"No, a lightweight medium machine gun"
*Armourer points to M60*
"No, we want to shoot to 1700 meters"
*Armourer points to M2*
"No, we want a machine gun, that is medium, but lightweight, but only lightweight when compared to the M2, but can shoot to 1700 meters, but also is smaller than .50 caliber, but not .30 caliber"
"And also we want it in .338 Norma"
*Someone from the back of the room says something about hyperburst*
*Armourer questions his career choice and wonders if drinking bleach is really THAT bad*


Because I was listening to this huge discussion between ex-airborne and other light infantry, and one of them mentioned having to drag an M2 on a sled because they needed its performance... And they couldn't mount it on a vehicle.

There was talk about how it would shoot straight, be good against light vehicles or very heavy cover, and generally just be a lighter M2.

Another thing that was mentioned is how it sucks to reload the CROWS while under fire, and having a lot more rounds would really be a benefit.

From what I understand, there is a huge margin of energy and mass between 7.62x51mm and .50 cal; just by looking at stats and cartridge size.
Pentagonal Armaments
Sometimes you just need something to protect yourself with.


People talking without speaking. People hearing without listening.

I'm surprised too, maybe it's a sign things are looking up.

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:05 am

Puzikas wrote:"we want a medium machine gun"
*armourer points to M240*
"No, a lightweight medium machine gun"
*Armourer points to M60*
"No, we want to shoot to 1700 meters"
*Armourer points to M2*
"No, we want a machine gun, that is medium, but lightweight, but only lightweight when compared to the M2, but can shoot to 1700 meters, but also is smaller than .50 caliber, but not .30 caliber"
"And also we want it in .338 Norma"
*Someone from the back of the room says something about hyperburst*
*Armourer questions his career choice and wonders if drinking bleach is really THAT bad*


338 WOUNDING ROUND UPGUNNED OUTCLOSE ON THE LINEAR BATTLEFIELDS OF YESTERDAY
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

User avatar
Pentaga Giudici
Diplomat
 
Posts: 788
Founded: Feb 13, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Pentaga Giudici » Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:16 am

Austrasien wrote:
Puzikas wrote:"we want a medium machine gun"
*armourer points to M240*
"No, a lightweight medium machine gun"
*Armourer points to M60*
"No, we want to shoot to 1700 meters"
*Armourer points to M2*
"No, we want a machine gun, that is medium, but lightweight, but only lightweight when compared to the M2, but can shoot to 1700 meters, but also is smaller than .50 caliber, but not .30 caliber"
"And also we want it in .338 Norma"
*Someone from the back of the room says something about hyperburst*
*Armourer questions his career choice and wonders if drinking bleach is really THAT bad*


338 WOUNDING ROUND UPGUNNED OUTCLOSE ON THE LINEAR BATTLEFIELDS OF YESTERDAY


The level of energy in .338 is so great, it doesn't even need to penetrate to kill you.

It's like a HESH round.
Pentagonal Armaments
Sometimes you just need something to protect yourself with.


People talking without speaking. People hearing without listening.

I'm surprised too, maybe it's a sign things are looking up.

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Sat Jul 22, 2017 6:43 am

I'm playing with the idea of adopting something like 6.5mm Arisaka to replace a not!8mm Lebel in the early 1900s. And supplement this in the 1920s with a 9.3mm Brenneke type round for medium MGs and vehicle mounted MGs. This would leave me with a conundrum for HMGs but that's another discussion.

My question is, for those who have an informed opinion, if there is no otherwise pressure to adopt a foreign SCHV round like 5.56mm NATO, and 6.5mm Arisaka is otherwise fine for the job required, would it be reasonable to still be using this caliber dichotomy today?
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Puzikas
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10940
Founded: Nov 24, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Puzikas » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:09 am

Semi-rimmed ammunition suffers a kind of similar issue in autoloaders as do rimmed
With that said it's easy to correct but not being dumb as a stone and watching the rims
Traditionally it's performance is similar, if slightly less, to that of 6.5x55 Swedish within 500m.

Probably just fine
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

Goodbye.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25016
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:16 am

Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?

You sure you wanna sign that invite for me to utilize thermonuclear weapons and nerve agents en masse?

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:31 am

Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?


A bomb, stealthily? A sick person, or a crop duster on their food supply
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25016
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:37 am

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Crsca wrote:What would be the best, and most efficient, way to deliver biological weapons?


A bomb, stealthily? A sick person, or a crop duster on their food supply

An unregistered crop duster with no flight plan would probs be stalked by army helicopters and shot down if they refuse to land.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:39 am

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
A bomb, stealthily? A sick person, or a crop duster on their food supply

An unregistered crop duster with no flight plan would probs be stalked by army helicopters and shot down if they refuse to land.


They asked most efficient and best, not most likely to succeed
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alpinumtia, Bagiyagaram

Advertisement

Remove ads