I dunno. I mean, it definitely up there with USS Frank Cable but...
Advertisement

by Western Pacific Territories » Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:35 am

by Theodosiya » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:56 am

by Pharthan » Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:40 pm
Theodosiya wrote:Scrap all my previous plan. I'll start to design a corvette first. The basis would be either SIGMA 9813/9814 or Buyan. It will have OTOBREDA 127mm gun, Mk 41 VLS, 2 Bofors 40mm or Oerlikon 35mm gun or Mk44 Bushmaster, 2x3 torpedo launcher, one or two Goalkeeper CIWS. Electronics, CMS and engine undecided. Opinions and suggestions appreciated.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

by Velkanika » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:13 pm
Rhodesialund wrote:Velkanika wrote:How about that time they recruited Pvt. Manning as an agent who they directed to steal top secret data from the Department of State? They recruited their own spy, so I think that counts as stealing.
Nope, you are confusing Wikileaks with Guardian, who hired Manning.
Theodosiya wrote:Scrap all my previous plan. I'll start to design a corvette first. The basis would be either SIGMA 9813/9814 or Buyan. It will have OTOBREDA 127mm gun, Mk 41 VLS, 2 Bofors 40mm or Oerlikon 35mm gun or Mk44 Bushmaster, 2x3 torpedo launcher, one or two Goalkeeper CIWS. Electronics, CMS and engine undecided. Opinions and suggestions appreciated.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:15 pm

by Velkanika » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:08 pm
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:A 95 mm gun? <.< >.>
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:30 pm
Velkanika wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:A 95 mm gun? <.< >.>
A 30mm gun is great if you plan on fighting Boghammers, but you really need more explosive power if you want to disable or sink something like another corvette or even a small cargo ship. Missiles are good and all, but sometimes HE-Frag shellfire is the best option, especially in the situations where corvettes excel.

by Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:55 am

by The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:25 am
Theodosiya wrote:Use 76mm Super Rapid Gun and one Goalkeeper. Might make another version for Mining ship.
So :
Name : Smersh-class Corvette
Weapons :
-1x Otobreda Super Rapid 76mm Gun
-2x Bushmaster Mk44 Autocannon, manual.
-1x Goalkeeper CIWS
-6x Cells of Mk41 VLS. Loadout undecided.
-2 x triple B515 launchers
Sensors, Decoy, ESM & ECM :
(WIP, need advice on what radar, sensors, etc.)
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.

by Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:34 am
The Selkie wrote:Theodosiya wrote:Use 76mm Super Rapid Gun and one Goalkeeper. Might make another version for Mining ship.
So :
Name : Smersh-class Corvette
Weapons :
-1x Otobreda Super Rapid 76mm Gun
-2x Bushmaster Mk44 Autocannon, manual.
-1x Goalkeeper CIWS
-6x Cells of Mk41 VLS. Loadout undecided.
-2 x triple B515 launchers
Sensors, Decoy, ESM & ECM :
(WIP, need advice on what radar, sensors, etc.)
Well, judging by how I do corvettes, I would use a multifunction radar, one that can work as both air search, surface search and navigation radar all in one - radars are expensive and the last thing you want is an expensive corvette. If you put sonar on it or not depends on if you want it to hunt subs or not.
As for Decoys, I would go with a Multi-Ammunition Softkill System for a start and then something for less advanced missiles, like chaff.
That's how I would start it. I am sure, that there are other opinions on it as well.

by The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:50 am
Theodosiya wrote:The Selkie wrote:
Well, judging by how I do corvettes, I would use a multifunction radar, one that can work as both air search, surface search and navigation radar all in one - radars are expensive and the last thing you want is an expensive corvette. If you put sonar on it or not depends on if you want it to hunt subs or not.
As for Decoys, I would go with a Multi-Ammunition Softkill System for a start and then something for less advanced missiles, like chaff.
That's how I would start it. I am sure, that there are other opinions on it as well.
Tell me some of the best radar, decoys and sonar manufacturer. And now i also wanted a ASUW variant. (ASUW, Mine-Warfare, General Purpose)
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.

by Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:57 am
The Selkie wrote:Theodosiya wrote:Tell me some of the best radar, decoys and sonar manufacturer. And now i also wanted a ASUW variant. (ASUW, Mine-Warfare, General Purpose)
That could be a little bit of a problem, as I usually work out my own systems and specifications...
As for the variants: Why not make it a general purpose corvette and include ASW-capabilities and mine-warfare capabilities into those?

by Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:08 am

by The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:10 am
Theodosiya wrote:The Selkie wrote:
That could be a little bit of a problem, as I usually work out my own systems and specifications...
As for the variants: Why not make it a general purpose corvette and include ASW-capabilities and mine-warfare capabilities into those?
Won't it be too expensive?
And i plan to use RL system coz i want it to be semi realistic.
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.

by Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:49 am

by The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:05 am
Theodosiya wrote:Alright, GP corvette. Still, using RL systems means more proven capability.

I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.

by Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:56 am
Rhodesialund wrote:Velkanika wrote:I haven't heard that version of events, where did you hear that claim?
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/the-guardian-hires-chelsea-manning-202383
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/10/the-guardian-hires-convicted-wikileaks-soldier.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/chelsea-manning-joins-the-guardian-as-contributing/
Like I said, you confused Wikileaks with Guardian. Manning was never hired by Wikileaks, ever. Wikileaks also doesn't pay people to leak information to them. It's done by the leaker's own volition.
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Velkanika wrote:A 30mm gun is great if you plan on fighting Boghammers, but you really need more explosive power if you want to disable or sink something like another corvette or even a small cargo ship. Missiles are good and all, but sometimes HE-Frag shellfire is the best option, especially in the situations where corvettes excel.
I was just noting that a 95 mm caliber is one that almost nobody uses. <.< It's almost Italian.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1

by Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:45 pm
Velkanika wrote:Rhodesialund wrote:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/the-guardian-hires-chelsea-manning-202383
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/10/the-guardian-hires-convicted-wikileaks-soldier.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/chelsea-manning-joins-the-guardian-as-contributing/
Like I said, you confused Wikileaks with Guardian. Manning was never hired by Wikileaks, ever. Wikileaks also doesn't pay people to leak information to them. It's done by the leaker's own volition.
That's not what I meant by recruited. I meant they recruited Manning as an intelligence source to provide them with Top Secret information on topics that interested them. Manning was a HUMANINT source for Wikileaks, by which I mean he was a spy. Not all spies are paid for the information they deliver, some of them do it for ideological reasons or are manipulated into doing it. Wikileaks as a point of fact did establish contact with Manning and convinced him to send them classified documents damaging to the United States, just like any number of traitors who have passed information to the Chinese, Russians, Israelis, Cubans, and almost every country on earth with an intelligence agency.

by Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:02 pm
Rhodesialund wrote:Velkanika wrote:That's not what I meant by recruited. I meant they recruited Manning as an intelligence source to provide them with Top Secret information on topics that interested them. Manning was a HUMANINT source for Wikileaks, by which I mean he was a spy. Not all spies are paid for the information they deliver, some of them do it for ideological reasons or are manipulated into doing it. Wikileaks as a point of fact did establish contact with Manning and convinced him to send them classified documents damaging to the United States, just like any number of traitors who have passed information to the Chinese, Russians, Israelis, Cubans, and almost every country on earth with an intelligence agency.
Hold on, let me slam my face into the desk in an effort to display my reaction to Weapons-Grade Derp within your statement.
Okay, now let's go over this again. Manning was never recruited by Wikileaks, nor is there any evidence to suggest that he did. He was never contacted by Wikileaks in the first place. Manning went onto Wikileaks' IRC/Jabber network of his own volition after hearing of Wikileaks unleash the 9/11 Pager Messages in 2009. Even the USCJ said that there was no evidence that Manning was recruited by Wikileaks.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1

by Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:59 pm
Velkanika wrote:Ok, then he recruited himself and my understanding of events was incorrect. That honestly makes my opinion of her drop somewhat below where it was because it means she was not manipulated into betraying her country and instead voluntarily did so. As an American my response to that is simple: How dare she.


by The Technocratic Syndicalists » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:55 pm
| SDI AG Arcaenian Military Factbook | Task Force Atlas International Freedom Coalition |

by Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:06 pm
The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:I'd be more comfortable with wikileaks if Assange wasn't an obvious SVR stooge. I won't be surprised if in the near future one of Assange's drinks mysteriously has a lethal dose of polonium-210 when Putin realizes he's outlived his usefulness.

by Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:45 pm
Rhodesialund wrote:The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:I'd be more comfortable with wikileaks if Assange wasn't an obvious SVR stooge. I won't be surprised if in the near future one of Assange's drinks mysteriously has a lethal dose of polonium-210 when Putin realizes he's outlived his usefulness.
lolno
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1

by Rhodesialund » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:18 am
Velkanika wrote:Rhodesialund wrote:
lolno
At this point, the evidence is pretty clear regarding Wikileaks being a tool of Russian soft power influence. The most obvious sign of this being the fact that Wikileaks has focused almost exclusively on information damaging to NATO members and the West when there is no lack of similarly interesting information coming out of Russia. On top of that, Assange is known to openly hate the United States and has made comments to the effect of wanting to embarrass and diminish out status as a superpower. Wikileaks is quite literally a self-declared enemy of the United States.

Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Innovative Ideas
Advertisement