NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Warships, Batch 3

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:35 am

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:
Pharthan wrote:10/10 would reenlist to serve on USS Shippy McShipface

That cap though, dank as hell. <.<

I dunno. I mean, it definitely up there with USS Frank Cable but...

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:56 am

My post still open for critiques
Last edited by Theodosiya on Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
Pharthan
Minister
 
Posts: 2969
Founded: Feb 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pharthan » Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:40 pm

Theodosiya wrote:Scrap all my previous plan. I'll start to design a corvette first. The basis would be either SIGMA 9813/9814 or Buyan. It will have OTOBREDA 127mm gun, Mk 41 VLS, 2 Bofors 40mm or Oerlikon 35mm gun or Mk44 Bushmaster, 2x3 torpedo launcher, one or two Goalkeeper CIWS. Electronics, CMS and engine undecided. Opinions and suggestions appreciated.

Sigma looks pretty big for a 'vette, but sure. I'd personally recommend a missile-based CIWS if you can mount it, but the VLS can double for that and your CIWS choices aren't bad - though you could also go for a smaller main gun like a 76mm and have it double as CIWS as well; might be better for a corvette. You're not exactly going to be trying to use it for a lot of lengthy combat or extensive landing-forces support (maybe small ops, though), anyway, might as well make the ship more defensible imo.

Also recommend some mine-warfare capabilities.
Last edited by Pharthan on Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

"Humanity is a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"Besides, if God didn't want us making glowing fish and insect-resistant corn, the building blocks of life wouldn't be so easy for science to fiddle with." - Dracoria

Why haven't I had anything new in my storefront for so long? This is why. I've been busy.

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:13 pm

Rhodesialund wrote:
Velkanika wrote:How about that time they recruited Pvt. Manning as an agent who they directed to steal top secret data from the Department of State? They recruited their own spy, so I think that counts as stealing.


Nope, you are confusing Wikileaks with Guardian, who hired Manning.

I haven't heard that version of events, where did you hear that claim?

Theodosiya wrote:Scrap all my previous plan. I'll start to design a corvette first. The basis would be either SIGMA 9813/9814 or Buyan. It will have OTOBREDA 127mm gun, Mk 41 VLS, 2 Bofors 40mm or Oerlikon 35mm gun or Mk44 Bushmaster, 2x3 torpedo launcher, one or two Goalkeeper CIWS. Electronics, CMS and engine undecided. Opinions and suggestions appreciated.

Corvettes don't need more than one gun if they have missiles, so I suggest giving it a 3.75" gun on the bow, a CIWS of some kind aft of the engine exhausts, ESM/ECM on a unified mast with the radar, and scrap the torpedo launchers because you don't have the tonnage or deck space to have those and everything else. You can compensate by loading SUBROC in the VLS.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24991
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:15 pm

A 95 mm gun? <.< >.>

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:08 pm

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:A 95 mm gun? <.< >.>

A 30mm gun is great if you plan on fighting Boghammers, but you really need more explosive power if you want to disable or sink something like another corvette or even a small cargo ship. Missiles are good and all, but sometimes HE-Frag shellfire is the best option, especially in the situations where corvettes excel.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24991
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:30 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:A 95 mm gun? <.< >.>

A 30mm gun is great if you plan on fighting Boghammers, but you really need more explosive power if you want to disable or sink something like another corvette or even a small cargo ship. Missiles are good and all, but sometimes HE-Frag shellfire is the best option, especially in the situations where corvettes excel.

I was just noting that a 95 mm caliber is one that almost nobody uses. <.< It's almost Italian.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:55 am

Use 76mm Super Rapid Gun and one Goalkeeper. Might make another version for Mining ship.

So :

Name : Smersh-class Corvette
Weapons :
-1x Otobreda Super Rapid 76mm Gun
-2x Bushmaster Mk44 Autocannon, manual.
-1x Goalkeeper CIWS
-6x Cells of Mk41 VLS. Loadout undecided.
-2 x triple B515 launchers
Sensors, Decoy, ESM & ECM :

(WIP, need advice on what radar, sensors, etc.)
Last edited by Theodosiya on Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16912
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:25 am

Theodosiya wrote:Use 76mm Super Rapid Gun and one Goalkeeper. Might make another version for Mining ship.

So :

Name : Smersh-class Corvette
Weapons :
-1x Otobreda Super Rapid 76mm Gun
-2x Bushmaster Mk44 Autocannon, manual.
-1x Goalkeeper CIWS
-6x Cells of Mk41 VLS. Loadout undecided.
-2 x triple B515 launchers
Sensors, Decoy, ESM & ECM :

(WIP, need advice on what radar, sensors, etc.)


Well, judging by how I do corvettes, I would use a multifunction radar, one that can work as both air search, surface search and navigation radar all in one - radars are expensive and the last thing you want is an expensive corvette. If you put sonar on it or not depends on if you want it to hunt subs or not.
As for Decoys, I would go with a Multi-Ammunition Softkill System for a start and then something for less advanced missiles, like chaff.
That's how I would start it. I am sure, that there are other opinions on it as well.
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:34 am

The Selkie wrote:
Theodosiya wrote:Use 76mm Super Rapid Gun and one Goalkeeper. Might make another version for Mining ship.

So :

Name : Smersh-class Corvette
Weapons :
-1x Otobreda Super Rapid 76mm Gun
-2x Bushmaster Mk44 Autocannon, manual.
-1x Goalkeeper CIWS
-6x Cells of Mk41 VLS. Loadout undecided.
-2 x triple B515 launchers
Sensors, Decoy, ESM & ECM :

(WIP, need advice on what radar, sensors, etc.)


Well, judging by how I do corvettes, I would use a multifunction radar, one that can work as both air search, surface search and navigation radar all in one - radars are expensive and the last thing you want is an expensive corvette. If you put sonar on it or not depends on if you want it to hunt subs or not.
As for Decoys, I would go with a Multi-Ammunition Softkill System for a start and then something for less advanced missiles, like chaff.
That's how I would start it. I am sure, that there are other opinions on it as well.

Tell me some of the best radar, decoys and sonar manufacturer. And now i also wanted a ASUW variant. (ASUW, Mine-Warfare, General Purpose)
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16912
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:50 am

Theodosiya wrote:
The Selkie wrote:
Well, judging by how I do corvettes, I would use a multifunction radar, one that can work as both air search, surface search and navigation radar all in one - radars are expensive and the last thing you want is an expensive corvette. If you put sonar on it or not depends on if you want it to hunt subs or not.
As for Decoys, I would go with a Multi-Ammunition Softkill System for a start and then something for less advanced missiles, like chaff.
That's how I would start it. I am sure, that there are other opinions on it as well.

Tell me some of the best radar, decoys and sonar manufacturer. And now i also wanted a ASUW variant. (ASUW, Mine-Warfare, General Purpose)


That could be a little bit of a problem, as I usually work out my own systems and specifications...
As for the variants: Why not make it a general purpose corvette and include ASW-capabilities and mine-warfare capabilities into those?
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:57 am

The Selkie wrote:
Theodosiya wrote:Tell me some of the best radar, decoys and sonar manufacturer. And now i also wanted a ASUW variant. (ASUW, Mine-Warfare, General Purpose)


That could be a little bit of a problem, as I usually work out my own systems and specifications...
As for the variants: Why not make it a general purpose corvette and include ASW-capabilities and mine-warfare capabilities into those?

Won't it be too expensive?
And i plan to use RL system coz i want it to be semi realistic.
Last edited by Theodosiya on Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:08 am

Velkanika wrote:
Rhodesialund wrote:
Nope, you are confusing Wikileaks with Guardian, who hired Manning.

I haven't heard that version of events, where did you hear that claim?


http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/the-guardian-hires-chelsea-manning-202383
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/10/the-guardian-hires-convicted-wikileaks-soldier.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/chelsea-manning-joins-the-guardian-as-contributing/


Like I said, you confused Wikileaks with Guardian. Manning was never hired by Wikileaks, ever. Wikileaks also doesn't pay people to leak information to them. It's done by the leaker's own volition.
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16912
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:10 am

Theodosiya wrote:
The Selkie wrote:
That could be a little bit of a problem, as I usually work out my own systems and specifications...
As for the variants: Why not make it a general purpose corvette and include ASW-capabilities and mine-warfare capabilities into those?

Won't it be too expensive?
And i plan to use RL system coz i want it to be semi realistic.


I would say no, simply because of one thing: What do you think is cheaper - three ships of the same kind or variations of the same vessel, one mine-warfare, one ASW, one general purpose?
Both in development, acquisition and upkeep, mind you. I would say, the three mass-produced vessels win this one.

As far as I know, I am doing a relatively good job at keeping it realistic as well, despite my custom systems (and me not being an engineer). I believe, that it depends on the RPer and the one, who works it out as part of his Navy/Storefront and from where he works (Wikipedia in my case).
Except for The Ship Which May Not Be Named, but that's a different story (don't ask).
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:49 am

Alright, GP corvette. Still, using RL systems means more proven capability.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16912
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:05 am

Theodosiya wrote:Alright, GP corvette. Still, using RL systems means more proven capability.


If you use RL-equipment or not is a choice depending on your own preferences, I guess.
I don't and I am not bad with it, I would say. Mostly. ;)
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:56 am

Rhodesialund wrote:
Velkanika wrote:I haven't heard that version of events, where did you hear that claim?


http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/the-guardian-hires-chelsea-manning-202383
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/10/the-guardian-hires-convicted-wikileaks-soldier.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/chelsea-manning-joins-the-guardian-as-contributing/


Like I said, you confused Wikileaks with Guardian. Manning was never hired by Wikileaks, ever. Wikileaks also doesn't pay people to leak information to them. It's done by the leaker's own volition.

That's not what I meant by recruited. I meant they recruited Manning as an intelligence source to provide them with Top Secret information on topics that interested them. Manning was a HUMANINT source for Wikileaks, by which I mean he was a spy. Not all spies are paid for the information they deliver, some of them do it for ideological reasons or are manipulated into doing it. Wikileaks as a point of fact did establish contact with Manning and convinced him to send them classified documents damaging to the United States, just like any number of traitors who have passed information to the Chinese, Russians, Israelis, Cubans, and almost every country on earth with an intelligence agency.

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:
Velkanika wrote:A 30mm gun is great if you plan on fighting Boghammers, but you really need more explosive power if you want to disable or sink something like another corvette or even a small cargo ship. Missiles are good and all, but sometimes HE-Frag shellfire is the best option, especially in the situations where corvettes excel.

I was just noting that a 95 mm caliber is one that almost nobody uses. <.< It's almost Italian.

I missed this, but you're right. I use 3.75" for my NS navy because it's so weird and forgot for a minute that I wasn't working on my own stuff.
Last edited by Velkanika on Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:45 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Rhodesialund wrote:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/the-guardian-hires-chelsea-manning-202383
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/10/the-guardian-hires-convicted-wikileaks-soldier.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/chelsea-manning-joins-the-guardian-as-contributing/


Like I said, you confused Wikileaks with Guardian. Manning was never hired by Wikileaks, ever. Wikileaks also doesn't pay people to leak information to them. It's done by the leaker's own volition.

That's not what I meant by recruited. I meant they recruited Manning as an intelligence source to provide them with Top Secret information on topics that interested them. Manning was a HUMANINT source for Wikileaks, by which I mean he was a spy. Not all spies are paid for the information they deliver, some of them do it for ideological reasons or are manipulated into doing it. Wikileaks as a point of fact did establish contact with Manning and convinced him to send them classified documents damaging to the United States, just like any number of traitors who have passed information to the Chinese, Russians, Israelis, Cubans, and almost every country on earth with an intelligence agency.


Hold on, let me slam my face into the desk in an effort to display my reaction to Weapons-Grade Derp within your statement.


Okay, now let's go over this again. Manning was never recruited by Wikileaks, nor is there any evidence to suggest that he did. He was never contacted by Wikileaks in the first place. Manning went onto Wikileaks' IRC/Jabber network of his own volition after hearing of Wikileaks unleash the 9/11 Pager Messages in 2009. Even the USCJ said that there was no evidence that Manning was recruited by Wikileaks.
Last edited by Rhodesialund on Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:02 pm

Rhodesialund wrote:
Velkanika wrote:That's not what I meant by recruited. I meant they recruited Manning as an intelligence source to provide them with Top Secret information on topics that interested them. Manning was a HUMANINT source for Wikileaks, by which I mean he was a spy. Not all spies are paid for the information they deliver, some of them do it for ideological reasons or are manipulated into doing it. Wikileaks as a point of fact did establish contact with Manning and convinced him to send them classified documents damaging to the United States, just like any number of traitors who have passed information to the Chinese, Russians, Israelis, Cubans, and almost every country on earth with an intelligence agency.


Hold on, let me slam my face into the desk in an effort to display my reaction to Weapons-Grade Derp within your statement.


Okay, now let's go over this again. Manning was never recruited by Wikileaks, nor is there any evidence to suggest that he did. He was never contacted by Wikileaks in the first place. Manning went onto Wikileaks' IRC/Jabber network of his own volition after hearing of Wikileaks unleash the 9/11 Pager Messages in 2009. Even the USCJ said that there was no evidence that Manning was recruited by Wikileaks.

Ok, then he recruited himself and my understanding of events was incorrect. That honestly makes my opinion of her drop somewhat below where it was because it means she was not manipulated into betraying her country and instead voluntarily did so. As an American my response to that is simple: How dare she.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:59 pm

Velkanika wrote:Ok, then he recruited himself and my understanding of events was incorrect. That honestly makes my opinion of her drop somewhat below where it was because it means she was not manipulated into betraying her country and instead voluntarily did so. As an American my response to that is simple: How dare she.


As an American, I'm 50/50 when it comes to whistleblowers and Wikileaks. They do the good deeds in blowing the lid off of things that many governments and people would never admit to the public. I also sometimes find them bad in the fact that they can put US operatives and lives at risk overseas. Gotta take the good with the bad. :meh:
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:55 pm

I'd be more comfortable with wikileaks if Assange wasn't an obvious SVR stooge. I won't be surprised if in the near future one of Assange's drinks mysteriously has a lethal dose of polonium-210 when Putin realizes he's outlived his usefulness.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:06 pm

The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:I'd be more comfortable with wikileaks if Assange wasn't an obvious SVR stooge. I won't be surprised if in the near future one of Assange's drinks mysteriously has a lethal dose of polonium-210 when Putin realizes he's outlived his usefulness.


lolno
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:45 pm

Rhodesialund wrote:
The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:I'd be more comfortable with wikileaks if Assange wasn't an obvious SVR stooge. I won't be surprised if in the near future one of Assange's drinks mysteriously has a lethal dose of polonium-210 when Putin realizes he's outlived his usefulness.


lolno

At this point, the evidence is pretty clear regarding Wikileaks being a tool of Russian soft power influence. The most obvious sign of this being the fact that Wikileaks has focused almost exclusively on information damaging to NATO members and the West when there is no lack of similarly interesting information coming out of Russia. On top of that, Assange is known to openly hate the United States and has made comments to the effect of wanting to embarrass and diminish out status as a superpower. Wikileaks is quite literally a self-declared enemy of the United States.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:18 am

Velkanika wrote:
Rhodesialund wrote:
lolno

At this point, the evidence is pretty clear regarding Wikileaks being a tool of Russian soft power influence. The most obvious sign of this being the fact that Wikileaks has focused almost exclusively on information damaging to NATO members and the West when there is no lack of similarly interesting information coming out of Russia. On top of that, Assange is known to openly hate the United States and has made comments to the effect of wanting to embarrass and diminish out status as a superpower. Wikileaks is quite literally a self-declared enemy of the United States.


You obviously haven't been around long enough to see what documents and stuff Wikileaks has released against Russia in the past. :eyebrow:
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
The Normal House
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Oct 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Normal House » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:23 am

I landlocked

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Innovative Ideas

Advertisement

Remove ads