NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Warships, Batch 3

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:33 pm

United Earthlings wrote:
Velkanika wrote:Nuclear technology is one of the few things in the US that is classified at birth. There's really not a whole lot available on the topic, even from the 60s.


While, I do tend to find the boring bits fascinating, since I never intend to build a reactor, I'm fine with those parts staying classified, especially considering for what's relevant to NS quite of bit of material can be found that is publically available, if your internal research assistant is strong that is in its determination to dig through endless hours of source material that will even at times contradict one another.

Honestly, I don't think you have to say anything at all, because at the rate all these private corporations and government entities are being hacked and their data stolen, add in the fact that more and more government employees clearly don't understand the classified coding system in use. Given enough time with the way things are going, no one's going to be using the word secret or classified anymore, they’ll have lost their meaning. :roll:

The Obama administration has actually cracked down heavily on leaks of any kind. Barring the items Wikileaks stole while acting as a non-state actor intelligence agency with a hardon for anti-Americanism, there have been comparatively few leaks of Top Secret information.

I expect President Clinton to crack down just as heavily given the content of her speeches on the issue of leaks.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Fri Oct 21, 2016 7:45 pm

Velkanika wrote:The Obama administration has actually cracked down heavily on leaks of any kind. Barring the items Wikileaks stole while acting as a non-state actor intelligence agency with a hardon for anti-Americanism, there have been comparatively few leaks of Top Secret information.

I expect President Clinton to crack down just as heavily given the content of her speeches on the issue of leaks.


Actually, Wikileaks didn't steal. They are a distributor, not a hacker group. They rely on stuff given to them.
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:18 pm

Rhodesialund wrote:
Actually, Wikileaks didn't steal. They are a distributor, not a hacker group. They rely on stuff given to them.


They're fed hacked emails by the Kremlin which are then published by their pet, I mean asset, Assange. Although the middling cybersecurity awareness of the DNC and HRC's camapign means it probably wasn't that hard to acquire anyways. Having read through chunks the emails pretty much all of them are fairly mundane and don't contain anything of national security importance unless risotto recipes are somehow code for our nuclear launch codes. The the only real "smoking gun" would be obvious evidence of collusion between journalists/media outlets and the HRC campaign which isn't illegal and shouldn't be surprising to anyone who's been following the election since the primaries.

Anyways the only thing I'm really interested in knowing about naval reactors when it comes to NS relevance is the thermal power output and either the thermal efficiency and/or the electrical power generation capability which isn't classified and/or can be reasonably well guessed using publicly available information. For most reactors the thermal output and shaft horsepower are readily available, it's the electrical power generation capability on top of that's that a bit more mysterious. According to Parthan the electrical power generation capability of the A4W is a quarter of the shaft power (shaft power is 140,000shp or ~100MW) which puts electrical generation capability at ~25 MW. The A4W is supposedly 550 MWth, with 125MW of output that gives it an efficiency of ~23%. For comparison most land based reactors are around 30-33% efficient. I'm currently using molten salt cooled reactors for my ships which at a coolant temp of 900 C have an efficiency of around 45% for a land based power-plant, applying the efficiency drop for a naval reactor (which trades efficiency for compactness) then gives me an efficiency of 45*(23/30) = 34.5%.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:44 pm

The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:
Rhodesialund wrote:
Actually, Wikileaks didn't steal. They are a distributor, not a hacker group. They rely on stuff given to them.


They're fed hacked emails by the Kremlin which are then published by their pet, I mean asset, Assange. Although the middling cybersecurity awareness of the DNC and HRC's camapign means it probably wasn't that hard to acquire anyways. Having read through chunks the emails pretty much all of them are fairly mundane and don't contain anything of national security importance unless risotto recipes are somehow code for our nuclear launch codes. The the only real "smoking gun" would be obvious evidence of collusion between journalists/media outlets and the HRC campaign which isn't illegal and shouldn't be surprising to anyone who's been following the election since the primaries.


Ehhh, it's pointed to the collusion. Plus to the intelligence of Hillary in several snippets. Kinda surprising that she had the intelligence of a turnip. :eek:
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:13 pm

This thread is about warships, not turnips.
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:19 pm

Triplebaconation wrote:This thread is about warships, not turnips.


We are through the looking glass here folks. It's not lizard aliens from outer space trying to take us over, it's those fucking turnips that are trying to set the course for world domination. This changes every... FUCKING... THING!!! :eek:
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals


User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:55 pm

So the new british SSBN will be named the Dreadnought class. The new american SSBN on the other hand will be named the Columbia class.

The bongs get a lot of hate but you can't deny they beat Americans when it comes to naming navy vessels.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:00 pm

The turnip theory is closer to the truth than xe knows...

Anyway, nuclear reactor info isn't super top-secret (some is), nor is it public domain. It's its own thing. A lot of formerly public information was scrubbed from the web in the 2004 paranoia rampage.

I think there's one verified inboard profile of a nuclear warship out there? Plus the A1B photos.
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:01 pm

Rhodesialund wrote:
Velkanika wrote:The Obama administration has actually cracked down heavily on leaks of any kind. Barring the items Wikileaks stole while acting as a non-state actor intelligence agency with a hardon for anti-Americanism, there have been comparatively few leaks of Top Secret information.

I expect President Clinton to crack down just as heavily given the content of her speeches on the issue of leaks.


Actually, Wikileaks didn't steal. They are a distributor, not a hacker group. They rely on stuff given to them.

How about that time they recruited Pvt. Manning as an agent who they directed to steal top secret data from the Department of State? They recruited their own spy, so I think that counts as stealing.

The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:So the new british SSBN will be named the Dreadnought class. The new american SSBN on the other hand will be named the Columbia class.

The bongs get a lot of hate but you can't deny they beat Americans when it comes to naming navy vessels.

Nah, they just recycle the same 40 or so verbs over and over again. At least we've still got some new names to throw out there every so often.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
United States of PA
Senator
 
Posts: 4325
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of PA » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:04 pm

Still need to build a battleship named Montana.......
In other words, conservatives are generous with their own money, and liberals are generous with other peoples money.
"I object and take exception to everyone saying that Obama and Congress are spending money like a drunken sailor. As a former drunken sailor, I quit when I ran out of money." ~ Unknown
"See, it doesn't matter how many people you have, how old your civilization is, or any such tripe. We're still the by-God US of A and we will seriously bitch slap you so hard your ancestors going back millenia will feel it if you piss us off."

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:04 pm

Velkanika wrote:Nah, they just recycle the same 40 or so verbs over and over again. At least we've still got some new names to throw out there every so often.


I mean we do the dame thing, except our ship/sub names are pretty much all either cities, states, or people.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:09 pm

I'm not sure the RN uses many verbs???

Columbia is quite good, scoring well on irony and neoclassicism. It only seems lame because America has lost its culture.

"Britannia owns her Independent Reign,
Hibernia, Scotia, and the Realms of Spain;
And Great Germania’s ample Coast admires
The generous Spirit that Columbia fires.
Auspicious Heaven shall fill with fav’ring Gales,
Where e’er Columbia spreads her swelling Sails:
To every Realm shall Peace her Charms display,
And Heavenly Freedom spread her gold Ray."
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:14 pm

Triplebaconation wrote:I'm not sure the RN uses many verbs???

Columbia is quite good, scoring well on irony and neoclassicism. It only seems lame because America has lost its culture.


It's specifically named after the district of Columbia. Somewhat mundane for something designed to inflict thermonuclear judgement on the enemies of FREEDOM.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:19 pm

The District of Columbia is named after the personification of the United States as a warrior goddess.
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:37 pm

Triplebaconation wrote:The District of Columbia is named after the personification of the United States as a warrior goddess.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/StatuePacificCemetery.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/American_progress.JPG
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/Puck_cover2.jpg

Columbia is my favorite personification of the United States.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:47 pm

Triplebaconation wrote:The District of Columbia is named after the personification of the United States as a warrior goddess.


I'm aware Columbia was/is the goddess-like female personification of the United States, I don't recall the warrior part.

Dreadnought is definitely a better name though. It's literal meaning of "fear not" is fitting for a ballistic missile submarine.

Now I'm wondering if they're going to make enough W88s to equip the entire US and british SSBN force. IIRC most Trident d%'s still carry the W76.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:07 pm

The Technocratic Syndicalists wrote:
Triplebaconation wrote:The District of Columbia is named after the personification of the United States as a warrior goddess.


I'm aware Columbia was/is the goddess-like female personification of the United States, I don't recall the warrior part.

Dreadnought is definitely a better name though. It's literal meaning of "fear not" is fitting for a ballistic missile submarine.

Now I'm wondering if they're going to make enough W88s to equip the entire US and british SSBN force. IIRC most Trident d%'s still carry the W76.


The British don't use W88, so there would be no reason to make enough to equip both the US and British forces. Given that the warheads are handled separately under separate procurement and refurbishment programs and no new missiles are planned, it's unlikely anything will change. All they're building are new submarines.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
The Technocratic Syndicalists
Minister
 
Posts: 2118
Founded: May 27, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Technocratic Syndicalists » Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:18 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
The British don't use W88, so there would be no reason to make enough to equip both the US and British forces. Given that the warheads are handled separately under separate procurement and refurbishment programs and no new missiles are planned, it's unlikely anything will change. All they're building are new submarines.


Yeah I remember now that Britain is stuck with the W76.

Trident D5 LE is supposed to remain in service until 2042 while Columbia is supposed to serve from the 2030s until the 2080s, thus it would be getting get a new missile, say a "Trident III" , only ~10 years into its service life. Who knows though, maybe they'll just keep making new D5s until forever.
SDI AG
Arcaenian Military Factbook
Task Force Atlas
International Freedom Coalition


OOC: Call me Techno for Short
IC: The Kingdom of Arcaenia

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:27 pm

Isn't the literal meaning of Dreadnought "dread nought?"

I imagine HMS Dreadnought sounded fairly silly when it was launched, as those not particularly interested in Royal Navy history would have associated the name with raincoats.
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:36 am

Scrap all my previous plan. I'll start to design a corvette first. The basis would be either SIGMA 9813/9814 or Buyan. It will have OTOBREDA 127mm gun, Mk 41 VLS, 2 Bofors 40mm or Oerlikon 35mm gun or Mk44 Bushmaster, 2x3 torpedo launcher, one or two Goalkeeper CIWS. Electronics, CMS and engine undecided. Opinions and suggestions appreciated.
Last edited by Theodosiya on Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:03 am, edited 3 times in total.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:57 am

Velkanika wrote:
Rhodesialund wrote:
Actually, Wikileaks didn't steal. They are a distributor, not a hacker group. They rely on stuff given to them.

How about that time they recruited Pvt. Manning as an agent who they directed to steal top secret data from the Department of State? They recruited their own spy, so I think that counts as stealing.


Nope, you are confusing Wikileaks with Guardian, who hired Manning.
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:32 am

United States of PA wrote:Still need to build a battleship named Montana.......

Still waiting on USS Nebraska.

Honestly I feel that America can make good ship names, the problem is that there are so many navy vessels now that there aren't enough good names to go around.

User avatar
Pharthan
Minister
 
Posts: 2969
Founded: Feb 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pharthan » Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:17 am

Triplebaconation wrote:The turnip theory is closer to the truth than xe knows...

Anyway, nuclear reactor info isn't super top-secret (some is), nor is it public domain. It's its own thing. A lot of formerly public information was scrubbed from the web in the 2004 paranoia rampage.

I think there's one verified inboard profile of a nuclear warship out there? Plus the A1B photos.

Wait, there are photos of an A1B?
Photos, honestly, will not tell you much.

In the US, reactor info falls under ITAR. It's Confidential, so only one step above NOFORN. Enough to get you jailed and could damage national security if disclosed, but not "serious" damage.

Western Pacific Territories wrote:
United States of PA wrote:Still need to build a battleship named Montana.......

Still waiting on USS Nebraska.

Honestly I feel that America can make good ship names, the problem is that there are so many navy vessels now that there aren't enough good names to go around.

10/10 would reenlist to serve on USS Shippy McShipface
Last edited by Pharthan on Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

"Humanity is a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
"Besides, if God didn't want us making glowing fish and insect-resistant corn, the building blocks of life wouldn't be so easy for science to fiddle with." - Dracoria

Why haven't I had anything new in my storefront for so long? This is why. I've been busy.

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24991
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:20 am

Pharthan wrote:
Western Pacific Territories wrote:Still waiting on USS Nebraska.

Honestly I feel that America can make good ship names, the problem is that there are so many navy vessels now that there aren't enough good names to go around.

10/10 would reenlist to serve on USS Shippy McShipface

That cap though, dank as hell. <.<

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Innovative Ideas

Advertisement

Remove ads