NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Warships, Batch 3

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Oct 30, 2016 12:43 am

Pharthan wrote:
Laritaia wrote:
if you pretty much always have aircraft parked onto of it you may as well not have it, on top of that the interaction between the forward aircraft lift and a second bow catapult would be less then desirable, further reducing it's usability.

Then there is the fact that the forward port CIWS would have to be relocated somewhere else along with the forward most weapons lift.

If you need all three cats to launch planes, then you just move more aircraft aft. You already can't use the waist cat if you're landing planes, so you just move aircraft into position in the landing-strip, ready to be moved quickly if need be.
Planes can be moved.


i'm sure they can

however a third catapult on the bow still doesn't fit

also none of the catapults are operable while landing planes so that's irrelevant
Last edited by Laritaia on Sun Oct 30, 2016 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 30, 2016 6:58 am

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Theodosiya wrote:So, a light, a medium and a heavy frigate?


There is no answer to this question.

It depends on your needs and your budget. Many nations have several categories of frigate ranging from small general purpose ones for basic patrol work all the way up to complex anti-air frigates that cost well over a billion dollars each.

Something that could face at least flotilla of Russian corvettes and frigates.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:37 am

Theodosiya wrote:Something that could face at least flotilla of Russian corvettes and frigates.


That's a rather unreasonable requirement. To expect a single ship to be able to defeat multiple opposing ships of roughly similar size and capability.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:42 am

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Theodosiya wrote:Something that could face at least flotilla of Russian corvettes and frigates.


That's a rather unreasonable requirement. To expect a single ship to be able to defeat multiple opposing ships of roughly similar size and capability.

2-3 ships. Quality vs quantity.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
EsToVnIa
Senator
 
Posts: 4779
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby EsToVnIa » Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:48 am

2-3 ships > just 1 ship
Most Heavenly State/Khamgiin Tengerleg Uls

Weeaboo Gassing Land wrote:Also, rev up the gas chambers.

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:CUNT

12:02:02 AM <Tarsas> premislyd is my spirit animal tbh

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:51 am

I mean, the capability of whatever new ships are better than average. 1 ships with capability of two.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:53 am

Theodosiya wrote:
The Akasha Colony wrote:
That's a rather unreasonable requirement. To expect a single ship to be able to defeat multiple opposing ships of roughly similar size and capability.

2-3 ships. Quality vs quantity.


It doesn't really work that way. Multiple ships have an inherent advantage in search capabilities and coverage. There are more of them. They can cover more ground.

As it stands, even a very small ship with anti-ship missiles can threaten a much larger ship. There is no real way to do anything about this. A 2,000 tonne missile corvette can threaten a 5,000+ tonne frigate. The frigate might have slightly better missile countermeasures, but it will never be totally "safe" from the smaller ship. Even a 10,000 tonne Burke would not be totally safe.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Oct 30, 2016 9:01 am

Alright then. The designs of my ships, while western, will retain at least some Russian holdover. Like, more than one CIWS, several different classes and subclasses from corvs to cruisers(Simplified, though). Budget, overall, 2% of GDP. Navy got sizeable funding, larger than airforce but smaller than army. SO, 2 corvettes sizes, 3 frigate sizes, one destroyer type, 3 cruisers type (2 "conventional Russian, one aviation based on improved Kusnetzov/Liaoning) [New ships type. For now, i use old Soviet hardware upgraded with western stuff]
Last edited by Theodosiya on Sun Oct 30, 2016 9:04 am, edited 2 times in total.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Greater Aryan Race
Senator
 
Posts: 4378
Founded: Mar 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Greater Aryan Race » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:26 am

Theodosiya wrote:Alright then. The designs of my ships, while western, will retain at least some Russian holdover. Like, more than one CIWS, several different classes and subclasses from corvs to cruisers(Simplified, though). Budget, overall, 2% of GDP. Navy got sizeable funding, larger than airforce but smaller than army. SO, 2 corvettes sizes, 3 frigate sizes, one destroyer type, 3 cruisers type (2 "conventional Russian, one aviation based on improved Kusnetzov/Liaoning) [New ships type. For now, i use old Soviet hardware upgraded with western stuff]

Seems a bit too complicated, why not plump for an all-NATO navy? Or, if you're insistent on having a mix of Russian/Western hardware, go procure some Indian warships like Kolkata.
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?

Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

This nation is now IC-ly known as the Teutonic Reich.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:28 am

The USSR few influence are in ships design.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
Lamoni
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9041
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Lamoni » Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:35 am

You likely won't have the money to spend on multiple classes of corvettes, frigates, etc. Thus, you're going to have to have general purpose ships, instead of specialized ships (which works far better with NATO naval doctrine, than Soviet). This also means that you'd likely have one class of corvette, one class of frigate, one class of destroyer, one class of Cruiser, etc.
National Anthem
Resides in Greater Dienstad. (Former) Mayor of Equilism.
I'm a Senior N&I RP Mentor. Questions? TG me!
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."


Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.


Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.

Part of the Meow family in Gameplay, and a GORRAM GAME MOD! My TGs are NOT for Mod Stuff.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:06 am

Works for me. Maximize on capability, then. Frigates will be large, DZP/Horizon based. Destroyers, bastardized AB-Atago-Sejong, 165m. Cruisers, Kirov based, slightly enlarged. Aircraft Carrier, Enlarged, CATOBAR capable Kuzny.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:28 am

Lamoni wrote:You likely won't have the money to spend on multiple classes of corvettes, frigates, etc. Thus, you're going to have to have general purpose ships, instead of specialized ships (which works far better with NATO naval doctrine, than Soviet). This also means that you'd likely have one class of corvette, one class of frigate, one class of destroyer, one class of Cruiser, etc.


Multiple classes are actually cheaper. A single high-performance class gets very expensive to field in sufficient quantities especially at smaller sizes. This is why most NATO navies with the exception of the United States operate multiple different classes of frigate geared toward different purposes. Even the British got put off by the cost of the Type 26 and converted the last five to the theoretically cheaper Type 31 program. The Soviets did this too, and even the USN did this until the introduction of Burke and the retirement of the old Spruances which ended the USN ASW destroyer line.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Chezzetcook
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Apr 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Chezzetcook » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:48 am

The Dominion of Chezzetcook, being an isolated island nation in the North Atlantic Ocean maintains a strong naval presence to ensure a secure and strong trade network upon which it relies for survival.

History
With the transition in 1902 of the former Colony of Chezzetcook into a self-ruling Dominion it was determined to that the island nation would require a naval force for self defense. With assistance from the Royal Navy. The Navy Act of 1907 established the basis for how the Chezzetcook Navy was to be formed, and in 1911 the Chezzetcook Navy received its first two warships: The former Royal Navy Edgar class Protected Cruisers Royal Arthur and Crescent.

In 1913 the Chezzetcook Naval Service was officially renamed the Royal Chezzetcook Navy with royal patronage from King George V.

By the end of WW2 the RCN primarily consisted of Destroyers, Minesweepers, and Corvettes acquired from either the British or Americans. As well, from 1944 until early 1946 the RCN provided the crew to a single RN Ruler class escort carrier. The end of WW2 and the start of tensions between the USSR and the former Western Allies led the RCN to reconsider its place in the world. In 1947 the RCN purchased the uncompleted HMS Leviathan and had her completed to a modified standard with an angled flight deck. Entering service after delays in 1958 as HMCS Acadia, she would serve for 35 years until paid off in 1993. Acadia was retained by the Chezzetcook government as a national museum, and can be visited by the public.

In 1980 the RCN recieved budgetary approval for an extensive plan to rebuild its naval capability. Tensions with the USSR and an upsurge in national pride led to a decade of revision in the RCN. Commitments to provide escorts to allied fleets were cut while a greater emphasis on the submarine force and the provision of a RCN battlegroup were pushed. The replacement for HMCS Acadia was determined at this time, with the decision to build a modified American Sea Control Ship design in greater numbers instead of a single ship. Manning restraints forced the move to a smaller, less capable carrier due to a parliamentary decree instructing the RCN to be able to provide a continuous battlegroup presence, forcing the requirement of two or three ships instead of one.

Current Ships:
Aircraft Carriers: Known as Annapolis or River Class.
- HMCS Annapolis, Commissioned 1991.
- HMCS Chezzetcook, Commissioned 1993.
- HMCS Gaspereau, Commissioned 1994.

Cruisers: Known as Island Class, destroyers or frigates in other navies.
- HMCS Ile Royale, Commissioned 2005.
- HMCS Tancook, Commissioned 2007.
- HMCS Sable, Commissioned 2009.

Destroyers: Known as Town Class.
- HMCS Truro, Commissioned 1986.
- HMCS Bridgewater, Commissioned 1987.
- HMCS Yarmouth, Commissioned 1987.
- HMCS Kentville, Commissioned 1988.
- HMCS Windsor, Commissioned 1988.
- HMCS Pictou, Commissioned 1989.
- HMCS Sherbrooke, Commissioned 1989.
- HMCS Havre Boucher, Commissioned 1990.

Corvettes: Known as Royal Class, ships unnamed, primarily mine countermeasure vessels.
- K180, Commissioned 1995.
- K181, Commissioned 1995.
- K182, Commissioned 1996.
- K183, Commissioned 1996.
- K184, Commissioned 1996.
- K185, Commissioned 1997.

Submarines: Known as Victoria Class, the last two boats were purchased for spares from the RN after removal from RN service and are not active.
- HMCS Victoria, Commissioned 1994.
- HMCS Elizabeth, Commissioned 1995.
- HMCS Anne, Commissioned 1996.
- HMCS Mary, Commissioned 1997.
- HMCS Ursula, Acquired 2002.
- HMCS Unicorn, Acquired 2002.

Support Vessels:
- Two 160 tonne Fire boats.
- Four 250 tonne Tug boats.
- Four 50 tonne tug boats.
- Two 200 tonne training boats.
- HMCS St. Mary, Operated by Naval Reserve, commissioned 1976.
- HMCS Provider, Commissioned 1992.
- HMCS Preserver, Commissioned 1994.

Fleet Air Arm:
The RCN operates fixed and rotary wing aircraft in support of maritime operations both locally and on board ships. It has the following inventory:

Fixed Wing:
- 52 AV-8B+ Harrier II (Designated CFA8 In RCN service).
- 8 TAV-8B Harrier II (Designated CT8 In RCN service).
- 9 P3 Orion Maritime Patrol (Designated CP112 In RCN Service).
- 5 Learjet 60 (Designated CC160 in RCN Service).
- 7 Embraer Tucano (Designated CT9 in RCN Service)

Helicopters:
- 22 AW101 Merlin (Designated CH132 in RCN service).
- 36 AS565 Panther (Designated CH165 in RCN service).

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:13 pm

Chezzetcook wrote:
The Dominion of Chezzetcook, being an isolated island nation in the North Atlantic Ocean maintains a strong naval presence to ensure a secure and strong trade network upon which it relies for survival.

History
With the transition in 1902 of the former Colony of Chezzetcook into a self-ruling Dominion it was determined to that the island nation would require a naval force for self defense. With assistance from the Royal Navy. The Navy Act of 1907 established the basis for how the Chezzetcook Navy was to be formed, and in 1911 the Chezzetcook Navy received its first two warships: The former Royal Navy Edgar class Protected Cruisers Royal Arthur and Crescent.

In 1913 the Chezzetcook Naval Service was officially renamed the Royal Chezzetcook Navy with royal patronage from King George V.

By the end of WW2 the RCN primarily consisted of Destroyers, Minesweepers, and Corvettes acquired from either the British or Americans. As well, from 1944 until early 1946 the RCN provided the crew to a single RN Ruler class escort carrier. The end of WW2 and the start of tensions between the USSR and the former Western Allies led the RCN to reconsider its place in the world. In 1947 the RCN purchased the uncompleted HMS Leviathan and had her completed to a modified standard with an angled flight deck. Entering service after delays in 1958 as HMCS Acadia, she would serve for 35 years until paid off in 1993. Acadia was retained by the Chezzetcook government as a national museum, and can be visited by the public.

In 1980 the RCN recieved budgetary approval for an extensive plan to rebuild its naval capability. Tensions with the USSR and an upsurge in national pride led to a decade of revision in the RCN. Commitments to provide escorts to allied fleets were cut while a greater emphasis on the submarine force and the provision of a RCN battlegroup were pushed. The replacement for HMCS Acadia was determined at this time, with the decision to build a modified American Sea Control Ship design in greater numbers instead of a single ship. Manning restraints forced the move to a smaller, less capable carrier due to a parliamentary decree instructing the RCN to be able to provide a continuous battlegroup presence, forcing the requirement of two or three ships instead of one.

Current Ships:
Aircraft Carriers: Known as Annapolis or River Class.
- HMCS Annapolis, Commissioned 1991.
- HMCS Chezzetcook, Commissioned 1993.
- HMCS Gaspereau, Commissioned 1994.

Cruisers: Known as Island Class, destroyers or frigates in other navies.
- HMCS Ile Royale, Commissioned 2005.
- HMCS Tancook, Commissioned 2007.
- HMCS Sable, Commissioned 2009.

Destroyers: Known as Town Class.
- HMCS Truro, Commissioned 1986.
- HMCS Bridgewater, Commissioned 1987.
- HMCS Yarmouth, Commissioned 1987.
- HMCS Kentville, Commissioned 1988.
- HMCS Windsor, Commissioned 1988.
- HMCS Pictou, Commissioned 1989.
- HMCS Sherbrooke, Commissioned 1989.
- HMCS Havre Boucher, Commissioned 1990.

Corvettes: Known as Royal Class, ships unnamed, primarily mine countermeasure vessels.
- K180, Commissioned 1995.
- K181, Commissioned 1995.
- K182, Commissioned 1996.
- K183, Commissioned 1996.
- K184, Commissioned 1996.
- K185, Commissioned 1997.

Submarines: Known as Victoria Class, the last two boats were purchased for spares from the RN after removal from RN service and are not active.
- HMCS Victoria, Commissioned 1994.
- HMCS Elizabeth, Commissioned 1995.
- HMCS Anne, Commissioned 1996.
- HMCS Mary, Commissioned 1997.
- HMCS Ursula, Acquired 2002.
- HMCS Unicorn, Acquired 2002.

Support Vessels:
- Two 160 tonne Fire boats.
- Four 250 tonne Tug boats.
- Four 50 tonne tug boats.
- Two 200 tonne training boats.
- HMCS St. Mary, Operated by Naval Reserve, commissioned 1976.
- HMCS Provider, Commissioned 1992.
- HMCS Preserver, Commissioned 1994.

Fleet Air Arm:
The RCN operates fixed and rotary wing aircraft in support of maritime operations both locally and on board ships. It has the following inventory:

Fixed Wing:
- 52 AV-8B+ Harrier II (Designated CFA8 In RCN service).
- 8 TAV-8B Harrier II (Designated CT8 In RCN service).
- 9 P3 Orion Maritime Patrol (Designated CP112 In RCN Service).
- 5 Learjet 60 (Designated CC160 in RCN Service).
- 7 Embraer Tucano (Designated CT9 in RCN Service)

Helicopters:
- 22 AW101 Merlin (Designated CH132 in RCN service).
- 36 AS565 Panther (Designated CH165 in RCN service).

This is a very well done navy on the smaller side. You've still got a rather impressive force by real world standards, but you have room for improvement. Three jump carriers is exactly where you want to be, but you might want to get a line of replacement destroyers into construction as your 80s-buld warships will be getting rather worn out after 30 years of service. You also might want another tanker if you're planning on expeditionary warfare, and expect to have to take your entire navy along if you're going to fight a competent adversary like Argentina in the South Atlantic War of 1983.
Last edited by Velkanika on Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
Kyiozo
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Aug 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Kyiozo » Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:15 pm


User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:48 pm

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/p ... 95.ch2.pdf

Yes.

A nuclear midget submarine.

And information on it is declassified.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:08 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395/MR1395.ch2.pdf

Yes.

A nuclear midget submarine.

And information on it is declassified.


Yes, the most hated sub in the entire US Navy.
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:10 pm

Personally I always found it to be adorable.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14157
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Akasha Colony » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:19 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1395/MR1395.ch2.pdf

Yes.

A nuclear midget submarine.

And information on it is declassified.


It was never all that secret given that it was used for scientific research and was basically a testbed. Rickover wanted a whole series of midget submarine testbeds but Congress refused to fund any more.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16929
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:19 am

Good morning,
I have a question, which might seem a bit weird, but since we are talking about warships, we might as well have something cute along the way as well: Ship's cats.
My idea is to have a ship's cat on my vessels and shore installations even in MT both for combatting evildoers and pests, as well as a morale factor for the crew. It sounds like a good idea to me, but that of course begs the question, what is done by modern navies to achieve exactly the same thing and how well that works.
So.... thoughts?
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25608
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:27 am

The Selkie wrote:Good morning,
I have a question, which might seem a bit weird, but since we are talking about warships, we might as well have something cute along the way as well: Ship's cats.
My idea is to have a ship's cat on my vessels and shore installations even in MT both for combatting evildoers and pests, as well as a morale factor for the crew. It sounds like a good idea to me, but that of course begs the question, what is done by modern navies to achieve exactly the same thing and how well that works.
So.... thoughts?


Meanwhile, on the Kuznetsov...

Image
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16929
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:48 am

Allanea wrote:
The Selkie wrote:Good morning,
I have a question, which might seem a bit weird, but since we are talking about warships, we might as well have something cute along the way as well: Ship's cats.
My idea is to have a ship's cat on my vessels and shore installations even in MT both for combatting evildoers and pests, as well as a morale factor for the crew. It sounds like a good idea to me, but that of course begs the question, what is done by modern navies to achieve exactly the same thing and how well that works.
So.... thoughts?


Meanwhile, on the Kuznetsov...

Image


Okay, Kuznetsov and some civilian vessels notwithstanding, as far as I know, navies by now banned the ship's cat. At least the RN did, as far as I know. Hence my question.
I am not sure, if the cats in the picture are regular parts of the crew, though.
Last edited by The Selkie on Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25608
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:14 am

The Russian Navy does not ban the ship's cat.

Ship's cats and other onboard pets are authorized on a case-by-case basis by the vessel's captain and most surface combatants of the Russian Navy have them.

I don't know, "the second largest navy in the world" seems like a pretty big exception to me.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
The Selkie
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16929
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby The Selkie » Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:23 am

Allanea wrote:The Russian Navy does not ban the ship's cat.

Ship's cats and other onboard pets are authorized on a case-by-case basis by the vessel's captain and most surface combatants of the Russian Navy have them.

I don't know, "the second largest navy in the world" seems like a pretty big exception to me.


So they are still in use with larger navies? (That sounds weird.)
I thought, that most did as the RN did. I am currently imagining a cat sitting on a rack of bombs or something on the flight deck of some USN-carrier, something like this, only a century later.
I play PT, MT and a bit FT. I am into character-RPs.
My people are called the Selkie, the nation is usually called the Free Lands in MT-settings. Thanks.

Silverport Dockyards Ltd.: Storefront - Catalogue

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: New Osea

Advertisement

Remove ads