I guess the navy designed it then :^)
Advertisement
by Gondolaulus » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:42 am
by Dostanuot Loj » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:00 am
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:Although FAMAS had a switch that allowed trained troops to ignore 3rd burst and just go with a SEF fire selector, while conscripts got theirs pinned to S-1-3.
by The Soodean Imperium » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:07 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:The Akasha Colony wrote:
The draft/professional status of the US military has never been a factor in choosing rifle firing modes.
The M16A1 was fielded when the US still had an active draft and was fully automatic. The M14 was also introduced as an automatic weapon while the US had a drafted force.
The M16A2 which introduced the burst-fire mode was introduced after the US transitioned to an all-volunteer force and ended the draft.
The US still has an all-volunteer force and brought back fully automatic fire with M4A1.
you're probably right but a factor in going with burst over auto was real or perceived ammo wasting which would probably happen more with conscripts than with professional
by Questers » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:17 am
by Stasnov » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:52 am
Puzikas wrote:"Wanna know how I got these scars?"- Gorby probably
Yalos wrote:"Nazi Germany lost WW2 because it thought like an NS player"
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:37 am
Gallia- wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Newt Gingrich said that any federal employee who voted Dem should be fired.
Luckily, no-one cares what he thinks.
More worrying is the dismissal of all US ambassadors without replacement. This leaves the US without diplomatic ties to any country, including ones where the relationship is very sensitive. It also suggests that Trump would want to fill all ambassadorial positions with idealogues and lackies - Ivanka has apparently expressed interest in becoming the US ambassador to the Czech Republic.
What the fuck? You realize that the bulk of American European/NATO ambassadorships are literally gifts to campaign donors, right? Those people weren't "dismissed", they voluntarily resigned. Why? Because that's the tradition that happens when a new administration comes into office. The only reason you're surprised is because you were like 14 when Obama got elected the first time and all of Bush's political appointments resigned or got ass destroyed and told to leave when the new ambassador arrives.
Wait, let me list Obama's campaign donor ambassadorships and let's see if we can piece together which ones Trump is going to replace:
- Argentina
- Austria
- Belgium
- Canada
- Costa Rica
- Czech Republic
- Dominican Republic
- Finland
- France/Monaco
- Germany
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Morocco
- New Zealand/Samoa
- Portugal
- Singapore
- Spain/Andorra
- Switzerland/Liechtenstein
- United Kingdom
- UN/Geneva
- UN/HRC
- UNESCO
Trump didn't gut the civil service, instead a bunch of people decided to resign. For the time being, the charge d'affairs of the American embassies, invariably a competent Foreign Service Officer, runs these embassies until Trump has rewarded his campaign's donors with ambassadorships to European allies. The major difference is that Trump is promoting people based less on their campaign donations and more on their perceived loyalty or outsider status from Big Money and the Beltway, but that's the same sort of nepotism that you see in American political appointments anyway so who_cares.
It's literally irrelevant because the ambassador's job is to be a pinstriped cookie pusher. He takes pictures with leaders, drinks tea, and generally is useless. The FSOs and any other other Civil Service officers do the heavy lifting/actual work behind the scenes.
Besides, Trump can't be much worse than Obama was. He appointed a fucking soap opera producer as the ambassador of Hungary.
http://www.npr.org/2014/02/12/275897092 ... appointees
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Chezzetcook » Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:59 am
by Stasnov » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:00 am
Puzikas wrote:"Wanna know how I got these scars?"- Gorby probably
Yalos wrote:"Nazi Germany lost WW2 because it thought like an NS player"
by Gallia- » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:53 am
Questers wrote:tfw youre a thalassocracy but the army manages to persuade everyone the navy are all gays
by Allanea » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:04 am
The actual Soviet Union decided to replace SKS with AK-47 (pre-AKM). And they made this decision not long after the SKS came into service.
This was at a time when the Soviet Army was entirely composed of conscripts and Stalin was still in power and had resumed his paranoid purges.
If anything, a fully automatic option is more attractive for poorly trained forces because it lets them compensate for poor marksmanship with a greater volume of fire, though as in the US military there will be many other perceptions and motives circling around in the decision-making process.
by Gondolaulus » Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:37 am
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:03 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Saint Fedski » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:23 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm fully aware that it's common for ambassadors to be dismissed at the end of their term.
It's usually common for them to have replacements lined up and ready to go, and for some - perhaps those with children - to be permitted to remain in their posts for a time to make arrangements for their families.
To my understanding, there has been a blanket dismissal with very few replacements already available.
by The Corparation » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:29 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:gangs in the military wat
i realize this is old news but i expected recruitment to be more selective lol
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Gallia- » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:47 am
The Corparation wrote:DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:gangs in the military wat
i realize this is old news but i expected recruitment to be more selective lol
It's impractical to do anything beyond a basic criminal background check for every person that enlists.if someone is in a gang but still has a clean record there isn't really a surefire fast and easy way to stop them from enlisting.
by The Soodean Imperium » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:57 am
Gondolaulus wrote:Just open some schools of marksmanship where people can get firearms training (for free!) in the evenings or so.
I mean, it kind of does the job.
by Austrasien » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:00 pm
Chezzetcook wrote:Is a 120mm mortar like the RT F1 a viable replacement for light pack howitzers for airborne forces? Or would it be good to retain a few howitzers for light forces as well.
This would be primarily for airborne forces focused on operating against other light and irregular forces at rapid notice, not against peer mechanized troops.
by Gallia- » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:03 pm
by Prosorusiya » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:15 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Gondolaulus wrote:Just open some schools of marksmanship where people can get firearms training (for free!) in the evenings or so.
I mean, it kind of does the job.
No, it's really more like "if you give your conscripts 3 to 4 months' regular infantry training, they will shoot about as well as a professional rifleman."
Though Prosorusiya's original post was about calling up emergency reservists who left the army five-plus years ago; I'm not sure how quickly marksmanship ability would atrophy in civilian life, or how well occasional reservist refresher courses would preserve it.
by Austrasien » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:17 pm
by Prosorusiya » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:27 pm
by Husseinarti » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:49 pm
Stasnov wrote:Does anyone know the legit Russian/Soviet tactical call sign scheme or system, if there is one?
Prosorusiya wrote:Ok, I'll probably do that then, and have my mobilized troops more resemble 1950s Soviet squads with AKMs (unmodernized, no folding stock), and RPD\PD's for fire support. That way, if I had to rearm my Internal Troops\3rd Line Troops they wouldn't have to take too much of a downgrade in terms of weaponry. I'm less worried about running out of ammo, that's fairly easy to produce, even if it's low quality, and I always have Russia to supply me if needed.
Speaking of mobilization in wartime: what kind of trucks that are common in Russia could be easily conscripted in during wartime? Are Ural 357s and Zil-131s/-157s still common or would the models be used.
Also, for further clarification I RP the MT era, but my tech level is about the same militarily as it was under the Soviet Union in 1990, as we are meant to be in a Ukraine like position where we haven't invested much in the military and are somewhat poor (but getting richer).
by Gallia- » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:52 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: British Georgia, Kractero, Shahi Bengal
Advertisement