Advertisement
by Gallia- » Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:13 pm
by Padnak » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:29 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by Purpelia » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:53 am
by Kassaran » Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:47 am
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:Tristan noticed footsteps behind him and looked there, only to see Eric approaching and then pointing his sword at the girl. He just blinked a few times at this before speaking.
"Put that down, Mr. Eric." He said. "She's obviously not a chicken."
by Purpelia » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:35 am
by Yes Im Biop » Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:52 am
Purpelia wrote:It's random question time.
Effectiveness of unguided rocket artillery for the purposes of counter battery fire on the modern battlefield when facing mechanized artillery forces?
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by United Earthlings » Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:56 am
Keskinen wrote:Question/wild idea for everyone?
How feasible would navalising a JAS-39E/F for use on a Kitty Hawk-class aircraft carrier? I ask because I just realized I hadn't overhauled my naval aircraft section yet and am looking for something to change over to from the mid-80's US-standard F-14/A-7/EA-6/S-3 set up when I "de-Americanised" my factbooks.
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:34 am
United Earthlings wrote:For example, if I only prioritized cost per flight hour as the determining factor to choose the best fighter in the world
by Keskinen » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:44 am
Gallia- wrote:United Earthlings wrote:For example, if I only prioritized cost per flight hour as the determining factor to choose the best fighter in the world
Then you'd realize Saab is lying in most of their promotional brochures.
The fact that the SwAF can't maintain a reliable QRA force is testament to this.
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:51 am
by Keskinen » Mon Jul 03, 2017 3:25 pm
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 3:53 pm
by Purpelia » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:04 pm
Keskinen wrote:Depends on whether or not they keep spotting "phantom Russian submarines" off their coast again. I haven't heard anything in a while but it sounded like they were kicking themselves for removing airborne ASW capability.
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:05 pm
Purpelia wrote:What are they going to do about it? Sink a Russian sub
by Purpelia » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:07 pm
by The Akasha Colony » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:09 pm
Purpelia wrote:Keskinen wrote:Depends on whether or not they keep spotting "phantom Russian submarines" off their coast again. I haven't heard anything in a while but it sounded like they were kicking themselves for removing airborne ASW capability.
I don't really see why they'd care. I mean, say its all true and that Putin did just brazenly violate their border. What are they going to do about it? Sink a Russian sub and start WW3? Un bloody likely. The most that'd happen is a stern protest and some meaningless posturing. So they ain't loosing nothing.
And besides Sweden literally voted to gave up their right to self defense in 1980.
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 5:12 pm
Purpelia wrote:Repeat after me: The atomic holocaust is not your friend.
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:03 pm
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:09 pm
by Gallia- » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:15 pm
Nuclear-armed anti-ship missiles (as the RBS-15 is believed to have such a non-conventional option capability), as well as nuclear-armed torpedoes, would primarily have been targeted at naval transportation.
by -AlEmAnNiA- » Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:44 pm
by Purpelia » Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:50 pm
by Gallia- » Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:50 pm
by Purpelia » Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:59 pm
Gallia- wrote:lmao landlocked
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Ammmericaaaa, Hals Chonland, Lushansk
Advertisement