NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultancy Thread Mk X Purps Safe Space

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Arthurista
Minister
 
Posts: 2312
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arthurista » Fri May 19, 2017 7:07 am

Hi, I'm planning a VBSS raid on a defended cargo ship on the high seas, and I want to do a stealthy approach if possible. Is it possible for me to approach with a SDV, or should I stick to helicopters or surface boats?

If the latter, can Very Slender Vessels survive in rough sea conditions?

If I approach from below, rather than by helicopter, what's the fastest way for the team to board? I imagine some kind of grappling hook system is the normal way to do it?


User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Fri May 19, 2017 7:32 am

Arthurista wrote:Hi, I'm planning a VBSS raid on a defended cargo ship on the high seas, and I want to do a stealthy approach if possible. Is it possible for me to approach with a SDV, or should I stick to helicopters or surface boats?

If the latter, can Very Slender Vessels survive in rough sea conditions?

If I approach from below, rather than by helicopter, what's the fastest way for the team to board? I imagine some kind of grappling hook system is the normal way to do it?


An SDV would find it nearly impossible to catch or even keep up with a cargo ship, especially on the high seas. It might be possible if it were at anchor, but if the ship is under way then helicopters and fast boats are really the only way, and helicopters are a bit safer.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3519
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Fri May 19, 2017 1:20 pm

How good was the Centurion tank in the post-war world? How did it compare to some of its contemporaries?

I'm thinking about fluffing out my 1950s military for a RP I've contemplating and the Centurion sure looks good, but I was wondering if this thread might have some thoughts on using the Centurion?
Last edited by Onekawa-Nukanor on Fri May 19, 2017 1:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Fri May 19, 2017 1:35 pm

Onekawa-Nukanor wrote:How good was the Centurion tank in the post-war world? How did it compare to some of its contemplaries?

I'm thinking about fluffing out my 1950s military for a RP I've contemplating and the Centurion sure looks good.

Probably one of/the best in the world until 1960 or so, but a lot of its reputation came from the great crews in them rather than its cardinal qualities
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Arthurista
Minister
 
Posts: 2312
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arthurista » Fri May 19, 2017 2:32 pm

Onekawa-Nukanor wrote:How good was the Centurion tank in the post-war world? How did it compare to some of its contemporaries?

I'm thinking about fluffing out my 1950s military for a RP I've contemplating and the Centurion sure looks good, but I was wondering if this thread might have some thoughts on using the Centurion?


Other NATO armies were using Leo 1s, AMX-30s and M-60A3s until the early-90s. 105mm Centurions with decent upgrades could probably have remained competitive until then. In the 50s it was the western MBT par excellence.

User avatar
Federated Kingdom of Prussia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 149
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Federated Kingdom of Prussia » Fri May 19, 2017 2:33 pm

How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Fri May 19, 2017 2:35 pm

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?


on a wider strategic level?

not much

citizen soldiers

memes

etc etc

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Fri May 19, 2017 2:36 pm

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?

If the words of actual Marines are to go by: Alot. I read a book awhile ago by a Marine Lt. who served in Anbar, who mentioned that despite all the training his platoon performed, it was worth nothing compared to having combat experience.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri May 19, 2017 2:41 pm

Western Pacific Territories wrote:
Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?

If the words of actual Marines are to go by: Alot. I read a book awhile ago by a Marine Lt. who served in Anbar, who mentioned that despite all the training his platoon performed, it was worth nothing compared to having combat experience.

Tbh, I have to doubt that; there are plenty of cases of "battle-hardened" militias getting the ever-loving shit kicked out of them by trained armies with less combat-experience.

Granted, a lot of that probably comes down to equipment superiority, but there are still lots of cases of inferior forces of trained soldiers either defeating or inflicting disproportionate damage against superior forces of combat-experienced (but not necessarily well-trained) militaries, paramilitaries, and militias.
Last edited by United Muscovite Nations on Fri May 19, 2017 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri May 19, 2017 3:05 pm

Experience is a good thing in a narrow sense that it makes you better at something, but it doesn't make you better at all things always.

How you learn to do the task and the experience you have with the task is good so long as you're doing the task well. If you learn and practice in a wrong, or suboptimal way, that can be to your disadvantaged.

The parallels should be obvious.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Fri May 19, 2017 3:16 pm

Questers wrote:Experience is a good thing in a narrow sense that it makes you better at something, but it doesn't make you better at all things always.

How you learn to do the task and the experience you have with the task is good so long as you're doing the task well. If you learn and practice in a wrong, or suboptimal way, that can be to your disadvantaged.

The parallels should be obvious.

^ From the grave

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri May 19, 2017 3:49 pm

Also:

In the wake of anti-CSA stuff in the US this week or whatever, some revisionist anti-RE Lee articles comnig out. Lots of it lies. Sad!
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Fri May 19, 2017 6:15 pm

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?


Well is possible to achieve a high-level of professionalism in armies without much or any combat experience it is very difficult for these forces to innovate and they tend to lag behind more experienced force in tactics and technology. Canadian-Ukrainian military cooperation has from what I hear been quite informative for both sides; the Ukrainian army is experienced with contemporary Russian tactics but unprofessional, the Canadian army is highly professional but has no shooting war experience at all.
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

User avatar
Arthurista
Minister
 
Posts: 2312
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arthurista » Fri May 19, 2017 7:49 pm

Austrasien wrote:
Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?


Well is possible to achieve a high-level of professionalism in armies without much or any combat experience it is very difficult for these forces to innovate and they tend to lag behind more experienced force in tactics and technology. Canadian-Ukrainian military cooperation has from what I hear been quite informative for both sides; the Ukrainian army is experienced with contemporary Russian tactics but unprofessional, the Canadian army is highly professional but has no shooting war experience at all.


So I imagine what combat experience the Canadians gained in Afghanistan isn't all that applicable in an environment with opposing tanks and arty?

User avatar
Rhodesialund
Minister
 
Posts: 2221
Founded: Nov 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesialund » Fri May 19, 2017 8:19 pm

Arthurista wrote:
Austrasien wrote:
Well is possible to achieve a high-level of professionalism in armies without much or any combat experience it is very difficult for these forces to innovate and they tend to lag behind more experienced force in tactics and technology. Canadian-Ukrainian military cooperation has from what I hear been quite informative for both sides; the Ukrainian army is experienced with contemporary Russian tactics but unprofessional, the Canadian army is highly professional but has no shooting war experience at all.


So I imagine what combat experience the Canadians gained in Afghanistan isn't all that applicable in an environment with opposing tanks and arty?


COIN and infantry experience. Plus IED/MRAP experience too. About the basic gist of it no?
Name: Valintina/Tina
Bio: President Donald Trump's Concubine
Occupation: Turning Men into Transsexuals

User avatar
Arthurista
Minister
 
Posts: 2312
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arthurista » Sat May 20, 2017 8:14 am

Does anyone know much about the development of British armoured reconnaissance late-60s to 80s? What was the point of having the Scorpion, Scimitar, Sabre and Fox all tasked with roughly the same roles?

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25545
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Sat May 20, 2017 8:22 am

Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:How much does actual combat experience matter in modern, first-world armies?


It's the difference between reading about engineering in a textbook and then actually doing engineering in real life. You can be a competent mathematician in both cases, but you're going to still make a lot of bad mistakes when it comes to bending metal if you don't have much practical understanding of machining.

Like Viky said, it drives innovation. Sure it's easy enough to say "oh look at UAVs", but until you know how they're used in combat, it's hard to verify if your memes are valuable.

Arthurista wrote:
Austrasien wrote:
Well is possible to achieve a high-level of professionalism in armies without much or any combat experience it is very difficult for these forces to innovate and they tend to lag behind more experienced force in tactics and technology. Canadian-Ukrainian military cooperation has from what I hear been quite informative for both sides; the Ukrainian army is experienced with contemporary Russian tactics but unprofessional, the Canadian army is highly professional but has no shooting war experience at all.


So I imagine what combat experience the Canadians gained in Afghanistan isn't all that applicable in an environment with opposing tanks and arty?


It's applicable if you only ever intend to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan?

User avatar
Kekonistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Mar 22, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kekonistan » Sat May 20, 2017 9:21 am

Trenches still viable yes/no?
★ In Support of Assad ★
Shia muslim, in favor of secularism, social conservatism, economical pragmatism. Axis of Resistance.

User avatar
North Arkana
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8867
Founded: Dec 16, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby North Arkana » Sat May 20, 2017 9:25 am

Kekonistan wrote:Trenches still viable yes/no?

A hasty slit trench is always viable. The effort on a full on system may not be.

SHOVELS.
https://youtu.be/fzs_dYE6MjA
"I don't know everything, just the things I know"

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10829
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Crookfur » Sat May 20, 2017 9:26 am

Arthurista wrote:Does anyone know much about the development of British armoured reconnaissance late-60s to 80s? What was the point of having the Scorpion, Scimitar, Sabre and Fox all tasked with roughly the same roles?

If you can find George fourty's scorpion book it pretty much lays out the entire CRV story.

Scorpion and similar were to work together shooting tanks and APCs respectively whilst Spartan carried dismount recce teams and surveillance radar, striker provided heavy AT overwatch and sultan coordinated everything.

Fox and given were for longer ranged stuff when roads were available, be a bit lighter and mote deployable and to provide recce for mechanized rather than armoured inf formations (IIRC but I'll double check).

Sabre came out of the retirement of fox and the realisation that the 76mm gun was now pretty useless so they stuck the better fix turrets on some of the better condition scorpion hulls. It was pretty much required due to the endless story of generally fuckery that was all the follow on recce programs that finally ended in Ajax SV. Fox got replaced with WMIKs and eventually jackel.

Prior to CRV recce was Saracens and saladins
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
Taviana SSR
Envoy
 
Posts: 269
Founded: Jul 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Taviana SSR » Sat May 20, 2017 9:33 am

Would WP be capable of setting residential housing on fire? Especially if delivered via artillery.

Also, how long would the smoke last in a common arty round?
General Secretary of the ★ COMINTERN ML ☭ - - - - Taviana SSR FACTBOOK
ЛЕНИН ЖИЛ, ЛЕНИН ЖИВ, ЛЕНИН БУДЕТ ЖИТЬ!

"Peace? Coexistence? What revisionist dogma is this? The capitalist pigs will fall!"

User avatar
Ardavia
Senator
 
Posts: 4732
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardavia » Sat May 20, 2017 9:37 am

Kekonistan wrote:Trenches still viable yes/no?


Image

that is to say

trenches are very useful for protecting yourself from shrapnel, bullets and other unpleasant things like that, and they are probably going to be dug if your troops have the time to do so, so yes they're viable
professional contrarian
for: whatever you are against
against: whatever you are for

User avatar
Kekonistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Mar 22, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kekonistan » Sat May 20, 2017 9:42 am

North Arkana wrote:
Kekonistan wrote:Trenches still viable yes/no?

A hasty slit trench is always viable. The effort on a full on system may not be.

SHOVELS.
https://youtu.be/fzs_dYE6MjA

That was the video that actually made me ask this question
★ In Support of Assad ★
Shia muslim, in favor of secularism, social conservatism, economical pragmatism. Axis of Resistance.

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Sat May 20, 2017 9:52 am

Taviana SSR wrote:Would WP be capable of setting residential housing on fire? Especially if delivered via artillery.


Very unlikely. Most houses do not have inflammable roofs.

WP particles have zero penetration so they cannot burn anything which is not directly exposed and there is very little combustion energy in the individual chunks that fall to the ground.
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Niwe England, Weltkria

Advertisement

Remove ads