go home billy yank
Advertisement
by Gallia- » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:37 am
by Gallia- » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:47 am
by Purpelia » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:50 am
by Korva » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:59 am
by Gallia- » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:02 am
Korva wrote:William "Ronson" Sherman's only crime was not burning more of the South.
by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:02 am
by Gallia- » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:03 am
by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:04 am
by Tekeristan » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:41 am
by Scandinavian Nations » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:55 am
Purpelia wrote:By having a way cooler flag ...
The Soodean Imperium wrote: basically AFAIK there's no real reason to choose SKS over AKM for reservists and militia.
by Allanea » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:02 am
Tekeristan wrote:How effective would a cargo container stuffed with explosives be as a bottom laying mine?
Probably for secretly laying into straits and stuff.
by Tekeristan » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:07 am
Allanea wrote:Tekeristan wrote:How effective would a cargo container stuffed with explosives be as a bottom laying mine?
Probably for secretly laying into straits and stuff.
The problem is that what you're proposing would cost more than a purpose-built mine once you finish adding in the price of the explosives, sensors, and all the other stuff needed.
by The Akasha Colony » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:12 am
Tekeristan wrote:Allanea wrote:
The problem is that what you're proposing would cost more than a purpose-built mine once you finish adding in the price of the explosives, sensors, and all the other stuff needed.
Mines are visually more 'giving' away than an occasional cargo crate in hostile straits.
Of course, I was thinking that the containers would have a signal receiver and a pulse GPS (sends, stops, waits.). Agents on shore keep an eye on things. Since the idea is to be selective in the targeting.
by Tekeristan » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:25 am
The Akasha Colony wrote:Tekeristan wrote:Mines are visually more 'giving' away than an occasional cargo crate in hostile straits.
Of course, I was thinking that the containers would have a signal receiver and a pulse GPS (sends, stops, waits.). Agents on shore keep an eye on things. Since the idea is to be selective in the targeting.
How do you propose to make GPS work underwater for a mine on the seafloor?
Or any other kind of communication? You'd have to use wires running to shore to connect the mines if you want to communicate with them, and that makes minelaying much more time consuming.
by The Akasha Colony » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:31 am
Tekeristan wrote:That's an excellent point I have not considered.
I suppose sending up a floater, but those could be spotted.. It could be disguised as floating debries, as it only needs to send a pulse or few to identify its relative position.
But then comes the issue off getting the signal of detonation to it.
I do suppose it doesn't matter too much if it hits a cargo ship or a military ship, as either helps with my objectives in my operations, but if if there's a way I am able to do such, the better. Since I'd imagine there's risks in sending in divers to pull cable across the floor of a flowing strait.
by Allanea » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:34 am
Tekeristan wrote:Allanea wrote:
The problem is that what you're proposing would cost more than a purpose-built mine once you finish adding in the price of the explosives, sensors, and all the other stuff needed.
Mines are visually more 'giving' away than an occasional cargo crate in hostile straits.
Of course, I was thinking that the containers would have a signal receiver and a pulse GPS (sends, stops, waits.). Agents on shore keep an eye on things. Since the idea is to be selective in the targeting.
by Gallia- » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:36 am
Questers wrote:I did a Gallan thing today. I replaced FV432 with a turretless Warrior. May God have mercy on my soul.
by Tekeristan » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:42 am
The Akasha Colony wrote:Tekeristan wrote:That's an excellent point I have not considered.
I suppose sending up a floater, but those could be spotted.. It could be disguised as floating debries, as it only needs to send a pulse or few to identify its relative position.
But then comes the issue off getting the signal of detonation to it.
I do suppose it doesn't matter too much if it hits a cargo ship or a military ship, as either helps with my objectives in my operations, but if if there's a way I am able to do such, the better. Since I'd imagine there's risks in sending in divers to pull cable across the floor of a flowing strait.
The simpler solution is just to do what modern mines can already do and include an acoustic listening device programmed with the acoustic signatures of target ships. Thus, the mine itself can discriminate between civilian and military ships, and even between specific classes of ship, and target only the ones you want.
You can even program them to let some ships slip by to make it appear that no minefield is present and then activate and engage at a later time or after a set number of ship when the enemy may be lulled into a false sense of security (although any reasonably alert enemy will be very wary of mines in any constrained passages they may be transiting).
And rather than making them just bundles of explosives, make them torpedo mines so that a single mine or handful of mines can cover a fairly wide area, significantly increasing the threat.
by Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:02 am
by The Akasha Colony » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:06 am
Tekeristan wrote:Well, that helps a lot!
In terms of torpedoes, the question is that since they're in a cargo container (since dropping undisguised mines will likely be harder to get away with), is how to disperse them. I do suppose that having GPS access would probably be helpful for that (guided torpedo mines), in which case, an underwater gps anchor might be quite helpful.
Automatic door release with a non-water proof container.. Paint the torpedoes sand colored.. Maybe a few magnetic?
@ Allanea
Floating into a hostile strait that's also surrounded by city to lay mines without any visual cover is probably along the lines of 'dangerous'.
Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 wrote:Much of the US State Department's leadership just resigned. Is this just the beginning of an exodus of government personnel who want nothing to do with the current administration? Even if it isn't, this doesn't bode well for the confidence government employees will have in their leadership.
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:28 am
Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 wrote:Much of the US State Department's leadership just resigned. Is this just the beginning of an exodus of government personnel who want nothing to do with the current administration? Even if it isn't, this doesn't bode well for the confidence government employees will have in their leadership.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Tumbra
Advertisement