
by Liberal-Finns » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:58 pm

by Des-Bal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:59 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Geilinor » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:03 pm

by BrightonBurg » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:04 pm


by Geilinor » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:08 pm

by Des-Bal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:08 pm
Geilinor wrote:You call her attractive?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:08 pm
Des-Bal wrote:ALREADY EXISTING THREAD ALREADY EXISTS

by Des-Bal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:10 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Meldaria » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:14 pm

by Israslovakahzerbajan » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:15 pm


Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:35 pm

by Meldaria » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:08 pm

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:21 pm
Meldaria wrote:Greater Rhodes wrote:As voted on by subscribers to the famous gentleman's magazine Homme Rhodien, the Sexiest Woman of 2009 in the magazine's January 2010 issue and the cover model for that issue, is none other than the nationally and critically acclaimed actress, model, and motorcycle aficionado Maëlle Jeannette Chemodanova- Photo Removed ~ Euro
- Photo Removed ~ Euro
Homme Rhodien's Runner Up: Bobsled athlete and political commentator Ms. Laura Isabel Reann
- Photo Removed ~ Euro
Do they do pronz?

by Kirhean Tribes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:57 pm

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:02 pm
Kirhean Tribes wrote:The attraction of soft and weak females confuses most Kirheans, we prefer women to be strong and just a bit dangerous. After all, if there is no danger what is the worth of pursuit?

by Kirhean Tribes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:30 pm

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:50 pm
Kirhean Tribes wrote:If the editor finds these females unattractive, then it is his "problem." They are, after all, human. I have simply chosen images from human sources, as we do not routinely produce images of our females or Third sex.
If it is not an imposition, I would ask the editor to clarify exactly which female is appalling and why. The strength both women portray is most appealing. The tone of their bodies shows great health, their expression shows underlying grace and high mental acuity...
They are clearly competent warriors and hunters, their children would grow strong and be an asset to our people. Any male should find them irresistible.

by Central Slavia » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:52 pm

Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:02 pm
Central Slavia wrote:http://www.lubovna.sk/index/photo/2007/14.12.2007.flash/JetPhotoView.swf
Name: Alena Kovarcikova
Age: 27
Job: Singer, and worker in OZaBa n.p. textile works in Banicov
She is also active in the Women' Union, ZRO (Unified Revolutionary Trade Unions) and is a waiter for Panslavic Communist Front (VKF) membership
On series of photographs,shown at the birthday of the Minister of Telecommunications and Internet , Ing. Ivan Pletnica.
At home, interviewed for Slovo Pracujucich

by Central Slavia » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:16 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:22 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:Greater Rhodes wrote:Kirhean Tribes wrote:If the editor finds these females unattractive, then it is his "problem." They are, after all, human. I have simply chosen images from human sources, as we do not routinely produce images of our females or Third sex.
If it is not an imposition, I would ask the editor to clarify exactly which female is appalling and why. The strength both women portray is most appealing. The tone of their bodies shows great health, their expression shows underlying grace and high mental acuity...
They are clearly competent warriors and hunters, their children would grow strong and be an asset to our people. Any male should find them irresistible.
If you would be so kind as to check, there is only one picture. The Editor-in-Chief, Mr. Jacobo Martine-Giraldi has this to say on why he finds that woman so utterly revolting:
"Despite my extensive travel, cultural knowledgeability, and adherence to cosmopolitanism, I believe that I speak for every Rhodian when I say that woman is simply repugnant. You see, whether one is homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual, most Rhodians lust for a woman who is feminine. One does not necessarily have to be born with beauty; beauty is how well one takes care of themselves and how well one showcases their feminine characteristics. How a woman does this may also be different to each Rhodian, but as long as a woman properly takes care of herself, there is no doubt that she will be found attractive and lusted for. Your unsightly female archetype, however, is too mannish. She has an abundance of wrinkles and a brash, uncouth look to herself which culminates in that mess she calls hair. As for the clothes, don't get me started. Furthermore, in her dirty, frail visage and her bony (but not femininely so) frame she has no evidence of being able to give birth to a strong Rhodian child, and neither does she give any evidence of being a competent hunter. I assure you she does not look as tough as half of the noble women which grace our lands, and I assure you even more so that any Rhodian woman who spent her whole life looking like that would die very, very lonely."
As a Gentleman of the Greater New Nicksyllvanian Empire, I wish to state that both of your countries woman are appalling and distasteful to fine, civilised men such as myself.
The samples from Greater Rhodes were coloured, scantily dressed, whores, the same sort of women you would find being peddling themselves in an alley of Nickograd rather then something you would want to represent your national values. While the sample from the Kirhean Tribes filled me with disgust, not only from the repulsive appearance, but also because their primitive culture seem to need women to be of sound body and mind in order to provide for their tribe. It is the mans duty to provide for the family, and any backwards state that fails to do so has nothing but contempt from the Nicksyllvanian populace. Indeed, pale skin, lean figure, and long hair signifying the lack of labour are what true signs of beauty are, proving to all men that witness the lady that they are well cared for by a Wealthy man and hence need not degrade themselves with menial tasks. I hope this settles this boorish argument.
Lord Federton vorn Hornscrowsky

by Central Slavia » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:29 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:
As a Gentleman of the Greater New Nicksyllvanian Empire, I wish to state that both of your countries woman are appalling and distasteful to fine, civilised men such as myself.
The samples from Greater Rhodes were coloured, scantily dressed, whores, the same sort of women you would find being peddling themselves in an alley of Nickograd rather then something you would want to represent your national values. While the sample from the Kirhean Tribes filled me with disgust, not only from the repulsive appearance, but also because their primitive culture seem to need women to be of sound body and mind in order to provide for their tribe. It is the mans duty to provide for the family, and any backwards state that fails to do so has nothing but contempt from the Nicksyllvanian populace. Indeed, pale skin, lean figure, and long hair signifying the lack of labour are what true signs of beauty are, proving to all men that witness the lady that they are well cared for by a Wealthy man and hence need not degrade themselves with menial tasks. I hope this settles this boorish argument.
Lord Federton vorn Hornscrowsky
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Kirhean Tribes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:40 pm
Greater Rhodes wrote:Kirhean Tribes wrote:If the editor finds these females unattractive, then it is his "problem." They are, after all, human. I have simply chosen images from human sources, as we do not routinely produce images of our females or Third sex.
If it is not an imposition, I would ask the editor to clarify exactly which female is appalling and why. The strength both women portray is most appealing. The tone of their bodies shows great health, their expression shows underlying grace and high mental acuity...
They are clearly competent warriors and hunters, their children would grow strong and be an asset to our people. Any male should find them irresistible.
If you would be so kind as to check, there is only one picture. The Editor-in-Chief, Mr. Jacobo Martine-Giraldi has this to say on why he finds that woman so utterly revolting:
"Despite my extensive travel, cultural knowledgeability, and adherence to cosmopolitanism, I believe that I speak for every Rhodian when I say that woman is simply repugnant. You see, whether one is homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual, most Rhodians lust for a woman who is feminine. One does not necessarily have to be born with beauty; beauty is how well one takes care of themselves and how well one showcases their feminine characteristics. How a woman does this may also be different to each Rhodian, but as long as a woman properly takes care of herself, there is no doubt that she will be found attractive and lusted for. Your unsightly female archetype, however, is too mannish. She has an abundance of wrinkles and a brash, uncouth look to herself which culminates in that mess she calls hair. As for the clothes, don't get me started. Furthermore, in her dirty, frail visage and her bony (but not femininely so) frame she has no evidence of being able to give birth to a strong Rhodian child, and neither does she give any evidence of being a competent hunter. I assure you she does not look as tough as half of the noble women which grace our lands, and I assure you even more so that any Rhodian woman who spent her whole life looking like that would die very, very lonely."

by Greater Rhodes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:44 pm
Central Slavia wrote:A Letter arrived from the ministry of Culture:
We agree to the request - Ms. Kovarcikova will be able to travel to Greater Rhodes to give the interview,.
We are proud that it has again been shown that despite lacking what the western nations call "show business", the culture and international presentation of our socialist state has no lack.
Perhaps a cultural exchange could be arranged with the Rhodian government to strengthen our ties and further improve the international image of our country, which slanderous tongues call a psychotic dictatorship based on unverified rumours?
Евгенний C. Цветликов , Minister of Culture


Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Urmanian, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement