Advertisement
by Maraque » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:46 am
by F1-Insanity » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:47 am
by Neo Israel » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:49 am
by Ostronopolis » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:59 am
by Rodrigues-Alves » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:25 am
by Ostronopolis » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:02 am
Fatatatutti wrote:"We have specific legislation which permits workers to take control of their workplace from the former non-working owners."
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:11 am
by Neo Israel » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:19 am
by Praetonia » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:21 am
Fatatatutti wrote:
"Theft" would imply that the prior ownership was legitimate. And since Fatatatutian culture has no strong tradition of individual property ownership at all, that kind of legitimacy is hard to establish. The possession-is-nine-points-of-the-law principle applies - those occupying the premises, using the tools, producing the goods, etc. have established considerable legitimacy.
-- Harmony Chang, President, Communist Party of Fatatatutti
by Amystris » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:22 am
by Lowell Leber » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:22 am
by Ostronopolis » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:23 am
Harmony Chang wrote:" "Theft" would imply that the prior ownership was legitimate. And since Fatatatutian culture has no strong tradition of individual property ownership at all, that kind of legitimacy is hard to establish. The possession-is-nine-points-of-the-law principle applies - those occupying the premises, using the tools, producing the goods, etc. have established considerable legitimacy."
by La Habana » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:32 am
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:57 am
Praetonia wrote:So if a worker takes their dividends from the co-op that they communally own and use it to buy tools which they rent to other workers, the other workers can take their tools away from them? That is exploitation, comrade.
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:04 am
Ostronopolis wrote:And how is an obtained factory or base of production using your own capital NOT having a legitimate base of ownership?
... I will say that your precept of the prior ownership having no legitimate right to actually own their property is thievery at best.
by Neo Israel » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:07 am
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:15 am
I'm highly successful, and I will not apologize for my methods.
by Big Brain City » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:20 am
The Big Brain wrote:Freedom? People are fools and unworthy of much freedom. Even I am a fool. Many people have recognized that and want me to suffer for it.
Unfortunately for them, I can glass their planets.
by Neo Israel » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:21 am
Fatatatutti wrote:
You're just procaliming that you earned the money legitimately. I said "IF it was NOT earned legitimately". If you exploited workers - e.g. if you underpaid them, made them work in unsafe conditions, polluted their environment, etc. - then you stole the money.I'm highly successful, and I will not apologize for my methods.
I never asked you to apologize. I just turned your factory over to more responsible owners.
And can you guys please unbunch your panties and stick to the topic?
-- Harmony Chang, President, Communist Party of Fatatatutti
by Danneland » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:27 am
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:38 am
Neo Israel wrote:I have never, in all my days, done anything dishonest by my workers. They are well paid, given fine benefits, and work in the best safety regulated conditions. I make sure of it.
That said, it is my company. I founded it, laid down the starting seed money, and I built it up by my husbandry of my resources.
If anybody tried to remove it from my control through a cowardly court slipknot, I would make it my personal goal to destroy that person, and I'm not in the least ashamed to say that.
by Neo Israel » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:43 am
Fatatatutti wrote:Then the workers would have little reason to want a change, would they? Our legislation is designed to encourage that kind of employer behaviour - and to remove employers who don't perform adequately. It's the ultimate in merit-based free enterprise.
And we still come back to the original question of how you obtained the seed money. If a thief gives you his loot, it is not legitimately yours.
There are eight billion of us.
-- Harmony Chang, President, Communist Party of Fatatatutti
by Praetonia » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:46 am
Fatatatutti wrote:Praetonia wrote:So if a worker takes their dividends from the co-op that they communally own and use it to buy tools which they rent to other workers, the other workers can take their tools away from them? That is exploitation, comrade.
Yes, renting tools to your own co-workers would be exploitation. A responsible worker-owner would vote to spend the money on communally-owned tools instead of distributing it as a dividend.
But the topic is about nationalization which has nothing to do with worker-controlled industries.
-- Harmony Chang, President, Communist Party of Fatatatutti
by Fatatatutti » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:54 am
Neo Israel wrote:You're no real concern, as no court would allow you to presume to enforce your laws on a Neo Israeli firm on Neo Israeli soil, and as there is no Beirut Pharmaceutical facility in your country, I have no cause to be worried.
by New Olwe » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:56 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: HarYan
Advertisement