by Kirhean Tribes » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:53 pm
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:00 pm
by Victorious Decepticons » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:02 pm
Newaswa wrote:What is the greatest threat to your nation?Vallermoore wrote:The Victorious Decepticons.Bluquse wrote:Imperialist, aggressive, and genociding aliens or interdimensional beings that would most likely slaughter or enslave us
rather than meet up to have a talk. :(TurtleShroom wrote:Also, like any sane, civilized nation, we always consider the Victorious Decepticons a clear, present, and obvious threat we must respect, honor, and leave alone in all circumstances. Always fear the Victorious Decepticons.
The Huskar Social Union wrote: ... massive empires of genocidal machines.
by Fatatatutti » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:08 pm
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:17 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:
Under no circumstances would any Fatatatutian commander ever use weapons of mass destruction, even if we had any. Anybody with such a lack of honour woulfd never get to a position of command.
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina
by Southland Sudan » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:26 pm
by Akosha » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:28 pm
Czardas wrote:Every political group supports Jesus and opposes Hitler, after all.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's asking the internet if she's stupid, then the answer is already obvious.
by Fatatatutti » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:31 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:So if a nation was invading your people, and destroying everything, literally driving your people to extinction, and you did have WMDs, you still would not use them?
by Imeriata » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:09 pm
Astralsideria wrote:You, sir, are the greatest who ever did set foot upon this earth. If there were an appropriate emoticon, I would take my hat off to you.
Altamirus wrote:^War! War! I want to see 18th century soldiers go up againist flaming cats! Do it Imeriata! Do it Now!
by The chrisman union » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:25 pm
Shebu wrote: 9 out of 10 times when you have a Ak47 pointed at you, you pay attention.
North Defese wrote:If I had a nickle and the head of everyone who called me [Defense], I'd be rich, and thrown in prison for all the mutliated corpses strewn about my house.
Tunizcha wrote:Never get in a staring contest with a cat. Even if you win, you still lose, because you just spent 5 minutes staring at a cat.
Canadai wrote:In Canadai, the vertically impaired are treated as equal citizens, and given ladders by the government.
Niur wrote:Lets all just get brain transplants to shark bodies.
by Akosha » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:26 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:So if a nation was invading your people, and destroying everything, literally driving your people to extinction, and you did have WMDs, you still would not use them?
That situation would never arise because we'd never have the WMDs in the first place.
It's all about premeditation. If somebody breaks into my house to do me bodily harm, I might try to fight him off with a knife that I happen to have for cooking. But would I keep a gun in the house for the exact purpose of killing him? No. That would border on mental illness.
It's better to die with honour than to live with dishonour.
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina
Czardas wrote:Every political group supports Jesus and opposes Hitler, after all.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's asking the internet if she's stupid, then the answer is already obvious.
by Akosha » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:30 pm
The chrisman union wrote:Unrestricted warfare is described in the Chrismanic dictionary as "The widescale use of strategic nuclear weapons, the targeting of civilian population centres and general ignorance of international rules of war." Unrestricted warfare, in all its forms, is just wrong. The whole point of warfare is to protect the citizens of your homeland. How does obliterating your opponent's country and family make you any better than him? It makes you just as worse as your aggressors, maybe even worse. The unrestricted slaughter of "enemy" civilians and non combatants is both dishonourable and immoral.
The whole point of warfare is to protect the citizens of your homeland.
How does obliterating your opponent's country and family make you any better than him?
Czardas wrote:Every political group supports Jesus and opposes Hitler, after all.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's asking the internet if she's stupid, then the answer is already obvious.
by Fatatatutti » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:32 pm
Akosha wrote:Alright then, say that the enemy was in the prossess of invading your nation and you just-so-happened to intercept a convoy of theirs which was carrying WMD. Obviously this weapon was intended for use against your state, and it is probable that they have the will and ability to field more of them. Do you sit back and enjoy as they prepare to exterminate your people, or do you use their own weapon against them, claim it as yours, and threaten to do it again if they don't back off?
by Akosha » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:33 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:Akosha wrote:Alright then, say that the enemy was in the prossess of invading your nation and you just-so-happened to intercept a convoy of theirs which was carrying WMD. Obviously this weapon was intended for use against your state, and it is probable that they have the will and ability to field more of them. Do you sit back and enjoy as they prepare to exterminate your people, or do you use their own weapon against them, claim it as yours, and threaten to do it again if they don't back off?
You quote me and then you ignore what you quoted: It's better to die with honour than to live with dishonour. How could we live with our own people knowing we had dishonoured them?
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina
Czardas wrote:Every political group supports Jesus and opposes Hitler, after all.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's asking the internet if she's stupid, then the answer is already obvious.
by Sarzonia » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:39 pm
by New Caldaris » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:43 pm
by Amn Voss » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:44 pm
by Fatatatutti » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:45 pm
Akosha wrote:How could you live with yourselves knowing that you could have saved your people from extinction, but chose not to?
by Uawc » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:48 pm
Fatatatutti wrote:We don't put any restrictions on warfare. Every soldier is restricted only by his/her own conscience.
In the unlikely event that one of our soldiers did something like killing prisoners, he/she would be sent home immediately in disgrace and rehabilitated like any other murderer.
Under no circumstances would any Fatatatutian commander ever use weapons of mass destruction, even if we had any. Anybody with such a lack of honour woulfd never get to a position of command.
-- Gen. Castro-Stalina
by Ostronopolis » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:49 pm
by JJ Place » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:50 pm
Kirhean Tribes wrote:What is your nation's definition of unrestricted warfare?
Are there any circumstances wherein it is not allowed?
Conversely...
Are there any circumstances wherein it is considered appropriate?
by Inabi » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:51 pm
by Akosha » Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:01 pm
Czardas wrote:Every political group supports Jesus and opposes Hitler, after all.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's asking the internet if she's stupid, then the answer is already obvious.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Niwe England, Seeland, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement