Advertisement

by Theodosiya » Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:54 am

by New Dutch Colonies » Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:16 am
Theodosiya wrote:Whew. Even our hands down BWP-2 are used as Amphibious AAA by the Marine Corps. (Tbh, they should've used it in its original role and either use 105/120mm armed variant. Or use Leopard 2. Or T-72/80/90 to go with WarPac theme). So, doable but inneficient?

by Theodosiya » Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:32 am

by New Dutch Colonies » Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:51 am
Theodosiya wrote:Desperate measure. Obviously because the 30mm gun could be used as AA gun, although obvioisly not the best choice. Would be Pantysr or Tunguska on BMP-3F or BWP-2 hull.

by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:00 pm

by Gallia- » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:13 pm
Allanea wrote:IT's been done. I'm not sure it's a very good idea, but BMP-2s have been used as sort of improvised light tanks in the Donbass conflict.
by Crookfur » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:42 pm
Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:It's late so this might be dumb but.
What is the viability of strapping the Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-30 on a T-64/T-80 chassis? (as some bizarre infantry support vehicle with limited AA use)
I tend to come up with dumb ideas like this late at night.

by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:50 pm
Crookfur wrote:Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:It's late so this might be dumb but.
What is the viability of strapping the Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-30 on a T-64/T-80 chassis? (as some bizarre infantry support vehicle with limited AA use)
I tend to come up with dumb ideas like this late at night.
You would likely be better off using 1 or two GSh-30-2Ks or 2A38Ms
Much less chance of melting and cook off and IIRC a much lighter coolant system.
Surface mounted GSh-6-30s/AO-18s are only seen on naval vessels for a reason.
by Crookfur » Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:04 pm
Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:Crookfur wrote:You would likely be better off using 1 or two GSh-30-2Ks or 2A38Ms
Much less chance of melting and cook off and IIRC a much lighter coolant system.
Surface mounted GSh-6-30s/AO-18s are only seen on naval vessels for a reason.
That does make more sense, I'll give it some more thought when it's not 1 am and I'm not running on 5 hours of sleep. Would 2 even fit in a turret? Or just stick to 1 like General electrics' proposed GAU-8 on a tank?

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:06 pm
Crookfur wrote:Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:It's late so this might be dumb but.
What is the viability of strapping the Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-6-30 on a T-64/T-80 chassis? (as some bizarre infantry support vehicle with limited AA use)
I tend to come up with dumb ideas like this late at night.
You would likely be better off using 1 or two GSh-30-2Ks or 2A38Ms
Much less chance of melting and cook off and IIRC a much lighter coolant system.
Surface mounted GSh-6-30s/AO-18s are only seen on naval vessels for a reason.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by New Vihenia » Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:15 pm
Theodosiya wrote:Desperate measure. Obviously because the 30mm gun could be used as AA gun, although obvioisly not the best choice. Would be Pantysr or Tunguska on BMP-3F or BWP-2 hull.

by Rich and Corporations » Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:16 pm
efficient timed fuses would make helicopters and drones obsoleteImperializt Russia wrote:This. Original Shilka was very lightly armoured, so Pantsir or Tunguska would be entirely sufficient for the same job with slightly more firepower.
In my early days, I had a "futur-Shilka" based off a devianart image, which was basically just a heavy 30/40mm Shilka on a tank chassis - Pantsir-S1 is probably better anyway.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |

by The Soodean Imperium » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:18 pm


by Taihei Tengoku » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:22 pm

by Gallia- » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:22 pm

by Hurtful Thoughts » Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:10 pm
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....

by Gallia- » Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:23 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:09 am

Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by New Dutch Colonies » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:55 am
by Opplandia » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:33 am
New Dutch Colonies wrote:>being a slavaboo
>not praising ze German Leopard 2 AA memevehicle
We Dutch call them Pruttel due to the sound they make (PRRRT, Pruttel to make it less autistic to pronounce). My dad keeps telling how happily those things drove past with their turrets spinning faster than Steven Seagal snapping someone's neck.

by New Dutch Colonies » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:35 am
Opplandia wrote:New Dutch Colonies wrote:>being a slavaboo
>not praising ze German Leopard 2 AA memevehicle
We Dutch call them Pruttel due to the sound they make (PRRRT, Pruttel to make it less autistic to pronounce). My dad keeps telling how happily those things drove past with their turrets spinning faster than Steven Seagal snapping someone's neck.
I suppose youre referring to the Gepard AA-tank, which is based on Leopard 1; not the Leo 2.

by Autonomous Eastern Ukraine » Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:30 am
Crookfur wrote:Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:That does make more sense, I'll give it some more thought when it's not 1 am and I'm not running on 5 hours of sleep. Would 2 even fit in a turret? Or just stick to 1 like General electrics' proposed GAU-8 on a tank?
They fit a pair on tungusta/pantsir so it's doable.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Crookfur wrote:You would likely be better off using 1 or two GSh-30-2Ks or 2A38Ms
Much less chance of melting and cook off and IIRC a much lighter coolant system.
Surface mounted GSh-6-30s/AO-18s are only seen on naval vessels for a reason.
^
This. Original Shilka was very lightly armoured, so Pantsir or Tunguska would be entirely sufficient for the same job with slightly more firepower.
In my early days, I had a "futur-Shilka" based off a devianart image, which was basically just a heavy 30/40mm Shilka on a tank chassis - Pantsir-S1 is probably better anyway.

by New Vihenia » Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:02 am


by Imperializt Russia » Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:07 am
Autonomous Eastern Ukraine wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:^
This. Original Shilka was very lightly armoured, so Pantsir or Tunguska would be entirely sufficient for the same job with slightly more firepower.
In my early days, I had a "futur-Shilka" based off a devianart image, which was basically just a heavy 30/40mm Shilka on a tank chassis - Pantsir-S1 is probably better anyway.
Well the idea (now that I've given it some actual thought) is to make a domestically produced replacement for the shilka (hence why they don't just use the Pantsir).
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Opluentia, The Akasha Colony
Advertisement