NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO FUN] Mark IX

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads



User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:27 am

perhaps it's time to talk about modern military vehicles.

it's too bad protection is valued so high, we usually fight against jihadis, and we could use tankettes armed with autocannons for anti-insurgent uses.

it is funny though that we are arming soldiers with 7.62mm weapons to fight insurgents who engage at range with mortars.

https://www.army.mil/article/179419
Army to test new armored vehicles as it updates older platforms

WASHINGTON (Army News Service) -- The first armored multipurpose Vehicle, or AMPV, is scheduled to be handed over to the Army Thursday for testing.

The AMPV demonstrator will roll out of the BAE Systems plant in York, Pennsylvania, to begin a 52-month engineering and manufacturing development phase for the vehicle. At least 29 of the vehicles will be manufactured for this phase of the procurement process, officials said.

If the low-rate production option for the AMPV is approved, procurement officials said several hundred of the vehicles will be manufactured for testing over the next four years.

The AMPV will replace the armored brigade combat team's M113 family of vehicles. The AMPV addresses the M113's shortcomings in survivability and force protection, and size, weight, power, and cooling, known as SWAP-C, officials said. It is also designed to incorporate future technologies and the Army's network.

The AMPV has a brand new hull, but it maintains some of the Bradley legacy design, allowing for some compatibility efficiencies, according to Maj. Gen. David G. Bassett, program executive officer for Ground Combat Systems. In fact, about 60 to 70 percent of the parts are common with existing ground combat vehicles, Bassett said during a press conference in October.

The AMPV also has the additional space inside to allow for the addition of new systems in the future, and it comes with an improved power train. The hull is stronger from a force protection perspective, too, he said.


etc

A new suite of mobile protected firepower (MPF) vehicles is also being conceptualized. The MPF is meant to fill the need among infantry brigade combat teams for something like a light tank, Bassett said. The Abrams is too heavy to be air dropped and, once it's on the ground, it can't maneuver in constricted areas like narrow mountain roads or alleyways.

In August, when industry representatives were invited to the Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, Georgia, the technical requirements for the MPF were purposely kept to a minimum, he said, because "we're trying to be open-minded."

For instance, a maximum weight of 32 tons was one requirement, which would allow it to be air dropped, he said.

Also among the requirements: the cannon must be capable of destroying a minimum number of targets and must provide a certain level of protection. The cannon could be 57-millimeter, 105-millimeter or 120-millimeter, which was mainly to save money because those cannons are already in the Army's inventory, he explained.


etc...
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:32 am

Rich and Corporations wrote:-snip-


Neither of these are new vehicles or even new ideas.

One is a Bradley without a turret, something that the US Army has wanted for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooong time now.

The other is basically the M8 AGS, which the US Army actually bought and type classified but never actually ordered.
Last edited by Laritaia on Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:36 am

Laritaia wrote:
Rich and Corporations wrote:-snip-


Neither of these are new vehicles or even new ideas.

One is a Bradley without a turret, something that the US Army has wanted for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooong time now.

The other is basically the M8 AGS, which the US Army actually bought and type classified but never actually ordered.

It's true that war never changes, but the article does highlight the requirements for vehicles, as opposed to the vehicles for requirements.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia


User avatar
Ban Pho
Diplomat
 
Posts: 569
Founded: Aug 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Ban Pho » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:45 am

Would it be possible to mount a Soviet T-12 anti-tank gun in a T-34-85 turret?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:47 am

Ban Pho wrote:Would it be possible to mount a Soviet T-12 anti-tank gun in a T-34-85 turret?

Probably not. Unless I'm wrong and T-12 isn't the family of 100mm guns that gave us Rapira, that's what T-44 and T-54/55 turrets were meant for.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1476
Founded: Dec 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:47 am

Ban Pho wrote:Would it be possible to mount a Soviet T-12 anti-tank gun in a T-34-85 turret?

Look at the T-34-100, and do what they did.

Alternatively, use a T-55.
militant radical centrist in the sheets, neoclassical realist in the streets.
Saving this here so I can peruse it at my leisure.
In IC the Federated Kingdom of Prussia, 1950s-2000s timeline. Prussia backs a third-world Balkans puppet state called Sal Kataria.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Tue Dec 13, 2016 3:45 pm

Ban Pho wrote:Would it be possible to mount a Soviet T-12 anti-tank gun in a T-34-85 turret?

as long as the turret doesn't traverse

User avatar
Fordorsia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20431
Founded: Oct 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fordorsia » Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:34 am

LindySpandau's latest video on muzzle brakes was pretty fine until he said the Churchill was probably the best tank of the war :V
Pro: Swords
Anti: Guns

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.

Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad

Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.

Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.

Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1476
Founded: Dec 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 » Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:23 am

Fordorsia wrote:LindySpandau's latest video on muzzle brakes was pretty fine until he said the Churchill was probably the best tank of the war :V

Churchill was the best tank of the war....

hence why it was used for so long postwar, unlike all the Shermans, T-34s, Chaffees, and even Panzer IVs.
militant radical centrist in the sheets, neoclassical realist in the streets.
Saving this here so I can peruse it at my leisure.
In IC the Federated Kingdom of Prussia, 1950s-2000s timeline. Prussia backs a third-world Balkans puppet state called Sal Kataria.

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:44 am

Fordorsia wrote:LindySpandau's latest video on muzzle brakes was pretty fine until he said the Churchill was probably the best tank of the war :V


I watched his tank platoon video and it was pretty bad.
Actually much of his tank stuff is bad.

Sparkey is better.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Fordorsia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20431
Founded: Oct 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fordorsia » Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:49 am

Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:LindySpandau's latest video on muzzle brakes was pretty fine until he said the Churchill was probably the best tank of the war :V


I watched his tank platoon video and it was pretty bad.
Actually much of his tank stuff is bad.

Sparkey is better.


I didn't notice anything off about his platoon one. What was wrong with it?

But that one about Cromwell shenanigans, yeah I call 100% bullshit on those stories actually happening, especially the one where they drive among a bunch of 88s then escape by jumping a river.
Pro: Swords
Anti: Guns

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.

Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad

Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.

Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.

Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:05 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:It's true that war never changes, but the article does highlight the requirements for vehicles, as opposed to the vehicles for requirements.


War never changes, the US Army never conducts air mechanized operations.

MPF is pretty much a perfect example of designing the requirements to the vehicle. It is not suited to any war the US has fought since Vietnam (at least) or any war the US Army can reasonably expect to fight in the future. That it is expected to weigh 32 tonnes shows the US Army knows it cannot square its desire for light weight with a minimally acceptable level of protection, and the real vehicle will certainly gain many more tonnes of weight and width (negating the size requirement) from add-on armour including skirts, which ever US armoured vehicle has gained in recent conflicts to deal with IED and RPG threats.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:53 pm

M1A1Ds and M2A2 ODS-SA for days.

All FXXI Army.

Tactical Data Reporting System aka dot matrix and CRT in a olive box.

Fordorsia wrote:
Dostanuot Loj wrote:
I watched his tank platoon video and it was pretty bad.
Actually much of his tank stuff is bad.

Sparkey is better.


I didn't notice anything off about his platoon one. What was wrong with it?


The part where he doesn't know what a platoon is.

Lindybeige is a polymath though. Like all polymaths he has a limited grasp of each subject he is aware of, and each time you become aware of a subject you bleed time that could be used deepening and reinforcing the trench of knowledge in other subject areas and domains.

Lindybeige scatters his brain cells in shell scrapes and fighting positions, but he is basically everywhere.

A PhD, at least a good PhD anyway, entrenches himself with multiply redundant zig-zags and commo trenches, bunkers, reinforced command posts, and continually improves these trenches to the point of replacing field wire with fiber optics and building hardened server farms into his trench of knowledge.

Unfortunately, by virtue of the amount of stupidity removed (it may be equivalent for both!), whether a deep knowledge trench or a dispersed small thought unit operation, you still turn into someone who thinks they know everything and has an opinion on everything.

At least for Lindybeige he has an inkling of what he's talking about. PhDs tend to be people who know one thing really well and assume this translates to other domains, within their own subject or not, and end up sounding like people who have never heard of political science or history or, well, much of anything unless you stumble across their obscure thesis manuscripts on the subjects of quantum states and neutrinos in which case they just tell you you're wrong about subatomic particles or the special kind of dust that stars are made of because I wrote thirty seven editorials for Nature so I know what I'm talking about when I say we should just kill about 15% of the population in industrial death camps.

Or something like that.

The moral of the story is that terminal degree holders can be kind of dumb and I'd still trust Lindybeige on jazz and how to paint miniatures over a PhD who just sits on his computer all day sending emails to other PhDs about what sort of whisky to bring to this years conference. I would trust the PhD on whisky recommendations, though, because "PhD" means Phucking Drunk.
Last edited by Gallia- on Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:03 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Western Pacific Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14014
Founded: Apr 29, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Pacific Territories » Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:33 pm

Speaking of LindyBren, what do y'all think about this dude?
https://youtu.be/OVOxUpLzvNk

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:32 pm

Fordorsia wrote:LindySpandau's latest video on muzzle brakes was pretty fine until he said the Churchill was probably the best tank of the war :V
LindyBeige was good until he became popular, and started branching out into modern militaries, and began phrasing things for popular digestion. His videos are not for us. His videos are for the call of duty crowd. And he will make a hundred dollars for each video he pops out.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:40 pm

There is no in-between. Lindybeige is a binary. He is either good or he is evil, and he is ultimately good. His attempts to explain things can't be judged in the context of right or wrong, because his opinion is fluid, and he is enough of a critical thinker to accept new information as it comes to him. The Lindybeige of yesterday is not the Lindybeige of today, and likewise the Lindybeige of today is not the Lindybeige of tomorrow.

He isn't so much attempting to educate people as he is just getting in front of a camera and spilling loads of thoughts in a sort of stream of consciousness manner. The most pure of spergforms.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:44 pm

Gallia- wrote:There is no in-between. Lindybeige is a binary. He is either good or he is evil, and he is ultimately good. His attempts to explain things can't be judged in the context of right or wrong, because his opinion is fluid, and he is enough of a critical thinker to accept new information as it comes to him. The Lindybeige of yesterday is not the Lindybeige of today, and likewise the Lindybeige of today is not the Lindybeige of tomorrow.

He isn't so much attempting to educate people as he is just getting in front of a camera and spilling loads of thoughts in a sort of stream of consciousness manner. The most pure of spergforms.


I disagree.

Sumer is more right than Lindybeige.

Even if he somehow managed to convince a bunch of people that a tank gun cannot physically be longer than seven meters.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:47 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:
Gallia- wrote:There is no in-between. Lindybeige is a binary. He is either good or he is evil, and he is ultimately good. His attempts to explain things can't be judged in the context of right or wrong, because his opinion is fluid, and he is enough of a critical thinker to accept new information as it comes to him. The Lindybeige of yesterday is not the Lindybeige of today, and likewise the Lindybeige of today is not the Lindybeige of tomorrow.

He isn't so much attempting to educate people as he is just getting in front of a camera and spilling loads of thoughts in a sort of stream of consciousness manner. The most pure of spergforms.


I disagree.


It's not like you're right about anything else, though. Lindybeige is good precisely because he has an interest in the subject which is all that is really needed once the entry requirements of intelligence are met, but it is also the most difficult thing to find. What he lacks are adequate source data and nothing else.

It's not like he trolls fifty thousand people or whatever because he has zero interest and just wants to paint his miniature swords or whatever. You're viewing a rare event: Genuine spergery. It isn't false spergery where all they want to do is play tabletop games and talk about Tiger tanks being badass, otherwise he'd stop at Wehraboo. But it isn't jaded academic pedantry because Lindybeige is a psychologist by education. It's nothing really in-between either of those, because genuine spergery might be a cohabitator of academic cynicism, but it's hardly a prerequisite (Keegan LoL). Lindybeige isn't the most advanced sperg or the most deep sperg, but he's an honest one who really likes what he is talking about and he talks about it without the motivator of money to do it, because he isn't evil and he isn't a member of the parasite class.

It's just honest sperg from a guy who is interested in a subject and doesn't have very many reliable source data to pull from. The fact that he makes money from it is entirely tangential, because he started these videos before he knew he would get money. He just did them for fun. Most importantly, though, he has an open mind and changes his opinions to suit new knowledge from reputable sources which he is informed of or provided. That last part is what makes him a rare sperg. The rarest of spergs? Possibly.

We might as well blame you for never reading Race to the Swift or thinking Sumer has some huge social capital in these threads [the real mafia is "Viky" and "dnt"]. Except TBH I doubt your spergery is as genuine as Lindybeige's since you do have access to a lot of sperglording from these threads and only use it to further a mysterious trollmusement agenda.
Last edited by Gallia- on Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:00 pm, edited 7 times in total.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:40 pm

The dimensions of my spergery is merely based upon some shifted axes. A wrong person who no one takes seriously is far more correct than a wrong person everyone repeats.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:56 pm

Lindybeige isn't an ignorant pedant, he's a genuine sperg.

You can be wrong and still be morally good because you are open to different viewpoints. This means that your bunker can be broken and the bayonets of illumination of thrust deep into the heart of ignorance and grenades of enlightenment bring epiphany where stupidity reigned. Being wrong and further fortifying yourself is the true foe to illumination. Some bunkers cannot be broken, some trenches cannot be taken, and some fortresses must be bypassed.

I'm still not sure which of these you are, TBF.

User avatar
The Wyoming Peoples Front
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 358
Founded: Nov 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wyoming Peoples Front » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:06 pm

According to The Wyoming air national guard, the 153rd Airlift Wing, participated in testing of 12 of these vehicles in the late 90s.

Image
M1025 HMMWV with 30mm M230 "Chain Guns"

What would be their application?

User avatar
Fordorsia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20431
Founded: Oct 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fordorsia » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:26 pm

The Wyoming Peoples Front wrote:What would be their application?


Nothing
Pro: Swords
Anti: Guns

San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.

Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad

Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.

Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.

Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chava Cal, Dtn, HarYan, Ord Caprica

Advertisement

Remove ads