the saddest tank of them all
Advertisement
by The Soodean Imperium » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:14 pm
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:01 pm
by Gallia- » Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:18 pm
by Husseinarti » Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:20 pm
by Dostanuot Loj » Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:54 pm
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Purpelia wrote:A short tank is a happy tank because a short tank is:
- harder to hit
- lighter, and thus better armored for the same weight
- lighter and thus faster
- turns more easily
- less likely to get stuck EVERYWHERE
A long tank is a sad tank.
the saddest tank of them all
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:I am thinking of developing a prototype vehicle based upon the Namer APC, but with better firepower which will be specifically designed to engage in urban operations.
by Autonomous Unified Territories » Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:06 pm
by Laritaia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:27 pm
by Omarios » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:33 pm
Autonomous Unified Territories wrote:Right, after shit-canning the idea of the ancient T-55 for urban support, I came to a slightly different idea. This is formerly the Israeli NaMer APC with some unique modifications. New powerplant, transmission from the rest of the fleet for ease of maintenance. The fire support version loses some passenger capacity to 6 pers in exchange for a 125mm gun. It borrows some of the tech from the Stryker MGS, where the turret is fully unmanned and uses 360 degree cameras combined with independent commander's and gunner's sights and an auto-loader. The ammunition is stored in the hull of the vehicle and the autoloader only has one round in the turret at any time - the one in the breech. The result is that the most heavily armored component of the vehicle stores the ammunition, which if detonated blows upwards out an emergency blowoff hatch in the turret roof, and not into the passenger or crew compartment.
The barrel is shortened but still maintains a high velocity but allows the traverse of the turret in confined spaces as compared to a longer main gun. Since the idea is to engage in confined and urban areas, the decrease in range is an acceptable tradeoff.
The crew sits in front of the autoloader behind the engine in the front for maximum protection. The sides, like a normal NaMer are sloped and heavily armored, meaning the vehicle has extensive protection from shoulder fired weapons from all sides, unlike a normal main battle tank.
(Image)
Danceria wrote:Erm...*Inches away from them*
by Allanea » Sun Jul 10, 2016 1:44 am
by Novorden » Sun Jul 10, 2016 5:16 am
Gallia- wrote:
it needs to be a v-hull
it would be deeper too im sure
you may wish to see if you can find images of FCS hull from the butt and the mine resistant strykers the us army made
the latter were so cool they couldnt put it on MGS for reasons but im not sure what the reasoning was if it was just money and the us army hates MGS or if there was some bad thing that happened
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 5:20 am
by Novorden » Sun Jul 10, 2016 5:26 am
Purpelia wrote:What suspension is this thing to use? I don't really see too much room being left anywhere to mount anything.
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 5:54 am
by Novorden » Sun Jul 10, 2016 6:39 am
Purpelia wrote:I still don't see where you are going to mount it. There is barely any room for anything between the wheel and the hull. Unless you intend to have the suspension arms inside those boxes under the seats or something.
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 7:01 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 7:06 am
Zrhajan wrote:WRT tank design, is it still valid to create a vehicle with very little armor but extreme speed and maneuverability in this day and age, following the legacy of Hellcats and Christie?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Novorden » Sun Jul 10, 2016 7:48 am
Purpelia wrote:Yea, that's super cool now.
Out of curiosity what are the side boxes behind the peoples head for? Are they just spaced armor or like can they pack stuff in there?
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 7:53 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 7:54 am
Novorden wrote:Purpelia wrote:Yea, that's super cool now.
Out of curiosity what are the side boxes behind the peoples head for? Are they just spaced armor or like can they pack stuff in there?
It's where the vehicles systems are, similar to this.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Rich and Corporations » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:00 am
Allanea wrote:Most tanks do reasonably well in urban combat.
Their main problems are not the length of their guns.
Also I very much doubt that you can have a place for six crewmen in a Merkava expy with a 125mm gun.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:02 am
by Gallia- » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:05 am
Allanea wrote:Most tanks do reasonably well in urban combat.
Their main problems are not the length of their guns.
Also I very much doubt that you can have a place for six crewmen in a Merkava expy with a 125mm gun.
by Gallia- » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:09 am
Purpelia wrote:What's the typical ground clearance on IFV's? 30cm? 50cm?
by Novorden » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:12 am
Lineart
Old designs
Newer Designs
by Purpelia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:19 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: HarYan, National Paranormal Investigation Bureau, New Cathen, Sayawari
Advertisement