That said, is a bullpup with a 20" barrel feasible as a service rifle?
Advertisement
by Palmyrion » Tue Dec 29, 2015 9:56 am
by Dostanuot Loj » Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:03 am
Kassaran wrote:IIRC, if you're in trenches, you're fucked. That's what it comes down to.
Yymea wrote:I have a question, when would it be a realistic situation to use trenches?
by Palmyrion » Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:05 am
by Dostanuot Loj » Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:07 am
by Immoren » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:14 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Fordorsia » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:17 am
Immoren wrote:It's realistic that burst from BAR can tear a door to pieces and make a 5m*5m sized hole on a floor in a room behind that door, right? Right?
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.
by Immoren » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:18 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by EsToVnIa » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:33 am
Palmyrion wrote:Is it possible for a 6.+ mm intermediate projectile to have 5.56 NATO ballistics and 7.62 NATO terminal performance? That's my goal, actually. I guess I might have to start from scratch for my intermediate cartridge, with only 6.5 Grendel as my parent case and the requirement of a 6.8mm bullet.
by Roski » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:40 am
Yymea wrote:I have a question, when would it be a realistic situation to use trenches?
by Puzikas » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:43 am
Yymea wrote:I have a question, when would it be a realistic situation to use trenches?
Fordorsia wrote:But if you're cool enough, use whatever you like. Even though all these are from the first half of the 20th century
Palmyrion wrote:Is it possible for a 6.+ mm intermediate projectile to have 5.56 NATO ballistics and 7.62 NATO terminal performance? That's my goal, actually. I guess I might have to start from scratch for my intermediate cartridge, with only 6.5 Grendel as my parent case and the requirement of a 6.8mm bullet.
Roski wrote:probably not needed in urban situations, however.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Arkandros » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:44 am
Palmyrion wrote:Is it possible for a 6.+ mm intermediate projectile to have 5.56 NATO ballistics and 7.62 NATO terminal performance? That's my goal, actually. I guess I might have to start from scratch for my intermediate cartridge, with only 6.5 Grendel as my parent case and the requirement of a 6.8mm bullet.
by Puzikas » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:55 am
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Aqizithiuda » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:34 pm
Palmyrion wrote:Azurg wrote:As I understand, it's because you claim improbable velocities for your rounds, 20" barrel or not. Too, your capacity estimates tend to be a bit high in my experience.
I can tone it down, and I have done it at least. I never want to go slower than 850 m/s for 6.8mm bullets though, and for me it's the borderline-can be more, but never less. I'm thinking of an inflated 6.5 Grendel case all because I want that 110gr 6.8 round going off the barrel at 2790 fps
Palmyrion wrote:Is it possible for a 6.+ mm intermediate projectile to have 5.56 NATO ballistics and 7.62 NATO terminal performance? That's my goal, actually. I guess I might have to start from scratch for my intermediate cartridge, with only 6.5 Grendel as my parent case and the requirement of a 6.8mm bullet.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Purpelia » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:45 pm
by EsToVnIa » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:50 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Basically, what you need to do is to take the 5.8x42mm and say "okay, here's my weight limit. Now, what can I do within it?".
by Puzikas » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:54 pm
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Purpelia » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:59 pm
Estovnia wrote:didn't even ask
by Aqizithiuda » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:00 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Ammmericaaaa, Lushansk
Advertisement