Check your elf-loving privilege.
Advertisement

by Orussia » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:40 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:41 pm

by Prosorusiya » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:42 pm

by Western Pacific Territories » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:42 pm

by The Kievan People » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:42 pm


by Western Pacific Territories » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:45 pm

by North Yemen- » Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:58 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:58 pm
North Yemen- wrote:I'm wondering how one should organize a paramilitary organization, akin to that of the Polish Paramilitary, Swiss reserves or something of that nature. Should I organize and integrate them with the conventional military, or allow them to develop and operate somewhat independently in the case of potential invasion?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Questers » Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:41 pm
British tank regiments usually include 2 tanks at the squadron & regiment level also. The squadron is ususally (4x3)*2 and regiments since 1990s have trended to being 3 squadrons+2 (44) or 4 squadrons +2 aka 58. Right now they're 4x3x4 but without the 2 command tanks, aka 56.Dostanuot Loj wrote:Nachmere wrote:
lol but why? thats a brigade size force your describing.
Because tank-centric proper.
Also, 36 is really small for a battalion. Most sit around 50-60.
As it is you're running 3x3x3 Tanks/Platoons/Companies.
I run 5x3x4.
UK is 4x3x3 btw. US Army does 4x3x4. Soviets loved 3x3x3, but also did 3x4x3.


by Prosorusiya » Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:43 pm

by Prosorusiya » Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:17 pm

by Esalonia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:57 am
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?

by The Akasha Colony » Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:22 am
Esalonia wrote:My thought was to reduce the recoil of a tank gun for the same amount of recoil length, and for that we're going to make it take longer for the gun to travel through its recoil length. Will it work?

by Esalonia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:46 am
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:55 am
Dostanuot Loj wrote:Nachmere wrote:
IDF formations have been mostly 3X3X3 for nearly ever. I could possibly have 4 tank platoons or another company. IDK that it is a clear cut need though. I rather prefer a smaller, leaner battalion. I guess there are pros and cons to both.
If the battalion is to work in 4 different groups, it will work as following:
2 pure tank companies
1 2:1 tank/armored infantry
1 2:1 armored infantry/tank
My IFVs are basically my tanks with BMP-3 like turrets...
As for the soviets and the 18 tanks thing, I had not though someone actually played around with this. I pull the number 20 out of my head(read ass) after thinking about what is the minimum number of tanks my RL battalion would need to get the stuff it usually does done. It seems however my guesstimate is very close to reality.
IDF tank units were 4x4x3 for a long long time. They moved, as I understand it, to 3x3x3 to allow more maneuver units for fewer tanks. The IDF, always being in a material and personnel shortage, needed maneuver units, and so moved.
Fun fact: This is the kind of thing that I'm mostly into. Armed forces put a surprising amount of money and energy into it.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:There's a new thread already? Hory sheet.
Orussia wrote:Western Pacific Territories wrote:Hey, it's racist to insult elves you jerk. She identifies as a elf.
I identify as mayonnaise, and mentioning identities triggers me.
On topic question: Is it still viable to have a launch vehicle for an Iskander-type SSM on a tracked chassis, a la Pluton?
The Kievan People wrote:this is what happens when samoz is elected OP ;___;

Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Akasha Colony » Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:09 am

by Esalonia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 4:25 am
The Akasha Colony wrote:Esalonia wrote:Yep. *insert Facebook Like icon here*
In the meantime the round is being readied for loading.
Unfortunately, it wouldn't work. In order to reduce the gun recoil speed, the recoil system has to apply greater arresting force on the gun. But if you could apply more force so easily, you could have already shortened the recoil travel to begin with. Gun recoil length is the minimum length required to reliably stop the gun without unduly stressing the components, and slowing the recoil velocity down means that this excess kinetic energy has to be transferred to the recoil mechanism, pushing it beyond that rated stress limit.
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?

by The Kievan People » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:28 am
Esalonia wrote:Currently thinking of a hydropneumatic recoil mechanism, which would be based off the hydropneumatic suspension.

by New Vihenia » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:12 am
Prosorusiya wrote:
What is the best Russian ECM Pod of the market right now? I'm looking to use it on my planes to increase their survivability on the modern battle field. I can't hope to live against F-22s, but not being insta-killed by F-16s would be great.

by Azenyanistan » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:26 am

by North Arkana » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:27 am
Azenyanistan wrote:How to invade Europe as a fictional Central Asian faction of the Muslims during the Crusades???

by Azenyanistan » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:28 am

Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, Russian Vavilon, The Land of the Ephyral
Advertisement