
by Agapathapoo » Fri Sep 25, 2015 6:08 pm

by Chinese Peoples » Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:06 pm

by Soyghuristan » Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:41 pm

by Agapathapoo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 1:52 pm
Montecroce wrote:Wrong forum. Try F7.

by Kazarogkai » Sat Sep 26, 2015 2:12 pm

by Agapathapoo » Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:46 am
Kazarogkai wrote:In terms of spoken language: Arabic. Sounds terrible but it's writing system is absolutely gorgeous, more akin to a piece of art than a practical writing system (seemingly)but still.
In terms of writing: French. In general I have a strong dislike for romance languages with their various word forms and the fact that they always seem to be written backwards, but French takes the cake in this regard. Plus those silent letters are just so freaking stupid.
In terms of complexities and inconsistencies: English. It is an alphabetical system making use of only 26 characters despite the fact that they have 44 phonemes(American English). It has so many contradictions and unspoken rules an in general retardation inducing crap embedded in the whole thing. Unless you learned it as a child it can be a struggle to learn, hence why I support bilingual education. As a child I remember so many times where I would be told "Your only supposed to do this, except when you don't" . The weirdness is so horrible that I had an honest conversation a while back where I argued it may just be best for us to simply use a logographic writing system, are language has many of the characteristics that make said writing system work nicely(it is Analytical for one).

by Conscentia » Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:50 am
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Conscentia » Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:53 am
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Gandoor » Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:20 am

by The New Dog Nation » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:41 am

by Bromida » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:44 am

by The Great Warrior Rivers » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:45 am

by Kar-Esseria » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:47 am

by Kazarogkai » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:44 am
Agapathapoo wrote:Kazarogkai wrote:In terms of spoken language: Arabic. Sounds terrible but it's writing system is absolutely gorgeous, more akin to a piece of art than a practical writing system (seemingly)but still.
In terms of writing: French. In general I have a strong dislike for romance languages with their various word forms and the fact that they always seem to be written backwards, but French takes the cake in this regard. Plus those silent letters are just so freaking stupid.
In terms of complexities and inconsistencies: English. It is an alphabetical system making use of only 26 characters despite the fact that they have 44 phonemes(American English). It has so many contradictions and unspoken rules an in general retardation inducing crap embedded in the whole thing. Unless you learned it as a child it can be a struggle to learn, hence why I support bilingual education. As a child I remember so many times where I would be told "Your only supposed to do this, except when you don't" . The weirdness is so horrible that I had an honest conversation a while back where I argued it may just be best for us to simply use a logographic writing system, are language has many of the characteristics that make said writing system work nicely(it is Analytical for one).
I meant sounding
also are you saying English should have a writing system more like Chinese where each syllable has it's own symbol and meaning?

by Anollasia » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:27 am
Kar-Esseria wrote:Chinese, Arabic, Welsh, Finnish, Turkish, and Mongolian.

by Mefpan » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:34 am

by Agapathapoo » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:34 am
Kazarogkai wrote:Agapathapoo wrote:
I meant sounding
also are you saying English should have a writing system more like Chinese where each syllable has it's own symbol and meaning?
Chinese is not a syllabery, the only major language that uses such a system is Japanese from what I remember. A pure Logographic system pretty much has an individual symbol for each and every morpheme which is the smallest grammatical unit in a language.
Also if you are only including sign language why do you have sign language which is technically not supposed to have sound.

by Conscentia » Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:50 am
Mefpan wrote:My native language, German, manages to make "butterfly" sound harsh and brutal. Schmetterling.
Like what the fuck. "Schmettern" tends to be used in instances where you want to describe hitting something like a ball for example with a lot of force.
What the genuine fuck.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Fatatatutti » Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:10 pm
Anollasia wrote:Turkish is a beautiful language if you're good at speaking it smoothly. Most Turks aren't sadly.

by The Serbian Empire » Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:13 pm

by Jute » Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:16 pm
Mefpan wrote:My native language, German, manages to make "butterfly" sound harsh and brutal. Schmetterling.
Like what the fuck. "Schmettern" tends to be used in instances where you want to describe hitting something like a ball for example with a lot of force.
What the genuine fuck.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Aramythia » Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:21 pm
The Background Nation of Aramythia
I came, I saw, I left
This is a box.

by Grunvirdym » Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:24 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement