Advertisement

by The Kievan People » Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:41 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:42 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Get rid of the "logistics force" :V
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Spirit of Hope » Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:28 pm
Palakistan wrote: The TDF is split into these groups:
Turkistan Ground Forces(TGF):
Motto: "You shall not Be afraid of the terror by night, nor of the arrows that fly by day."
Total manpower: 70,000 troops, 150,000 reserves.
Divided into 4 armies:
1st, 2nd and 3rd armies have each: 23,000 troops, 500 Merkava M4 windbreakers, 300 Namer APC's, 1,000 humvees, and 50 M109's
Turkistan Naval Forces(TNF):
Total manpower: 30,000 men, and 50,000 reserves
Motto: "He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. Navies shall bow before him."
1st naval task force includes:
3 sa'ar class 5 corvettes
9 dolphin class submarines
20 super Dvora Mk III patrol boats
2 Arleigh Burke class destroyers
Turkistan Air Forces(TAF):
Total manpower: 50,000 troops, 20,000 reserves
Motto: "Control the skies, control the war"
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th air corps armies include each: 40 f-16 fighting Falcons, 7 b-2 bombers, , 5 A-130's and 10 AWAC's, and 70 AH-64 Apache Gunships
Turkistan Logistics Force(TLF):
Motto: "The backbone of the war"
Total manpower: 140,000 service men, 100,000 reserves
Logistic corps is spreading it across the country, and cooperates with different branches. Typically the logistic corps handle the command structure and help direct combat flow. 3,000 M35 cargo trucks and 40 C-5 Galaxies.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Esalonia » Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:32 pm
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?

by Palakistan » Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:59 pm
I'll get on it soon, thanks for the input.Spirit of Hope wrote:Palakistan wrote: The TDF is split into these groups:
Turkistan Ground Forces(TGF):
Motto: "You shall not Be afraid of the terror by night, nor of the arrows that fly by day."
Total manpower: 70,000 troops, 150,000 reserves.
Divided into 4 armies:
1st, 2nd and 3rd armies have each: 23,000 troops, 500 Merkava M4 windbreakers, 300 Namer APC's, 1,000 humvees, and 50 M109's
Why the Namer APC? honestly Isreal only has a small number in comparison to there other APC's and IFV's for a reason. They are great for carrying troops into urban combat environments, but really aren't outstanding outside of that. You are also probably going to want more APC's you have enough for your infantry, see bellow comment, but you are going to want more for ambulances, mortar carriers, ammo carriers command units, etc.
On top of this all of your Armies appear to be approximates of US armored divisions. You probably want to balance that, some of those armies should be more geared towards mechanized infantry.Turkistan Naval Forces(TNF):
Total manpower: 30,000 men, and 50,000 reserves
Motto: "He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. Navies shall bow before him."
1st naval task force includes:
3 sa'ar class 5 corvettes
9 dolphin class submarines
20 super Dvora Mk III patrol boats
2 Arleigh Burke class destroyers
What do you want your navy to do? Those destroyers and corvettes don't appear to be in high enough numbers to do much by themselves. Also you probably want some mine sweepers.
I mean your navy is tiny compared to the amount you spend on your air force.Turkistan Air Forces(TAF):
Total manpower: 50,000 troops, 20,000 reserves
Motto: "Control the skies, control the war"
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th air corps armies include each: 40 f-16 fighting Falcons, 7 b-2 bombers, , 5 A-130's and 10 AWAC's, and 70 AH-64 Apache Gunships
You want a lot more fighter/multi role aircraft for your airforce. You have ~200 F-16's. But 35 B-2's. The USAF has ~1000 F-16's and 20 B-2's.
You don't need that many B-2 bombers or AC-130s. Honestly you probably don't need more than 20 B-2's and you do want a lot more conventional bombers, B-52's and B-1's are something to look at.
AC-130's you don't need more than 15-20 of either, they are only really good for precision attacking enemies who can't shoot back.
I would say move gunships to the army, because that is who is going to be using them. You also need some form of heavy lift helicopters and utility helicopters.
Closing thoughts air force: One you should look at real air forces (particularly the USAF) to see how many aircraft of various types they operate. Two you are probably better off organizing your air force by plane type, i.e. 1st group is all of the fighters, 2nd group is all of the bombers, etc.Turkistan Logistics Force(TLF):
Motto: "The backbone of the war"
Total manpower: 140,000 service men, 100,000 reserves
Logistic corps is spreading it across the country, and cooperates with different branches. Typically the logistic corps handle the command structure and help direct combat flow. 3,000 M35 cargo trucks and 40 C-5 Galaxies.
I would say send the C-5's over to the air force but it is ok if you don't want to. Also you are going to want some lighter form of transport aircraft.
Also you almost certainly want more trucks.
Closing thoughts, look at RL armed forces to see how they distribute there forces, and how much they have for those forces.
Your worst In Character enemy should be your best Out Of Character friend.- to you who said that: genius!

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:02 pm
Esalonia wrote:Honeycomb armor in all its glory.
http://www.popsci.com/elastic-honeycomb ... ompression
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by The Soodean Imperium » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:07 pm
Purpelia wrote:Not mortar brigades, but artillery brigades. Or rather, indirect fire support units.

by Spirit of Hope » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:10 pm
Palakistan wrote:I'll get on it soon, thanks for the input.Spirit of Hope wrote:
Why the Namer APC? honestly Isreal only has a small number in comparison to there other APC's and IFV's for a reason. They are great for carrying troops into urban combat environments, but really aren't outstanding outside of that. You are also probably going to want more APC's you have enough for your infantry, see bellow comment, but you are going to want more for ambulances, mortar carriers, ammo carriers command units, etc.
On top of this all of your Armies appear to be approximates of US armored divisions. You probably want to balance that, some of those armies should be more geared towards mechanized infantry.
What do you want your navy to do? Those destroyers and corvettes don't appear to be in high enough numbers to do much by themselves. Also you probably want some mine sweepers.
I mean your navy is tiny compared to the amount you spend on your air force.
You want a lot more fighter/multi role aircraft for your airforce. You have ~200 F-16's. But 35 B-2's. The USAF has ~1000 F-16's and 20 B-2's.
You don't need that many B-2 bombers or AC-130s. Honestly you probably don't need more than 20 B-2's and you do want a lot more conventional bombers, B-52's and B-1's are something to look at.
AC-130's you don't need more than 15-20 of either, they are only really good for precision attacking enemies who can't shoot back.
I would say move gunships to the army, because that is who is going to be using them. You also need some form of heavy lift helicopters and utility helicopters.
Closing thoughts air force: One you should look at real air forces (particularly the USAF) to see how many aircraft of various types they operate. Two you are probably better off organizing your air force by plane type, i.e. 1st group is all of the fighters, 2nd group is all of the bombers, etc.
I would say send the C-5's over to the air force but it is ok if you don't want to. Also you are going to want some lighter form of transport aircraft.
Also you almost certainly want more trucks.
Closing thoughts, look at RL armed forces to see how they distribute there forces, and how much they have for those forces.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Esalonia » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:14 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Esalonia wrote:Honeycomb armor in all its glory.
http://www.popsci.com/elastic-honeycomb ... ompression
"Armour" sounds disingenuous.
This is protection for blunt-force impact - vehicle crashes, helmet smashes. I doubt its utility against high-velocity penetrating trauma.
Tech level: NS MT
Esalonian Factbook *does not use NS Stats anymore*
DEFCON: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Member of these Multilateral Organizations
Fortitudinem wrote:They're a budding power. Pun intended.
Marquesan wrote:You have a damned fine advanced understanding of interior and exterior ballistics for a fifteen year old.
Gim wrote:Esalonia wrote:Certainly me. My best pic so far.
You would be an excellent Filipino Super Junior member. :p
Facebook chat:
Sum frind: okay klng? (Are you okay?)
Me: Yes. I am definitely okay in a mental asylum
Sum frind: ?

by United Earthlings » Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:02 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Thanks. Does that have stuff for the Soviet navy and air force, too?
Purpelia wrote:Husseinarti wrote:Us logistics during WW2 were all grouped within their combat units.
European theater of operations was a combat formation.
But there has to have been some sort of logistics unit outside of that feeding into the European theater of operations. Unless the troops are growing their own food and directly buying bullets out of factories there has to be someone on the outside providing this.

by Gallia- » Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:59 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Jun 22, 2015 9:25 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Gallia- » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:01 am


by Imperializt Russia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:44 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Gallia- » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:49 am

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:55 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Gallia- » Tue Jun 23, 2015 2:15 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Is there an article on such exploits?

by The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:26 am
Gallia- wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Is there an article on such exploits?
Probably.
The tank itself is just a cheeky Abrams crew running OPFOR at Fort Irwin or Grafenwoehr.
e: Since OPFOR home team is contractually obligated to win, they also prepare the Army for zombie apocalypses as well. Not flesh eating TV zombies, but real Voudon zombies who shoot you with guns or try to beat you to death with a table leg.

by Dostanuot Loj » Tue Jun 23, 2015 8:43 am

by Palakistan » Tue Jun 23, 2015 11:30 am

Your worst In Character enemy should be your best Out Of Character friend.- to you who said that: genius!

by Gallia- » Tue Jun 23, 2015 12:48 pm
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Gallia- wrote:
Probably.
The tank itself is just a cheeky Abrams crew running OPFOR at Fort Irwin or Grafenwoehr.
e: Since OPFOR home team is contractually obligated to win, they also prepare the Army for zombie apocalypses as well. Not flesh eating TV zombies, but real Voudon zombies who shoot you with guns or try to beat you to death with a table leg.
I wanna be in an OPFOR. Sounds like jolly good fun.
by Mitheldalond » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:07 pm

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:50 pm

by Gallia- » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:52 pm

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:56 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Rio Cana, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement