NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread Type 08

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12474
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed May 13, 2015 7:58 pm

Zeinbrad wrote:Is there any mention of PTSD in ancient warfare? Or is it more recent? I mean they did have changed control of their fate back then, no missiles and shit.

There is no mention of PTSD, there are many mentions of symptoms we would associate with PTSD. Battle rage, bad dreams, flashbacks, etc are all mentioned in historical literature, chronicles, and so on.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Wed May 13, 2015 8:02 pm

Connori Pilgrims wrote:
United Marxist Nations wrote:I haven't reported anyone for saying things I don't like; I reported them for directly insulting me and griefing me for making a goddamn moderation report. What I like even less is this passive-aggressive shit that is directly referencing me with the intent to make me angry. I don't want the thread to be locked, and I don't dislike the people here. I even like Gallia; he has been very helpful in providing information. We had moved past this. I am not the topic of the fucking thread, I just want to lurk here and read stuff about interesting things without being insulted and slighted. If you want to insult me, go to an IRC or Skype message; that's what most people do, and I know people have insulted me in NS IRC's before, but it isn't here. It is out of sight, out of mind.


Given your dragging of politicking into this thread, and the fact that your actions have directly resulted in the (temporary) ban of someone these people seem to like... you shouldn't be surprised when people here voice their thinly-veiled displeasure of you.

Zeinbrad wrote:Is there any mention of PTSD in ancient warfare? Or is it more recent? I mean they did have changed control of their fate back then, no missiles and shit.


It most certainly existed back then, however given the understanding of medicine at the time it is likely they confused it for something else, like possession or just plain insanity.

I didn't drag it in. I asked about the capacity of the Soviet Union to produce tanks because I wanted to know for both nation purposes and for a couple of RP's I am in. The whole discussion of economics and the morality of communism started without me, and I was in it for only a short period of time.

My actions didn't result in his ban, his did, and there should be no further discourse on this line of discussion.
Last edited by United Marxist Nations on Wed May 13, 2015 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Wed May 13, 2015 9:16 pm

Ulfr-Reich wrote:
Auroya wrote:Everything breaks down once in a while, Armata-chan was just unlucky


I do believe you mean "The Armata's engineering crew was exceptionally drunk with their gussied up T-72". Because that looks like an absolute fucktastrophe of event & mechanical management.


Image



Because that looks like "Armata-Chan" is getting hauled off for being a broken hunk of salvaged cold-war stuffs.


It was a "planned" stop, alright? And the Armata drove away under its own power.
Last edited by Yukonastan on Wed May 13, 2015 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Transnapastain
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12255
Founded: Antiquity
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Transnapastain » Wed May 13, 2015 9:21 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:
Connori Pilgrims wrote:
Given your dragging of politicking into this thread, and the fact that your actions have directly resulted in the (temporary) ban of someone these people seem to like... you shouldn't be surprised when people here voice their thinly-veiled displeasure of you.



It most certainly existed back then, however given the understanding of medicine at the time it is likely they confused it for something else, like possession or just plain insanity.

I didn't drag it in. I asked about the capacity of the Soviet Union to produce tanks because I wanted to know for both nation purposes and for a couple of RP's I am in. The whole discussion of economics and the morality of communism started without me, and I was in it for only a short period of time.

My actions didn't result in his ban, his did, and there should be no further discourse on this line of discussion.


Hows about you stop responding to it, everyone stops and moves the hell on?

User avatar
Vancon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9877
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Vancon » Wed May 13, 2015 10:25 pm

The United Remnants of America wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:Why don't we talk about something else?

As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Is medic normal for a squad-level infantry unit?

That one country with a maple leaf has one on a squad level, last time I checked.
Mike the Progressive wrote:You know I don't say this often, but this guy... he gets it. Like everything. As in he gets life.

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The balkens wrote:Please tell me that condoms and Hazelnut spread are NOT on the same table.

Well what the fuck do you use for lube?

Krazakistan wrote:How have you not died after being exposed to that much shit on a monthly basis?
Rupudska wrote:I avoid NSG like one would avoid ISIS-occupied Syria.
Alimeria- wrote:I'll go to sleep when I want to, not when some cheese-eating surrender monkey tells me to.

Which just so happens to be within the next half-hour

Shyluz wrote:Van, Sci-fi Generallisimo


U18 2nd Cutest NS'er 2015
Best Role Play - Science Fiction 2015: Athena Program

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Wed May 13, 2015 10:36 pm

Vancon wrote:
The United Remnants of America wrote:Is medic normal for a squad-level infantry unit?

That one country with a maple leaf has one on a squad level, last time I checked.


A combat first responder is not a medic.
Well, it is, it fills the same role and has many of the same skills but carries a gun.
But it's not a medic in the same sense that the US Army has one.

This is one of those fun differences between the Canadian and American armed forces.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Wed May 13, 2015 10:40 pm

Vancon wrote:
The United Remnants of America wrote:Is medic normal for a squad-level infantry unit?

That one country with a maple leaf has one on a squad level, last time I checked.

huh?

This is a Canadian section:

Section Commander - Sergeant - C7
Rifleman - Corporal/Private - C7
Rifleman - Corporal/Private - C7/M203
C9 Gunner - Corporal/Private - C9 LMG

Section 2 i/c - Master Corporal - C7
Rifleman - Corporal/Private - C7
Rifleman - Corporal/Private - C7/M203
C9 Gunner - Corporal/Private - C9 LMG

User avatar
Vancon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9877
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Vancon » Wed May 13, 2015 11:10 pm

Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Vancon wrote:That one country with a maple leaf has one on a squad level, last time I checked.


A combat first responder is not a medic.
Well, it is, it fills the same role and has many of the same skills but carries a gun.
But it's not a medic in the same sense that the US Army has one.

This is one of those fun differences between the Canadian and American armed forces.

Yeap.

Korva, the way I had it described to me by one of my officers at cadets was that it's like this:

Rifleman (scout)
TL
Radio
Gunner
Rifleman/supply
2IC
Medic
Gunner

He could've modified it for our purposes, but regardless.
Mike the Progressive wrote:You know I don't say this often, but this guy... he gets it. Like everything. As in he gets life.

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The balkens wrote:Please tell me that condoms and Hazelnut spread are NOT on the same table.

Well what the fuck do you use for lube?

Krazakistan wrote:How have you not died after being exposed to that much shit on a monthly basis?
Rupudska wrote:I avoid NSG like one would avoid ISIS-occupied Syria.
Alimeria- wrote:I'll go to sleep when I want to, not when some cheese-eating surrender monkey tells me to.

Which just so happens to be within the next half-hour

Shyluz wrote:Van, Sci-fi Generallisimo


U18 2nd Cutest NS'er 2015
Best Role Play - Science Fiction 2015: Athena Program

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 14, 2015 12:58 am

Repost because it got lost in kindergarten (as americans would call it...)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/870 ... DF_NMA.pdf
PDF outlines my military reforms and structure

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/870 ... vision.png
divisional template; greyed out = reserves

MBT: Challenger 2
MICV: Warrior
W-APC: Stryker
W-REC: LAV-III
T-APC: Spartan & Stormer
T-REC: Scimitar
SPH: AS-90
MRL: M270
T-ATGM: Spike NLOS, Milan 3
AA: Stormer, Rapier
Gunship: AH-64, Lynx 20-mm, TOW + CRV-7
Last edited by Questers on Thu May 14, 2015 1:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Thu May 14, 2015 1:09 am

Korva wrote:Is there any precedent for wholesale importation of shipbuilding capacity? As in signing a contract not just for a series of ships but also for the facilities to build and maintain them along with the personnel to do so?

I ask because my nation borders the Caspian and has little experience in building anything larger than FACs. It is unlikely that a contract could/would be secured with any Russian or Iranian firm.
The United Remnants of America wrote:Is medic normal for a squad-level infantry unit?

Put your medics at the platoon or company level.
Yes, but not in the modern era. IIRC Japanese shipyards were built by and bought from the British and French in the early 20th C/late 19th.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Thu May 14, 2015 2:34 am

Allancia wrote:
Zeinbrad wrote:Is there any mention of PTSD in ancient warfare? Or is it more recent? I mean they did have changed control of their fate back then, no missiles and shit.

Of course they did. They probably had more of it, in fact. Ancient warfare consisted of going up to people and stabbing them with glorified sticks until they were dead, or your arm's tendons snapped. It wasn't until the invention of muskets that you could kil them from far enough away to to not see their jaws break open.

if one wants to maximize the squick factor, just bring up the Rape of the Sabine Women.

Game of Thrones is quite civilized.
Questers wrote:Repost because it got lost in kindergarten (as americans would call it...)
Actually, we'd call it Detention for this specific situation.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1052
Founded: Mar 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Thu May 14, 2015 6:09 am

Zeinbrad wrote:Is there any mention of PTSD in ancient warfare? Or is it more recent? I mean they did have changed control of their fate back then, no missiles and shit.

Certainly PTSD is mentioned in older accounts, but it is very interesting how some cultures dealt with it. The Spartans, for example, had a word in Doric which was katalepsis(not the Stoic thing) which basically meant "the derangement of the senses that comes when terror or anger usurps dominion of the mind". This was basically another way of expressing phobos, fear, which the Spartans shunned at any cost. Being a culture dominated by warriors with a warrior mindset, it was likely that they did not have the problem of veterans committing suicide because they can't talk about their feelings like we do now; our current society is terrible with veterans returning from shitty places like the Middle East and it doesn't help that the government is more than willing to fuck people over in the name of penny-pinching(not trying to take any political sides here, don't wanna get banlocked). And as others have said, there are plenty of examples in historical accounts of people exhibiting symptoms of what we would call PTSD; in the Macedonian Wars of the Romans, the battle-hardened general Aemilius Paulus reportedly was so horrified of the sight of the nightmarish pikes at Pydna that he suffered lifelong terrors of the image. Ironic.

I'm less familiar with Middle Ages and Renaissance PTSD history but even dogs can suffer from PTSD.
3dank5u
call me Shannon ^-^

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Thu May 14, 2015 7:33 am

Zeinbrad wrote:Is there any mention of PTSD in ancient warfare? Or is it more recent? I mean they did have changed control of their fate back then, no missiles and shit.


Yes.
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12605
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Thu May 14, 2015 8:39 am

So with all the talk of a "War with Iran"; there isn't really much Israel and Iran could do to each other in terms of a ground war, no?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither has the ability to effectively deliver large numbers of troops either by sea or by air, so wouldn't any conflict be a quick Air-Sea war?


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
EsToVnIa
Senator
 
Posts: 4779
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby EsToVnIa » Thu May 14, 2015 8:41 am

You're forgetting the U.S would be in Iran before the Israelis
Most Heavenly State/Khamgiin Tengerleg Uls

Weeaboo Gassing Land wrote:Also, rev up the gas chambers.

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:CUNT

12:02:02 AM <Tarsas> premislyd is my spirit animal tbh

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Thu May 14, 2015 8:47 am

Inyourfaceistan wrote:So with all the talk of a "War with Iran"; there isn't really much Israel and Iran could do to each other in terms of a ground war, no?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither has the ability to effectively deliver large numbers of troops either by sea or by air, so wouldn't any conflict be a quick Air-Sea war?

Iran and Israel have been fighting each other on the ground for over 30 years.
Image

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Thu May 14, 2015 10:06 am

Questers wrote:Repost because it got lost in kindergarten (as americans would call it...)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/870 ... DF_NMA.pdf
PDF outlines my military reforms and structure


Is it a fair assumption after reading that the intention is to remove as much as possible great commander independence at the lower levels, centralizing things, to maintain the ability for the reservists to readily jump into the formation when needed?

It seems like an interesting solution to the dilemma of introducing reserve forces into combat when they are needed. Less flexibility in the region of the unit commander may have downsides, but you will have the ability to readily integrate reservists, which would mean your flexibility in terms of operational power would be greater.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Forenet Skandinavien
Envoy
 
Posts: 222
Founded: Jan 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Forenet Skandinavien » Thu May 14, 2015 10:59 am

So, I've dine some research on both railguns and coilguns, and from what it seems, though coilguns are limited by switch times and magnetic saturation (which lead to lower average projectile speeds than railguns), they are more economically sound than railguns because railguns require constant rail maintenance (due to wear from the immense forces present under firing conditions). Theoretically, could an MT superpower have already developed naval coilguns similar to how the US Navy is developing railguns now? Coilguns are much easier to build than railguns. Also, would such weapons be plausible to use for MBTs or infantry weapons?

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 14, 2015 11:06 am

Forenet Skandinavien wrote:So, I've dine some research on both railguns and coilguns, and from what it seems, though coilguns are limited by switch times and magnetic saturation (which lead to lower average projectile speeds than railguns), they are more economically sound than railguns because railguns require constant rail maintenance (due to wear from the immense forces present under firing conditions). Theoretically, could an MT superpower have already developed naval coilguns similar to how the US Navy is developing railguns now?


No. In fact, the lower projectile speeds rather defeat the point. It is not an accident or a fluke that the USN is investing in railguns and not coilguns.

Also, would such weapons be plausible to use for MBTs or infantry weapons?


No.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Wulfenia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1432
Founded: Apr 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wulfenia » Thu May 14, 2015 12:19 pm

Based partially on Civil War legions, I made a unit combining mechanized infantry with mobile artillery and Wiesel AWC. They're typically made up of 1,500 - 5,000 men, and are intended to perform swift breakthrough operations, provide fire support, and protect the flank for divisions.

I wasn't sure whether this has potential to be effective, or was simply unnecessary.
P2TM's favorite Fascist catgirl
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:It's called being a reactionary. No wonder you're unpopular.

User avatar
Stahn
Senator
 
Posts: 4663
Founded: May 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stahn » Thu May 14, 2015 12:28 pm

I wouldn't use the Wiesel for breakthrough operations.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 14, 2015 12:28 pm

Wulfenia wrote:Based partially on Civil War legions, I made a unit combining mechanized infantry with mobile artillery and Wiesel AWC. They're typically made up of 1,500 - 5,000 men, and are intended to perform swift breakthrough operations, provide fire support, and protect the flank for divisions.

I wasn't sure whether this has potential to be effective, or was simply unnecessary.


The Wiesel is unnecessary since presumably the IFVs the infantry are riding in can already provide plenty of weapons support. More than the Wiesel could, and with better protection to boot.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Celibrae
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1357
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Celibrae » Thu May 14, 2015 1:05 pm

Ok, so how should I structure my military divisions?
"Though much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are. One equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will. To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield."

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu May 14, 2015 1:22 pm

Celibrae wrote:Ok, so how should I structure my military divisions?

This is a very broad question that could be asking many things.

Do you feel your country needs the Division as a standard unit size?
What does your nation have to face? Opponents, their size, their capabilities? What sort of a war do you hope to fight?

Add in the usual questions of terrain, situation etc to decide what sort of school of though you best suit (Russian or Western).
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Thu May 14, 2015 1:34 pm

Celibrae wrote:Ok, so how should I structure my military divisions?


What is the role of the division within your military? There are lots of potential ways to organize them. Questers has posted a number of his divisions, and you can find lots of examples online of IRL divisions. I have a TO&E for a division as well.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ditrania, Google [Bot], Indo States

Advertisement

Remove ads