Korouse wrote:So, when a jet intercepts something like a Bomber or a transport plane, how do they usually y'know, tell it to go away? Except for shooting at it.
hand signal, radio communication or firing gun that has a tracer ammunition.
Advertisement

by New Vihenia » Sun Sep 13, 2015 9:05 pm
Korouse wrote:So, when a jet intercepts something like a Bomber or a transport plane, how do they usually y'know, tell it to go away? Except for shooting at it.

by Dostanuot Loj » Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:30 pm

by Crookfur » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:32 am
Korouse wrote:So, when a jet intercepts something like a Bomber or a transport plane, how do they usually y'know, tell it to go away? Except for shooting at it.
by Mitheldalond » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:09 am
Crookfur wrote:Korouse wrote:So, when a jet intercepts something like a Bomber or a transport plane, how do they usually y'know, tell it to go away? Except for shooting at it.
If it's a regular occurrence such as us/UK fighters intercepting patrolling bears then both sides know the script and they flying alongside each other taking photos and in the case of the Americans showing the poor Russians porn mags (although this was more an 80s/90s thing).
Mostly it's just about giving each other a good eyeballing and listening for any useful ELINT. No sane bomber crew is going to push matters once they know they have fighter company.

by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:39 pm
Mitheldalond wrote:Crookfur wrote:If it's a regular occurrence such as us/UK fighters intercepting patrolling bears then both sides know the script and they flying alongside each other taking photos and in the case of the Americans showing the poor Russians porn mags (although this was more an 80s/90s thing).
Mostly it's just about giving each other a good eyeballing and listening for any useful ELINT. No sane bomber crew is going to push matters once they know they have fighter company.
And no sane commander is going to let an insane bomber crew fly missions into another nation's airspace.

by Western Pacific Territories » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:44 pm

by Laywenrania » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:45 pm
Western Pacific Territories wrote:What's the range of a cruise missile fired from a submarine?
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

by Western Pacific Territories » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:46 pm

by Free Asian Ports » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:49 pm

by The Akasha Colony » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:53 pm
Western Pacific Territories wrote:What's the range of a cruise missile fired from a submarine?

by Laywenrania » Mon Sep 14, 2015 2:55 pm
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

by Roski » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:47 pm

by North Arkana » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:51 pm
Roski wrote:does anyone here understand how traditional warfare during the colonial periods of the United States worked?
Other than the whole "line up and fire volleys"

by Roski » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:01 pm
North Arkana wrote:Roski wrote:does anyone here understand how traditional warfare during the colonial periods of the United States worked?
Other than the whole "line up and fire volleys"
Taking a page from Morgan's book (I think) make use of militia as skirmishers who fire a couple shots, then fall back to regroup. Hold the line with regulars until the militia reforms and is ready to engage again. Rinse and repeat. Once you think it's at a good point, have the regulars fall back, but instead of reforming behind the militia, let the enemy almost catch up with them, turn around, point blank volley, bayonets.

by North Arkana » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Roski wrote:North Arkana wrote:Taking a page from Morgan's book (I think) make use of militia as skirmishers who fire a couple shots, then fall back to regroup. Hold the line with regulars until the militia reforms and is ready to engage again. Rinse and repeat. Once you think it's at a good point, have the regulars fall back, but instead of reforming behind the militia, let the enemy almost catch up with them, turn around, point blank volley, bayonets.
So basically, have some militia with the professional military
use the militia as bait continuously to the professionals, and when everythings going good, fall back, and then when the enemy chases you, turn around and massacre them?

by The Kievan People » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:17 pm
Western Pacific Territories wrote:What wold a normal range be? I'm specifically looking for missiles that can sink a ship or heavily damage it.

by Empire of Narnia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:49 pm

by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:57 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:This *might* be beyond the scope of this thread but I'll ask anyways. How would an otherwise realistic and modern military best utilize super-powered individuals in battle? If you look in my factbook you'll see some examples but this should be relevant for any nation with superheroes.
What strategies would they be best used for? Should I use them in major battles or not? How would they be useful in occupations or domestic policing? Also how would enemy nations try to counter them?

by Empire of Narnia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:02 pm
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:Empire of Narnia wrote:This *might* be beyond the scope of this thread but I'll ask anyways. How would an otherwise realistic and modern military best utilize super-powered individuals in battle? If you look in my factbook you'll see some examples but this should be relevant for any nation with superheroes.
What strategies would they be best used for? Should I use them in major battles or not? How would they be useful in occupations or domestic policing? Also how would enemy nations try to counter them?
Said 'superheroes' are so far outside the realm of what's realistic that I think it's a bit hard to even judge them. Something like a cat or primate are no more or less flesh and blood than any human, and thus vulnerable to anything humans are, but when you get into things like shapeshifting, telekinesis, and teleportation, you've gone beyond science fiction and into fantasy.

by Free Asian Ports » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:07 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:Said 'superheroes' are so far outside the realm of what's realistic that I think it's a bit hard to even judge them. Something like a cat or primate are no more or less flesh and blood than any human, and thus vulnerable to anything humans are, but when you get into things like shapeshifting, telekinesis, and teleportation, you've gone beyond science fiction and into fantasy.
I'm looking at it from a more strategic standpoint rather than if they themselves could exist or not. Like if you had a few people in your army who are super-strong and nearly impervious to damage how would they be best used?

by Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:09 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:Said 'superheroes' are so far outside the realm of what's realistic that I think it's a bit hard to even judge them. Something like a cat or primate are no more or less flesh and blood than any human, and thus vulnerable to anything humans are, but when you get into things like shapeshifting, telekinesis, and teleportation, you've gone beyond science fiction and into fantasy.
I'm looking at it from a more strategic standpoint rather than if they themselves could exist or not. Like if you had a few people in your army who are super-strong and nearly impervious to damage how would they be best used?

by The Kievan People » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:59 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:This *might* be beyond the scope of this thread but I'll ask anyways. How would an otherwise realistic and modern military best utilize super-powered individuals in battle? If you look in my factbook you'll see some examples but this should be relevant for any nation with superheroes.
What strategies would they be best used for? Should I use them in major battles or not? How would they be useful in occupations or domestic policing? Also how would enemy nations try to counter them?

by Empire of Narnia » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:02 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Empire of Narnia wrote:This *might* be beyond the scope of this thread but I'll ask anyways. How would an otherwise realistic and modern military best utilize super-powered individuals in battle? If you look in my factbook you'll see some examples but this should be relevant for any nation with superheroes.
What strategies would they be best used for? Should I use them in major battles or not? How would they be useful in occupations or domestic policing? Also how would enemy nations try to counter them?
What they can and cannot do is entirely up to you.

by Free Asian Ports » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:03 pm

by Inyourfaceistan » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:09 pm
Empire of Narnia wrote:This *might* be beyond the scope of this thread but I'll ask anyways. How would an otherwise realistic and modern military best utilize super-powered individuals in battle? If you look in my factbook you'll see some examples but this should be relevant for any nation with superheroes.
What strategies would they be best used for? Should I use them in major battles or not? How would they be useful in occupations or domestic policing? Also how would enemy nations try to counter them?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, The Land of the Ephyral
Advertisement