NATION

PASSWORD

Infantry Discussion Thread 6: True Korea Edition

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Vote to elect the next glorious brother leader of IDT

Gallan Systems
5
6%
Ulfr
4
5%
Mick Swagger
6
7%
Puzikas
27
31%
Nirvash Type TheEND
19
22%
Sevv
2
2%
Estovnia
1
1%
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502
3
3%
Gallia
7
8%
Glorious Comrade Padnak
13
15%
 
Total votes : 87

User avatar
Rhoderberg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhoderberg » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:42 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Randmar wrote:
I haven't actually design my military beyond some vague it exist and does stuff.

My diplomatic security detail comes up more often as I do embassies and participate in regional meetings.



I am looking for recommendations for actual weapons rather than vague archtypes like "go get sub machine guns" or something to that extent. I dont really know what sub machine gun has the accuracy and lack of stopping power I am seeking so I thought I ask here before I get drill through pages and pages on weapons.

G36c and MP5. There you go.

Don't listen to him.

FN FALs are the only weapon you need.

Edit: You should also considering buying Tsavonian.

Image
Last edited by Rhoderberg on Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ave Nex Alea | Formerly known as New Tsavon | Mick Swagger unjustly DOS - 4 / 4 / 2015

Mallorea and Riva should resign

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:48 pm

Rhoderberg wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:G36c and MP5. There you go.

Don't listen to him.

FN FALs are the only weapon you need.

Edit: You should also considering buying Tsavonian.

Image


Get that awesomely drawn piece of FN (good)crap out of here.

The only Weapon you need is the HK-416, perfect for dudes in Black uniforms and kick ass looking insignias.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:58 pm

Remember when I mentioned google sheets?

Protip: Scroll to the right for notes.
Also credit Velkanika
Last edited by Nirvash Type TheEND on Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Laywenrania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 825
Founded: Aug 05, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Laywenrania » Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:25 pm

Randmar wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Carbines and submachine guns.


I am looking for recommendations for actual weapons rather than vague archtypes like "go get sub machine guns" or something to that extent. I dont really know what sub machine gun has the accuracy and lack of stopping power I am seeking so I thought I ask here before I get drill through pages and pages on weapons.

AKS-74U. :D
Or PP-2000
Last edited by Laywenrania on Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Factbook on II-Wiki
NationStates Factbooks
Factbook website

Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.

Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

User avatar
The Archangel Conglomerate
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6469
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archangel Conglomerate » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:07 pm

Randmar wrote:I am looking for recommendations for actual weapons rather than vague archtypes like "go get sub machine guns" or something to that extent. I dont really know what sub machine gun has the accuracy and lack of stopping power I am seeking so I thought I ask here before I get drill through pages and pages on weapons.

Alas, without knowing more about your nation's armaments all we can offer are "vague archetypes." Really though, everyone's right. A carbine version of your standard combat rifle firing frangible ammunition, or an SMG with hollow points is exactly what you're looking for.

My personal preference, though, is for high velocith saboted solid steel penetrators.



Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:G36c and MP5. There you go.

Speaking of which, it seems the G36's accuracy issues are actually a thing. Admittedly, I'm quite surprised.
(\/)(•,,,,•)(\/)
Please, call me Arch

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.

For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.

For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.

For want of real weapons, they lost the war.

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10822
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crookfur » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Randmar wrote:
Yukonastan wrote:
What is your service rifle? Issue a carbine variant of that, optionally with frangible ammunition.

Optionally just line the interior walls of your embassy with half an inch of lead.


I haven't actually design my military beyond some vague it exist and does stuff.

My diplomatic security detail comes up more often as I do embassies and participate in regional meetings.

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Carbines and submachine guns.


I am looking for recommendations for actual weapons rather than vague archtypes like "go get sub machine guns" or something to that extent. I dont really know what sub machine gun has the accuracy and lack of stopping power I am seeking so I thought I ask here before I get drill through pages and pages on weapons.

The thing is within a class most firearms are going to be more or less the same so really it's more down to what you like the look of and what fits your nation.

You probably want a sidearm and for that any current 9mm or .45 acp pistol will do. You might want a model that comes in both full size and compact varieties but that's optional. As to what is hot at the moment it seems to be all about HK VP9s, S&W M&Ps, SIGs and the perennial Glock. All have thier fan boys and talking about them can cause lots of rage and butt hurt but honestly any of them or stuff from the likes of FN or Beretta will do the job so just use what ever pistol your favourite cop/action show uses.

As to "long arms" I w out don't bother with SMGs they don't have notably less wall and body penetration than small rifle calibre carbines which is part of the reason many police forces have/are transitioning to carbines. Any 10-12" barreled AR-15/M-16 derivative would work well (heck even the British transport police have one of these now) but you could go longer to 14-16" if you desired. Again there are loads of people making good short barrel AS but the likes of LMT, colt and FN are generally the favoured government contractors for these things although colt and FN tend to build US government designs rather than offer thier own catalogue options. Alternatively any other 5.56mm carbine would work so if you prefer the looks of the SCAR - or even a bullpup like the tavor that's cool.

You shouldn't need much else bar perhaps some 12 gauge pump shotguns and maybe a 40mm launcher issued with tear gas or other less than lethal rounds. As ever what you are permitted will depend on the nation you ate setting an embassy up in.

Remember how I mentioned what fits your nation? Well that I mean whilst I have mostly mentioned the very latest (trendy) stuff it could be that you nation isn't about the latest a greatest gear (although diplomatic protection groups tend to have thier own separate high priority procurement channels) so don't be put off looking at slightly older stuff or stuff from one particular country if that would be more fitting.
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:11 am

Husseinarti wrote:
Korva wrote:obviously those armories are packed with GPMGs and mortars in case Jason Bourne shows up


They have rifles and stuff.

But " don't really need anything beyond pistols" is how you get your embassy raided.

I assume he meant for the guys in the lobby.
Yukonastan wrote:
Randmar wrote:So I am creating a "Foreign Guard" which will basically be security officers meant for guarding embassies, protecting visiting dignitaries, and generally be the public face of my military on the international scene.

I am curious I do not know much about guns but what would be some good weapons and calibers to arm them with? I need weapons that are highly accurate and are not as likely to shoot through walls just in case they do miss. I am not to concern about stopping power, I'd rather avoid killing some nosy reporter or other person whose death will set the media on fire.


What is your service rifle? Issue a carbine variant of that, optionally with frangible ammunition.

Optionally just line the interior walls of your embassy with half an inch of lead.

Bonus - radiation shielding!
Randmar wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Carbines and submachine guns.


I am looking for recommendations for actual weapons rather than vague archtypes like "go get sub machine guns" or something to that extent. I dont really know what sub machine gun has the accuracy and lack of stopping power I am seeking so I thought I ask here before I get drill through pages and pages on weapons.

Almost all rifles will have an acceptable accuracy (~man-sized target at 300m), so it's really a personal preference. This preference could be based on your proposed ethnicity and relations to the real world - ie, whether you select a Kalashnikov or an AR-15 model. All submachine guns will similarly be broadly comparable in terms of precision, just to a much shorter range. One would hope embassy guards need not fight at 300 metres or so, and will probably be shooting at targets significantly closer, where dispersion of the weapon can be almost ignored.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:56 am

The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:Speaking of which, it seems the G36's accuracy issues are actually a thing. Admittedly, I'm quite surprised.

They had a wandering zero. Pretty sure it's been fixed.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:58 am

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:Speaking of which, it seems the G36's accuracy issues are actually a thing. Admittedly, I'm quite surprised.

They had a wandering zero. Pretty sure it's been fixed.

Rather than using spec polymers, HK has apparently been using the same kind of plastic as milk cartons for years for key structural components of the rifles.
The rifles are actually inherently faulty due to manufacturing.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 am

Unreachable.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:47 am

Radicchio wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Jeep infantry squad

  • Squad leader - rifle
  • Grenadier - rifle + UBGL
  • Rifleman - rifle
  • Gunner - belt-fed GPMG

with rifle grenades / disposable rocket launchers spread among them, y/y?

Also, what exactly is a "scout" in a squad? Do they have some better optics or lighter load or smth?


This is almost identical to how I run a jeep squad with four jeeps to a squad and one of those four having only two riflemen and a radio operator running a field network.

And for the purposes of my infantry, a "Scout" is a designated marksman who has done some hand to hand combat training, graduated a week of evasion/survival classes, gets to ditch the extra belt of 30cal and instead humps around a short range laser designator for painting up the CAS targets.


wait what. So a single squad is 4 jeeps and 12+3=15 men?

I was thinking more of a 4-man squad, perhaps x4 for a platoon + a jeep carrying a 60mm (probably commando) mortar and platoon leader and another jeep with platoon 2ic and a MMG team or smth (or DM + MMG)

EDIT: Alternatively, I could have a non-dismountable crew of 2 (driver and gunner) so that the vehicles can still move and possibly offer fire support to the dismounts. But then I'd be left with only 3 dismounts which is even less for a squad.

Maybe 2 vehicles per squad would be better to give a 6-man squad. However, I'd be left with 6 vehicle platoons not including command/weapons squad.

2 vehicles per squad really grinds my OCD gears tho
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
The East Asian Post-Apocalyptic Pact
Diplomat
 
Posts: 601
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Asian Post-Apocalyptic Pact » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:13 am

Image
You guys said that the post-apocalyptic rifleman would be equipped with some sort of AK. But if this takes place in a hundred years later in the future against a variety of enemies such as hostile wildlife, mutants, zombies, aliens, and finally other humans, what kind of improvements would you expect for the Kalashnikova?

>inb4 nyet rifle is fine
Last edited by The East Asian Post-Apocalyptic Pact on Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
When Debating: Please don't be condescending. I debate when I know my stuff; I don't debate when I don't know my stuff. Yes, I love Mass debating.
About me IRL: (66.7% Good 46.2%) Lawful Good Jew-on-a-stick-worshipping Asian Commie. Privelage Level: 125 SH1TL0RD
About IC nation: I have a factbook now! Yay!
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_east_asian_post-apocalyptic_pact/detail=factbook/id=main

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:31 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Radicchio wrote:
This is almost identical to how I run a jeep squad with four jeeps to a squad and one of those four having only two riflemen and a radio operator running a field network.

And for the purposes of my infantry, a "Scout" is a designated marksman who has done some hand to hand combat training, graduated a week of evasion/survival classes, gets to ditch the extra belt of 30cal and instead humps around a short range laser designator for painting up the CAS targets.


wait what. So a single squad is 4 jeeps and 12+3=15 men?

I was thinking more of a 4-man squad, perhaps x4 for a platoon + a jeep carrying a 60mm (probably commando) mortar and platoon leader and another jeep with platoon 2ic and a MMG team or smth (or DM + MMG)

EDIT: Alternatively, I could have a non-dismountable crew of 2 (driver and gunner) so that the vehicles can still move and possibly offer fire support to the dismounts. But then I'd be left with only 3 dismounts which is even less for a squad.

Maybe 2 vehicles per squad would be better to give a 6-man squad. However, I'd be left with 6 vehicle platoons not including command/weapons squad.

2 vehicles per squad really grinds my OCD gears tho


I fail to see how it's anti OCD
Image

:p
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:33 am

Immoren wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
wait what. So a single squad is 4 jeeps and 12+3=15 men?

I was thinking more of a 4-man squad, perhaps x4 for a platoon + a jeep carrying a 60mm (probably commando) mortar and platoon leader and another jeep with platoon 2ic and a MMG team or smth (or DM + MMG)

EDIT: Alternatively, I could have a non-dismountable crew of 2 (driver and gunner) so that the vehicles can still move and possibly offer fire support to the dismounts. But then I'd be left with only 3 dismounts which is even less for a squad.

Maybe 2 vehicles per squad would be better to give a 6-man squad. However, I'd be left with 6 vehicle platoons not including command/weapons squad.

2 vehicles per squad really grinds my OCD gears tho


I fail to see how it's anti OCD
Image

:p


All platoons must have 4 squads. All companies must have 4 platoons. Each squad in its own vehicle.

NO

EXCEPTIONS

(this is how my brain works irl)
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:35 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Immoren wrote:
I fail to see how it's anti OCD
Image

:p


All platoons must have 4 squads. All companies must have 4 platoons. Each squad in its own vehicle.

NO

EXCEPTIONS

(this is how my brain works irl)


Call it a troop or section to get around it then.
:p
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10822
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crookfur » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:37 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Immoren wrote:
I fail to see how it's anti OCD

:p


All platoons must have 4 squads. All companies must have 4 platoons. Each squad in its own vehicle.

NO

EXCEPTIONS

(this is how my brain works irl)


What are you the Federated Suns? Just call your platoon a Lance and be done with it.

Anyway you are a heretic for not following the one true light of the Rule of three+ specials
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:41 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Immoren wrote:
I fail to see how it's anti OCD
Image

:p


All platoons must have 4 squads. All companies must have 4 platoons. Each squad in its own vehicle.

NO

EXCEPTIONS

(this is how my brain works irl)


Don't be a Square.

Rule of three trumps all.

Image

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:46 am

Gallia- wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
All platoons must have 4 squads. All companies must have 4 platoons. Each squad in its own vehicle.

NO

EXCEPTIONS

(this is how my brain works irl)


Don't be a Square.

Rule of three trumps all.

Image


And pants are for squares.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:26 am

Gallia- wrote:Don't be a Square.

...lol
Unreachable.

User avatar
Tekeristan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5344
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Tekeristan » Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:29 am

How shall infantry carry rockets to keep up with tank designs?

With tanks improving their missile-defense systems, what do you guys thing?

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:44 am

Tekeristan wrote:How shall infantry carry rockets to keep up with tank designs?

With tanks improving their missile-defense systems, what do you guys thing?

Dedicated anti-tank weapons at the platoon level.
Unreachable.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:53 am

Tekeristan wrote:How shall infantry carry rockets to keep up with tank designs?

With tanks improving their missile-defense systems, what do you guys thing?


M72 for every infantryman, not preoccupied with machine gun.
Platoon has has 18 NLAWs that will handed out to platoon`s Riflemen according to the Platoon leader's battleplan and METT-T.

Further anti-tank troops are on higher levels.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:54 am

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Tekeristan wrote:How shall infantry carry rockets to keep up with tank designs?

With tanks improving their missile-defense systems, what do you guys thing?

Dedicated anti-tank weapons at the platoon level.

Dedicated anti-tank is a battalion or company asset.

Rifle platoons and their squads only need weapons that can harass and suppress enemy armour, which are offered by general grenadier weapons like RPG-7, Carl Gustav, SMAW and also disposable/light launchers such as AT-4, RPG-22, LAW.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:10 am

The East Asian Post-Apocalyptic Pact wrote:(Image)
You guys said that the post-apocalyptic rifleman would be equipped with some sort of AK. But if this takes place in a hundred years later in the future against a variety of enemies such as hostile wildlife, mutants, zombies, aliens, and finally other humans, what kind of improvements would you expect for the Kalashnikova?

>inb4 nyet rifle is fine


nyet rifu ees fine. *nods*
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:13 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Dedicated anti-tank weapons at the platoon level.

Dedicated anti-tank is a battalion or company asset.

Rifle platoons and their squads only need weapons that can harass and suppress enemy armour, which are offered by general grenadier weapons like RPG-7, Carl Gustav, SMAW and also disposable/light launchers such as AT-4, RPG-22, LAW.

US army gives Javelins to their weapons squads Image

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Agausia, Google [Bot], HarYan, South West Rhodesia, Urmanian

Advertisement

Remove ads