Episode 5; Corda Strikes Back
Advertisement


by Fordorsia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:29 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.

by Vancon » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:29 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:You know I don't say this often, but this guy... he gets it. Like everything. As in he gets life.
Krazakistan wrote:How have you not died after being exposed to that much shit on a monthly basis?
Rupudska wrote:I avoid NSG like one would avoid ISIS-occupied Syria.
Alimeria- wrote:I'll go to sleep when I want to, not when some cheese-eating surrender monkey tells me to.
Which just so happens to be within the next half-hour
Shyluz wrote:Van, Sci-fi Generallisimo

by Puzikas » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:30 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:My supervisor is now looking at me like I'm an idiot, thanks.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

by The balkens » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:39 am

by Yukonastan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:42 am

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:44 am
Puzikas wrote:Amazing.
Yukonastan wrote:Puzikas, modular grenades*. Thoughts?
*ie different types of fuzes, bodies (whole or segmented), time adjustable fuzes, yayayaya.

by Yukonastan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:48 am

by Tekeristan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:50 am

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:50 am
Yukonastan wrote:Put a stick on a pineapple.
Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?

by Tekeristan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:51 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Yukonastan wrote:Put a stick on a pineapple.
Shit dude, you're half way there. Just brush it with some honey and grill it over a maple fire.Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?
Heavier and space inefficient.

by The balkens » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:54 am
Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?


by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:55 am
The balkens wrote:Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?
my guess is low explosive yield. A possible solution is to stick a bunch of the charges together.
Like so.
It was a common tactic in WW1, great for clearing trenches and it was also seen in WW2, often by German heavy infantry. I also heard that the soviets did this method with their anti-tank grenades and were apparently effective.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

by Yukonastan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:55 am
Nirvash wrote:Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?
Heavier and space inefficient.

by Laywenrania » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:56 am
Tekeristan wrote:Stick grenades look pretty awesome, and seem like you could throw them farther.
What are the cons?
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

by Nirvash Type TheEND » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:57 am
Yukonastan wrote:Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Shit dude, you're half way there. Just brush it with some honey and grill it over a maple fire.
Maple fires are too heavy and bulky to issue to every fireteam =/Nirvash wrote:Heavier and space inefficient.
Hence why the fuzes/other random shit parts/whatever are modular. If you need to finnperate at high speed no drag you remove the sticks at your base and replace them with pineapple-style fuzes, and if you need to into longer throws you use a stick handle fuze instead. And with different charges you get stick CS gas grenades, stick smoke grenades, stick flashbang grenades, stick concussion grenades, stick antitank grenades, stick grenades ribbed for her pleasure...

by Yukonastan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:59 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Yukonastan wrote:Maple fires are too heavy and bulky to issue to every fireteam =/
Hence why the fuzes/other random shit parts/whatever are modular. If you need to finnperate at high speed no drag you remove the sticks at your base and replace them with pineapple-style fuzes, and if you need to into longer throws you use a stick handle fuze instead. And with different charges you get stick CS gas grenades, stick smoke grenades, stick flashbang grenades, stick concussion grenades, stick antitank grenades, stick grenades ribbed for her pleasure...
You would actually be better off using explosive dogs at that point.

by Puzikas » Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:14 pm
Yukonastan wrote:Puzikas, modular grenades*. Thoughts?
*ie different types of fuzes, bodies (whole or segmented), time adjustable fuzes, yayayaya.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 2:43 pm
Puzikas wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:All of my work with my forces is based upon FM-100-2-3 (US), which is not the most reliable of models, I'm told
It's from where I get my breakdown of the Soviet rifle platoon - three sections of seven fighting men, a BMP each and two commanders for the platoon. FM-100-2-3 was written at a time when the BMP-1 was still the dominant vehicle in the Soviet and WarPac inventory, and the structure may have changed entirely.
Its changed so many times between each branch of service in the last ~15 years I really dont know whats normal and whats not anymore.
At the time of my enlistment, the standard Soviet doctrine was still in place for motor rifle squads in BTR-70s and 80s, BMP-1s and BMP-2s. However, as the soviet nature sort of fledged away from my unit, commanders began sort of reorganizing squad, Platoon, and Company structures on the basis that we were "inefficient".
Squad composition went from as described in FM-100-whatever (Which did have some issues; I haven't read it in some time but it certainly was not 100%) to something a bit different.
A standard platoon had two SVD gunners, Two PK gunners and two RPG gunners. The squads no longer had three of four RPGs, one SVD and one PK. It just wasn't necessary to have so many RPG-7s, primarily due to the increased prevalence of disposable launchers like the RPG-18/22 and RPG-26, and the existence of assistants, who could also act as suppression and maneuver elements far better than an RPG-7 gunner could.
The addition of an SVD and a PK was a logical choice, really; it allowed the platoon to engage at further distances, place down more fire, more accurately, while not taking away from the efficiency of normal riflemen.
Not having been Army, however, I am unsure of their organization during this time. I believe it likely retained its organization. The problem with the Soviet organizational system for Squads and Platoons is they felt no obligation to actually deploy the infantry weapons in any cohesive fashion. Sure, there were probably 4 men trained (Well, tasked, pretty much everyone would know how to use it) on the RPG-7, but maybe only one had the RPG-7, and the rest were toting around Kalashnikovs or RPKs. A platoon might have one Sniper assigned to them, but they somehow have three or four.
The modern organizational system is dramatically different since the 2008 reforms and the 2012 re-reforms, im sure. If I had to guess, based on the, among the members of the dismounts, you would find:
-14/15 AK-74Ms with 3 GP-25/GP30 grenade Launchers
-3 RPK-74s
-2 SVDs
-2 RPG-7s
-2 PKM/P Machine Guns
Assuming 23 total dismounts (7 men from each BTR+ MIC & 2IC)
Though I am rather unsure. I dont have any friends still in the Army service; they've all moved to the MVD, FSB, or various special purpose units, or have left the service since that time.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Immoren » Tue Apr 21, 2015 2:52 pm

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Laywenrania » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:00 pm
Immoren wrote:Separate winter and summer bdus, or single bdu with summer camo on one side and winter camo on the other, and is turned inside out as needed?
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:02 pm

Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Immoren » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:09 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Surely your winter BDU would be separate and be more warming than summer gear?
Or is summer really that cold in Finland?

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Archangel Conglomerate » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:15 pm
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement