Advertisement
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:00 am
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:05 am
by The Archangel Conglomerate » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:06 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
by Laywenrania » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:18 am
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:22 am
Laywenrania wrote:While reading about the different bolt action systems, the Enfield, Mauser and Mosin system seem to have differences in the design, but in "performance" they seem to be all pretty close.
Now does any of the three has remarkable advantages over others or is it "choose whatever you want because they're more or less equal"?
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:22 am
Laywenrania wrote:While reading about the different bolt action systems, the Enfield, Mauser and Mosin system seem to have differences in the design, but in "performance" they seem to be all pretty close.
Now does any of the three has remarkable advantages over others or is it "choose whatever you want because they're more or less equal"?
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:25 am
Purpelia wrote:Laywenrania wrote:While reading about the different bolt action systems, the Enfield, Mauser and Mosin system seem to have differences in the design, but in "performance" they seem to be all pretty close.
Now does any of the three has remarkable advantages over others or is it "choose whatever you want because they're more or less equal"?
The later. Although if you want my advice I am going to say neither. The best system is the strait-pull used by the Schmidt-Rubin series of rifles.
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:27 am
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:29 am
Purpelia wrote:Yukonastan wrote:
The best system is a K31 with a gas cylinder jerryrigged onto it, bruh.
Yea, I know.
by Laywenrania » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:30 am
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:34 am
Laywenrania wrote:Would a straigth pull system have any major drawbacks (esp. regarding reliability in muddy/swampy conditions)?
Aka why aren't they more widespread?
by Gawdzendia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:35 am
Laywenrania wrote:Would a straigth pull system have any major drawbacks (esp. regarding reliability in muddy/swampy conditions)?
Aka why aren't they more widespread?
NATIONSTATES STATS USED IN THEIR ENTIRETY GOVERNANCE: Chamber of Estates / Presidential Council GOVERNMENT: Citizen Republic President: Alexander Christensen CAPITAL: Adonia City OFFICIAL LANGUAGES: German, French, English CURRENCY: Gawdzendian Dollar (GZD) GENERAL AWARENESS & WEAPON DEPLOYMENT CONDITION 1 - PEACETIME 2 - HEIGHTENED AWARENESS 3 - EARLY MOBILIZATION 4 - MOBILIZATION 5 - SYMMETRICAL WARFARE 6 - NUCLEAR WARFARE | | <<~~ About Gawdzendia ~~>> | | Canadian |
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:36 am
Gawdzendia wrote:Laywenrania wrote:Would a straigth pull system have any major drawbacks (esp. regarding reliability in muddy/swampy conditions)?
Aka why aren't they more widespread?
They were kinda hit and miss when the happened IRL, I don't know about the Mannlicher and how it fared during the Great War, but the Canadians used a straight pull called the Ross Rifle that had a bad habit of shooting the bolt back at you if you didn't re-assemble it just perfectly following a good cleaning.
As you can imagine, a rifle with that sort of tolerance for dirt and grime was not very popular when all you did was sit in miles long stretches of dirt and grime.
by Gawdzendia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:39 am
Purpelia wrote:Gawdzendia wrote:
They were kinda hit and miss when the happened IRL, I don't know about the Mannlicher and how it fared during the Great War, but the Canadians used a straight pull called the Ross Rifle that had a bad habit of shooting the bolt back at you if you didn't re-assemble it just perfectly following a good cleaning.
As you can imagine, a rifle with that sort of tolerance for dirt and grime was not very popular when all you did was sit in miles long stretches of dirt and grime.
That's not a feature of strait pulls but of the Ross which was frankly badly designed. Here is a link that explains the details: http://www.forgottenweapons.com/myth-an ... oss-mkiii/
Basically the bolt was designed in a way which allowed it to be reassembled wrong. And if you did that the bolt would not rotate properly and thus would not lock. And you'd get an out of battery shot.
Laywenrania wrote:Would a straigth pull system have any major drawbacks (esp. regarding reliability in muddy/swampy conditions)?
Aka why aren't they more widespread?
NATIONSTATES STATS USED IN THEIR ENTIRETY GOVERNANCE: Chamber of Estates / Presidential Council GOVERNMENT: Citizen Republic President: Alexander Christensen CAPITAL: Adonia City OFFICIAL LANGUAGES: German, French, English CURRENCY: Gawdzendian Dollar (GZD) GENERAL AWARENESS & WEAPON DEPLOYMENT CONDITION 1 - PEACETIME 2 - HEIGHTENED AWARENESS 3 - EARLY MOBILIZATION 4 - MOBILIZATION 5 - SYMMETRICAL WARFARE 6 - NUCLEAR WARFARE | | <<~~ About Gawdzendia ~~>> | | Canadian |
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:40 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:16 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Purpelia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:19 am
by Bratislavskaya » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:20 am
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:15 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:20 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:27 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:3-3.5kg unloaded, ~650rpm.
If you're comparing it to the AK, not sure why you're expecting it to be different.
by Bratislavskaya » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:31 am
by Yukonastan » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:36 am
Bratislavskaya wrote:Are squad level snipers a good idea? Well, more along the lines of designated marksmen, with a not!M76 or something rather than an actual sniper, but should I do this at squad level?
by Korva » Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:38 am
Bratislavskaya wrote:Are squad level snipers a good idea? Well, more along the lines of designated marksmen, with a not!M76 or something rather than an actual sniper, but should I do this at squad level?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Dayganistan
Advertisement