Might be. Might also simply be korvascale. Either way doesn't tickle my leninade.
Edit: M56 stahlhelms of the DDR.

Advertisement

by Yukonastan » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:40 am


by Korva » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:41 am

by Bears Armed » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:51 am
Depends on the tanks (& other AFVs) that you expect your troops to encounter; also on budget, and sources for procurement...New Terricon wrote:I am working on a new equipment list for my military, and I've run into a few obstacles. The biggest issue I've had in writing it up so far is the anti-tank weaponry. So far, I have an RPG-7 and an RPG-29 without any actual rockets. Obviously I should completely revise this portion, but how should I go about in doing it?

by Aethal » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:53 am

by Laywenrania » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:55 am
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.


by Korva » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:24 am
Yukonastan wrote:Might also simply be korvascale. Either way doesn't tickle my leninade.


by Bezktovakia » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:34 am
by Doppio Giudici » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:43 am

by Bezktovakia » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:44 am
Yep, it'd be fine.Sakrand wrote:Would the HK33 be an ok service rifle?
Hm. Why not?Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:n

by Yukonastan » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:50 am

by Bezktovakia » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:53 am
;-;Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:It's disgusting that's why.

by Korva » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:57 am


by Bezktovakia » Thu Feb 19, 2015 11:59 am
Korva wrote:Any suggestions on how to make what's essentially a tube look not-shit?


by Korva » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:01 pm
Bezktovakia wrote:The handguard on the StG 45. Generally not a fan of tubular handguards but I'm not sure how I could do anything different given the shape of the receiver.

by Spirit of Hope » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:02 pm
Sakrand wrote:Part of my country is desert so I was wondering, how much water should my soldiers be issued?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Yukonastan » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:03 pm

by Azurg » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:41 pm
Sakrand wrote:Would the HK33 be an ok service rifle?
Doppio Giudici wrote:G-41 is better?

by Puzikas » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:49 pm
Aethal wrote:Puzikas wrote:
I could give you a bullshit answer confirming my sage like knowledge of firearms and the properties therein, but I won't.
He has indicated it was a necked down.45 ACP casing (23mm length) firing an M1 Carbine projectile (100 grains at 16.5mm length) while maintaining the OAL of .45ACP (32.4mm). I estimated the case capacity at 23 grains and assumed similar pressure profile to .45 ACP at 21K PSI (The high range, given), thus leading me to said velocity from a 6" barrel.
huh, alright. In this case, it's safe to assume that the casing is rocking a slightly heftier (Not to much, not to little; enough for added kick, not enough for horrific barrel burning, reasonable sounding, right?) powder load than your usual .45 acp. I mean, if anything, I want to squeeze as much range and as oomph as possible out of this lovely little mutant. Anyhow, thanks Puz; you may like the device that fires it; almost like an american Wimmersperg Carbine, just more of a blending of the Thompson, Colt Monitor, Sieg Rifle and the glory of the M1911A1.
Azurg wrote:Name three good reasons
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;

by Galmarch » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:51 pm

Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, Majestic-12 [Bot], Russian Vavilon, The Land of the Ephyral
Advertisement