Advertisement
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 17, 2015 8:41 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by EsToVnIa » Sun May 17, 2015 8:43 am
by Fordorsia » Sun May 17, 2015 8:45 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:"Any officer who goes into battle without his sword is improperly dressed."
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.
by Immoren » Sun May 17, 2015 8:53 am
Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Azurg » Sun May 17, 2015 8:54 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:"Any officer who goes into battle without his sword is improperly dressed."
Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Estovnian_Army#Infantry
moar sperg
by EsToVnIa » Sun May 17, 2015 8:57 am
Azurg wrote:It's seventy-five ratmen plus, though. That said, I think you're right. I'm probably going to end up tripling the size of the rifle platoons. That'd put a company up to 176-180 ratmen in all.
by Azurg » Sun May 17, 2015 9:30 am
Estovnia wrote:Yeah I just saw "3-5" so I just multiplied by 15 without taking into account the other platoon sizes
75 men is fine. You're just going to have a lot more of subunits in say, a brigade, or battalion which may reduce the overall effectiveness.
Edit: it would be more spergy if i could fit if https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/169 ... ia/BCT.png this would fit without making the page poop :c
by Mansuriyyah Islamic State » Sun May 17, 2015 9:33 am
by EsToVnIa » Sun May 17, 2015 9:36 am
Azurg wrote:Estovnia wrote:Yeah I just saw "3-5" so I just multiplied by 15 without taking into account the other platoon sizes
75 men is fine. You're just going to have a lot more of subunits in say, a brigade, or battalion which may reduce the overall effectiveness.
Eh, either way. Too, I figure having massive rifle platoons better fits with the idea that they're largely disposable bullet sponges who's main purpose is to outlast the enemy's rifle platoon.
As for overall effectiveness, there's meant to be a goodly bit of inefficiency and political/bureaucratic muddahfukkery in the higher ranks. I'm going for a bit of a Stalinist Red Army type deal.
Azurg wrote:Perhaps you can cut some of the margin from between the columns?
Mansuriyyah Islamic State wrote:Hi everyone,
Based on my total number of personel in the Army, how many Divisions can I field? I'd prefer a means to calculate it so if I have to change my nation's Armed Forces size I can reaculculate the number of divisions.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 17, 2015 9:37 am
Mansuriyyah Islamic State wrote:Hi everyone,
Based on my total number of personel in the Army, how many Divisions can I field? I'd prefer a means to calculate it so if I have to change my nation's Armed Forces size I can reaculculate the number of divisions.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Azurg » Sun May 17, 2015 9:41 am
Estovnia wrote:Then you should keep the current layout. Nothing screams inefficiency like have 8 companies in a battalion D
Azurg wrote:I should've clarified. By "sperg" I meant thinly hiding my own sexual shortcomings by trying to make my military seem rly OP.
by Immoren » Sun May 17, 2015 9:48 am
Estovnia wrote:Then you should keep the current layout. Nothing screams inefficiency like have 8 companies in a battalion D
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Ulfr-Reich » Sun May 17, 2015 10:18 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Well what it is, is an 18.5mm piece of hollow metal that, through witchcraft and evil, becomes significantly larger than 18.5mm.
by Husseinarti » Sun May 17, 2015 11:04 am
The Kievan People wrote:*cough* MG 42 *cough*
by Fordorsia » Sun May 17, 2015 11:27 am
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.
by Ulfr-Reich » Sun May 17, 2015 11:35 am
by Anshaskia » Sun May 17, 2015 11:37 am
Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Estovnian_Army#Infantry
moar sperg
by EsToVnIa » Sun May 17, 2015 11:38 am
Anshaskia wrote:Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Estovnian_Army#Infantry
moar sperg
I didn't know modernized armies still used reconciles rifles. I thought they were pretty much ineffective against armour nowadays.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 17, 2015 11:38 am
Anshaskia wrote:Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Estovnian_Army#Infantry
moar sperg
I didn't know modernized armies still used reconciles rifles. I thought they were pretty much ineffective against armour nowadays.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Immoren » Sun May 17, 2015 11:47 am
Anshaskia wrote:Estovnia wrote:Unfortunately Arch, that's one of the problems with the thread is nobody reads infantry sperg stuff ; _ ;
So you're just doing fire-and-maneuver with 15 man sections/squads?
There's no real problem with any of it, aside from 45-60 men companies being really small.
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Estovnian_Army#Infantry
moar sperg
I didn't know modernized armies still used reconciles rifles. I thought they were pretty much ineffective against armour nowadays.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 17, 2015 12:00 pm
Anshaskia wrote:How is the RPG-29 a recoilless rifle?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Falloa, Indo States, Unogonduria
Advertisement