NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Mark 8

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Visegrad
Minister
 
Posts: 2652
Founded: May 30, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby New Visegrad » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:56 pm

BLV-12-B Operation Chutti camouflage
Operation Chutti was Imperial Cirasthayi's contribution to the Middle Eastern conflicts. The only overseas deployment consisted of aircraft and special forces, but a camouflage scheme for the BLV-12 was conceptualized based on the pattern applied to aircraft for the mission.

The next upgrade for the BLV-12, for 2015 deployment, will probably include an APS, UAV roost, and additional spaced/slatted armour. Since the first two require a new turret I think I'll drop the rear turret floor to match the rest of the turret while I'm there.
(Art) -- People who get DEATed usually deserve it.
New Visegrad region - “One man stood tall and in the face of evil roared”
Capital: March City
Affiliation: Core Governance
Tech level: FT/Multiverse
Post-apocalyptic hypertechnological corporate/bureaucratic militaristic multispecies semi-utopia.
It is the year 4411. After a devastating galactic war between the authoritarian Galactic Defense League and an alliance of breakaway factions seeking to overturn the fascist government, a new socialist state - the Core Governance - seeks to rebuild a unified, peaceful galaxy where everyone can live in safety.
Brit. Concept artist (hire me). If you like to call people "SJWs" I'm probably one of them.

User avatar
Erusuia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 559
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Erusuia » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:04 pm

Image

WIP UG-66

my not:T-64
Glorious Erusuia Forever
Pharthan wrote:
Padnak wrote:Are there any crippling disadvantages to blasting ride of the Valkyries out of the helicopters during an air assault against hostile forces that know you're there?

Being too awesome?

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:06 pm

Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle
Last edited by Tunguskania on Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:08 pm

Erusuia wrote:(Image)

WIP UG-66

my not:T-64

There is something off about it.

I think maybe the road wheels are too small, same with the turret.
Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle

BMP-2, Bradley, K21, and more
Last edited by Korva on Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Erusuia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 559
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Erusuia » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:10 pm

Korva wrote:
Erusuia wrote:(Image)

WIP UG-66

my not:T-64

There is something off about it.

I think maybe the road wheels are too small, same with the turret.


Eh I can't help but feel the same way about it

the wheels are the same size as the T-64s and so is the turret roughly

can't place whats off about it
Glorious Erusuia Forever
Pharthan wrote:
Padnak wrote:Are there any crippling disadvantages to blasting ride of the Valkyries out of the helicopters during an air assault against hostile forces that know you're there?

Being too awesome?

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:13 pm

Korva wrote:
Erusuia wrote:(Image)

WIP UG-66

my not:T-64

There is something off about it.

I think maybe the road wheels are too small, same with the turret.
Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle

BMP-2, Bradley, K21, and more

Do you know where can i get the stats or something like that?

User avatar
Erusuia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 559
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Erusuia » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:18 pm

Much improved

Image

I shortened the hull a bunch
Glorious Erusuia Forever
Pharthan wrote:
Padnak wrote:Are there any crippling disadvantages to blasting ride of the Valkyries out of the helicopters during an air assault against hostile forces that know you're there?

Being too awesome?

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:19 pm

Erusuia wrote:Much improved

(Image)

I shortened the hull a bunch

Can you add some armour plates?

User avatar
Erusuia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 559
Founded: Sep 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Erusuia » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:22 pm

Tunguskania wrote:
Erusuia wrote:Much improved

(Image)

I shortened the hull a bunch

Can you add some armour plates?


I'm probably going to make a modernized variant eventually

This is supposed to be a design from the early 60s that incorporates composite armor
Glorious Erusuia Forever
Pharthan wrote:
Padnak wrote:Are there any crippling disadvantages to blasting ride of the Valkyries out of the helicopters during an air assault against hostile forces that know you're there?

Being too awesome?

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:22 pm

Erusuia wrote:Much improved

(Image)

I shortened the hull a bunch

I compared it against youroker's T-64B, some aspects of yours were smaller. With the reduced hull length it looks better. :)
Tunguskania wrote:
Korva wrote:There is something off about it.

I think maybe the road wheels are too small, same with the turret.

You can find the most basic stats (hull size/armament/number of crew) on wikipedia.

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:24 pm

Korva wrote:
Erusuia wrote:Much improved

(Image)

I shortened the hull a bunch

I compared it against youroker's T-64B, some aspects of yours were smaller. With the reduced hull length it looks better. :)
Tunguskania wrote:

You can find the most basic stats (hull size/armament/number of crew) on wikipedia.

weee tank shares wheels:)

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:27 pm

Tunguskania wrote:
Korva wrote:I compared it against youroker's T-64B, some aspects of yours were smaller. With the reduced hull length it looks better. :)

You can find the most basic stats (hull size/armament/number of crew) on wikipedia.

weee tank shares wheels:)

Almost if its like a copy made in paint.net

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:12 pm

Image
Would this work?

User avatar
New Emphillon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Emphillon » Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:15 pm

Tunguskania wrote:
Korva wrote:There is something off about it.

I think maybe the road wheels are too small, same with the turret.

BMP-2, Bradley, K21, and more

Do you know where can i get the stats or something like that?

This should help: http://www.military-today.com/apc.htm

User avatar
New Emphillon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1573
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Emphillon » Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:19 pm

Quick question: what is the purpose of specialized armored personnel carriers like the BMO-T or the PMRS when specialist combat teams can just use regular APCs?


User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:47 pm

New Emphillon wrote:Quick question: what is the purpose of specialized armored personnel carriers like the BMO-T or the PMRS when specialist combat teams can just use regular APCs?


The BMO-T needs to deliver its crew much closer than the BMP was ever intended to. The RPO is a shoulder fire weapon. For RPO teams to do their job they need to be delivered within range of shoulder fired weapons. Which means they are also in range of RPGs.

The PMRS has the specialized reconnaissance equipment needed for reconnaissance.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Stahn
Senator
 
Posts: 4663
Founded: May 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stahn » Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:38 pm

Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle

These 2 seem pretty good to me:

Combat Vehicle 90

Marder (IFV)

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:32 am

Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle


BMP-2
AMX-10P
M2 Bradley
Warrior
Marder I
CV90
BMP-3

etc.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Padnak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6408
Founded: Feb 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Padnak » Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:20 am

BMP-3

:o
"มีใบมีดคมและจิตใจที่คมชัด!"
Have a sharp blade, and a sharper mind!
Need weapons for dubious purposes? Buy Padarm today!
San-Silvacian: Aug 11, 2011-Mar 20, 2015
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.

Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.

Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.

Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.

The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:39 am

BMP-1 is elite tier
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10822
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crookfur » Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:13 am

Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle


Not personnally no, but from what i hear they are a bit stand offish and tend not to like making new aquaintances.



Anyway warrior=bestest wagon.
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
The Greater Luthorian Empire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1403
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Greater Luthorian Empire » Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:58 am

Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle

No, your soldiers they want APCs. I suggest M-113, best vehicle ever made, cheap, fast, and carries soldiers. Also if America exists in your timeline I suppose you could buy them for extremely low prices.

In all seriousness there aren't any really notable IFVs, they mostly have autocannons, carry like 5-10 guys, have pretty thin armour, a few can carry more guys or use bigger guns, but as a whole they aren't too varied, any IFV used by a major country would work fine, I suggest you narrrow down your choices a bit. How many guys do you want it to carry, do you want an autocannon or something like the BMP-3, do you want it to be able to travel across water?
Imperializt Russia wrote:They told me I could be anything, so I became a razor blade.

User avatar
Tunguskania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 758
Founded: Oct 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tunguskania » Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:15 am

The Greater Luthorian Empire wrote:
Tunguskania wrote:Does anyone know a good infantry figthing vehicle

No, your soldiers they want APCs. I suggest M-113, best vehicle ever made, cheap, fast, and carries soldiers. Also if America exists in your timeline I suppose you could buy them for extremely low prices.

In all seriousness there aren't any really notable IFVs, they mostly have autocannons, carry like 5-10 guys, have pretty thin armour, a few can carry more guys or use bigger guns, but as a whole they aren't too varied, any IFV used by a major country would work fine, I suggest you narrrow down your choices a bit. How many guys do you want it to carry, do you want an autocannon or something like the BMP-3, do you want it to be able to travel across water?

Yeah i got those, i even got them some TOW's because i dont know why i like rockets so much

User avatar
Stahn
Senator
 
Posts: 4663
Founded: May 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stahn » Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:36 am

Tunguskania wrote:
The Greater Luthorian Empire wrote:No, your soldiers they want APCs. I suggest M-113, best vehicle ever made, cheap, fast, and carries soldiers. Also if America exists in your timeline I suppose you could buy them for extremely low prices.

In all seriousness there aren't any really notable IFVs, they mostly have autocannons, carry like 5-10 guys, have pretty thin armour, a few can carry more guys or use bigger guns, but as a whole they aren't too varied, any IFV used by a major country would work fine, I suggest you narrrow down your choices a bit. How many guys do you want it to carry, do you want an autocannon or something like the BMP-3, do you want it to be able to travel across water?

Yeah i got those, i even got them some TOW's because i dont know why i like rockets so much


I am assuming you are talking about the M-113. You might be interested in the AIFV (Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle) which is a development of the M113A1.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIFV

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Slavatania

Advertisement

Remove ads