NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Mark 8

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:47 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Questers wrote:MRAP are for pussies.

Remove wheeled death truck.


How do you conduct rapid operational level exploitation without wheeled death trucks?

Sparky doesnt know what to think
Image

User avatar
Padnak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6408
Founded: Feb 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Padnak » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:55 pm

>removal of vietcong intensifies

actually, that thing gave me an idea...

If you had a heavy truck and a tank with no tracks, could you put the tank on the back and use it like a crazy guntruck?
Last edited by Padnak on Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"มีใบมีดคมและจิตใจที่คมชัด!"
Have a sharp blade, and a sharper mind!
Need weapons for dubious purposes? Buy Padarm today!
San-Silvacian: Aug 11, 2011-Mar 20, 2015
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.

Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.

Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.

Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.

The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1052
Founded: Mar 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:13 pm

Padnak wrote:>removal of vietcong intensifies

actually, that thing gave me an idea...

If you had a heavy truck and a tank with no tracks, could you put the tank on the back and use it like a crazy guntruck?

Sure, until you make a hard turn and the thing flips because it's so top-heavy. So drive carefully! You don't want anyone getting hurt, right?
3dank5u
call me Shannon ^-^

User avatar
The Kingdom of Rhamos
Envoy
 
Posts: 216
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Kingdom of Rhamos » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:39 pm

Padnak wrote:>removal of vietcong intensifies

actually, that thing gave me an idea...

If you had a heavy truck and a tank with no tracks, could you put the tank on the back and use it like a crazy guntruck?


Apparently during the early days of the OIF surge a convoy of Abrams got caught on their haulers while the crews were in the cabs of the trucks, this did not go so well. So the next time they did the same thing except the crews stayed in the tanks and when they were ambushed the Abrams started up and started firing from the trailers before simply driving off into battle.

I have so sauce except the old wise tales of my former TC so take it as you will :P
Faites Saigner le Métal

Armata Strigoi

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:07 pm

New Vihenia wrote:Say.. what might be the consequences of lengthening the barrel of a tank gun. So far the pros would be increased muzzle velocity, more accuracy (less dispersion) And the cons as far as i see is Increased weight, burdening the hydraulics to raise them and somewhat a restriction on turret rotation (Say..Kelly's Heroes anyone ?)

But i wonder if there's any other detrimental effect i'm not aware of. Might also incorporate it into my Gun calculator.

thinking about lengthening the barrel of my tank gun. It's 138mm gun from previously 49.7 Caliber with total length of tube of 7.7 m. The new caliber would be 52 or 55 Cal With total tube length of some 8-9 m.


Dispersion will accually increase (and accuracy thus decrease) with longer barrels due to motion. The only ways to beat this are to stiffen the barrel (AKA, make it stronger and thus heavier) or don't move it around as much. This is one of the big reasons the US does not want to move to a longer gun.

I can not stress enough how much of a problem this can be if you are looking to do any kind of motion while firing, which includes slewing the turret of a stationary tank to aim. Especially as I think your existing 138mm would already be suffering from these problems due to its length.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:22 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Padnak wrote:you say what like you don't conduct extensive internal security operations with the possibilities of ied attacks...

(Image)

Armored utility trucks <3

If you are carrying out internal security operations with the possibility of IED's you are no longer talking about SWAT team operations.

because the days of rage never happened....

the reason swat exists was because of the Black Panthers.
Black Panthers don't exist anymore.

Just petty criminals.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25421
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:37 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Padnak wrote:you say what like you don't conduct extensive internal security operations with the possibilities of ied attacks...

(Image)

Armored utility trucks <3

If you are carrying out internal security operations with the possibility of IED's you are no longer talking about SWAT team operations.


You're right, that's a job for EOD.


User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:47 pm



I don't see any MANPADS or any SAM system.

I do see something that looks like it could be a laser dazzler system, or anything of the sort, or even targeting system for a SAM, but there is no evidence of any launching tube.
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:52 pm

Dostanuot Loj wrote:


I don't see any MANPADS or any SAM system.

I do see something that looks like it could be a laser dazzler system, or anything of the sort, or even targeting system for a SAM, but there is no evidence of any launching tube.

First picture, side of turret.

I'm tired of noobs.

User avatar
New Vihenia
Senator
 
Posts: 3913
Founded: Apr 03, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby New Vihenia » Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:54 pm

Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Dispersion will accually increase (and accuracy thus decrease) with longer barrels due to motion. The only ways to beat this are to stiffen the barrel (AKA, make it stronger and thus heavier) or don't move it around as much. This is one of the big reasons the US does not want to move to a longer gun.

I can not stress enough how much of a problem this can be if you are looking to do any kind of motion while firing, which includes slewing the turret of a stationary tank to aim. Especially as I think your existing 138mm would already be suffering from these problems due to its length.


Ah i see thanks.

Anyway how one define barrel length ? Is that the whole gun tube (including the breech, chamber etc) Or The "Projectile travel section" At the end of the gun chamber ?
We make planes,ships,missiles,helicopters, radars and mecha musume
Deviantart|M.A.R.S|My-Ebooks

Big Picture of Service

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:58 pm

New Oyashima wrote:First picture, side of turret.

Totally brain-farted the whole first picture, lol.

New Oyashima wrote:I'm tired of noobs.

That's nice, and you are...?
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:14 pm

New Oyashima wrote:
Dostanuot Loj wrote:I don't see any MANPADS or any SAM system.

I do see something that looks like it could be a laser dazzler system, or anything of the sort, or even targeting system for a SAM, but there is no evidence of any launching tube.

First picture, side of turret.

I'm tired of noobs.


i died
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:18 pm

The Kievan People wrote:
New Oyashima wrote:First picture, side of turret.

I'm tired of noobs.


i died


It's OK buddy, I have emergency first aid, I'll save you.
I just need to find my defib pads...
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:44 pm

New Vihenia wrote:
Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Dispersion will accually increase (and accuracy thus decrease) with longer barrels due to motion. The only ways to beat this are to stiffen the barrel (AKA, make it stronger and thus heavier) or don't move it around as much. This is one of the big reasons the US does not want to move to a longer gun.

I can not stress enough how much of a problem this can be if you are looking to do any kind of motion while firing, which includes slewing the turret of a stationary tank to aim. Especially as I think your existing 138mm would already be suffering from these problems due to its length.


Ah i see thanks.

Anyway how one define barrel length ? Is that the whole gun tube (including the breech, chamber etc) Or The "Projectile travel section" At the end of the gun chamber ?

projectile travel section,. ou can seat the gun deeper in tank if you use an oscillating turret.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Tue Apr 21, 2015 1:42 am

Gallia- wrote:
Questers wrote:MRAP are for pussies.

Remove wheeled death truck.


How do you conduct rapid operational level exploitation without wheeled death trucks?
I have wheeled vehicles, they're just not death or trux.

Image rosomak rosomak
Restore the Crown

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:44 am

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Padnak wrote:you say what like you don't conduct extensive internal security operations with the possibilities of ied attacks...

(Image)

Armored utility trucks <3

If you are carrying out internal security operations with the possibility of IED's you are no longer talking about SWAT team operations.


..and here is where RN's peculiarities come into play.

RN simply doesn't buy into the whole Police, Border Guards, Internal Intelligence and Gendarmerie/National Guard combo. We only have "police" here.

Also, the armed forces are prohibited from operating on home soil unless some sort of invasion is going on.

As such, the "police" must be ready to deal with anything up to and including small scale insurgencies, even if that's highly unlikely (as RN is quite a stable state) simply because if SHTF they can't just call in the military until the shit seriously starts hitting that fan. Also the military isn't really all that well equipped or trained for COIN, especially not on home soil.

I figured seeing how there will be plenty of times I'll want to haul stuff on wheels and under armor that can't be hauled by the JLTV and that I'm already using the FMTV (80% parts commonality) the Caiman would prove plenty useful.
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1052
Founded: Mar 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:29 am

What is the modern use of wheen AFVs armed with tank-caliber weapons but otherwise lightly armored? Like the Panhard EBR or Stryker MGS?
3dank5u
call me Shannon ^-^

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:30 am

Being able to put a mobile 105mm-gun platform on the ground fast when it's needed. Its tactical and strategic mobility are great.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Checheyna
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Feb 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Checheyna » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:02 am

Would a 90mm howitzer with a 5 shell autoloader be plausible on a modernized Panhard chassis?

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10822
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crookfur » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:15 am

Checheyna wrote:Would a 90mm howitzer with a 5 shell autoloader be plausible on a modernized Panhard chassis?


Depends on what you mean by Panhard Chassis, they have built rather a lot of different vehicles over the years...

i assume you mean the AML in which case likely not as i doubt you could fit a big enough turret for a howitzer or be able to mount a fixed one.

Honestly you would better with a truck or a larger APC chassis to work from. The ERC chassis might work if you want to keep the panhard connection.
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

User avatar
Checheyna
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Feb 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Checheyna » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:47 am

Crookfur wrote:
Checheyna wrote:Would a 90mm howitzer with a 5 shell autoloader be plausible on a modernized Panhard chassis?


Depends on what you mean by Panhard Chassis, they have built rather a lot of different vehicles over the years...

i assume you mean the AML in which case likely not as i doubt you could fit a big enough turret for a howitzer or be able to mount a fixed one.

Honestly you would better with a truck or a larger APC chassis to work from. The ERC chassis might work if you want to keep the panhard connection.


I had been thinking a Panhard EBR chassis for stability and a larger platform than the ECR.

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:56 am

Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:What is the modern use of wheen AFVs armed with tank-caliber weapons but otherwise lightly armored? Like the Panhard EBR or Stryker MGS?


The purpose of mobile gun systems is to make holes. Tactical holes, actual holes, holes in buildings, front lines, enemy IFVs, et cetera. The gun is a multipurpose piece that primarily supports infantry.
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Purpelia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34249
Founded: Oct 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Purpelia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:07 am

Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 wrote:What is the modern use of wheen AFVs armed with tank-caliber weapons but otherwise lightly armored? Like the Panhard EBR or Stryker MGS?

Well basically it's like this. Infantry tends to fight stuff other than other infantry in the open. Stuff like tanks, infantry in cover, infantry inside buildings etc. And to do that effectively, they at times need to blow big, 100mm or so worth of HE sized chunks out of stuff they disprove off. That's why every army since the invention of cannon has tried to somehow roll them along side infantry. And why everyone and their mother were racing to mount a field gun on some sort of tracked all terrain chassis to move along side infantry ever since they figured out you could run carts without horses. Now, as time went on people figured out that they did not need two separate vehicles, one to carry the infantry and the other to carry the gun. You can use one vehicle and it will be brilliant. Well, some people at least. The rest of the world for some reason refuses to get the message and instead have to somehow compensate. And that's where the vehicles you mention come in.
Purpelia does not reflect my actual world views. In fact, the vast majority of Purpelian cannon is meant to shock and thus deliberately insane. I just like playing with the idea of a country of madmen utterly convinced that everyone else are the barbarians. So play along or not but don't ever think it's for real.



The above post contains hyperbole, metaphoric language, embellishment and exaggeration. It may also include badly translated figures of speech and misused idioms. Analyze accordingly.

User avatar
Bratislavskaya
Minister
 
Posts: 2201
Founded: Jun 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bratislavskaya » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:26 am

J'ai vourdrais....
Glory to the Soviet Socialist Republic of Bratislavskaya!
Communist Party of Britain Member

Je suis Donbass

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: La Xinga, Monhaine

Advertisement

Remove ads