What do you have against missiles?
Advertisement

by Atomic Utopia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:35 pm

by Roski » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:38 pm

by The Corparation » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:39 pm
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |

by Roski » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:41 pm

by Yukonastan » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:42 pm

by Roski » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:43 pm

by Yukonastan » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:44 pm

by The Corparation » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:53 pm
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |

by Roski » Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:13 pm
The Corparation wrote:Roski wrote:
If you knew what the satellite is for.
"Hey that satellite that we don't know the role of just maneuvered multiple times and is now on an interesting orbit with our whatever-sat." "Right, have the whatever-sat to adjust its orbit so that we don't run the risk of collision."
It's a bit more complicated than that, but you get the idea. It really doesn't take much to move out of the way of another satellite if you have time, and an orbital rendezvous isn't exactly something that's fast or simple. A missile on the other hand will give you a much more limited time to act.

by Roski » Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:36 pm
Roski wrote:The Corparation wrote:"Hey that satellite that we don't know the role of just maneuvered multiple times and is now on an interesting orbit with our whatever-sat." "Right, have the whatever-sat to adjust its orbit so that we don't run the risk of collision."
It's a bit more complicated than that, but you get the idea. It really doesn't take much to move out of the way of another satellite if you have time, and an orbital rendezvous isn't exactly something that's fast or simple. A missile on the other hand will give you a much more limited time to act.
Fair enough, I suppose.
But, does anyone know the best organization structure to mimic?

by Vancon » Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:07 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:You know I don't say this often, but this guy... he gets it. Like everything. As in he gets life.
Krazakistan wrote:How have you not died after being exposed to that much shit on a monthly basis?
Rupudska wrote:I avoid NSG like one would avoid ISIS-occupied Syria.
Alimeria- wrote:I'll go to sleep when I want to, not when some cheese-eating surrender monkey tells me to.
Which just so happens to be within the next half-hour
Shyluz wrote:Van, Sci-fi Generallisimo

by Vancon » Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:08 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:You know I don't say this often, but this guy... he gets it. Like everything. As in he gets life.
Krazakistan wrote:How have you not died after being exposed to that much shit on a monthly basis?
Rupudska wrote:I avoid NSG like one would avoid ISIS-occupied Syria.
Alimeria- wrote:I'll go to sleep when I want to, not when some cheese-eating surrender monkey tells me to.
Which just so happens to be within the next half-hour
Shyluz wrote:Van, Sci-fi Generallisimo

by Immoren » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:47 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Yukonastan » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:48 am

by Immoren » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:51 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Elan Valleys » Sat Jan 31, 2015 2:44 am
Vancon wrote:Can someone link me Novo's new tracks list thing?

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:38 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:58 am
New Kvenland wrote:The Kievan People wrote:
1. Rods from god suck.
2. The really big EMPs are produced by nuclear bombs. Conventional EMPs cover about the same area as a conventional bomb.
1. Eh, they're fast, and are powerful combined. Admittedly, the satellites would be hard to protect.
2. That's what I thought. I assume conventional EMP carpet-bombing would be highly unrealistic?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Auroya » Sat Jan 31, 2015 5:12 am

by The Kievan People » Sat Jan 31, 2015 5:55 am
Auroya wrote:Assume I have a casaba-howitzer on a weapons station which orbits at perhaps 500-600 kilometers. Obviously, the altitude should be enough to protect me from the sort of small ASATs which can be launched by aircraft, but the station can still be shot at if the enemy has weapons with that range.
Now assume I detect such a weapon, probably nuclear in nature, heading towards me, as it leaves the atmosphere at some 100km of altitude. If I were to shoot the casaba-howitzer at it, what are the effects at the Earth's surface likely to be when the nuclear shaped charge plume impacts it, and what sort of systems would I need to ensure that the missile is hit from that distance, assuming the shaped charge disperses at around two degrees?
According to some rough calculations, that would mean the plume has a width of 8.7km (at most) when it reaches the missile.

by Alien Space Bats » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:41 am
New Kvenland wrote:Alright, I will use kinetic suborbital ICBMs, then.
New Kvenland wrote:Would the nuke have the fallout of a ground-detonated nuke?

by The Greater Luthorian Empire » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:44 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:They told me I could be anything, so I became a razor blade.

by DnalweN acilbupeR » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:05 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:27 pm
Auroya wrote:Assume I have a casaba-howitzer on a weapons station which orbits at perhaps 500-600 kilometers. Obviously, the altitude should be enough to protect me from the sort of small ASATs which can be launched by aircraft, but the station can still be shot at if the enemy has weapons with that range.
Now assume I detect such a weapon, probably nuclear in nature, heading towards me, as it leaves the atmosphere at some 100km of altitude. If I were to shoot the casaba-howitzer at it, what are the effects at the Earth's surface likely to be when the nuclear shaped charge plume impacts it, and what sort of systems would I need to ensure that the missile is hit from that distance, assuming the shaped charge disperses at around two degrees?
According to some rough calculations, that would mean the plume has a width of 8.7km (at most) when it reaches the missile.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Korva » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:33 pm
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:UTV vs jeep
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Etoile Arcture, Gabeonia, Kaskalma, Reloviskistan, The Land of the Ephyral
Advertisement